Myth versus fact: What we know about the risks and side effects of the new weight-loss drugs
When Proietto warned she might feel 'pretty rotten' to begin with, she thought little of it. On the first night, she gave herself the injection and settled into bed to watch TV. Suddenly, her stomach let out a gurgle. Within hours, she was in the grip of wave after wave of nausea. 'I was absolutely as sick as a dog,' she says. 'I had diarrhoea and vomiting for seven days straight. And I lost six kilos in one week.' In the second week, she adjusted to the medication. In the past six years, weight-loss drugs have helped her lose 25 kilograms. 'It just quietens your appetite,' she says. 'I know people who haven't been able to cope with the side effects and have stopped taking it but, for me, it was a short-term thing.'
Ozempic is part of a new wave of drugs, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, that have evolved from treating diabetes to managing obesity and which are now in wider use for weight loss. Not only have they proven successful in helping people regulate blood-sugar levels and shed kilos (and in reducing weight-related issues such as heart conditions) but there is interest in their potential to treat other maladies, from Alzheimer's to addiction.
Unsurprisingly, the drugs are a hot topic of conversation – in the space where urban myth, anecdotal evidence and early scientific findings collide. How do you manage dinners where half the guests are barely eating? Do these drugs really 'eat' your muscles? What's 'Ozempic face'? What are the side effects? What happens if you stop taking them?
Where did the drugs come from (and what's a Gila monster)?
In the Sonoran Desert, in the south-west of the United States, a poisonous lizard feasts on rodents, birds and other reptiles to pack on fat – then stops eating for months. In the 1980s, venom from the Gila monster (pronounced 'hee-lah') caught the attention of US scientists, who observed it stimulating pancreatic cells harvested from guinea pigs. When they investigated why, they discovered a new peptide, which they named exendin-4.
As they looked closer, they noticed that exendin-4 was similar to a hormone in humans called GLP-1 – or glucagon-like peptide 1 – which regulates insulin, the hormone that controls glucose levels in the body and which causes us to feel full after eating. 'I used to tell the students that this hormone is released after a meal and then it does everything except wash the dishes,' says Joe Proietto, a professor emeritus at the University of Melbourne. 'It goes to the pancreas, binds to the receptor on the cells that make insulin and stimulates insulin release ... then [it] goes to the stomach and it slows its emptying, making you feel fuller for longer. And then it goes to the brain and suppresses hunger.'
People with diabetes produce less GLP-1. Until the Gila monster discovery, GLP-1 injected into humans stayed there for only a few minutes. But the peptide carried by the Gila monster lasted several hours. In 2005, US pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly used it in the drug Byetta, for type 2 diabetes. 'I never imagined this peptide would have clinical importance or be marketed as a drug,' Jean-Pierre Raufman, one of the scientists who discovered the venom's importance, tells us from Washington DC. 'Sometimes being lucky is better than being smart.'
'I am very grateful that what started as a 'fishing expedition' turned out to be so impactful.'
As well as being effective for diabetes, Byetta led to people losing about 5 per cent of their body weight within months. It was proof of concept for Danish company Novo Nordisk to begin work on its own anti-diabetes drugs, which went on to mimic the naturally occurring GLP-1 with even longer-lasting results. (The drugs are called GLP-1 receptor agonists because they bind to and activate the body's GLP-1 receptor molecules.)
Raufman was surprised the pharmaceutical industry didn't catch on sooner to the potential 'marketability' of this new class of diabetes drugs for obesity. 'I am very grateful that what started as a 'fishing expedition' turned out to be so impactful,' he says.
Today, there are about half a dozen GLP-1 receptor agonists known by their active ingredients. In Novo Nordisk's latest drugs, this is semaglutide. It's found in Ozempic, available in Australia since 2019 as a weekly injection on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, along with a handful of other semaglutide drugs, for treating type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide is also in Novo Nordisk's Wegovy, available since late 2022 for treating obesity, although not on the PBS. Then there's the Eli Lilly drug, Mounjaro, with the active ingredient tirzepatide, which mimics both GLP-1 and a 'sibling' hormone called GIP – a combination that leads to greater appetite suppression.
The PBS recorded 2,397,521 prescriptions of semaglutide in 2023-24, up 60 per cent on the previous year (the figure includes individuals who have filled multiple scripts). In March, this jump prompted the federal Department of Health to send more than 1000 letters to doctors who had prescribed the drug through the PBS for weight loss, reminding them they can't do this for patients with no history of type 2 diabetes.
