
Greenhouse growers take aim at Trump's 'tomato tax' on Mexican imports
But greenhouse growers, importers and industry groups in Arizona and Texas are blasting the Commerce Department's withdrawal from the agreement, warning that it could raise prices and cost U.S. jobs.
"There has to be a better way of doing business than just putting duties on products that the consumers want," said NatureSweet CEO Rodolfo Spielmann, who grows greenhouse tomatoes in Arizona and Mexico.
Since President Donald Trump took office in January, he's waged a sweeping trade war to promote domestic industries and specific political demands. Earlier this month, he threatened to impose a 30% tariff on Mexico for allegedly failing to dismantle drug cartels. But the tomato levy is distinct. It stems from the termination of a nearly 30-year-old trade agreement specific to Mexican tomatoes.
Growers like Spielmann hoped — and still hope — the agreement would be renegotiated instead. Because NatureSweet works on both sides of the border, he says it's impossible to scale back Mexican operations without also hurting domestic ones.
The footprint of NatureSweet's Arizona greenhouse could hold 30 football fields, Spielmann said. The company, whose tomatoes are primarily sold in grocery stores, planned to more than double its capacity in the United States, in response to growing demand and a desire to innovate. But it has now put that expansion on hold, he said, because of the change in trade policy.
He says the new tariff will support Florida growers, who mostly plant in open fields, at the expense of everyone else, including consumers, who've grown accustomed to enjoying a wide variety of tomatoes grown in greenhouses year-round.
"We understand that there's a need to protect the Florida tomato production, but also we should be protecting the total U.S. tomato production," Spielmann said.
Moving more operations to the U.S. would present hurdles for NatureSweet. The climate in Mexico is better for growing tomatoes, he explained. And the partial-year H-2A visa program for farmworkers doesn't account for greenhouse operations that need employees for a full year.
It would "take years and a lot of money" to transfer more greenhouses to the U.S., said Tom Stenzel, executive director of the Controlled Environment Agriculture Alliance, whose members include greenhouse tomato growers with operations in the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
Economists have warned that the new tomato tax could mean price increases of up to 10%, harming both consumers and restaurants that rely on tomatoes. Industry groups that represent companies that distribute Mexican tomatoes in the U.S. say their workers are now at risk.
"There is such a wide selection of tomatoes, and there's so many different factors that go into bringing all those different varieties to the store shelf," said Dante Galeazzi, CEO and president of the Texas International Produce Association, which represents warehouses handling imported produce.
The White House did not respond to questions but referred NBC News to a statement Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick gave last week when he announced the end of the trade agreement. "Mexico remains one of our greatest allies, but for far too long our farmers have been crushed by unfair trade practices," he said.
Critics say the trade agreement's safeguards didn't prevent Mexican tomatoes from being "dumped," or being sold at unfairly low prices, in the U.S., despite being renegotiated several times in an effort to help level the playing field.
"People say, 'you're protectionist,'' said Tony DiMare, president of DiMare Fresh, which has operations in Florida and California. "You're darn right I am." The U.S. needs "boundaries and guidelines and trade laws to keep these countries in check," he said.
The number of family farms has dwindled in recent years, according to Robert Guenther, executive vice president of the Florida Tomato Exchange, which spearheaded the original trade case against Mexican imports. Mexican tomatoes now comprise roughly 70% of the tomatoes consumed in the U.S.
"We're talking about 100 years of domestic tomato supply that we don't want to see go away and this will help," he said. The Commerce Department's decision to impose anti-dumping duties is in line with tariffs imposed on other products, he said.
Political leaders and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle in Texas and Arizona aren't convinced that the tomato tax will ultimately benefit the U.S. A statement from Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, cited a Texas A&M study estimating that nearly 50,000 jobs in Arizona and Texas are tied to the import of tomatoes, jobs she said are now at risk.
"Donald Trump's reckless trade war is raising prices, threatening our economic growth and killing jobs," she said.
