ASM International expects FY sales growth of 10%-20% despite tariff uncertainty
Computer chip equipment maker ASM International (ASMI) said on Tuesday it expects annual sales to grow in a double-digit percentage range at constant currencies, despite increased macroeconomic uncertainty from trade tensions.
The Dutch company expects sales to grow in a range of 10 per cent to 20 per cent for 2025.
"While we have reasonable visibility that we will achieve the lower end of the range, achieving the higher end will require some upside opportunities to materialize, which at this point is still uncertain," the company said in a statement.
U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs and uncertainty over his trade policies have sent global markets into a tailspin and significantly dampened investors' economic optimism.
"For 2025, we now expect gross margin to be in the upper half of the target range of 46 per cent-50 per cent," CEO Hichem M'Saad said, adding that this excludes any potential direct impact from tariffs, which was currently difficult to predict.
Europe's second-largest chip equipment supplier also expects its second-quarter sales to increase by a range of 1 per cent-6 per cent, at constant currencies, from 839.2 million euros ($958.03 million) in the first quarter.
($1 = 0.8760 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Oil prices hit multi-week highs amid US-China trade talks
[NEW YORK] Oil prices hit multi-week highs on Monday, buoyed by a weaker US dollar, while investors awaited news from US-China trade talks in London in hopes a deal could boost the global economic outlook and subsequently fuel demand. Brent crude futures settled 57 cents higher, or 0.9 per cent, to US$67.04 a barrel. During the session, the benchmark rose to US$67.12 a barrel, the highest since April 28. US West Texas Intermediate crude rose 71 cents, or 1.1 per cent, to US$65.29. The contract reached US$65.38 a barrel during the session, the highest since April 4. A weaker US dollar gave some support to oil prices, as the dollar index dropped 0.3 per cent, making oil cheaper for holders of other currencies. Last week, Brent rose 4 per cent and WTI gained 6.2 per cent as the prospect of a US-China trade deal boosted risk appetite for some investors. 'Much of this advance appears technically driven and such rallies can easily subside without new bullish headlines,' analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note. 'Much attention will be given to the ongoing US-China trade talks.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up US President Donald Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping spoke by telephone on Thursday before US and Chinese officials met in London on Monday to calm trade tensions between the two nations. A trade deal between the United States and China could support the global economic outlook and in turn boost demand for commodities including oil. Monday's talks could dampen the impact on prices of Chinese data releases, IG market analyst Tony Sycamore said. Chinese export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as US tariffs curbed shipments while factory gate deflation deepened to its worst in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy at home and abroad. 'Bad timing for crude oil, which was testing the top of the range and knocking on the door of a technical break above US$65,' Sycamore said, referring to WTI prices. The data also showed that China's crude oil imports declined in May to the lowest daily rate in four months as state-owned and independent refiners began planned maintenance. The prospect of a potential China-US trade deal outweighed concern over the price impact from increased output by the Opec+ group of oil producers next month. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' oil output rose in May by less than the volume planned, a Reuters survey found, as Iraq made further cuts to compensate for earlier pumping above target and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates made smaller hikes than allowed. Opec pumped 26.75 million barrels per day last month, up 150,000 bpd from April's total, the survey showed on Monday, with Saudi Arabia making the largest increase. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Iran to present counter-proposal to US, Trump says talks to resume
FILE PHOTO: Iran's and U.S.' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Iran to present counter-proposal to US, Trump says talks to resume DUBAI/WASHINGTON - Iran said on Monday it will soon hand a counter-proposal for a nuclear deal to the United States in response to a U.S. offer that Tehran deems "unacceptable," while U.S. President Donald Trump said talks would continue. Trump made clear that the two sides remained at odds over whether the country would be allowed to continue enriching uranium on Iranian soil. "They're just asking for things that you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up," Trump told reporters at the White House. "They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment." Earlier, Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran was preparing a counter-offer to the U.S. proposal that was presented in late May. He said there was not yet any detail about the timing of a sixth round of talks. While Trump said the next round of talks would take place on Thursday, a senior Iranian official and a U.S. official said Thursday was unlikely. The U.S. official said the talks, led by U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, could be on Friday or Sunday, possibly in Oman or Oslo. "The U.S. proposal is not acceptable to us. It was not the result of previous rounds of negotiations. We will present our own proposal to the other side via Oman after it is finalised. This proposal is reasonable, logical, and balanced," Baghaei said. "We must ensure before the lifting of sanctions that Iran will effectively benefit economically and that its banking and trade relations with other countries will return to normal." Reuters previously reported that Tehran was drafting a negative response to the U.S. proposal. An Iranian diplomat said the U.S. offer failed to resolve differences over uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, the shipment abroad of Iran's entire stockpile of highly enriched uranium and reliable steps to lift U.S. sanctions. Last week, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed the U.S. proposal as against Iran's interests, pledging to continue enrichment on Iranian soil, which Western powers view as a potential pathway to building nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes. Trump said Iran was the main topic of a phone conversation he had on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu's office said the president had told him talks with Iran would continue at the end of the week. During his first term in 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump ditched a 2015 nuclear pact between Iran and six powers and reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy. Iran responded by escalating enrichment far beyond that pact's limits. Iran says the West has turned a blind eye to Israel's nuclear programme even while pushing against Iran's. Israel neither confirms nor denies that it has nuclear weapons. Baghaei said sensitive Israeli documents, which Iran has previously promised to unveil, would demonstrate "that parties constantly questioning Iran's peaceful nuclear programme actively work to strengthen Israel's military nuclear programme". The negotiating parties should not allow Israel to disrupt diplomatic processes, he added. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump and Musk are fighting. It's difficult to pick a side
