Cape Town International Airport named best in the WORLD
The prestigious ranking, which evaluates airports on on-time performance, customer experience, and quality of service, awarded CTIA an overall score of 8.57 – placing it ahead of some of the globe's most renowned airports.
Cape Town scored 8.6 for punctuality and an impressive 8.7 for passenger experience, highlighting the airport's commitment to operational excellence and warm hospitality.
'This one hits different,' commented one traveller, echoing the sentiments of many who described their CTIA arrival as friendly, smooth, and stress-free.
CTIA outperformed major international hubs, including: Hamad International Airport (Qatar)
(Qatar) Riyadh King Khaled International Airport (Saudi Arabia)
(Saudi Arabia) Brasília International Airport (Brazil)
(Brazil) Muscat International Airport (Oman)
(Oman) Salt Lake City International Airport (USA)
While many global airports have struggled with efficiency and service consistency, Cape Town International has distinguished itself through timely operations, clean facilities, and a welcoming atmosphere – offering travellers an ideal start or end to their journeys.
Framed by Table Mountain, close to vineyards and penguin-lined beaches, CTIA is more than an airport – it's the gateway to one of the world's most iconic destinations.
The win comes as a boost for South Africa's tourism industry, reinforcing its global appeal and positioning Cape Town as a top-tier travel hub in 2025.
The AirHelp Score is one of the most comprehensive global rankings of airports, based on data from passengers and independent metrics.
It reflects how airports perform under pressure while delivering a superior experience.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Concerns over Canal+ and Multichoice merger: impact on local content producers
Jack Devnarain Image: Instagram Local content producers and actors are concerned that the French Television Giant Canal+'s acquisition of Multichoice may lead to fewer local productions and could lead to an increase in unemployment for those working in the entertainment industry, especially those dependent on commissions from Multichoice. The Competition Commission Tribunal hearing this week, focused on public interest clauses of the merger, especially around commitments to support local content creators and historically disadvantaged persons (HDPs). Regulators and commissioners sought to understand how local content creators and HPDs will be supported under the merged entity. Canal+ and MultiChoice had committed to obligations to continue procuring goods and services from a diverse group of beneficiaries, including HDP firms, small and medium enterprises (SMMEs), and South African content creators. Concerns were raised during Thursday's hearing on whether the wording under Clause 7 of the merger conditions was explicit enough to assure beneficiaries—particularly local content producers—that they are covered under the commitments. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The Competition Tribunal panel also queried Canal+ and Multichoice on the basis for monetary commitments related to local content procurement and HDP participation. However, specific amounts set for this by the merging parties remain confidential, although they explained that these figures were derived from historical and projected expenditure data covering a three-year period. They said they had made financial commitments to reflect average spend based on past and future spending to ensure that support for local content and HDP firms is maintained—not diminished—after the merger. 'To be clear, these are not additional or new commitments—they are meant to safeguard ongoing procurement activity, especially given that there was no certainty these would continue if the merger didn't proceed,' explained the merging parties.' These commitments are part of a broader set of public interest conditions tied to the merger, designed to ensure that local economic development, transformation, and content diversity are not compromised by foreign control of one of Africa's largest media platforms. However Jack Devnarain, veteran actor and chairperson of the South African Guild of Actors, said they didn't have any expectations of Canal+ which was here to 'play the game' in an unregulated industry, which he believes was a 'huge attraction' for them. 'From the actor's point of view, we are always suspicious of mergers such as this because typically, given that we are in an unregulated industry, it means that actors are the last to get any benefit whatsoever from the transaction. 'We are the last to have our rights protected in any way, and we are deeply concerned that while all this content is going to find a new home, that actors are going to be left without new opportunities for work.' Devnarain said that Ideally they would like to engage with Canal+ on various issues like a new contractual agreement in which they can secure commercial exploitation fees in contract, and even if old content is re-versioned and dubbed, that actors will receive some residual income. 