In June, four Republican lawmakers in Arizona and Texas warned against abandoning the agreement in a letter to Lutnick. "This agreement has safeguarded American jobs, stabilized markets, and driven agricultural innovation without burdensome government interference," they wrote.
The Republican-dominated Legislature in Texas passed a resolution opposing the Trump administration's withdrawal from the agreement.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a staunch Trump ally, signed it last month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump plans to meet with Putin as soon as next week, New York Times reports
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump plans to meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as next week, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing two people familiar with the plan. Trump then plans to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the newspaper reported, adding that the plans were disclosed in a call with European leaders on Wednesday. The White House did not immediately respond to the report but earlier on Wednesday Trump acknowledged that he spoke with European leaders after U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff's "highly productive" meeting with Putin in Russia. While noting that "great progress" was made during the meeting, Trump wrote on Truth Social: "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." Trump, who promised to end Russia's war in Ukraine on "day one" during his presidential campaign, has held several phone calls with Putin and has met with Zelenskiy since returning to the White House in January. However, in recent weeks, he has become increasingly frustrated with Moscow over a lack of progress towards ending the three-year conflict.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's the Salary You Need So You Are Not Just Surviving in America's 50 Biggest Cities
There's getting by in the big city, and there's living comfortably. There's also how you define 'comfortably' when it comes to your annual income. Read Next: Find Out: Bringing in twice the average annual cost of living is one measure. Among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, that means making anywhere from $63,000 a year to $280,000. To give you an idea of how much you'll need to live comfortably in each of these cities, GOBankingRates has blended data from the U.S. Census, Zillow, and the Federal Reserve. The comfortable salary needed for each city has been calculated by doubling the cost of living. Here's a list of the 50 most populous U.S. cities, counting down from No. 50 to No. 1. In addition to the salary needed to live comfortably, we've included population, the average annual cost of living, and other details for each city: 50. Aurora, Colorado Population: 390,201 Annual cost of living: $59,176 Comfortable salary needed: $118,351 You'll find Aurora just east of Denver. As of May 2025, a single-family home here is worth about $500,000 on average. Learn More: Check Out: 49. Tampa, Florida Population: 393,389 Annual cost of living: $51,976 Comfortable salary needed: $103,953 You can still find single-family homes in Tampa for less than $400,000, with the average value sitting at $395,000 as of earlier this year. The median household income of around $71,000 is significantly lower than the 'comfortable' salary of about $104,000. Try This: 48. Arlington, Texas Population: 394,769 Annual cost of living: $46,645 Comfortable salary needed: $93,290 The seventh most populous city in Texas, Arlington has a median household income of $72,000 a year. Single-family homes here are worth $321,000 on average, slightly less than nearby Dallas. 47. Wichita, Kansas Population: 396,488 Annual cost of living: $36,221 Comfortable salary needed: $72,443 Single-family homes in Wichita will cost you less than most of the other cities in our list, with average values coming in around $200,000. Wichita's household median income sits around $63,000 a year. 46. Bakersfield, California Population: 408,366 Annual cost of living: $51,677 Comfortable salary needed: $103,354 Bakersfield gets a livability score of just 57 from AreaVibes, second lowest among the cities in this list. A single-family home here is still worth about $400,000 on average, and the median household income sits at $77,000. Bakersfield gets a livability score of just 57 from AreaVibes, second lowest among the cities in this list. A single-family home here is still worth about $400,000 on average, and the median household income sits at $77,000. 45. Tulsa, Oklahoma Population: 412,322 Annual cost of living: $37,755 Comfortable salary needed: $75,511 Among the 50 most populous cities in the U.S., Tulsa is the only city that showed a slight decrease in percentage of residents age 65+, between 2022 and 2023. Tulsa's household median income comes in around $58,000. 