SINGAPORE: Once inseparable, United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest man, Elon Musk, are now locked in a very public - and very bitter - divorce. In a matter of days, Mr Musk torched Mr Trump's signature "big, beautiful" Bill, condemned his spending plans, threatened to form a new political party and even suggested the president be impeached. Mr Trump retaliated in kind. He called Mr Musk 'a big-time drug addict', threatened to cut his companies off from government contracts and warned of ' serious consequences ' if the billionaire were to finance Democratic Party candidates running against Republicans. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Mr Trump told NBC on Saturday (Jun 7), saying he believed their relationship was over. Unlike most public spats between public figures, this one offers no easy side to take. The two men are, in many ways, cut from the same cloth. They operate with little patience for deliberation and considerable appetite for the spotlight, and are accustomed to getting their own ways. A PERSONAL FIGHT WITH NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES The trouble with breakups is that any fallout doesn't stay between the warring parties. There's always collateral damage. For example, after Mr Trump threatened to pull government deals with Mr Musk's companies, Tesla shares tanked 14 per cent and lost US$150 billion in value. This very public falling-out carries risks for both men. For Mr Trump, the feud with Mr Musk marks the first major rift with a prominent adviser in his second term. It has shattered the 'bromance' that many assumed would continue and could fracture Mr Trump's support among tech leaders and wealthy donors. Mr Musk, who spent nearly US$300 million in last year's elections, was not only Mr Trump's richest backer, but also a key bridge to Silicon Valley. He helped connect Mr Trump to tech investors and gave the pro-business wing of the Republican Party reason to support the president. Now, Mr Musk's defection could undermine Republican unity on Capitol Hill. His vocal criticism of the debt impact has emboldened some Republican fiscal hawks to oppose Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed the US House late last month. The Bill, which combines tax breaks, spending cuts, border security funding and other priorities, is the centrepiece of Mr Trump's domestic policy agenda. Critics, however, have said it could increase the deficit by as much as US$4 trillion over a decade. If it falters in the Senate due to Republican defections, it would be a significant blow to Mr Trump's legislative agenda. Moreover, Mr Musk's talk of a new centrist party and his massive online influence hint at a potential challenge to the two-party status quo, which should alarm Republican strategists. Although an actual third party is a long shot, even the suggestion feeds a narrative that Mr Trump's brand of Republicanism is alienating a segment of his base. A prolonged Trump-Musk feud could make it harder for Republicans to hold Congress in next year's midterms, given Mr Musk's financial clout and devoted following. FEUD SPREADS TO SPACE Mr Trump, for his part, appears eager to show he won't be dictated to by a billionaire ally. A White House official stressed that the administration is 'not beholden to Elon Musk on policy' and that by attacking the Bill, Mr Musk 'has clearly picked a side' against Mr Trump. In the short term, Mr Trump's hardline stance may shore up his image as a president who puts his agenda above any one person, even the world's richest man. His core base, many of whom harbour scepticism toward tech elites, might even cheer him for standing up to Mr Musk. However, Mr Trump's unpredictable retaliatory streak raises questions in Washington and on Wall Street. Would he really cut off federal contracts to SpaceX and Tesla to punish Mr Musk, even if it jeopardises US interests? NASA and the Pentagon rely heavily on SpaceX for America's spaceflight capabilities and military satellite launches. Pulling the plug on SpaceX partnerships could set back crucial programmes (like the International Space Station transport, Moon missions and defence satellite deployments) and force the government to scramble for alternatives. It's an open question how far Mr Trump is willing to go. Even some within Mr Trump's circle may urge caution, given the billions at stake and the fact that SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is integral to US-led space efforts (NASA has invested roughly US$15 billion in SpaceX projects). So, while the president talks tough, cutting Mr Musk off is not without consequences. Rattled by Mr Musk's initial threat to retire the Dragon spacecraft, NASA and Pentagon officials have contacted at least three competitors - Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Blue Origin - to assess their rocket development and availability for government missions, according to a report by the Washington Post over the weekend. CAN MUSK AFFORD TO ALIENATE WASHINGTON? For Mr Musk, this episode is a high-stakes gamble that could redefine his role in the tech and political ecosystems. On one hand, Mr Musk has rebranded himself as an independent voice, unafraid to challenge a president he once supported. This could salvage his reputation among moderates or Tesla customers who were uneasy with his closeness to Mr Trump. By distancing himself from Mr Trump, Mr Musk may refocus attention on his companies' innovations rather than partisan politics. He has already said he will curtail political spending going forward, signalling a retreat from the kingmaker role he played in 2024. On the other hand, Mr Musk is now on a collision course with the US government that could have serious business implications. If Mr Trump were to follow through on cancelling contracts, SpaceX stands to lose enormous revenue (an estimated US$22 billion in government deals is now at risk). Mr Musk must also consider the broader impact on Tesla, which until now has benefited from government electric vehicle (EV) incentives and a friendly regulatory environment. If Mr Trump now views Mr Musk as an adversary, Tesla could face a chillier reception in policy areas important to it (such as environmental credits, infrastructure support or foreign trade deals). AN EXPENSIVE BREAKUP What happens next is very much anyone's guess; it could well depend on what either man decides to post next. The Trump-Musk fallout has escalated from a policy disagreement into a personal and political reckoning. Mr Trump is defending his legislative legacy and asserting authority over a defiant former ally. Mr Musk is recasting himself as an independent visionary, willing to challenge power, but at the cost of political access. Whether this fades or hardens, the consequences will be felt well beyond Washington. Ben Chester Cheong is a law lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, and of counsel at RHTLaw Asia. He is a visiting fellow in law at the University of Reading, and a centre researcher at the University of Cambridge.