Doctors can prescribe Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro 'off-label'. To whom? People with a body-mass index of 30 or more (which is considered obese); or with a BMI of 27 or more (25 to 29 is considered overweight) and who have obesity-related complications such as cardiovascular risk. A person's BMI is their weight divided by their height in metres squared.
But doctors will take other factors into account too, says Terri-Lynne South, chair of an obesity management group at the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: whether they've tried these drugs before, their health literacy, fitness, mental health, any risks of eating disorders and their age. More research is needed into the drugs' effects on people over 65, she says, and older patients would need a particularly in-depth weighing of pros and cons before going on the drugs. (For one thing, muscle mass is already starting to decrease at that age.)
Off-label prescriptions don't have to be reported, so it's unclear how many Australians are taking the drugs. Without any PBS subsidy, they can be pricey: 'pens' of Ozempic cost $133, Wegovy $260 and Mounjaro $330 which, depending on the dose, can be a monthly outlay. 'The people who need these medications the most,' says South, 'are usually the ones who can afford it least, based on socioeconomic data.'
Do the drugs work (and what's food noise)?
Jen was in her mid-20s when she began putting on weight in what she now recognises as a food addiction. Her best friend owned a restaurant where she learned to like high-end food. 'You go from being a kid who is kind of happy with just what you have, until you understand you can have mushrooms that have been flown over from France and eat them the same day they arrive in the country,' she tells us. 'You procure stuff and do a massive cook-up and really enjoy things with a glass of wine and the music on, and have friends around. It was simple hedonism that got out of control.'
Over 15 years, she gained almost 100 kilos. She tried exercise and dieting to no lasting effect. When a tumour developed on her leg requiring surgery, doctors referred her to a weight-loss clinic with a team including a dietitian, psychologist, endocrinologist, exercise physiologist and sleep apnoea specialist. They suggested Jen try Ozempic.
Obesity is believed to be influenced by genetics, which can make it a stubborn challenge.
In 2023, on the first morning after taking the drug, she skipped breakfast without a thought. 'Usually by 10 o'clock in the morning, if I'm working from home and I don't manage to get breakfast straightaway, my stomach is rumbling and I'm dying – like, I could eat a truck driver's dinner.' She has since lost nearly 30 kilograms.
Obesity affects about a third of Australian adults, while another third is classified as overweight. There can be genetic differences between body types, sexes and racial backgrounds, so doctors often use waist circumference as another measure alongside BMI. As for what causes obesity, behaviour and environment play a role, yet between 40 and 70 per cent of obesity is believed to be influenced by genetics, which can make it a stubborn challenge.
Proietto and his colleagues have even found that when people lose just five kilograms, changes to the hormones that control hunger can make them feel hungrier – for several years. 'It was unbelievably frustrating treating obesity because everybody regained weight before long,' he says. 'Now, we've got tools – but we're still frustrated because of the high cost.'
The drugs cause weight loss by slowing gastric emptying, the movement of food from the stomach to the small intestine. The results have been game-changing. In 2021, Novo Nordisk's own clinical trials found people who took semaglutide lost 14.9 per cent of their body weight after 68 weeks, as compared with a placebo group who lost 2.4 per cent. Clinical trials from Eli Lilly's Mounjaro found it could reduce body weight by 25 per cent in the first year.
There are flow-on effects: some evidence of the drugs lowering heart attack and stroke risk, and reducing kidney disease. An Australian study in The Lancet that weighed up trials of several GLP-1 agonists (including semaglutide but not tirzepatide) found the drugs reduced the risk of kidney failure by 16 per cent.
'My friends will say, 'Is that all you're eating?' and I'm like, 'Yeah.' '
Colette McCracken, who lives in south-west Sydney, had tried diets, obesity support groups and a gastric sleeve (surgical removal of part of the stomach). She first used Ozempic in 2019 – and the results went far beyond her expectations. 'You can make good choices because you aren't so overly hungry,' she says. When McCracken goes out for dinner, she opts only for an entree. 'My friends will say, 'Is that all you're eating?' and I'm like, 'Yeah'.'
Another effect of the drug is it reduces 'food noise' – constant thoughts about food that might, for example, mean you're unable to walk into a service station without picking up a bag of chips, or the like. Jen describes the thoughts as relentless and intrusive: What are you going to make for dinner? Maybe you should go to the supermarket? What's on special this week? When it stopped, she experienced a new sense of calm.
