logo
Fragmenting A Nation: Israel's Enduring Pursuit Of Palestinian Disunity

Fragmenting A Nation: Israel's Enduring Pursuit Of Palestinian Disunity

Scoop17-07-2025
Israel is aggressively implementing plans to shape Palestine's future and the broader region, sculpting its vision for the 'day after' its genocide in Gaza.
The latest, bizarre iteration of this strategy proposes fragmenting the occupied West Bank into so-called 'emirates,' starting with the 'emirate of Hebron.'
This unexpected twist in Israel's protracted search for alternative Palestinian leadership first surfaced in the staunchly pro-Israeli US newspaper, the Wall Street Journal. It then quickly dominated all Israeli media.
The report details a letter from a person identified by the WSJ as "the leader of Hebron's most influential clan." Addressed to Nir Barakat, Jerusalem's former Israeli mayor, the letter from Sheikh Wadee' al-Jaabari appeals for "cooperation with Israel" in the name of "co-existence."
This "co-existence," according to the "clan leader", would materialize in the "Emirate of Hebron." This "emirate" would "recognize the State of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people," in exchange for reciprocal recognition of the "Emirate of Hebron as the Representative of the Arab residents in the Hebron District."
The story may seem perplexing. This is because Palestinian discourse, regardless of geography or political affiliation, has never entertained such an absurd concept as united West Bank 'emirates.'
Another element of absurdity is that Palestinian national identity and pride in their people's unwavering resilience, especially in Gaza, are at an unprecedented apex. To float such clan-based alternatives to legitimate Palestinian leadership seems ill-conceived and is destined to fail.
Israel's desperation is palpable. In Gaza, it cannot defeat Hamas and other Palestinian factions who have resisted the Israeli takeover of the Strip for 21 months. All attempts to engineer an alternative Palestinian leadership there have utterly collapsed.
This failure has compelled Israel to arm and fund a criminal gang that operated before October 7, 2023, in Gaza. This gang functions under the command of Yasser Abu Shabab.
The gang has been implicated in a litany of violent activities. These include hijacking humanitarian aid to perpetuate famine in Gaza and orchestrating violence associated with aid distribution, among other egregious crimes.
Like the clan leader of Hebron, the Abu Shabab criminal gang possesses no legitimacy and no public support among Palestinians. But why would Israel resort to such disreputable figures when the Palestinian Authority (PA), already engaged in "security coordination" with Israel in the West Bank, is ostensibly willing to comply?
The answer lies in the current Israeli extremist government's adamant refusal to acknowledge Palestinians as a nation. Thus, even a collaborating Palestinian nationalist entity would be deemed problematic from an Israeli perspective.
While Benjamin Netanyahu's government is not the first Israeli leadership to explore clan-based alternatives among Palestinians, the Israeli prime minister and his extremist allies are exceptionally determined to dismantle any Palestinian claim to nationhood. This was explicitly stated by extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. He famously declared in Paris, in March 2023, that a Palestinian nation is an "invention."
Thus, despite the PA's willingness to cooperate with Israel in controlling Gaza, Israel remains apprehensive. Empowering the PA as a nationalist model fundamentally contravenes Israel's overarching objectives of denying the Palestinian people their very claim to nationhood and, consequently, statehood and sovereignty.
Though Israel has consistently failed to establish and sustain its own alternative Palestinian leadership, its repeated efforts have invariably proven disruptive and violent.
Prior to the Nakba of 1948, the Zionist movement, alongside British authorities colonizing Palestine, heavily invested in undermining the Arab Higher Committee, anationalist body comprising several political parties. They achieved this by empowering collaborating clans, hoping to dilute the Palestinian nationalist movement.
When Israel occupied the remainder of historic Palestine in 1967, it reverted to the same divide-and-conquer tactics. For instance, it established a Palestinian police force directly commanded by Israeli military administrations, in addition to creating an underground network of collaborators.
Following the overwhelming victory of nationalist candidates in the 1976 elections in occupied Palestine, Israel responded by cracking down on PLO-affiliated politicians, arresting, deporting and assassinating some.
Two years later, in 1978, it launched its 'Village Leagues' project. It hand-picked compliant traditional figures, designating them as the legitimate representatives of Palestinians.
These individuals, armed, protected and financed by the Israeli occupation army, were positioned to represent their respective clans in Hebron, Bethlehem, Ramallah, Gaza and elsewhere.
Palestinians immediately denounced them as collaborators. They were widely boycotted and socially ostracized.
Eventually, it became evident that Israel had no alternative but to engage directly with the PLO. This culminated in the Oslo Accords in 1993 and the subsequent formation of the PA.
The fundamental problem, however, persisted: the PA's insistence on a Palestinian state remains anathema to an Israel that has shifted dramatically to the right.
This explains Netanyahu's government's unwavering insistence that the PA has no role in Gaza in any 'day after' scenario. While the PA could serve Israel's interest in containing the rebellious Strip, such a triumph would inevitably recenter the discussion of a Palestinian state—a concept repugnant to most Israelis.
There is no doubt that neither the Abu Shabab gang nor the Hebron emirate will govern Palestinians, either in Gaza or the West Bank. Israel's insistence on fabricating these alternatives, however, underscores its historic determination to deny Palestinians any sense of nationhood.
Israel's persistent fantasies of control invariably fail. Despite their profound wounds, Palestinians are more unified than ever, their collective identity and nationhood hardened by relentless resistance and countless sacrifices.
- Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The lasting legacy of the situation in Gaza
The lasting legacy of the situation in Gaza

