MAS: digital token services for overseas customers must be licensed by 30 June or cease operations
SINGAPORE: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) will mandate that digital token service providers (DTSPs) serving only overseas clients must be licensed from 30 June 2025. This includes providers dealing in digital payment tokens or capital market product tokens.
MAS issued a clarification on 6 June 2025, reiterating that the licensing bar will be set 'high' and that such licences will 'generally' not be issued.
The central bank cited elevated money laundering risks and supervisory limitations as key reasons.
'If their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it stated.
DTSPs that continue to offer services to only foreign clients without a licence after 30 June will be required to cease those activities.
MAS has communicated this position consistently since 14 February 2022, reaffirming it in statements dated 4 October 2024 and 30 May 2025.
On 30 May 2025, MAS released its response to feedback on the Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulatory Approach, Regulations, Notices and Guidelines for DTSPs.
The proposed framework falls under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022.
According to the regulator, the internet-based and cross-border nature of these services increases the likelihood of misuse for money laundering and terrorism financing, posing risks to Singapore's financial integrity.
MAS also clarified that DTSPs already licensed to serve Singapore customers are unaffected. These entities may also serve overseas clients as part of their operations.
Providers dealing with tokens other than payment or capital market types – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to the new licensing requirement.
MAS emphasised that the upcoming framework targets only a small segment of DTSPs. 'Based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers,' the authority stated.
The regulator has reached out to those likely to be affected to clarify its policy and discuss an orderly wind-down of operations. Affected parties are advised to contact MAS at AMLCFT@mas.gov.sg.
This move aligns with MAS' broader efforts to fortify Singapore's financial ecosystem against illicit financial activities, without disrupting regulated providers already operating within the city-state.
Singapore rejects crypto for SWFs investments over speculation, volatility
During Parliamentary sitting on 5 March, then-Minister of State for Trade and Industry and MAS Board Member Alvin Tan reaffirmed that cryptocurrencies are unsuitable for Singapore's sovereign wealth funds due to their speculative and volatile nature.
He emphasised that both the Government and MAS view cryptocurrencies as lacking the underlying economic fundamentals required for long-term institutional investments.
This stance was reiterated in response to WP MP Jamus Lim's queries on whether cryptocurrencies could play a role for institutional investors, to which Tan questioned the Workers' Party's position and reaffirmed the Government's cautious approach.
Tan also responded to concerns from MP Yip Hon Weng about the tightening of regulations on crypto-related services, especially the prohibition of using credit or leverage for crypto purchases.
He warned of the risks of compounded debt and financial loss due to the high volatility of cryptocurrencies.
Addressing whether a total ban was considered, Tan explained that MAS prefers regulation and education over prohibition, aiming to avoid driving crypto trading underground while fostering a responsible digital asset ecosystem.
Temasek's FTX investment: Losses, internal review, and accountability measures
Temasek invested US$275 million in FTX across two funding rounds in 2021, believing in the exchange's potential and its role in the digital asset ecosystem.
However, in November 2022, FTX collapsed due to liquidity issues and allegations of fraud, leading to its bankruptcy.
Following the collapse, Temasek wrote off its entire investment in FTX, acknowledging the loss.
In May 2023, Temasek announced that it had conducted an internal review of its due diligence process.
As a result, it cut the compensation of its senior management and investment team responsible for the failed investment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
DBS, OCBC to recognise CPF Life payouts as proof of income in credit card applications
The banks' push comes as MAS confirmed that the CPF Life payout can be considered by banks as an income source. PHOTO: ST FILE SINGAPORE – Applicants for DBS and OCBC's credit cards will be able to use their CPF Life payouts as proof of income under a policy update by the banks. Individuals aged 65 and above can do so from June 11. CPF Life, or CPF Lifelong Income For the Elderly, is an annuity that provides monthly payouts to people based on their savings in their CPF Retirement Account. They can choose to start their payouts from age 65 at the earliest. In formalising the process, DBS said in a statement on June 10 that while some banks may accept CPF Life payouts as income proof on a discretionary basis, the process remains lacking in transparency and assurance. Mr Calvin Ong, DBS's Singapore consumer banking head, said the bank has over 900,000 Singaporean or permanent resident customers who are aged 65 and above and know how important CPF payouts are in supporting retirees' daily needs and aspirations. 'By recognising the payouts as income, we're making sure seniors continue to have fair access to credit and the cards' accompanying privileges. This move ensures banking remains accessible and meaningful for our senior customers, so they can enjoy a fulfilling retirement,' he said. OCBC Bank said in response to The Straits Times queries that it will also allow those aged 65 and above to apply for any OCBC credit card using CPF Life payouts as proof of income from June 11. Mr Joseph Wong, managing director of consumer credit risk management at OCBC, said the number of seniors applying for credit cards is generally low, as most retirees typically already have credit cards. 'However, we hope this announcement puts to ease any concerns seniors may have about getting access to credit even after they have stopped working,' he said. The banks' push comes as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) confirmed that the CPF Life payout can be considered by banks as an income source. MAS rules state that those who are over 55 must show they have an annual income of at least $15,000 when applying for new unsecured loan facilities such as credit cards, even if they don't have a salary or the traditional income required. While the MAS does not prescribe what income banks must consider when assessing a retiree's eligibility, it says that regular payout streams such as rent, interest, dividends or annuity payments from CPF Life or similar products can be considered in such assessments. Borrowers must prove that they are earning such income in order to qualify. For instance, those who hit the age of 65 in 2025 will receive monthly payouts of up to $1,300, or $15,600 a year, if they had set aside at least $161,000 as their full retirement sum a decade ago. Besides income, individuals over 55 can also qualify for credit cards if they have total net personal assets exceeding $750,000 or if they have a guarantor with an annual income of at least $30,000. The eligibility of older folk qualifying for credit cards was highlighted in The Straits Times Forum recently when a 64-year-old retiree wrote about his plight of having an existing card cancelled when he tried to increase its credit limit for an overseas holiday. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Online Citizen
