Nova Scotia funds new affordable housing project in Yarmouth
Premier Tim Houston made the announcement on Wednesday, saying, 'We said that we would build more homes faster, and we are doing just that.'
'This project in Yarmouth is the perfect example of what's possible when all levels of government work together with non-profit organizations and developers to ensure every Nova Scotian has a place to call home,' he added.
According to a news release from the province, the two multi-unit buildings will include studio and one- and two-bedroom apartments as well as three-bedroom townhouses. The units will house more than 50 people, with 14 of the units renting between $397 to $1,085. The other units will have market rates of $1,000 to $1,675.
Residents are expected to move in by early 2026.
'It's exciting to watch this build happen because of what it means. It's affordable housing for those in need and adds so much to our community,' said Mayor of Yarmouth Pam Mood. 'Thanks to the Province for funding and our team for putting this together. She's going to be a beauty!'
The province is contributing $2.66 million to the project through the Affordable Housing Development Program and $1.5 million in funding will come from Canada's National Housing Strategy initiatives. Another $3.9 million is from the federal government's Affordable Housing Fund. The Town of Yarmouth donated the land.
For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
'What is a conflict of interest, anyway?' The imagined thoughts of Mark Carney's ethics disclosures
The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner has released the full details of Mark Carney's asset disclosures, and they reveal a prime minister who appears to be more constrained by conflicts of interest than any other. Article content Carney's years of helping to oversee the trillion-dollar portfolio of Brookfield Asset Management gave him an equity stake over dozens of companies whose fortunes are likely to be directly impacted by the policies of his government. Article content Article content And so, the Ethics Commissioner has accepted a complex arrangement wherein any time one of 103 Carney-linked companies comes up in cabinet discussions, he's supposed to leave the room while declaring that he's doing so. Article content Article content But no, it turns out that all these assets were seen as a liability. A bad thing. The commissioner was prejudicially assuming that just because Mr. Carney happened to own substantial shares of a few dozen companies, this was itself evidence that he would use his public influence for personal gain. For shame, I say. Look within your heart, Canada. An intelligent, beautiful man volunteers to be your prime minister and your first impulse is to assume that he must only be doing it for selfish reasons? Article content Article content Article content What is a conflict of interest, anyway? Mr. Carney is a bipedal mammal who requires oxygen for cellular respiration. Does that put him at a 'conflict of interest' if he takes pro-oxygen positions in public life? Article content I have known Mr. Carney to ride inside automobiles manufactured by Mercedes, Lexus and, if he's slumming it, Volkswagen. Does that put him at a 'conflict of interest' when it comes to foreign relations with the respective governments of Germany and Japan? Article content By your logic, surely his appreciation of the elegant and responsive interior of the 2025 E-class would instantly transform him into a Manchurian candidate loyal only to the whims of Mercedes-Benz AG and the Chancellor of Germany, in that order. Article content Perhaps your next ethical disclosure should uncompromisingly litigate everything that has ever given Mr. Carney joy or satisfaction of any kind. Did he once enjoy a matinee screening of Ladri di biciclette? Watch out; because that surely means he'll sell us out to Italy at the first opportunity.
National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
Ryan Cardwell: Supply management isn't free
Supply management (SM) is a complex set of government policies that restricts production, marketing, and trade of dairy and poultry in Canada. At its core, SM is a textbook cartel in which producers collude to fix production at the national level, and set prices charged to processors who make the consumer food products sold in restaurants and grocery stores. Such collusion is illegal in other industries — food and elsewhere — but is mandated in SM through government policies. Article content Article content Some market outcomes of these policies are high and stable incomes for producers, high consumer prices for dairy and poultry products, and smaller farms. Article content Article content Government support for farm incomes is not new, or unique to SM. Field crop and other livestock producers in Canada receive generous government support as subsidized insurance, direct payments, and other programs. But the support provided to SM producers differs in important ways. Article content First, the level of support provided to SM producers is much higher; the OECD estimates that SM policies in Canada account for approximately one-third of gross farm receipts for SM producers. This is multiples higher than support provided to field crop and other livestock producers. It is noteworthy, too, that recipients of this support are relatively high-income households; average household income for dairy and poultry farm families is more than double the average income of the Canadian households who pay for the support through higher food prices (approximately $245,000 for SM farm families compared to the Canadian average of $116,000). Article content Article content Second, the source of funding for support to SM producers comes from an implicit tax on food, not from government transfers. This has important implications. Support to other agricultural producers is funded from government revenues, much of which is raised through a progressive tax system and does not significantly affect food prices. Article content Article content On the other hand, SM's implicit food tax has regressive distributional effects, imposing a heavier burden on low-income households who spend larger shares of their incomes on food; this implicit tax rate is five times higher for low-income households than for high-income households. Our research shows that support for SM is higher among people who support progressive redistribution policies, despite SM doing precisely the opposite through a regressive tax on consumers and by supporting the incomes of relatively high-income families. Article content The opacity of how cartelized production and import restrictions increase prices is a feature, not a bug, of the system. The effects of these policies are difficult to understand without formal training in economics. Also, these policy tools allow lobby groups to claim that the system isn't subsidized ($5 billion in payments to SM interest groups in the wake of recent trade agreements notwithstanding), while at the same time, admitting that 'consumers pay twice for most food, once through their taxes (whether they buy it or not), and again at the grocery counter,' with the exception of dairy, poultry and egg products.
