Taekwondo instructor's shocking lies before triple murder
Kwang Kyung Yoo, 51, earlier this year pleaded guilty to murdering Min Cho, 41, and a seven-year-old child at Yoo's North Parramatta taekwondo studio as well as Ms Cho's husband, Steven Cho, 39, at his Baulkham Hills home in February last year.
A statement of agreed facts tendered to the court do not state Yoo's motivation for the horrific murders.
However, they do reveal that in the lead-up he lied to his wife that he was being given a BMW as a work car and instead took Ms Cho's BMW X5 after killing her.
The court documents also reveal he was obsessed with wealth and had told lies about his academic credentials and having competed at the Olympics.
Yoo confirmed his three guilty pleas in the NSW Supreme Court in Sydney on Friday.
'Yes,' Yoo said, appearing from prison via videolink, as he confirmed he would plea guilty to each murder.
Yoo hung his head during Friday's mention in the Supreme Court.
Yoo ran the Lion's Taekwondo and Martial Arts Academy at North Parramatta and was known to his students as 'Master Lion' at the time of the horrific triple murder.
According to court documents, in January last year, he lied to his wife when he told her that a primary school – where he had a part-time job – was giving him a BMW as a work car.
In the 11 days leading up to the horrific murders, Yoo was captured on CCTV driving into the complex where the Cho family lived in his grey Toyota Camry on five occasions
The court was told that about 6.22pm on February 19, after the other parents and students had left his taekwondo studio, Yoo strangled Ms Cho in a storeroom before dragging her body into the office.
Later that evening, he was captured on CCTV taking Ms Cho's car keys before he later called his wife to say his new BMW had arrived.
'The car has arrived,' he told her during a brief phone call.
He then killed the seven-year-old boy in the storeroom by strangling him.
At 8.48pm, he drove Ms Cho's BMW X5 away from the scene to her Baulkham Hills townhouse where he broke in.
Mr Cho returned home and was stabbed to death by Yoo, with blows to the head, neck and chest.
Mr Cho stabbed Yoo in self-defence but was killed in the altercation.
Yoo returned to his studio and called his wife, saying: 'I've been stabbed with a knife.'
He drove to Westmead Hospital and was treated for a collapsed lung and stab wounds.
He claimed to police that he had been stabbed by three people in the carpark of a North Parramatta Woolworths; however, officers quickly established that was a lie after viewing CCTV footage.
Police searched Ms Cho's BMW, which Yoo had driven to hospital, and found traces of blood inside.
Mr Cho's body was discovered the next day when friends became concerned and went to the couple's home.
Police then went to the Lion's Taekwondo and Martial Arts Academy, where they noticed blood on the front steps before the bodies of Ms Cho and the boy were found inside.
'During the investigation, police obtained evidence that suggested that the offender (Yoo) had interests in luxury items, social status and wealth,' the court documents state.
Police found evidence of Yoo inspecting properties and falsely telling agents that he was acting on behalf of his wealthy employer or his parents who had a budget of up to $50m.
He showed the mother of one of his students a picture that he falsely claimed was taken from his home with Harbour Bridge views.
He had further lied about owning property in Sydney's eastern suburbs and luxury cars and that he holidayed in New York and California.
Yoo also told people, including his wife and sister, that he had a master's degree and PHD from Macquarie University and The University of Sydney.
However, both institutions had no record of him.
He was also found to have lied about competing in taekwondo at the 2000 Olympics.