RNZ News

time3 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The lasting legacy of the situation in Gaza

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently holding a meeting of his security cabinet to discuss plans to take over all of the Gaza Strip. The Israeli Defence Force has just told people in Gaza City to leave two an interview with Fox News, Mr Netanyahu says Israeli control is not the long-term goal, and that Israel will hand over Gaza to Arab forces once Hamas has been removed. Aid agencies say escalating military operations in Gaza City would be "devastating". Meanwhile families and supporters of the hostages being held in Gaza have chained themselves together outside Benjamin Netanyahu's office, saying his latest comments are a death sentence for their loved ones. Ilan Noy is an a leading academic in the economics of disasters - at Victoria University in Wellington. He holds dual Israel and New Zealand citizenship - and says the impacts of the disaster in Gaza will be felt for generations to come, including in his own family.

Opinion: Palestinian recognition isn't a reward. It's a rescue plan – British High Commissioner Iona Thomas
Opinion: Palestinian recognition isn't a reward. It's a rescue plan – British High Commissioner Iona Thomas

NZ Herald

time7 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Opinion: Palestinian recognition isn't a reward. It's a rescue plan – British High Commissioner Iona Thomas

The devastation in Gaza is undeniable and unrelenting. In the words of Starmer, 'the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza are all indefensible'. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has suspended arms exports to Israel and increased humanitarian aid. Photo / Getty Images This is not to deny the horrific nature of the October 7 attack by Hamas. And the UK is clear that Hamas must never be rewarded. We call on Hamas to immediately release all the hostages, commit to disarmament and accept it will play no part in the Government of Gaza. The UK's support for Israel's right to exist and defend itself is unwavering. But Israel has an obligation to uphold the rights and dignity of Palestinians. There is no contradiction between support for Israel's security and support for Palestinian statehood. Recognition of a Palestinian state, in this context, is not about blame or rewarding one side over another. It's about restoring balance. It's about ensuring that any path forward includes the rights, futures and dignity of both peoples. In practical terms, the UK has taken action to address the current crisis: we have suspended arms exports to Israel, sanctioned Israeli ministers and violent settlers, frozen trade talks and increased humanitarian aid. Now, recognition of Palestine joins that list, as part of a wider strategy, not a moment in isolation. For decades, the international community, including New Zealand, has reiterated its commitment to two states living side by side. UN resolutions, from 242 (1967) to 2334 (2016), are the accumulated conviction of a world that wants peace but sees it slipping further away. Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said plainly that the Israeli Government's outright rejection of a two-state solution is 'morally and strategically wrong'. Shutting down the only path that can deliver both peace and legitimacy, it both harms Palestinians and undermines the long-term interests of Israelis. Recognition alone won't resolve the crisis. But it signals a shift: away from waiting for perfect conditions and toward using diplomacy as an active lever. It puts pressure on all parties, Israel, Hamas and others, to return to the negotiating table. The UK has made clear that no party can hold a veto over our recognition. Both Hamas and the Israeli Government will be judged on whether they meet clear conditions: ceasefire, humanitarian access, a political horizon. It's a firm but balanced approach, one aimed at preserving the viability of the only solution that offers dignity, peace and security, not only today but for a future that is different from the last years. New Zealand and the UK have long supported a rules-based international order. We speak often about justice, peace and multilateralism. We have backed UN resolutions affirming Palestinian self-determination, supported UNRWA, and consistently called for aid access and de-escalation. New Zealand and the UK have consistently supported international law, justice and peace through backing UN resolutions, aid access and multilateral efforts. Photo / RNZ The UK's position now invites others to reflect. As the conflict deepens and the humanitarian crisis worsens, how can countries like ours use our voice, reputation and diplomacy to stop this war from extinguishing the last chance for peace? There are no simple answers. But there is a clear direction: towards action that supports civilian life, international law and the promise of a two-state future. In closing his address to the UN, the Foreign Secretary said: 'The hand of history is on our shoulders.' These words were not poetic hyperbole, but a reminder of responsibility. The two-state solution is not dead yet but finds itself in critical condition. What happens now will decide whether it survives. Recognition won't fix everything. But alongside co-ordinated efforts, aid delivery, a ceasefire, diplomacy and accountability, it can help shift the balance towards justice and survival. This is not about choosing sides. It's about people, hostages still held, children starving and trust eroded on all sides. Diplomacy in these times of instability is when our principles as diplomats are put to the test. The UK is determined to work towards a lasting peace. Staying engaged, clear-eyed and committed to a peaceful outcome may be the most important contribution we can make.

