
The Celebrity Traitors 'confirmed' cast salaries make me feel incredibly uneasy
When the cast of the first-ever celebrity edition of Claudia Winkleman's cloak and dagger reality series, The Traitors, was announced in May, no one could quite believe what they were reading.
Months later, I'll still be going about my day and remember Sir Stephen Fry, Jonathan Ross, Charlotte Church, and Clare Balding will be gallivanting around a Scottish castle together and I'm thankful I'm alive to see it.
The full line-up is astonishing, an incredible feat for Studio Lambert, which is the production company behind the show, which is currently at the top of its game. They also do Race Across The World, arguably the second-biggest reality TV series in the UK right now.
In theory, I always imagined there would be a stream of A-list talent queuing up to take part in the first ever Celebrity Traitors.
But still, it felt like a miracle they managed to pull off what must be the best line-up in celebrity reality television history.
Now that miracle seems even more unreal.
We don't have a fixed release date yet, but Celebrity Traitors is coming to BBC One and BBC iPlayer this autumn. We'll update you when we know more! Comedian Alan Carr Singer and songwriter Cat Burns Actor Celia Imrie Singer Charlotte Church Broadcaster Clare Balding Historian David Olusoga Former England rugby player Joe Marler Comedian Joe Wilkinson Presenter Jonathan Ross Good Morning Britain presenter Kate Garraway Comedian Lucy Beaumont Actor Mark Bonnar Actor and comedian Nick Mohammed Content creator Niko Omilana Singer and songwriter Paloma Faith Actor Ruth Codd Actor and presenter Stephen Fry Actor and comedian Tameka Empson Former professional diver Tom Daley
The prize money for winning Celebrity Traitors will be £100,000, which will go the the charity of the winner's choosing.
On Tuesday's episode of The Rest Is Entertainment podcast, host Marina Hyde reported that every single star taking part will be paid a flat rate of £40,000.
According to Hyde's sources, Sir Stephen Fry – by far the show's biggest booking – will receive exactly the same fee as actress Ruth Codd, best known for starring in Netflix's 2022 series The Midnight Club.
Want to get all the latest news and predictions for the best and most dramatic show this new year? Join our The Traitors WhatsApp channel for live episode coverage, behind-the-scenes gossip and a place to recover from all the cliffhangers.
Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications!
This is despite the former easily being the biggest draw for audiences, likely to even lure in viewers who have never seen The Traitors.
Everyone is playing the same game, has made the same commitment, and will be valued in exactly the same way.
My immediate reaction is that I'm uncomfortable – but let me get to the positives first.
A flat-rate – if true – is a big equaliser, meaning no big egos to match.
More often than not, the highest-paid 'talent' on reality TV can be a car-crash.
Just this year, Mickey Rourke was said to have been paid £500,000 to be confined to a compound with the likes of Jojo Siwa and former Conservative MP Michael Fabricant in Celebrity Big Brother. He lasted less than a week and had to be removed from the house for 'unacceptable behaviour'.
In 2023, Nigel Farage was reportedly paid £1.5 million for I'm A Celebrity. Sure, he ended up coming third, but his appearance in the jungle alone threatened to tarnish the show for good.
So a flat rate for the Celebrity Traitors season would genuinely be a very welcome shift in direction.
Still, it sits uncomfortably with me that some of The Celebrity Traitors cast are being paid at all, especially when it's being pitched as a game for charity — with a maximum of £100,000 being donated to the winner's chosen cause.
In total, the cast is reportedly being paid £760,000 – that's £660,000 more than the money that can possibly be raised for the charity or charities who benefit from a winning celebrity.
Should three faithful come out on top at the end, the flat £40,000 rate would mean they've individually been paid more than they've raised for their charity, which feels disingenuous and actually quite vulgar.
It's been reported previously that The Traitors contestants in the regular civilian seasons are only compensated for their time at a rate of around £100 a day, unless they win the eventual prize.
As evidenced by the emotional stories of why they want to win, it's clear many of them likely need it a lot more than the cast playing the celebrity version.
Granted, it's a life-changing experience: Minah Shannon, the true hero of season 3, has just gone on to land a slot on BBC Radio 1, while Alexander Dragonetti hosted his own Friday night series on Classic FM.