'We're not optimistic about that at all, simply because we know Africa, African content, African filmmakers and broadcasters are typically the ones to be exploited when it comes to the arrival of the European or American broadcasters or streamers. The Global North has always sought opportunities to exploit the content opportunities emanating from the Global South and Africa has always been ripe because we are incredibly diverse in our linguistic content, in the cultural content and in the incredible locations that we have.' Devnarain described it as a new form of colonisation where international conglomerates and corporate players from the Global North find wonderful opportunities in the Global South, and again exploit the talent that comes out of South Africa and Africa, without compensating them. The merger between Multichoice and Canal+ will be subject to a restructuring exercise under to ring-fence MultiChoice's licensed broadcasting entity, MultiChoice (Pty) Ltd. This unit will be hived off into a standalone company, LicenseCo in line with local regulatory requirements. After settlement of the merger, the combined group will have no interest or control in LicenseCo. However, details of the this carve-out structure for LicenseCo remain confidential. LicenceCo will be majority-owned by previously disadvantaged and black economic empowerment companies, with MultiChoice Group holding a 49% interest. Canal+ has however previously said that it was still engaging with Phuthima Nathi which has been earmarked to hold a 27% interest in LicenceCo although the board has already given its support for the transaction. Black-owned and managed companies, Identity Partners Itai Consortium and Afrifund Consortium, have also been roped into LicenceCo, bringing 'highly experienced leaders' with 'great commercial and industry' knowledge. Regulators are expected to consider these clarifications as they finalize their decision on whether the merger may proceed under South Africa's competition and public interest laws. The merger awaits final regulatory and competition approvals. Denvnarain said they are concerned that work that was already produced would be dubbed and sold to new markets and the actors not compensated for it. 'Because those rights didn't exist under the MNet or KYKNet agreements, we don't expect that Canal+ is going to come into South Africa and acknowledge rights that our own South African broadcaster refused to give us. So, we don't see the upside as actors unless we are creating new content for the new owners under a new contractual regime where we are able to secure commercial exploitation rights. 'And again, it's unheard of to secure commercial exploitation rights in a contract if your industry itself is an unregulated industry.'
The Citizen
19 hours ago
- The Citizen
How can you save when you use 75% of your income to pay debts?
You would excuse South African consumers for being cynical about saving given that their money runs out before the month does. Most consumers are cynical about National Savings Month in July, asking how they can even begin to think about saving when they spend 75% of their income to repay debts which are usually the result of borrowing just to survive. According to the 2025 1Life Generational Debt Survey, only 41% of employed South Africans manage to save each month and even those who do are often not saving nearly enough to build financial security. A further 36% say they simply do not earn enough to save at all. The situation is just as concerning among middle- to higher-income earners, as DebtBusters reports that individuals earning R5 000 or less are using 75% of their income to service debt. People earning R35 000 or more are not much better off, spending 74% of their income on debt repayments. 'Too many South Africans are overwhelmed by debt and living paycheque to paycheque, but no matter your income level, there are real, practical steps you can take to regain control, build healthier money habits and start working towards long-term financial stability,' Hayley Parry, money coach and facilitator at 1Life's Truth About Money, says. ALSO READ: Savings month: How to save like a millionaire – even if you are not one yet Stop telling consumers they must save and show them how to Tando Ngibe, senior manager at Budget Insurance, says we must move beyond simply telling people to save and start showing them how. 'Budgeting does not have to be complicated. Even small changes can create breathing room and protect you from the financial shocks that so often derail progress. It is about building a new culture of money awareness and resilience.' Insights from the 2025 1Life Generational Debt Survey paint a sobering picture of the nation's financial health: 22% of respondents admit that past financial decisions have left them in debt 34% are carrying inherited debt passed on by previous generations 53% still believe they can build generational wealth, even with a modest income. Separate research from Trading Economics highlights just how strained household budgets are. South Africa's household savings rate dropped to -1.2% in the fourth quarter of 2024 from -1.0% in the third quarter, according to Trading Economics. Parry and Ngibe agree that while the data is sobering, it is not the end of the story. ALSO READ: Savings month: Here's how to build your financial future brick by brick Stop judging consumers for not saving and equip them to Parry says they are not there to judge, but to equip. 'Financial freedom starts with knowledge and consistent action. Even if your starting point is deep in debt, there is always a way forward and platforms like 1Life's Truth About Money, which offers free courses tailored to different life stages, are designed to help South Africans take that first step. 'The choices we make today do not just affect our own futures; they have the power to break cycles of inherited debt and create lasting financial security for the next generation.' Ngibe echoes this sentiment, saying it is time to demystify money. 'Savings Month is not just about setting aside cash but about shifting mindsets, breaking generational cycles and making sure every rand works as hard as you do. With the right tools, support and commitment, financial resilience is possible.' They say this National Savings Month, the message is clear: it is never too early or too late to take back control of your money, and you do not have to do it alone.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