Yoo will appear in court again next week when a date will be set for sentence proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The controlling mind, the ‘cover-up' and the critical flaw: Fresh claims against Richard White
Controversial WiseTech billionaire Richard White has been accused of turning a blind eye to a 'cover-up' to keep serious technical vulnerabilities from a potential purchaser of his anti-money laundering software business Kyckr. 'Mr White … stood to benefit from the removal of individuals unwilling to downplay material risk,' former chief technology officer Rebecca Glover has alleged in a wrongful dismissal claim. Glover also claims there was an 'organisational purge' against employees deemed disloyal to White. Glover and her colleague, Jason Davey, were fired on June 20, a week after Kyckr's chief executive officer, Kathy Phelan, was sacked. Davey and Glover have launched wrongful dismissal claims with the Fair Work Commission. Phelan is pursuing her own legal claim. 'There was no consultation, no support and no due process,' Davey's court claim said. Glover has alleged in court documents that she identified a 'critical cybersecurity flaw' which represented 'a major breach of technical and regulatory obligations' for the company. She also claims she raised concerns about a possible product liability risk arising from Kyckr's verification of UBOs (ultimate beneficial owner), 'which was returning inaccurate results to regulated clients' in up to 20 per cent of cases. UBO searches are crucial for preventing financial crime such as money laundering and terrorist financing by identifying the key owners of entities, even if they are owned through a complex web of companies. Court documents allege that Kyckr chief operations officer Steve Lamb and White were involved in her wrongful dismissal because she objected to concealing issues from a potential purchaser, Sydney-founded anti-money laundering solutions business Encompass Corporation. In her wrongful dismissal claim, Glover alleges she and Phelan were sacked for refusing 'to participate in this cover-up'.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The controlling mind, the ‘cover-up' and the critical flaw: Fresh claims against Richard White
Controversial WiseTech billionaire Richard White has been accused of turning a blind eye to a 'cover-up' to keep serious technical vulnerabilities from a potential purchaser of his anti-money laundering software business Kyckr. 'Mr White … stood to benefit from the removal of individuals unwilling to downplay material risk,' former chief technology officer Rebecca Glover has alleged in a wrongful dismissal claim. Glover also claims there was an 'organisational purge' against employees deemed disloyal to White. Glover and her colleague, Jason Davey, were fired on June 20, a week after Kyckr's chief executive officer, Kathy Phelan, was sacked. Davey and Glover have launched wrongful dismissal claims with the Fair Work Commission. Phelan is pursuing her own legal claim. 'There was no consultation, no support and no due process,' Davey's court claim said. Glover has alleged in court documents that she identified a 'critical cybersecurity flaw' which represented 'a major breach of technical and regulatory obligations' for the company. She also claims she raised concerns about a possible product liability risk arising from Kyckr's verification of UBOs (ultimate beneficial owner), 'which was returning inaccurate results to regulated clients' in up to 20 per cent of cases. UBO searches are crucial for preventing financial crime such as money laundering and terrorist financing by identifying the key owners of entities, even if they are owned through a complex web of companies. Court documents allege that Kyckr chief operations officer Steve Lamb and White were involved in her wrongful dismissal because she objected to concealing issues from a potential purchaser, Sydney-founded anti-money laundering solutions business Encompass Corporation. In her wrongful dismissal claim, Glover alleges she and Phelan were sacked for refusing 'to participate in this cover-up'.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
For too many victims of family violence, police harm more than help, new research finds
When we think of family violence almost instinctively we think of police: they are the gatekeepers to the criminal justice system and have become key first responders in Victoria — and around Australia — to the extent that Victoria Police last year responded to 104,786 family incidents, the highest number on record. But rather than helping victims, new research has found that in too many cases police responses to family violence are harming them, replicating the power and control dynamics that underpin abuse and increasing risk, trauma and feelings of powerlessness. If you need help immediately call emergency services on triple-0 The report, Harm in the Name of Safety: Victorian Family Violence Workers' Experiences of Family Violence Policing, is brimming with disturbing accounts from the frontline: of police misjudging victims as perpetrators, downplaying and dismissing violence, deliberately targeting Aboriginal women and other minority groups (queer people, disabled people, sex workers), colluding with abusers, and even using family violence themselves. The report's authors say the evidence they've gathered is so damning — and the harm to victims so serious and widespread — that the problems cannot be fixed with more police training and education. Instead, they argue, community-based responses to family violence that don't involve police at all must urgently be expanded, including violence prevention and crisis response programs, early intervention and behaviour change programs, and accountability and restorative justice