44. Minneapolis Population: 426,845 Annual cost of living: $47,579 Comfortable salary needed: $95,158 Minnesota's most populous city has a median household income around $80,000. The average single-family home here is worth $358,000. For You: 43. Oakland, California Population: 438,072 Annual cost of living: $84,401 Comfortable salary needed: $168,802 The average value of single-family homes in Oakland has dipped by about $70,000 over the past year, the largest decrease among major U.S. cities. That average value still sits at $829,000, however. The median household income here is $97,000. 42. Miami Population: 446,663 Annual cost of living: $73,432 Comfortable salary needed: $146,863 As of last May, a single-family home in Miami is worth around $667,000. The median household income here comes in around $59,000, significantly lower than the average annual cost of living. 41. Virginia Beach, Virginia Population: 457,066 Annual cost of living: $53,483 Comfortable salary needed: $106,966 Virginia Beach saw a small population decline between 2022 and 2023. The median household income here is $92,000. 40. Long Beach, California Population: 458,491 Annual cost of living: $91,653 Comfortable salary needed: $183,305 Long Beach's percentage of residents age 65 and up ticked up 0.7% between 2022 and 2023 — the largest increase in our list. The median household income here is around $84,000. 39. Raleigh, North Carolina Population: 470,763 Annual cost of living: $54,114 Comfortable salary needed: $108,228 Raleigh gets a livability score of 84 from AreaVibes, tied for the highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. As of last May, the average single-family home here was worth $484,000. Trending Now: 38. Colorado Springs, Colorado Population: 483,099 Annual cost of living: $54,413 Comfortable salary needed: $108,827 You'll find Colorado Springs about 70 miles south of Denver in central Colorado. The median household income in Colorado Springs is $83,000, around $8,000 less than Denver. 37. Omaha, Nebraska Population: 488,197 Annual cost of living: $43,496 Comfortable salary needed: $86,991 You can still find single-family homes for less than $300,000 in Omaha, with average values sitting at $295,000 as of last May. Omaha's median household income is $73,000. 36. Atlanta Population: 499,287 Annual cost of living: $56,838 Comfortable salary needed: $113,676 The capital of Georgia — and the unofficial capital of the South — has a household median income of $82,000. Single-family homes here are worth $456,000 on average. 35. Mesa, Arizona Population: 507,478 Annual cost of living: $55,442 Comfortable salary needed: $110,884 Fast-growing Mesa saw a 17 percent increase in population age 65+ from 2022 to 2023, the second highest jump among the cities in our list. The median household income in Mesa is around $79,000, and the average single-family home is valued at $454,000. 34. Kansas City, Missouri Population: 508,233 Annual cost of living: $40,452 Comfortable salary needed: $80,905 Single-family homes in Kansas City are relatively affordable compared to most of the other cities in our list, with average values of just over $250,000. Kansas City's median household income is about $67,000. Explore More: 33. Sacramento, California Population: 524,802 Annual cost of living: $60,000 Comfortable salary needed: $120,000 California's capital city has a median household income of $84,000. The average value of single-family homes here ($497,000) is much lower than it is in the state's other major cities. 32. Tucson, Arizona Population: 543,348 Annual cost of living: $45,904 Comfortable salary needed: $91,808 Tucson's household median income is $55,000, the fourth lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. A single-family home in Tucson is valued at $342,000 on average. 31. Fresno, California Population: 543,615 Annual cost of living: $51,638 Comfortable salary needed: $103,276 AreaVibes gives Fresno a livability score of 63, the second lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Still, its population ticked up 0.4% between 2022 and 2023. 30. Albuquerque, New Mexico Population: 562,488 Annual cost of living: $45,349 Comfortable salary needed: $90,698 Just over 17% of Albuquerque's residents are age 65 and up, the third highest percentage among the cities in our list. The median household income here comes in at $66,000. 