Will NZ move with the tide over Gaza?
Will NZ move with the tide over Gaza?

Newsroom

time8 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Will NZ move with the tide over Gaza?

Nearly two years after the Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel and the beginning of Israel's military response in Gaza, response from both inside and outside Israel suggests public opinion may be shifting. 'I think the images of emaciated children, the accounts that we've had from families of what they've been going through in terms of the near-famine that is affecting parts of Gaza, I think has had a very, very strong effect,' says BBC's Middle East regional editor, Sebastian Usher. 'I think it's had a big effect on public opinion in the West, and we talk about the West because it's the West that essentially is seen as closest to Israel.' This has come to a head in the past few weeks, with leaders of France, the UK and Canada announcing they will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The shift also seems to be happening within Israel itself, where media has reported on polls showing upwards of 74 percent of Israelis would favour ending the war in exchange for the return of the hostages. In an open letter this week, some 600 former Israeli security officials asked US President Donald Trump to pressure Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to end the war. Meanwhile, overnight Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with his security cabinet to discuss a plan to scale up the military invasion of Gaza. 'What we've been seeing is a sense from people who've had the highest positions in the Israeli military, in Mossad, the security agencies, an ex-prime minister, ex-ministers – people who've been major players in Israel politically as part of the elite of the establishment for decades – coming out and saying that the war should end because there's no point to it anymore, it's not achieving anything anymore,' says Usher. But here in New Zealand, Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth says it's a bit harder to pick apart where our Government stands. 'I think it's actually difficult to discern a clear policy and I think for a long time it has tried to stay out of it and not make any comments critical of Israel,' she says. 'In the early statements after the original Hamas attack in October 2023, New Zealand was rightly quick to condemn Hamas' actions, but also called for peace, sent humanitarian aid to the agencies that were then still working and able to work in Gaza. 'From that moment on, New Zealand took very much a 'softly softly' approach, although if you trace through the statements and the voting patterns across the general assembly for New Zealand we did call for peace, we did lament the humanitarian situation.' Last week, New Zealand, along with 27 other countries, issued a humanitarian statement calling for an immediate end to the war, which Dunworth says is the first time we've seen something like this from the 'global north'. This week, Newsroom reported that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade dispatched close to $8 million in aid to Gaza at the end of June – the first funding for the crisis in six months. The Government didn't announce the aid formally, unlike in the past six rounds of funding to the region. This comes after reports of what the UN is calling 'catastrophic hunger' in Gaza, with a third of the population going days at a time without food. Since May, the UN says more than 1000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking aid, and according to the Gaza Health Ministry, 63 people starved to death last month alone. In today's episode of The Detail, Usher gives explanation and analysis of the current situation in Gaza, and Dunworth describes the steps that New Zealand could take in response. Dunworth says New Zealand could impose a trade embargo on Israel, change our immigration regulations to mirror the 'fast track' we have for Ukrainians, and look at the way we share intelligence through the Five Eyes system, 'because it is well understood that the United States is sharing intelligence with Israel … and through our involvement with the Five Eyes, all of the intelligence that we gather up from this region is shared automatically with the United States authorities.' While she doesn't think recognising a Palestinian state is, in and of itself, going to make a big difference, she does 'think it's an important symbolic move'. 'Next month the General Assembly is going to meet and the Gaza situation is on its agenda and there is still time for New Zealand to start to engage proactively and ambitiously. 'We could not just arrive in the General Assembly and go along with whatever's happening, but we could proactively shape the contours of that debate.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store