Many contestants make a quick buck through endorsements, appearances, and a substantial boost in social media followers, but they can give up their jobs and are only paid lost wages during filming.
Yes, they have the chance to walk away with a huge amount of money – but when split between other Faithfuls, it's roughly the same as the celebrities who are being paid anyway.
Of course, I appreciate some of the celebrity line-up will have had to move projects or even drop projects to make it work. I'm also sure playing The Traitors for two weeks isn't always the jolly it appears to be on TV.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
And I have no doubt some of the cast will donate their fee to the charity of their choice anyway. Sir Stephen Fry and Jonathan Ross are worth tens of millions and have done plenty of charity work for free – I'd be amazed and honestly very disappointed if they actually took any of their fee home with them.
For other names on the bill, the rumoured £40,000 probably means a lot more. Charlotte Church recently admitted she blew her £25million fortune and says she is 'no longer a millionaire'. I mean, yes, join the club – but also £40,000 is a lot of money to anyone who isn't rolling in it.
Admittedly, it's naïve of me to think the cast won't have been paid at all or that celebrities don't lend their name and the value it has to campaigns and charities without making a few bob. But it does make me uncomfortable.
I'm A Celebrity doesn't donate any prize money to charity, which isn't exactly more honourable, but at least there's no pretence.
The stars on that show are very open about taking part for the money and there's nothing wrong with that. I'd want six-figures too to spend a day with Nigel Farage, let alone three weeks.
So what's the solution? The cast signs up without pay? I'm sure Studio Lambert could have found an all-star cast of talent that would genuinely want to take part for the love of the game and their charity without being paid a dime. More Trending
But perhaps I'd feel more comfortable if the prize to the charity was guaranteed to be larger than the pay to the celebrity.
The format of The Traitors is unbeatable. Combined with the star power of this line-up, I can't imagine anything else will be as popular on television this year. I can't even think of anything, at least in entertainment, that will come close.
If the show's going to fork out the cash on celebs to take part, then maybe it should also be willing to double the prize pot, bringing in some real jeopardy for the celebs so you'd make a better – and fairer – show.
View More »
Metro approached the BBC and Studio Lambert who both declined to comment
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: I've heard enough words – I want more Government action on Israel-Palestine
MORE: BBC confirms decision on MasterChef series filmed with John Torode and Gregg Wallace
MORE: EastEnders fans 'obsessed' as Walford legend returns to TV screens
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
5 minutes ago
- Metro
Disturbing scenes in early EastEnders release as Joel sinks to new lows
This article contains spoilers for tonight's episode of EastEnders, which airs at 7.30pm on BBC One or can be streamed now on iPlayer. Joel Marshall (Max Murray) has spiralled out of control – and dad Ross (Alex Walkinshaw) has enabled it. The teen has now chosen to target a neighbour after another troubling week. As viewers have seen, Joel discovered that his mum Cleo – who he previously branded a 'slapper' – was getting remarried. He seemed to take the news well, but later headed to The Vic to steal booze with his mate Tommy Moon (Sonny Kendall). When they were caught, he began to tear strips off Tommy's mum Kat (Jessie Wallace), and Ross had to drag him out of the pub. Back at home, he decided to allow his dad into his inner circle, showing him a worrying video from a sexist and misogynistic influencer who he clearly was inspired by. When Joel wandered off into the kitchen, Ross decided to delve deeper into his files and noticed that he'd shared countless videos of girls being upskirted or filmed without their knowledge online. Ross snapped, and threw the laptop into the sink before branding his son a 'disgusting little pervert.' In today's episode, Vicki Fowler (Alice Haig) questioned why the device had been waterlogged, and why Ross didn't want Joel to work with him at the timber yard. Outside on Bridge Street, Joel begged Peter Beale (Thomas Law) to give him work, clearly desperate to get some money in his pocket to buy a new laptop. Vicki questioned her partner once again, and he finally came clean about what he'd found. She was disgusted, and told him that it was about time he set the vile youngster onto the straight and narrow. Joel apologised to Kat, and while hanging out with Tommy again, noticed that Vicki was downing drinks with Stacey Slater (Lacey Turner) at the bar. The two were discussing recent events, and Stace' spoke of her own mistreatment at the hands of various men