29. Milwaukee Population: 569,756 Annual cost of living: $38,219 Comfortable salary needed: $76,438 Among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, Milwaukee has the third-lowest household median income — $52,000. Single-family homes in Milwaukee are worth $221,000 on average, and the median household income is around $52,000. Be Aware: 28. Baltimore Population: 577,193 Annual cost of living: $37,306 Comfortable salary needed: $74,612 Baltimore's population declined 1.3% between 2022 and 2023, the second largest drop among the cities in our list. As of last May, the average value of a single-family home in Baltimore was $187,000. 27. Memphis, Tennessee Population: 629,063 Annual cost of living: $32,690 Comfortable salary needed: $65,381 Memphis has the second-lowest median household income ($51,000) among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Its 'comfortable' salary is the second lowest in our list. 26. Detroit Population: 636,644 Annual cost of living: $31,609 Comfortable salary needed: $63,217 Detroit's household median income of $40,000 is the lowest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities, and its 'comfortable' salary is the lowest in GBR's list. Single-family homes in the Motor City are valued at $78,000 on average. 25. Portland, Oregon Population: 642,715 Annual cost of living: $64,008 Comfortable salary needed: $128,016 The average value of a single-family home in Oregon's largest city comes in around $570,000. Portland's median household income is $89,000. 24. Las Vegas Population: 650,873 Annual cost of living: $57,400 Comfortable salary needed: $114,800 Las Vegas saw a population increase of about 1% from 2022 to 2023. The average value of a single-family home here was $462,000 as of last May. Read More: 23. Boston Population: 663,972 Annual cost of living: $86,439 Comfortable salary needed: $172,878 The median household income in Massachusetts' capital city is $95,000. Single-family homes in Boston are worth $859,000 on average. 22. Washington, D.C. Population: 672,079 Annual cost of living: $80,645 Comfortable salary needed: $161,289 The nation's capital has the fourth highest median household income in this list, coming in at $106,000. Single-family homes here are worth $772,000 on average. 21. El Paso, Texas Population: 678,147 Annual cost of living: $38,249 Comfortable salary needed: $76,497 Single-family homes in El Paso are worth $232,000 on average, one of the lowest figures among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. El Paso's median household income is $59,000. 20. Oklahoma City Population: 688,693 Annual cost of living: $37,609 Comfortable salary needed: $75,219 Single-family homes in Oklahoma City are relatively inexpensive compared to other major U.S. cities, with average values at $208,000. Oklahoma City's median household income sits at $67,000. 19. Denver Population: 713,734 Annual cost of living: $65,461 Comfortable salary needed: $130,921 The Mile High City has a median household income of $92,000. The average value of a single-family home in Denver has inched above $600,000. Consider This: 18. Seattle Population: 741,440 Annual cost of living: $92,061 Comfortable salary needed: $184,122 The average value of a single-family home in Seattle has reached $969,000 — the fifth highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Seattle's median household income is $122,000. 17. San Francisco Population: 836,321 Annual cost of living: $129,872 Comfortable salary needed: $259,745 Famously expensive San Francisco has the second highest 'comfortable' salary needed in our list, along with the second highest median household income ($141,000). Single-family homes here are worth a whopping $1.4M on average. The City by the Bay saw a population decrease of 1.7% between 2022 and 2023 — the steepest drop among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. 16. Indianapolis Population: 882,043 Annual cost of living: $38,606 Comfortable salary needed: $77,212 As of last May, the average value of a single-family home in Indiana's capital stood at $238,000. The median household income in Indianapolis comes in around $63,000. 15. Charlotte, North Carolina Population: 886,283 Annual cost of living: $51,765 Comfortable salary needed: $103,530 North Carolina's largest city saw a 1.3% population bump between 2022 and 2023. The average value of a single-family home here is $414,000, and the median household income is $78,000. 14. Columbus, Ohio Population: 906,480 Annual cost of living: $41,226 Comfortable salary needed: $82,452 Ohio's capital has an average single-family home value of $273,000 and a median household income of $66,000. Learn More: 13. Fort Worth, Texas Population: 941,311 Annual cost of living: $45,555 Comfortable salary needed: $91,110 Fort Worth's population jumped nearly 2% between 2022 and 2023, the largest increase among the cities in our list. The average value of a single-family home in Fort Worth is just over $300,000. 