'One woman who had alcoholic liver disease said, 'When I taste wine now, it tastes like vinegar.' '
How do the drugs silence thoughts? Katherine Samaras, an endocrinologist at St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney, says it's likely to be because GLP-1 receptors are also scattered throughout the brain. Researchers are still untangling how the drugs act on the brain more broadly. One area of interest is whether the medication has the potential to treat Alzheimer's disease after a London study of 200 people showed a semaglutide drug halved brain shrinkage in those with the disease and reduced cognitive decline by 18 per cent.
Addiction is another area of interest. One randomised control study of 127 people found the drugs didn't reduce heavy alcohol consumption. Still, Samaras and her colleagues have patients on the drugs who report reduced interest in alcohol. 'One woman who had alcoholic liver disease said, 'When I taste wine now, it tastes like vinegar.' She was having seven to eight standard drinks a day, minimum.'
What are the immediate side effects (and what's Ozempic face)?
A search on social media brings up anything from 'sulfur burps' (a rare side effect) to hair loss (which can happen during any rapid weight loss). Jen was anxious about side effects before taking Ozempic. 'I was Googling my head off,' she says. 'There was lots of stuff on social media, a lot of noise, and it was hard to get definitive information.'
The most common side effects of Ozempic are nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and constipation. Clinical trials by Novo Nordisk found about 20 per cent of people who take the drug experience nausea (although a small study of 150 people who'd taken it for two years found the number rose to more than half). The Therapeutic Goods Administration advises that, as of June 25, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea are the common reactions they had received notice of, from 2046 reports. (The TGA encourages people to report even if there is only a very small chance that a drug caused an adverse event.)
As Proietto puts it: 'There is a huge range of sensitivity to the hormone.' Some people have the lowest dose and can't even look at food while others have the maximum and it doesn't work. Tailoring the dose is a process. Says Samaras: 'What really concerns me is that social media ... [is] promoting escalation of the dose when often you don't need to. By not escalating the dose and finding that individual sweet spot, you can actually mitigate or prevent the nausea.'
'The body, if you're crash dieting, will use up fat, but it will also use up fuels in the body like protein and so that's where people can get muscle wasting.'
Experts we spoke with said persisting through initial mild side effects might be necessary, but people shouldn't be suffering. Doses range between 0.25 and 2 milligrams for Ozempic and 2.4 milligrams for Wegovy. Doses of Mounjaro, which has a different potency, ranges between 2.5 and 15 milligrams. Proietto advises his most sensitive patients to start with a small dose of Ozempic, three clicks of the injection (a milligram is roughly 78 clicks), which he increases by one click a week, depending on the patient's tolerance. (Colette briefly had slight constipation when her dose increased but has had none since then.)
What of the ailment dubbed – mostly on social media – Ozempic face? Talk of it has coincided with a rise in online searches for face fillers and cosmetic surgeons to rectify it. Samaras explains this is not a direct side effect of the drug but rather a consequence of rapid weight loss. 'The body, if you're crash dieting, will use up fat, but it will also use up fuels in the body like protein and so that's where people can get muscle wasting or sarcopenia, and when you have that pronounced in the face, you'll lose muscle in the face.'
How should you eat on the drugs?
General practitioner Terri-Lynne South shows patients a chart of side effects to explain what they could expect before taking the drugs. 'If an individual is not tolerating them, I want them to come back to me and we'll be looking at, 'OK, well, why are you not tolerating them?''
A transition period is common as people change their eating habits to match their now-slower digestion. If they continue to overeat, it can contribute to nausea. South will initially tell people to put half as much as they usually would on their plate, and to take 15 to 30 minutes to eat each meal, even suggesting they set a timer and put down their knife and fork between mouthfuls. 'It's about pulling up at that first sign of feeling full.'
Dehydration is one sure way to make nausea worse; so is eating foods high in sugar, carbohydrates and fat, which naturally stay in the stomach for longer. 'So you've got the drug that causes that delayed emptying, and then if you add in foods that also stay around in the stomach, it's like a double whammy,' says South.
Constipation can be exacerbated by poor or unbalanced diets. Fibre and important fats such as oils help maintain bowel movements and prevent blockages. 'Some people use the medication in such a way that they don't eat, and if you don't have anything going through the intestinal tract, then there's not going to be a bowel motion,' Samaras explains. 'Some people don't have a balanced diet. They've just had a prescription for the medication. As you might see with some of the online pharmacies, there's no nutritional intervention, which is foundational to the appropriate use of these medications.'
'I have seen scurvy, which is vitamin C deficiency, when people just don't eat and their gums start bleeding.'