All well and good to ‘Pick ‘n Play', but think about safeguarding football's integrity
Days after Supersport United CEO Stanley Matthews celebrated with coach Andre Arendse after surviving relegation in Pretoria against Golden Arrows, the Tshwane club sold its franchise. Never again will the Matsatsantsa faithful ever see their beloved team in action again. While this practice may be tempting for investors seeking financial gain, it is essential to examine the detrimental effects it has on club identity, community connections, and the integrity of the game itself. A growing trend in the buy-and-sell practice of local club franchises has raised deep concerns. It poses a threat to the integrity of the sport that is woven through the nation's cultural fabric. As football holds significant cultural importance for countless supporters, the ramifications of this trend are substantial, resonating far beyond the pitch. At this time of the year, the landscape of South African football evolves, and not always for the better. Buying and selling Premier Soccer League (PSL) football club franchises has raised concerns about the integrity and stability of the sport. It has the potential to undermine its traditional structures and values. While such transactions can bring financial investment and potentially improve a club's standing, they also introduce risks such as financial instability, and loss of local identity. Loss of identity and community connection Clubs represent more than just teams; they embody the dreams, histories, and cultures of their communities. However, the buying and selling of franchises can severely undermine identity and community connections. Relocations to different cities or name changes often echo the whims of new ownership rather than the traditions that fans hold dear. For instance, when a beloved club is renamed or uprooted from its traditional home, it severs vital ties with its supporter base, alienating those who have stood by the team through thick and thin. Historical legacies are tarnished, rivalries diluted, and the emotional investment of fans is often disregarded. Loyal supporters can find themselves disconnected, leading to dwindling attendance and support for a team which has changed beyond recognition. Prioritising profit over sporting integrity With the potential for rapid financial returns, the acquisition of football clubs can create an environment focused squarely on short-term profits rather than sustainable sporting success. Critically, the Premier Soccer League (PSL) has faced scrutiny for its insufficient vetting of new owners, some questionably stable or motivated solely by financial ambition. This lack of due diligence raises concerns about the long-term viability of clubs linked to owners with a limited understanding of the football landscape. As clubs owned by financially unstable individuals struggle to meet player payments, their on-field performance also suffers, creating a vicious cycle of instability. The focus on quick monetary gains can eclipse the essential areas of long-term development and community engagement that are vital for a club's success. Undermining competition with franchise acquisitions A key tenet of football worldwide is the promotion and relegation system, a mechanism designed to foster competitive balance. However, purchasing a franchise effectively circumvents this structure, allowing less meritocratic routes to higher leagues. As the integrity of sporting merit becomes threatened, clubs might abandon youth investment and strategic planning in favour of simply acquiring a position in a higher tier, distorting the competitive landscape. Addressing the challenges ahead To address these issues and preserve the essence of South African football, several critical steps need to be taken. Firstly, the PSL must strengthen regulations by implementing rigorous vetting procedures for potential club owners, including thorough financial checks and background assessments. Moreover, protecting club identity should be paramount, with restrictions placed on relocations and name changes that adversely affect longstanding supporter bases. Encouraging sustainable ownership and responsible management is equally vital to establishing a landscape that prioritises long-term success over immediate financial benefits. Enhanced fan engagement also plays a crucial role; clubs must build robust relationships with their supporters and actively include them in key decision-making processes. By addressing these urgent issues, South African football can aspire to a more sustainable and competitive future, where clubs are cherished for their sporting achievements and their intrinsic ties to their communities.