12. Jacksonville, Florida Population: 961,739 Annual cost of living: $44,731 Comfortable salary needed: $89,462 Jacksonville's AreaVibes livability score of 84 is tied for the highest in our list. The household median income here is $67,000, and the average single-family home is valued at just over $300,000. 11. Austin, Texas Population: 967,862 Annual cost of living: $62,863 Comfortable salary needed: $125,726 Austin is a young city, with only about 10% of its population age 65 and up. That's the lowest percentage among cities in this list. Single-family homes in Austin are worth $592,000 on average — about $35,000 less than a year ago. 10. San Jose, California Population: 990,054 Annual cost of living: $140,115 Comfortable salary needed: $280,229 Among the most populous U.S. cities, it doesn't get much more expensive than San Jose. This Silicon Valley city tops our list for annual cost of living, 'comfortable' salary needed, median household income ($142,000), and average single-family home value ($1.6M). 9. Dallas Population: 1,299,553 Annual cost of living: $47,589 Comfortable salary needed: $95,177 'Big D' is the third most populous city in Texas, trailing only San Antonio and Houston. Single-family homes in Dallas are worth $332,000 on average, and the median household income is $68,000. Check Out: 8. San Diego Population: 1,385,061 Annual cost of living: $106,761 Comfortable salary needed: $213,522 Sunny San Diego's 'comfortable' salary is the third-highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. Single-family homes here are worth $1.2M on average. 7. San Antonio Population: 1,458,954 Annual cost of living: $40,362 Comfortable salary needed: $80,724 San Antonio's median household income sits at $63,000. The average single-family home here is valued at $258,000. 6. Philadelphia Population: 1,582,432 Annual cost of living: $42,610 Comfortable salary needed: $85,220 Philadelphia saw a population decrease of 0.7% between 2022 and 2023. The household median income here comes in around $61,000. 5. Phoenix Population: 1,624,832 Annual cost of living: $54,082 Comfortable salary needed: $108,164 Arizona's capital saw a population increase of about 1% from 2022 to 2023. Its median household income sits at $77,000, and single-family homes here are valued at $429,000 on average. 4. Houston Population: 2,300,419 Annual cost of living: $43,438 Comfortable salary needed: $86,876 Sprawling Houston, one of four U.S. cities with a population over 2 million, has a median household income of $63,000. As of last May, single-family homes in Houston were worth $278,000 on average. Read More: 3. Chicago Population: 2,707,648 Annual cost of living: $46,725 Comfortable salary needed: $93,450 The Windy City's median household income comes in around $75,000. Single-family homes in Chicago are worth $315,000 on average. 2. Los Angeles Population: 3,857,897 Annual cost of living: $100,266 Comfortable salary needed: $200,532 The nation' second-most populous city gets a livability score of 67 from AreaVibes, the third-lowest score in our list. A single-family home in LA is still worth $1M on average. 1. New York Population: 8,516,202 Annual cost of living: $92,576 Comfortable salary needed: $185,152 New York City's 1.2% population decline between 2022 and 2023 was the third highest among the 50 most populous U.S. cities. The Big Apple's average annual cost of living (about $93,000) is significantly higher than its median household income ($80,000). Ashleigh Ray and Sydney Champion contributed to the reporting for this article. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed the 50 largest U.S. cities by population and determined the salary needed to live comfortably in each location. GBR determined the top 50 cities by population using the U.S. Census American Community Survey (the most recent available). Using the same survey, GBR sourced 2023 and 2022 data for the total population, population age 65 and over, total households, and household median income. One-year changes in percent and amount were calculated for each variable. The single-family home value was sourced from the Zillow Home Value Index from May 2025 and May 2024. By assuming a 10% downpayment and using the national 30-year fixed mortgage rate of 6.75 as sourced on July 21 from Federal Reserve Economic Data, the average mortgage cost was calculated. With the average mortgage cost and average expenditure cost, the average total cost of living was calculated for each city. Using the 50/30/20 rule, which states that needs should not exceed 50% of total household income, the total cost of living was doubled to find the comfortable cost of living. The cities were then sorted to show the largest one-year increase in total population. All data is up to date as of July 21, 2025. More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on Here's the Salary You Need So You Are Not Just Surviving in America's 50 Biggest Cities Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Miami Herald