After days of using Ozempic, Jen thought to herself: You still have to eat but now are you going to do it smart? With a dietician, she developed a meal plan to ensure she eats 30 grams of protein a day to stop muscle wasting (up to a quarter of the weight that people lose can be lean body mass and muscle). Studies have found people who have a high-protein breakfast are also less likely to snack later. Jen's breakfast is usually two boiled eggs with spinach and tomatoes. Most days she has only one other meal such as soup, or poached chicken with vegetables, or a salad with tuna. If she needs a snack, she eats fruit or yoghurt.
Loading
Two meals a day might work for some, for others it won't provide a balance between macronutrients (proteins and carbohydrates) and micronutrients (vitamins and minerals). Ideally, a daily diet includes 30 grams of fibre, 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight (adjusted for the healthy weight being aimed for), five vegetables and two pieces of fruit. Often it's about reducing fats rather than removing them – dicing lean beef for a stir-fry, for example, rather than cooking a marbled rib-eye. A lack of vitamin B12 can cause nerve damage and lower your ability to concentrate, a lack of calcium can affect bone density. Samaras refers patients who are new to the drugs for blood tests every three to six months to check their nutrition. 'I have seen scurvy, which is vitamin C deficiency, when people just don't eat and their gums start bleeding.'
She also gleans whether they should see a psychologist – 'you have to understand what makes people binge; is it when they're stressed?' – and an exercise physiologist. Anyone on a calorie-restrictive diet risks losing muscle mass and bone density. Alongside a diet with protein, resistance training two or three times a week helps offset this risk. Jen is up early most mornings to swim laps at her local pool. 'It's outdoor and it's freezing. Let me tell you, my Viking ancestors are proud of me.'
What do we know about long-term side effects?
A scroll through drug companies' disclaimers can be enough to raise anyone's heart rate. (As it happens, all GLP-1 receptor agonists generally increase heart rates by two to three beats a minute, which is not enough to cause damage.) The scarier risks listed for these drugs include thyroid tumours, pancreatitis (a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the pancreas) and vision loss. There's nothing unusual about drugs flagging potential long-term risks, especially when patient data is limited, says Katherine Samaras. 'We have this conundrum in almost every avenue of medical treatment. If we consider obesity a disease with mortality, comorbidities and life suffering then we need to balance up the risk versus the benefit.'
'If it does cause pancreatitis, it's extremely rare.'
What of pancreatitis? The TGA has received 358 reports of it since they started recording data on semaglutide in 2019, but whether these cases were induced by the drugs or are coincidental is unclear. The main causes of pancreatitis are wrapped up in common factors associated with weight gain, such as excessive alcohol consumption and gallstones. Novo Nordisk's two-year clinical trial of 3297 people on semaglutide showed nine had mild pancreatitis. Says Joe Proietto: 'If it does cause pancreatitis, it's extremely rare.' Still, he takes the precaution of starting people with a history of pancreatitis on a lower dose.
Then there's the eye condition called diabetic retinopathy that affects up to a third of diabetic Australians 50 or older. Novo Nordisk found 3 per cent of people in the two-year trial had subsequent damage to their retina. However, treating diabetes with too big of a dose of insulin is a well-known accelerant of retinopathy. In at least some cases, says Proietto, 'It's not the Ozempic that's doing it, it's the drop in sugar.'
Meanwhile, studies have found conflicting evidence for another eye condition – non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy – which affects the optic nerve. Boston-based researchers found an 8.9 per cent incidence of this disease from studying 16,000 people prescribed semaglutide. Others have trawled a database of 66 million users and found no association. The TGA told us it was investigating. 'If a safety signal is confirmed, we will take regulatory action as appropriate.'
What about thyroid cancer? Novo Nordisk flags that semaglutide has caused what are known as C-cell tumours found in thyroid cancer during tests on rodents. In 2022, a study in France concluded there was an association between higher rates of thyroid cancer and people who used GLP-1 receptor agonists. Still, there's no causal link to use of the drug, says Proietto. 'And you know why? Because they found that monkeys and humans don't have receptors on them whereas rats do – our C-cells can't react to the GLP-1 because a hormone can't react unless it's got a receptor to bind to.'
This much is clear: people with bowel cancer should not use GLP-1 receptor agonists because the hormone can cause the cancer to grow. In other words, the drugs don't cause this cancer but can accelerate it. If any of Proietto's patients have a family history of the disease, he will explain the risks and let them make an informed decision. He points out there are other weight loss drugs that don't come with this risk, including Contrave, Phentermine and Xenical, because they don't use GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Loading
What happens when you stop taking the drugs?