in her life. Joel lashed out again in a public display of hatred, demanding that Vicki go home and make his evening meal and degrading Stacey. Kat ordered the boys back upstairs, where Tommy leapt to the defence of his family, explaining that Stacey had once been stalked as a result of using the platform SecretCam. That clearly gave Joel food for thought… As viewers will recall, Freddie Slater (Bobby Brazier) introduced Stacey to the OnlyFans dupe when she was looking for a way to make some quick cash. Under the username IceSKater95, she uploaded feet pictures to the site to pay off her bills and a loan shark. Her uploads became more risqué at the request of a subscriber, who she later realised was Walford High teacher Theo Hawthorne (William Ellis). He subsequently stalked Stacey, attempting to rape her and was handed a 10 year stretch in prison. Inspired by Tommy's story, he headed downstairs and referred to Stacey by her username, branding her a 'dirty little prostitute'. He then brought up daughter Lily Slater (Lillia Turner), saying that she is a 'sket' because she fell pregnant with Ricky Branning's (Frankie Day) baby when she was 12 years old. Stacey was furious, and as Ross stepped into the bar, she slapped Joel across the face. Want to be the first to hear shocking EastEnders spoilers? Who's leaving Coronation Street? The latest gossip from Emmerdale? Join 10,000 soaps fans on Metro's WhatsApp Soaps community and get access to spoiler galleries, must-watch videos, and exclusive interviews. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications so you can see when we've just dropped the latest spoilers! In a serious case of déjà vu, Ross marched him back across the road for another confrontation. Boosted by some advice from Harvey Monroe (Ross Boatman) about parenting, he told Joel that some things are better left unsaid – even if it is how you feel. More Trending He also demanded that if he felt compelled to view such shocking content online in future, he should turn to him for support. Then, to make matters a lot worse, he presented Joel with a new laptop that he could use to study ahead of his return to Walford High in September. Ross clearly thought that by putting trust in him, his behaviour would change. View More » Of course, it hasn't. When Ross left the room, Joel loaded up Stacey's SecretCam page. MORE: All EastEnders spoilers for next week as character reported to the police MORE: EastEnders fans 'work out' twist after major fan theory is seemingly ruled out MORE: All 44 EastEnders pictures for next week as Ross makes shocking discovery


Metro
5 minutes ago
- Metro
I am baffled by the hype for this goofy horror film
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Zach Cregger's film Weapons is getting rave reviews, and while it's a fun watch, you might leave feeling a little short-changed. What happens to a town when one day 17 children go missing in the middle of the night, fleeing their homes to never return again? This is the premise of Cregger's movie Weapons, starring Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Benedict Wong, Austin Abrams, and Alden Ehrenreich as townspeople in Maybrook, where this tragedy has taken place. Following the release of his 2022 debut film Barbarian, expectations for this film have been high as Cregger has come in hot with a bigger budget and bigger ambitions in this two-hour and eight-minute long project. The horror film has had impeccable marketing and was even part of a Hollywood bidding war as producers were desperate to get their hands on the movie – only amping up the anticipation for fans. Even teasers for the movie were praised as 'the creepiest trailer in years'. And, as reviews for the film begin trickling in, it has been lauded as a must-watch of 2025, and boasts a 100% Rotten Tomatoes ranking. But I for one am baffled. The horror pied piper-esque movie aims to terrify and amuse, blending humour and dark horror in what is supposed to be a discomforting but entertaining watch. And yes, although there are some solid, funny moments, often the humour undercuts the tension and the high stakes of a scene. Rather than feeling frightened or relieved after a tense scene, instead I'm confused and a little bit deflated as the horror became laughable and the tension building up from the scene dissipated without reaching its full capability. The key villain in this tale is at some points like a formidable presence and at others a clownish, goofy caricature. The inconsistency in their portrayal, along with the frequent jarring changes in tone, leads to narrative whiplash. But, that's not to say that it isn't capable of producing fear. Zach Cregger Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Alden Ehrenreich, Benedict Wong, Austin Abrams, Amy Madigan, Cary Christopher. 