schemes. "This evidence … makes it very clear that we need to take urgent action to constrain police harms and to build and strengthen alternative survivor-led and community-based family violence responses," said report co-author Lauren Caulfield, coordinator of the Beyond Survival Project, which supports victims who have been harmed by police responses to family violence. "It's evidence that demands a fundamental rethink of the way police are positioned as a solution to family violence when for so many people, police responses actually increase risk and harm." The report's recommendations are likely to reignite debate about abolition feminism, whose proponents argue that criminal legal or "carceral" responses to domestic violence — including policing, prosecution and imprisonment — ultimately exacerbate violence and further oppress marginalised victim-survivors, especially First Nations women. In Australia, those conversations have largely been led by Aboriginal scholars and advocates and are firmly at odds with calls in the mainstream to strengthen criminal legal responses to gender-based violence. But while many baulk at the idea of abolishing police and even the laws they're supposed to enforce, academics, frontline workers and survivors are increasingly willing to consider alternative visions of justice as more of them are exposed to the flaws and dangers of the current system. For Tania Farha, chief executive of Safe and Equal, the peak body for specialist family violence services in Victoria, the report is an opportunity to do both: to improve the way police are responding to family violence and to build and strengthen alternative supports for victim-survivors who don't want to engage with police. "What it really highlights is that police and justice system responses to family violence are not for everybody, nor have they ever been," Ms Farha said. "But police are an important component of the system, particularly for those who want to engage with the justice system, and sometimes they're the only appropriate response in high-risk situations." As part of their research the Beyond Survival Project and RMIT university surveyed 225 family violence workers in Victoria about their observations and concerns about how police were responding to family violence. The workers' answers, collected in 2020 and 2021, revealed that "harmful" police responses were "routinely occurring" in interactions between officers and victims. The most common issue to emerge was victim misidentification, where police incorrectly name a victim of family violence as a perpetrator on an intervention order or charge them with criminal offences. When asked directly, 83 per cent of survey participants said they had encountered misidentification, with two-thirds (64 per cent) saying they had seen it happen five or more times over the last five years. Experts have long been reporting that female victims — First Nations and migrant women in particular — are misidentified often because they have fought back or tried to defend themself against their partner's violence, or because they've presented as angry, "hysterical" or drunk when police arrive, challenging officers' assumptions about how victims behave. Police may also fail to identify patterns of coercive control in the relationship or a perpetrator's calculated attempts to weaponise legal systems, perhaps because they have not taken statements from both parties or called in an interpreter to translate. Crucially, it can have life-altering consequences, as one survey respondent explained: "Misidentification [has] led to women losing their children, their jobs, property and assets, affected their mental health, lead to suicidal thoughts and attempts, drugs and alcohol use … and losing all their legal rights, friend and families and community." But misidentification tends to be characterised by police as a mistake — something that occurs because family violence is complex, said report co-author Peta Malins, senior lecturer in criminology and justice studies at RMIT. What the frontline workers' accounts show, she said, is that it's a product of police cultural and institutional bias. "Misidentification is not a mistake," Dr Malins said. "It's actually a targeted practice" that has serious repercussions for First Nations and migrant communities, queer and disabled people and women generally. Associate Professor Bridget Harris, director of the Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, said family violence workers who have had negative experiences with police may have been more likely to respond to the survey, potentially shaping the results. But the report is full of valuable insights from people we don't often hear from, she said: "I think we're behind in terms of Australian research on this topic … it's an issue that needs more attention and what I would hope is that police take this as an opportunity to address things." Progress has also been made since the survey was taken in 2021, Dr Harris said — for instance, more police attention to and training on the issue of victim misidentification in Victoria, several domestic violence inquiries and, through her own team's work with the Commonwealth Attorney-General's Department, a new training and education package for police around the country. But frontline services are still waiting for change. Djirra, which supports Aboriginal women experiencing family violence, recently assisted five women who they say were "racially targeted and misidentified" by police to have intervention order applications struck out in court. "We have not seen any reduction in misidentification," said Djirra chief executive Antoinette Braybrook. "Rather, we have seen an increase." Another significant issue to emerge in the survey was perpetrators of family violence in