When Jen started on Ozempic in 2023 she would take it for a few months then not be able to buy it again due to widespread shortages at the time. With every interlude, she regained four or five kilograms, had to exercise more and would be back in the ring with her eating habits. 'It's a constant battle.'
In a 2021 trial funded by Novo Nordisk, patients regained two-thirds of their prior weight within 12 months of discontinuing their use of semaglutide. The see-sawing of people's weight has physicians concerned. 'It's expected when people lose weight they lose muscle and fat tissue,' says Terri-Lynne South. 'But we often see with the weight regain there's proportionally more fat gain, and it's the fat tissue that is the concern for the health risks.' In addition, the trial found associated conditions such as high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular risks return after people stopped taking semaglutide.
'Not taking the medicine and then taking it again is like chalk and cheese.'
However, anecdotes about what happens to people's weight when they stop are mixed. Not everyone regains substantial weight, says Samaras. 'My view is that's because there has been the support to keep people on track with psychological support, nutritional support and the championing and encouragement of people to stay on this narrow pathway.' She has seen her patients go off the drug without regaining so much as half a kilogram. 'They say, 'I was too scared to go back to eating the way I did. I ate exactly as I did when I had the medication'.'
Without the drug, Jen notices aches – a return of inflammation from overloaded joints. 'Within a week, everything starts to hurt again when you get out of bed,' she says. 'Not taking the medicine and then taking it again is like chalk and cheese.' Samaras says when people restrict their calories, they reduce immune cells that cause inflammation by 80 per cent – therefore, if they go off the drug their inflammation can return.
Then there are those costs. Each time Jen stops and restarts Ozempic she notices she needs a higher dose 'to then maintain that same equilibrium'. She recently switched to Mounjaro, at $565 every two months. 'You have to be committed because, like, I could do three pens and be in Fiji for two weeks eating lobster, right?'
Still, the medication has put a healthier life within her reach. 'My goal is not about aesthetics,' she says. 'It's actually just being strong for longevity, and I'm not waiting for a written invitation for a heart attack, a stroke, diabetes or any other fat-related disease.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
How Australia is failing dying children
EXCLUSIVE Warning: This story discusses the death of a child and paediatric palliative care Looking back now, 51-year-old Alix can see the signs that her irreverent, curious youngest child, Sofia, was seriously ill much earlier than anyone realised. In early 2018, the six-year-old was getting headaches. Somewhat inexplicably – given Sofia's happy and relaxed family and school life – the doctors put the issue down to 'stress'. Only when Alix, her husband and their eldest daughter holidayed with Sofia in Bali later that year did things become impossible to ignore. To Alix, Sofia seemed unusually thin, and her stomach was swollen. On their return to Australia, an ultrasound revealed the devastating truth. 'That's when our lives changed, you know? The doctor phoned me to say I had to come to the clinic immediately. Sofia had a tumour in her tummy, in her liver,' Alix told The diagnosis was angiosarcoma, a rare and aggressive cancer usually seen in adults, not young children. The prognosis was grim. Sofia's story is far from unique. In Australia, approximately 32,000 children live with life-limiting conditions. Yet, according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, in 2021 alone, an estimated 654 children died from these conditions, and less than half received specialist paediatric palliative care. Palliative care is specialised medical support for people with life-limiting illnesses, focused on improving quality of life rather than prolonging it. Yet despite its benefits, many families of critically ill children are never offered this care — a gap experts say must urgently be addressed. In the wake of Sofia's diagnosis, what followed were months of surgeries, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and unrelenting uncertainty. At one stage, doctors removed a vertebra from Sofia's spine and replaced it with titanium. The young girl, once so lively and full of energy, woke from surgery unable to walk, plagued by burning sensations and neurological issues. 'When you talk about the treatment, that's what hurts the most,' Alix says, her voice faltering with grief as she recalls the needles, the fever, the feeding tube. 'That is the part that becomes difficult.' For a while, Sofia returned to school. But the cancer came back, this time in her foot and hip. The doctors understood Sofia would not survive. 'They knew she would die but they didn't tell us: 'This is the path.' 'Communication was absent,' Alix explained. Instead, a cycle of vague suggestions for further chemotherapy and radiotherapy continued, even after it was clear Sofia's cancer was terminal. Alix remembers the moment she and her husband were encouraged to consider yet more treatment. 'We couldn't understand. If she's going to die and the cancer is going to keep growing, why are you offering her chemo and radio,' she said. The family had reached breaking point. 'We didn't want to be disrespectful, but we wanted to scream at the doctor and say: 'Are you stupid? Why do you want her to have that?' So, she's going to last six more months and she will die, vomiting, bald, not eating and with a tube. Horrible!' In that moment, Alix did something many parents never feel empowered to do. She took a deep breath and asked for something radically different. 'I said, 'When the time comes, can you help her to die well? I don't want her to suffer.'' Only then, after Alix specifically requested it, was Sofia referred to specialist palliative care services. This delay is heartbreakingly common, according to experts like Sara Fleming, an Adelaide-based nurse practitioner with nearly 25 years' experience in paediatric palliative care. 