a day ago
- Online Citizen
MAS: digital token services for overseas customers must be licensed by 30 June or cease operations
SINGAPORE: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) will mandate that digital token service providers (DTSPs) serving only overseas clients must be licensed from 30 June 2025. This includes providers dealing in digital payment tokens or capital market product tokens. MAS issued a clarification on 6 June 2025, reiterating that the licensing bar will be set 'high' and that such licences will 'generally' not be issued. The central bank cited elevated money laundering risks and supervisory limitations as key reasons. 'If their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it stated. DTSPs that continue to offer services to only foreign clients without a licence after 30 June will be required to cease those activities. MAS has communicated this position consistently since 14 February 2022, reaffirming it in statements dated 4 October 2024 and 30 May 2025. On 30 May 2025, MAS released its response to feedback on the Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulatory Approach, Regulations, Notices and Guidelines for DTSPs. The proposed framework falls under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022. According to the regulator, the internet-based and cross-border nature of these services increases the likelihood of misuse for money laundering and terrorism financing, posing risks to Singapore's financial integrity. MAS also clarified that DTSPs already licensed to serve Singapore customers are unaffected. These entities may also serve overseas clients as part of their operations. Providers dealing with tokens other than payment or capital market types – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to the new licensing requirement. MAS emphasised that the upcoming framework targets only a small segment of DTSPs. 'Based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers,' the authority stated. The regulator has reached out to those likely to be affected to clarify its policy and discuss an orderly wind-down of operations. Affected parties are advised to contact MAS at AMLCFT@ This move aligns with MAS' broader efforts to fortify Singapore's financial ecosystem against illicit financial activities, without disrupting regulated providers already operating within the city-state. Singapore rejects crypto for SWFs investments over speculation, volatility During Parliamentary sitting on 5 March, then-Minister of State for Trade and Industry and MAS Board Member Alvin Tan reaffirmed that cryptocurrencies are unsuitable for Singapore's sovereign wealth funds due to their speculative and volatile nature. He emphasised that both the Government and MAS view cryptocurrencies as lacking the underlying economic fundamentals required for long-term institutional investments. This stance was reiterated in response to WP MP Jamus Lim's queries on whether cryptocurrencies could play a role for institutional investors, to which Tan questioned the Workers' Party's position and reaffirmed the Government's cautious approach. Tan also responded to concerns from MP Yip Hon Weng about the tightening of regulations on crypto-related services, especially the prohibition of using credit or leverage for crypto purchases. He warned of the risks of compounded debt and financial loss due to the high volatility of cryptocurrencies. Addressing whether a total ban was considered, Tan explained that MAS prefers regulation and education over prohibition, aiming to avoid driving crypto trading underground while fostering a responsible digital asset ecosystem. Temasek's FTX investment: Losses, internal review, and accountability measures Temasek invested US$275 million in FTX across two funding rounds in 2021, believing in the exchange's potential and its role in the digital asset ecosystem. However, in November 2022, FTX collapsed due to liquidity issues and allegations of fraud, leading to its bankruptcy. Following the collapse, Temasek wrote off its entire investment in FTX, acknowledging the loss. In May 2023, Temasek announced that it had conducted an internal review of its due diligence process. As a result, it cut the compensation of its senior management and investment team responsible for the failed investment.
Singapore Law Watch
a day ago
- Singapore Law Watch
MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers
MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers Source: Straits Times Article Date: 09 Jun 2025 Author: Timothy Goh The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has clarified that digital token service providers offering services solely to customers outside Singapore – whether involving digital payment tokens or capital market products – will need to be licensed from June 30. The central bank added in its clarification on June 6 that it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. 'The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it said. Without a licence, existing digital token service providers serving only overseas customers will be required to cease these activities when the regime comes into effect on June 30, said MAS. In its response on May 30 to feedback on a consultation paper regarding its proposed regulatory framework for digital token service providers, MAS noted that such providers may be more vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing risks due to the internet-based and cross-border nature of their services. This increases the likelihood that they could be misused for illicit purposes, to the detriment of Singapore's reputation. The proposed regulatory framework will come under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022. MAS also clarified that service providers for digital payment tokens or tokens of capital market products that serve customers in Singapore are already regulated, and there will be no change to what these licensed providers can do. Providers serving customers in Singapore may also offer services to overseas clients, while those dealing with other types of tokens – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to licensing or regulation under the new regime and are therefore unaffected. MAS said that it has reached out to persons who, based on information available to them, may be affected by the new regime to clarify its policy position and to discuss their plans for an 'orderly wind-down' of the activity. It added that 'based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers'. Parties who may be affected by the digital token service regime may contact MAS at [email protected]. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
