
Coca-Cola Will Get More Expensive if it Changes to Cane Sugar. Here's Why
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to announce that Coca-Cola had agreed to use "REAL Cane Sugar" in its beverages produced in the U.S., adding that this "will be a very good move by them."
The change would fulfill one of the goals of Trump's health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has blamed high intake of fructose corn syrup—the sweetener currently used in U.S. coke—for many of America's health maladies and called the ingredient "just a formula for making you obese and diabetic."
Coca-Cola has not yet explicitly confirmed the change. A spokesperson for the company said in a statement that they "appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand" and that "more details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon."
However, if Trump's post is correct, and the company does indeed plan on switching to cane sugar after decades of sweetening its beverages with high-fructose corn syrup, this could result in significant price increases in the U.S.
Bottles of Coca-Cola are displayed in San Anselmo, California, on April 24, 2023.
Bottles of Coca-Cola are displayed in San Anselmo, California, on April 24, 2023.While cane sugar is still used in many coke variants made overseas, since the 1980s, Coca-Cola sold in the U.S. has primarily relied on corn syrup as a sweetener because of its relative cost-effectiveness.
The U.S. imports both corn and sugar, but its domestic agricultural base has significantly reduced reliance on imports of the former. According to the Observatory of Economic Complexity, the U.S. imported $2.58 billion worth of raw sugar, of which $1.66 billion was cane, compared to only $258 million worth of corn in 2024.
Domestic corn production has been boosted by nearly a century of subsidies in the form of direct payments, crop insurance programs, and price supports for American farmers. These totaled reached $3.2 billion in 2024, making corn the most-subsidized crop in the country.
The ability to largely rely on domestic production has also reduced the effective cost of high-fructose corn syrup, which is mainly produced in the Midwestern U.S., with Iowa and Illinois being major production areas. As a result, America's corn farmers and refiners have already responded negatively to Trump's announcement.
"Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar doesn't make sense. President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit," said Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode. "Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit."
In addition, tariffs and restrictions placed on foreign sugar imports have seen sugar prices in the U.S. surge over the past few years. According to the Sweetener Users Association, U.S. sugar costs have risen from $27.2 per pound in 2013 to $54.1 in 2024, more than double the global rate of $25.7.
These effects are already evident when comparing Coca-Cola made with cane sugar to versions made with corn syrup. A 24-pack of Mexican coke —which uses pure cane sugar—costs $40.69 at Costco, compared with only $25 dollars for the canned, corn-syrup equivalent.
These price differences could increase, given the further tariffs Trump is currently threatening on imports from many of America's main sugar suppliers, such as Brazil and Mexico. In addition, the Department of Agriculture has recently announced further restrictions on the import of "specialty" sugars, such as organic cane, as part of its "farmers first" policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
16 Red States Where Energy Costs Could Go Up the Most Under Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill'
President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB) was signed into law on July 4. The final legislation has significant repercussions for energy. It includes policies that will increase oil and gas leasing and repeal clean energy tax credits. Wholesale electricity prices are expected to increase 25% by 2030 and 74% by 2035. Electricity rates paid by consumers are expected to increase between 9% and 18% and household energy costs are anticipated to go up $170 annually by 2035. Find Out: Read Next: Red states could be hit harder by rising energy costs than blue states chiefly because Republican-led states generally don't have their own policies to develop renewable energy in the way that Democrat-led states do. A new analysis by the Energy Innovation Policy & Technology, LLC found the 16 red states that will see the biggest annual increases to household energy costs by 2035 as a result of the OBBB. 16. Wisconsin Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$300 Learn More: 12. Utah Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$320 12. Nevada Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$320 12. Michigan Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$320 12. Indiana Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$340 11. Iowa Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$350 10. Kansas Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$380 8. Florida Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$430 8. Arkansas Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$430 7. Louisiana Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$440 6. Texas Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$480 5. North Carolina Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$490 4. Oklahoma Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$540 2. South Carolina Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$630 2. Kentucky Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$630 1. Missouri Annual energy cost increase per household by 2035: +$640 More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on 16 Red States Where Energy Costs Could Go Up the Most Under Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CCSC Technology International Holdings Full Year 2025 Earnings: US$0.12 loss per share (vs US$0.13 loss in FY 2024)
CCSC Technology International Holdings (NASDAQ:CCTG) Full Year 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$17.6m (up 20% from FY 2024). Net loss: US$1.41m (loss widened by 8.9% from FY 2024). US$0.12 loss per share. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period CCSC Technology International Holdings shares are up 3.7% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before we wrap up, we've discovered 2 warning signs for CCSC Technology International Holdings (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Western aid cuts cede ground to China in Southeast Asia: study
China is set to expand its influence over Southeast Asia's development as the Trump administration and other Western donors slash aid, a study by an Australian think tank said Sunday. The region is in an "uncertain moment", facing cuts in official development finance from the West as well as "especially punitive" US trade tariffs, the Sydney-based Lowy Institute said. "Declining Western aid risks ceding a greater role to China, though other Asian donors will also gain in importance," it said. Total official development finance to Southeast Asia -- including grants, low-rate loans and other loans -- grew "modestly" to US$29 billion in 2023, the annual report said. But US President Donald Trump has since halted about US$60 billion in development assistance -- most of the United States' overseas aid programme. Seven European countries -- including France and Germany -- and the European Union have announced US$17.2 billion in aid cuts to be implemented between 2025 and 2029, it said. And the United Kingdom has said it is reducing annual aid by US$7.6 billion, redirecting government money towards defence. Based on recent announcements, overall official development finance to Southeast Asia will fall by more than US$2 billion by 2026, the study projected. "These cuts will hit Southeast Asia hard," it said. "Poorer countries and social sector priorities such as health, education, and civil society support that rely on bilateral aid funding are likely to lose out the most." Higher-income countries already capture most of the region's official development finance, said the institute's Southeast Asia Aid Map report. Poorer countries such as East Timor, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar are being left behind, creating a deepening divide that could undermine long-term stability, equity and resilience, it warned. Despite substantial economic development across most of Southeast Asia, around 86 million people still live on less than US$3.65 a day, it said. - 'Global concern' - "The centre of gravity in Southeast Asia's development finance landscape looks set to drift East, notably to Beijing but also Tokyo and Seoul," the study said. As trade ties with the United States have weakened, Southeast Asian countries' development options could shrink, it said, leaving them with less leverage to negotiate favourable terms with Beijing. "China's relative importance as a development actor in the region will rise as Western development support recedes," it said. Beijing's development finance to the region rose by US$1.6 billion to US$4.9 billion in 2023 -- mostly through big infrastructure projects such as rail links in Indonesia and Malaysia, the report said. At the same time, China's infrastructure commitments to Southeast Asia surged fourfold to almost US$10 billion, largely due to the revival of the Kyaukphyu Deep Sea Port project in Myanmar. By contrast, Western alternative infrastructure projects had failed to materialise in recent years, the study said. "Similarly, Western promises to support the region's clean energy transition have yet to translate into more projects on the ground -- of global concern given coal-dependent Southeast Asia is a major source of rapidly growing carbon emissions." djw/dgi/dhw/rsc Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data