'The most heartbreaking thing that used to happen, and sometimes still does, is when referrals come late, and a family would sit there asking, 'Where have you been? Why didn't we meet you before?'' Sara recalls her early days in the sector when families with dying children were left isolated, afraid, and unsupported. 'There was a level of suffering that didn't need to be there, just because of a lack of knowledge and a lack of outreach from health professionals.' In the wider community, families face social isolation too. Friends, neighbours and acquaintances often don't know how to cope, so they simply disappear. 'You represent the unthinkable,' Sara says. 'These diagnoses, these things that kill people's kids … it's generally just a s**tful roll of the dice. And so, you reflect, 'There by the grace of God, goes me.'' Alix experienced this first-hand. 'When a kid gets sick, everyone is so panicked, and people don't talk to you anymore because they don't know how to manage,' she explained. Yet, as Alix and experts like Sara argue, early, honest conversations about prognosis, treatment options, and palliative care could dramatically change families' experiences. Sara believes paediatric palliative care is fundamentally different from end-of-life care for adults. Children often live with life-limiting conditions for years, while still navigating normal developmental challenges like puberty, friendships and schooling. 'We're stepping into working alongside a family where their child has been diagnosed with a life-limiting illness or disease,' she said, 'However, in the meantime, what matters is the living of that life. For children, it's also about what happens after they die. 'What memories or mark will they leave behind? For kids, it's important that we have these conversations about what's their legacy.' Alix's daughter Sofia was a perfect example of this. 'She was always laughing, even since she was four months old. She was so much fun, and even when she grew up, she was always cheeky.' Sofia loved to paint, read, and collect rocks. Her bedroom is still filled with soft toys, books, and her framed artwork. 'Rocks?' I ask Alix, surprised. Alix nods, laughing softly through tears. 'She used to pick them up and bring them to the house. And I used to throw them away so much! She was a different [type of] person, and she would speak up her mind.' In Sofia's final months, Alix kept her promise: no more needles, no more invasive treatments. Her pain was managed, and she was surrounded by loved ones. The night before she died, Sofia's family gathered for a prayer. Alix whispered gently to her: 'When you dream, just follow the light, because you're going to be happy again. You're going to run again.' Sofia died at home on June 7, 2020. For Alix, one of the most painful parts of the experience remains the absence of clear, compassionate conversations from medical professionals early in Sofia's diagnosis. 'Don't make people suffer because you don't want people to die. It's not your job to save everyone,' she said. Her message echoes what advocates have been fighting for decades to achieve: a health system where families like hers aren't left to fend for themselves, and where palliative care is offered early, not as a last resort. A national first for Australia, the Paediatric Palliative Care National Action Plan is aiming to shift that reality. Released in 2023 by Palliative Care Australia (PCA) after years of research and consultation, the Plan marks a significant step forward for Australian families and health professionals. Now in its second stage, PCA is working on nationwide awareness and implementation. 'This is a really important step for paediatric palliative care in Australia,' Annette Vickery, Projects Manager at PCA, told 'Having a national plan and clear guidelines means families and clinicians will finally have more consistency and support. I hope it makes a real difference in everyday practice — helping teams feel more confident and better equipped to care for children, wherever they are.' The Plan has also led to the development of Australia's first paediatric palliative care clinical guidelines – which will be made public by the end of this year – as well as the nation's first Paediatric End-of-Life Care Communication course for health professionals. This whole suite of work was co-designed with bereaved parents. 'Talking and communicating a terminal diagnosis is difficult and especially so when it involves children and young people,' Annette explained. 'It was very important that we equip and empower our health professionals with the right skills and tools to communicate meaningfully across different stages of the care journey and across diverse cultures.' But Annette is clear: there is still a long way to go. 'Too many children who could benefit from paediatric palliative care are not referred early enough,' she said. 'Systemic barriers like workforce shortages, lack of community-based services, lack of connections between specialists, and the stigma attached to the term 'palliative care' often delay or limit access.' The Plan specifically acknowledges the inequities faced by families outside major cities, those from disadvantaged backgrounds, and children with non-cancer conditions — groups who often miss out on timely care altogether. To tackle this, the Plan recommends workforce training, culturally safe care, and expanding outreach services, including for families in rural and remote areas. Annette also believes it's about reframing how society understands palliative care. 'When palliative care is seen only as end-of-life care, families and health professionals often delay referrals, fearing it means giving up hope,' she explained. 'What's lost is the chance to make memories, and spend the last days, months or years doing what matters most with your loved ones.' For Sara, it's time for the health workforce to face the uncomfortable truth. 'It's about the clinician saying, 'This is not a failure.' It's not a failure to acknowledge that maybe time might be short.' Her hope, like Alix's, is for a cultural shift — one that finally brings children's palliative care out of the shadows. 'If we start teaching kids about death, since they are little, they will take it as natural from childhood into adulthood,' Alix added. And, perhaps, families like hers will no longer have to navigate the unimaginable alone. For anyone seeking further information and resources about paediatric palliative care, start here.