National Post
21 minutes ago
- National Post
NP View: Mark Carney's Trumpian moment
Article content In 'The Art of War,' the Chinese general Sun Tzu wrote: 'If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.' By imposing tariffs on Canada's non-American trade partners, Prime Minister Mark Carney is taking that advice one step further — becoming the enemy he was elected to confront. Article content Throughout history, the prevailing international order has been overthrown countless times, but it doesn't always go out with a bang, as it did in 1914 when Archduke Franz Ferdinand took a bullet to the jugular, precipitating the First World War and leading to a precipitous decline in international trade. Article content At our current moment in history, we are witnessing the process of trade liberalization that was started after the Second World War go out with a whimper. Article content The dismantling of the postwar economic order was started by U.S. President Donald Trump, who began by targeting Canada and Mexico, and then extended his tariffs to the rest of the world. Article content But in every crisis lies an opportunity. For Canada, the opportunity was not only to develop the natural resources we have allowed to sit idle for years, but to forge an alliance of free-trading nations that could act as a counterweight to Trump's protectionist policies. Article content Carney is not only squandering this unique opportunity, he's introduced policies that will only serve to broaden the global trade war. Article content This week, the prime minister announced a series of measures intended to protect Canada's steel industry after Trump increased tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum to a punishing 50 per cent. Some of the more sensible policies include a pledge to use Canadian steel for domestic infrastructure projects and funds to help retrain affected workers. Article content But Carney also announced sweeping tariffs on foreign steel imports, including from countries that Canada has free trade agreements with. Article content Going forward, the tariff rate quota will be set at 50 per cent of 2024 levels for countries that don't have trade agreements with us and 100 per cent for those that do. Steel imports above those levels will be slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Article content On the surface, the Liberals are following a certain logic: Trump's across-the-board steel and aluminum levies will lead to a glut of supply in producing countries, which they will try to dump into the Canadian market at rock-bottom prices, putting our domestic industry at risk. Article content But in doing so, Carney is all but inviting our trade partners to bring in retaliatory tariffs against Canadian products. Article content Following the Trudeau government's decision to impose a 100 per cent tax on Chinese electric vehicles and a 25 per cent levy on its steel and aluminum last fall, Beijing retaliated by sanctioning numerous Canadian products — including canola oil, fish, seafood and pork — which has had a deleterious effect on our agriculture industry at the most inopportune time. Article content The worst part is that Carney's tariffs are also being imposed on countries that have free trade deals with Canada, which will surely violate the spirit, if not the text, of those agreements. Article content If any of those countries are found to be dumping steel into Canada at below-market rates, the proper course of action would be to use the dispute-resolution mechanisms contained in our existing agreements, rather than imposing blanket tariffs on everyone. Article content When he made his announcement at a steel company in Hamilton, Ont., on Wednesday, the prime minister said that, 'Moving forward, we must diversify our trade relationships.' Article content But who's going to want to do business with a country that stabs its closest allies in the back? And how are we going to entice more countries to open their markets to Canadian products when Ottawa has shown that it can't be trusted? Article content Unfortunately, Carney has been so consumed with striking a deal with the United States — which he now admits is unlikely to fully eliminate tariffs on Canadian products — he has largely neglected the other side of the coin: expanding our trading relationship with other countries. Article content Yes, he travelled to Europe in June and signed a security and defence pact with the European Union, but it merely reiterates our commitment to the free trade deal we signed in 2016 but still hasn't fully come into force because not all EU member states have ratified it. Article content If Carney can't even convince his pals in Europe to ratify an agreement that's already been negotiated, it's hard to believe he will have much luck convincing other potential partners to cut new deals with us. Article content Especially given that one of the first things Canada's 45th Parliament did following the spring election was pass a law protecting supply management from future trade negotiations. Article content Article content