16 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Visitors to the U.S. on business and tourist visas may have to pay $15,000 bonds
Some international visitors to the United States might be required to pay up to $15,000 deposits as part of a new visa bond pilot program announced by the State Department this week in a document published in the Federal Register. The pilot program is another strategy the Trump administration is utilizing to crack down on illegal immigration and is meant to discourage the number of visitors who overstay their visas. The State Department said in the filing that those who overstay their visas pose a national security threat to the U.S. The program is being formed as part of the enforcement of a January executive order in which President Donald Trump declared there was an invasion by illegal immigration through U.S. borders. The consular officers in the respective U.S embassies will determine the amount of the bond during the issuance of the visa. Travelers will have to post the assigned bond amount before they are issued a single-entry visa, which will be valid for three months. Travelers with visa bonds would also be limited to traveling in and out of pre-selected airports. The list of airports has yet to be announced. The administration said 500,000 people overstayed their visas in 2023, based on data from the Department of Homeland Security. The pilot bond program will focus on those countries that the administration has identified as having high visa overstays. The program is limited to only B-1 business and B-2 tourist visas. It does not affect students applying for F-1 student visas. The full list of countries has yet to be announced. A State Department spokesperson said business and tourist visitors from Malawi and Zambia who are eligible for the B-1/B-2 visas will have to post bonds starting Aug. 20. According to Homeland Security's 2023 fiscal year visa overstay data, Malawi had a total visa overstay rate of 14% from 1,655 visitors, and Zambia had 11% from 3,493 visitors. The complete list of countries will be published when the program takes effect. This new program comes as South Florida airports saw a decline in the number of domestic and international travellers compared to the previous year. Dan Linblade, the president and CEO of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Chamber of Commerce, which represents more than 1,250 companies, said in a statement that international business and tourism were vital to the economy and the new bond pilot program is a 'disincentive to travel from abroad.' 'We are concerned of the potential negative impact on international tourism at a time when we see declining numbers related to foreign travel,' said Lindblade. 'If the State Department's focus is only targeted to bad players then the impact will be smaller.' The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which covers the Sixth District of the Federal Reserve, including Florida, reported in July that group bookings from international travel to the U.S from Canada, Asia, and Europe continued to slow, but there was some growth in overall travel and tourism. In the filing this week, the Department of State said that after reviewing reports going back as far as 2000, when the Immigration and Naturalization Service Data Management Improvement Act was introduced, the reports of entry and exits of nonimmigrant visa holders to the U.S. who overstayed their visas show that thousands of visitors failed to depart by their visa terms. The first Trump administration had tried to initiate a six-month visa-bond pilot program in November 2020. The program was to 'serve as a diplomatic tool to encourage foreign governments to take all appropriate actions to ensure their nationals timely depart the United States after making temporary visits.' It was to run from December 2020 through June 2021. The State Department scrapped the pilot program due to the reduction of global travel because of COVID-19. 'Data collected during the Pilot may also be used to determine the effectiveness of visa bonds at reducing overstays, evaluate concerns about insufficient identity verification, and the extent to which visa bonds may deter otherwise legitimate B-1 and B-2 visa applicants from traveling to the United States,' the State Department said. The bond program will run until August 2026, and the countries on the list will continually be updated over the year. Visitors with bonds will have to file for a refund within 30 days of their departure from the United States. Failure to do so results risks forfeiting the deposits.