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Toxoplasmosis test could lead to learning how parasite affects behaviour
An international research team has developed an online test that they say is capable of detecting toxoplasmosis infection, commonly spread to humans by cats. While the test is not designed to replace a medical diagnosis, the researchers hope it will open the door for more large-scale studies into the effects of toxoplasmosis on the population. An estimated 30 to 50 per cent of the world's population is infected with Toxoplasma gondii, a single-celled parasite capable of infecting humans and any warm-blooded animal or bird. In Australia, the main host of the parasite is cats, which typically become infected by eating small mammals such as rodents or birds. The disease associated with the parasite, toxoplasmosis, can cause a range of health problems, from minor flu-like symptoms to, in rare cases, inflammation of the brain, seizures, and blindness. Toxoplasmosis can alter behaviour in animals, and some research suggests it may also affect how humans think. A new international study published in Acta Psychologica may provide a new way to study these effects. According to neuroeconomist Michele Garagnani, from The University of Melbourne and study co-author, toxoplasmosis affects our neurochemistry by influencing neurotransmitters such as dopamine, serotonin, and adrenaline, which regulate behaviour. Unlike many parasitic infections, being infected with T. gondi has been linked to a range of mental health conditions and behavioural changes, including bipolar disorder, delayed reaction times, and schizophrenia. The infection has been found to make mice impatient and willing to take risks. In some cases, mice actively seek out cats, which makes them more likely to be eaten. While it is still unknown how the parasite causes these changes, it raises important questions about the broader impacts of toxoplasmosis on human health and behaviour. "When we estimate that toxoplasmosis affects 2.4 billion people worldwide, that's a very large portion of the global economy who are having their decisions at least partially influenced by a parasite," Dr Garagnani said. Much about how toxoplasmosis affects human behaviour remains unknown. One major obstacle is that medical testing for the parasite is expensive and invasive, requiring blood or saliva samples. "Our research was trying to develop a method that is very cheap and easy to test on a large number of people," Dr Garagnani said. In the study, researchers ran a laboratory experiment with 79 participants with RhD-negative blood lacking the RhD protein on the surface of red blood cells, asking them to complete a reaction-time task. People with the RhD-negative blood type, about 20 per cent of Australians, have slower response times when infected by the parasite. While it is unclear why RhD-negative individuals have slower reaction times when infected, some theorise that the RhD antigen has protective capabilities against the parasite, and in its absence, patients experience elevated symptoms. Despite the small sample size, the team found that their method matched medical testing with 97 per cent accuracy. The delay in reaction time is small, between 0.16 and 0.25 seconds, but Dr Garagnani said even marginal effects could have large-scale consequences. "On a societal scale, having toxoplasmosis infection with that particular blood type leads to an increase in traffic accidents, for example," he said. The team then replicated the experiment using an online survey with more than 1,000 participants in the UK who had RhD-negative blood. Based on the results, the research team deemed 18 per cent of the respondents to be infected with toxoplasmosis. The team then asked participants a series of questions about their risk preferences, employment status, income, and completed other cognitive tests. "Those who were deemed infected were more likely to smoke, drink alcohol, and experience mental health problems such as anxiety, stress and depression compared to the non-infected participants," Dr Garagnani said. While the new online test does not replace a medical diagnosis, Dr Garagnani hoped it would allow researchers to measure the impact of toxoplasmosis on humans. "Our new method is an opportunity for the world as a whole to understand how many of us are infected, how it affects our behaviour, and what steps we can take to manage its impact," he said. Veterinary parasitologist Tharaka Liyanage said the study posed an innovative approach to exploring the potential behavioural consequences of an infection. "I find it fascinating that a microscopic cat parasite could influence not only human health, but also cognition, behaviour, and even economic decision-making," he said. "This tool may be particularly useful in low-resource settings or as a preliminary step in large-scale epidemiological studies." But, Dr Liyanage cautioned that a lot of work needed to be done before the tool made its way into a clinical setting. "I believe further validation, particularly in consultation with medical and clinical experts, would be necessary before this method can be considered for broader application." The test also requires people to have RhD-negative blood, which only 15 to 20 per cent of people have. Rima McLeod, an internationally recognised toxoplasmosis expert from the University of Chicago, echoed this sentiment and called for further research. "Proper, accurate serologic controls documenting toxoplasma infection or its absence for each participant would be needed to implicate toxoplasma in the associations they propose," Professor McLeod said. Dr Garagnani hoped to conduct further tests on the diagnostic tool. "We are hoping that with future study we verify further that the method works, and whether it could be used as a public policy type of intervention where we could firstly test for toxoplasmosis using our method and then try to understand how to effectively target the population where the prevalence is more diffuse."