18, strong bloody violence, gore. 2hr 8mins August 8, 2025 There is some excellent foreshadowing, good horror references, and a healthy inclusion of truly grotesque or fear-inducing moments that will have you really spooked. Memorable scenes include using a potato peeler as a rather ruthless weapon, and a bloody head butt that is guaranteed to stay with you. Told from five different perspectives, Weapons showcases the best and worst of human nature. Garner particularly shines as the missing schoolchildren's teacher, Justine Gandy, who slips into alcoholism as worried parents – including Archer Graff played by Brolin – point the finger at her for their children's disappearance. The multithreaded storytelling is an effective tool in this movie, keeping the pace while gently unveiling major plot points and amping up the gore and supernatural elements of this story. The performances across the board are strong, with the believable portrayals mopping up some of the more far-fetched elements of the story. Based on an original concept, Weapons is most certainly going to appeal to those looking to enjoy some well-executed horror. The jump scares are pitch-perfect, and the film avoids some of the more clichéd elements of the genre. For horror fans, the real question is: 'Is it better than Barbarian?' The short answer to that is no. More Trending Barbarian left audiences chilled to their core with a fresh, elevated story, and while Weapons is by no means a poor follow-up, it's not quite hitting the mark. But fans of Cregger will enjoy some fun cameos from his previous film in a cheeky wink to his fanbase. The movie is a fun watch, with strong characters and a gripping story that will keep you hooked for the rather long runtime, but if you go in expecting perfection that other reviews have promised thus far, expect to be disappointed. An enjoyable, well-executed horror that loses its tone at points, but nonetheless makes for a gripping and original film that you won't regret watching on the big screen. Weapons is in cinemas on August 8. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Francis Ford Coppola, 86, shares update after being 'rushed to hospital' MORE: Original Naked Gun director reveals why he's refusing to watch the new remake MORE: I never expected to love Disney nostalgia bait sequel Freakier Friday


The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
'I cook with an ancient Orkney grain dating back to the Neolithic'
(Read more: A new take on Scottish produce at Michelin Guide Edinburgh restaurant) On the menu, you'll find dishes such as gooseberry mackerel ceviche with pumpkin seed milk and smoked creme fraiche, smoked venison, white carrot and Douglas fir pyu-re, and bere 'risotto' with chicken of the woods and clava. The restaurant was recently added to the Michelin Guide, with inspectors praising the team's "pure, natural dishes that chime with the dining room's pared-back aesthetic". This week, Pinder answers our newly revamped Chef's Q&A. When did you realise that you wanted to be a chef? From when I was 10 years old. When my dad ran the kitchen in the Dorchester, I used to love popping in. I was mesmerised by the whole thing; from the military style to the search for perfection and most of all, the buzz. What was your first kitchen job like? I was a kitchen porter and I learned a lot. I pushed hard at my tasks and learned to cook as well. It helped shape my entire career. What does 'good food' mean to you? Food cooked with love and a built-in respect for ingredients. Seasonality and locality are equally important. Can you share a memory of your worst kitchen disaster? I accidentally dropped 20 whole pigeons when I worked at Le Manoir aux Quat'Saisons. They had just been seared in the oven, and I slipped. That meant we had no pigeons to serve at the PDR event we were hosting. I had to go and apologise, then rapidly help break down some ducks… Where is your favourite place to eat out? There are so many at the moment, but The Little Chartroom has always been a favourite of mine. Great price for the quality. It just gets better every time. What is the best thing you've cooked recently? Beremeal. It seems like a crazy choice, but as Scottish ingredients go, it is unbelievable. I have always loved barley, but this is on another level. A fantastic product from Orkney, and it dates back to the Neolithic period. What do you think is the biggest misconception people have about working in a professional kitchen? People think that kitchens are aggressive or hot and sweaty all the time. They also think it is long hours and non-stop. These things can be true, but if done correctly, this is not the case. If you weren't a chef, what do you think you'd be doing with your life? I would be a dog trainer. I actually have some qualifications, and I have had experience in it. What is one ingredient or kitchen tool that you think everyone should have handy at home? Katy Rodgers crème fraîche. A fantastic Scottish product that will rival even the best in France, in my opinion. What has been the one highlight that stands out in your career so far? Helping to open Moss and seeing our customers leave happy. A lot of blood, sweat and tears, but we have a passionate team and we are off to a great start.