police ranks. More than half the frontline workers (51 per cent) said they had encountered cases of family violence involving a serving police officer, with many describing the violence as more coercive and more covert because of the officer's authority, training and access to weapons and systems. Many workers also raised concerns that the lack of independent oversight of police complaints in Victoria was deterring victims from reporting violence and abuse. "I have represented several women whose partners have been police officers and all have threatened their partner with their status as a police officer to gaslight … and convince them that no one would believe [them] and if she did report it, he would ensure the police would retaliate against her," one survey respondent said. "One client had her house raided with six police officers, all friends of her partner." Victoria Police in 2021 set up a dedicated unit to investigate such complaints, but an ABC News investigation recently revealed women have continued to face insensitive treatment, stressful delays and even criminal charges themselves after reporting family violence allegations against police, some of whom still seem to be evading accountability. In response, experts and advocates have been calling on the government to overhaul police oversight by ensuring all complaints about police are investigated by a properly resourced independent body. The new report makes a similar recommendation, finding that the extent and impact of the police-perpetrated family violence described by workers "directly challenges the notion of police representing safety" and "demands an urgent reconsideration of the powers, resources and social license" police are afforded as first responders. It also makes several other recommendations for expanding community-based family violence programs that do not rely on police or the criminal legal system, as well as investing in affordable housing and strengthening prevention and accountability initiatives. Notably, more than half of the frontline workers surveyed (54 per cent) made specific suggestions to improve police responses to family violence, including improving police feedback and complaint processes (21 per cent), enhanced training (16 per cent) and finding ways to ensure officers collaborate better with family violence workers (12 per cent). Ultimately, though, the research team warned against further investing in police. Often when policing harms are exposed there are calls for more training for officers, Ms Caulfield said, and more resources for police forces generally. "But these reforms inevitably function to entrench … the role of police in family violence responses rather than actually addressing or constraining the harm." The report flags that there are already several programs in Australia and overseas that aim to help victims without relying on police that could be embraced in Victoria. For example, Aboriginal-led healing centres such as Waminda on the NSW south coast. Or the White Bird Clinic's CAHOOTS program in Oregon in the United States, where teams of medics and mental health specialists respond to 911 calls about mental health crises to achieve non-violent resolutions — and especially to avoid the fatalities which have occurred as a result of police involvement. In Victoria, Djirra has long advocated against investing in policing as a solution to family violence. "Our advocacy comes from many years of witnessing the poor, unsafe and often non-existent responses from police for Aboriginal women's and children's safety," Ms Braybrook said. "Women are not believed, they are punished, criminalised and incarcerated." The answer, she added, is to invest in specialist organisations like Djirra, which runs early intervention and prevention programs that ensure women understand their rights and can navigate systems that are often "racist and violent". Safe and Equal has also developed a resource to help family violence practitioners support victims who don't want to engage with police and who may become isolated from services as a result. "I think it's really important that alternative options are [available]," Ms Farha said. "This is the very reason why we need a properly and sustainably funded specialist family violence sector, because … they are the emergency response for survivors who don't want to call the police." Dr Harris agrees. Some people want assistance from police and the criminal justice process they initiate, she said; others want support only from community based services; while others want something in between — for example, police who work closely with social workers or specialist domestic violence workers in a so-called "co-responder" model. "For some people, the justice system protects and empowers them — they see it positively," Dr Harris said. "For others, it replicates the violence they've experienced — it replicates trauma — and it is not a positive experience. So we need to be really conscious of that when we're looking at different ways forward." In a statement, a Victoria Police spokesperson said the force works closely with family violence professionals and support groups to "hear their insights and strengthen our response". "The safety of victims is at the forefront of everything we do," the spokesperson said. "All police receive extensive family violence training which includes how to accurately identify predominant aggressors", while "more than 90 per cent of police have undergone Aboriginal cultural awareness training". They added: "We know it's especially difficult for victim-survivors to come forward when their perpetrator is a police officer. That's why we created a team specifically tasked with tackling this issue, skilled in supporting victims and understanding the tactics police perpetrators use."