West Australian
3 days ago
- West Australian
‘In limbo': Queensland mum diagnosed with rare form of Alzheimer's at 29
Erin Kelly is likely going to forget her eight-year-old daughter Evie's name before her little girl finishes high school. At just 29 years old, the Queensland mum has been diagnosed with a rare hereditary form of Alzheimer's disease. It is the most common form of dementia in Australia – making up 70 per cent of all cases – and is a condition most people develop in their mid- to late-60s. In January 2020, Ms Kelly's father revealed that she and her siblings had a 50/50 chance of getting Alzheimer's – information she decided to 'pretend (she) was never told'. 'Originally I think I was in a little bit of denial, and I originally said I didn't want to know,' Ms Kelly said. 'I sort of stuck my head in the sand and just pretended it wasn't happening for probably the first three years, until I decided that I needed to do something about it.' Ms Kelly wasn't even half the standard age of diagnosis when her brain scans came back positive for the gene in May last year. 'I got the results saying that I've inherited the gene, and there wasn't much help from there,' Ms Kelly. 'I'd contacted Alzheimer's Australia and they just said 'Look, we can't help you at the moment. We don't really know who can'. 'I went to a few doctors, a few neurologists – I'd contacted a few people, (but) no one could really help until I got hold of a geriatrician.' Geriatricians are doctors who specialise in multidisciplinary care for the elderly, which can often include managing several chronic conditions, preventing disease, and general quality-of-life care. 'I saw him for a few visits. He ordered the scans, and then it was only a couple of weeks ago that the scan results came back saying there's evidence of disease in the brain already,' Ms Kelly said. 'From what my doctor was saying, my case is very unique – he's never worked with anyone even close to my age,' she said. 'It was very daunting … very conflicting.' Ms Kelly said she often had moments of 'hypervigilance', where she would forget something the way a normal person would and assume the disease had taken hold even earlier than expected. But it was not long before Ms Kelly sprung into action. 'It was, 'All right, well it's not just me (I have to look after) – I've got a child, my brothers, I have cousins … I want to do something about this, there's not enough knowledge out there, it took so long for me to just even be seen,' she said. With the help of her stepsister Jessica Simpson, Ms Kelly has now launched an online fundraiser, which she hopes will both cover her treatment and raise awareness and research funds for unique genetic dispositions that can lead to Alzheimer's. Ms Kelly's geriatrician told her the treatment that could best hold off any degradation in her brain function was 'lecanemab' – but getting a hold of it would not be straightforward. Lecanemab is not approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), and therefore is not subsidised. Eighteen-month treatments currently cost about $90,000, and have not been tested on someone as young as Ms Kelly. 'The criteria at the moment to get any help is (being) 50 to 90 years old,' she said. 'I could go on the drug and it might have a reverse side-effect, but they don't know, so I'm willing to be that person to say, 'All right, let's give it a go and see'.' 'I just want to make a difference for people like me.' Ms Simpson said her stepsister did not give herself enough credit for the effort she is making – not just for herself, but for her family as well. 'She's a great mum to Evie, and I think in general she's just a really easy person to be around,' Ms Simpson said. 'Erin isn't asking for a miracle – she knows there's no cure … she's simply asking for more time. More ordinary days. More little moments. More memories Evie can carry with her when Erin no longer can.' 'If you can help … your support means the world to our family.' About 480,000 Australians currently live with dementia, according to Alzheimer's Research Australia.