logo
AUB Holds Panel Discussion on the Reform of Governance in Saudi Arabia

AUB Holds Panel Discussion on the Reform of Governance in Saudi Arabia

Web Release17-07-2025
The Good Governance and Citizenship Observatory (GGCO) at the Asfari Institute for Civil Society and Citizenship at the American University of Beirut (AUB) hosted a panel discussion titled 'Hawkama and Vision 2030: The Reform of Governance in Saudi Arabia.' The event featured Professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University Bernard Haykel, a leading expert on the Gulf and Middle East. The conversation explored how institutional reform and regulatory change are advancing transparency, accountability, and sustainable development as part of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's broader transformation agenda.
The panel drew a distinguished audience, including Saudi Ambassador to Lebanon Dr. Waleed Al-Bukhari; Spanish Ambassador to Lebanon Jesús Santos Aguado; Mexican Ambassador to Lebanon Francisco Romero Bock; Dr. Fadi Makki, Lebanon's minister of state for administrative reform; and former ministers. Also in attendance were Dr. Fadlo Khuri, AUB president; Dr. Zaher Dawy, AUB provost; as well as university deans, senior administrators, and faculty members.
Director of the Asfari Institute Lina Abou-Habib opened the event by welcoming the attendees and highlighting the significance and timeliness of the discussion, describing it as 'within the mandate of the institute, to discuss prospects, trends, and emerging initiatives that influence governance structures in the Arab region, particularly at this incredibly important moment of transition and instability.'
Dr. Simon Kachar, GGCO founding and current director, and lecturer in political science at AUB, followed with opening remarks that placed the discussion in a broader regional and institutional context. 'In an era marked by rapid transformations and evolving global dynamics, understanding the nuances of governance reform becomes paramount,' he said. 'Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 represents an ambitious and far-reaching blueprint for economic diversification and social change, and at its very core lies the fundamental pillar of governance.'
Kachar noted that the GGCO was established to foster critical thinking, encourage informed dialogue, and advance knowledge on good governance and active citizenship within Arab contexts. 'We believe that genuine progress and sustainable development are linked to transparent, accountable, and inclusive governance structures,' he added.
He emphasized that the panel provided an opportunity to examine how Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 is being translated into practice and how governance reforms are reshaping institutions. 'Saudi Arabia is positioning itself as a forward-looking nation, globally integrated and domestically resilient,' he said.
Dr. Fadlo Khuri, AUB president, then delivered his welcoming remarks, highlighting the panel's regional and global relevance. 'Questions like how Vision 2030 is shaping Saudi Arabia in the region are extremely germane to what's happening in Lebanon and the entire region,' he said. He added that understanding what is happening in Saudi Arabia is essential—not only for neighboring countries, but for the international community as a whole. 'Saudi Arabia is a global concern,' he noted.
He went on to commend the event's keynote guest, Professor Haykel, for his academic depth and candid insight. 'I feel fortunate that today at AUB, we have arguably the most insightful expert—and also one of the most honest experts in the region. Not just academically qualified, but more than happy to share careful observations from a place of objectivity and great knowledge,' Khuri added.
The panel discussion was moderated by Dr. Tania Haddad, associate professor of public administration and nonprofit management at AUB and member of the GGCO Steering Committee. She opened by framing the scope of the conversation: 'Over the past decade, the kingdom has undertaken one of the most ambitious state-led transformation agendas in the region. Anchored in Vision 2030, these reforms span economic diversification, bureaucratic modernization, social liberalization, and institutional restructuring. This panel aims to critically examine the governance dimensions of these reforms, including their origins, mechanisms, and implications.'
Haddad then introduced Professor Haykel as a prominent scholar of the Arabian Peninsula, whose work focuses on the politics, economics, and history of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries and Yemen, and 'has critically engaged with questions of state reform, institutional change, and governance in the kingdom.'
The discussion unfolded as a moderated, in-depth exchange, structured around four key themes central to understanding Saudi Arabia's governance reform trajectory. It began by examining the driving forces behind the reform agenda. Haykel traced the impetus to a growing realization among Saudi leadership—and increasingly, among the public—that the previous system of governance had become unsustainable.
'The driver for reform in Saudi Arabia is a sense that exists among the leadership—but I think it's also prevalent in society—that the country, as it was functioning before the accession of King Salman in 2015… was unsustainable, and that the country needed to dramatically change,' Haykel said. He added that 'what's particularly distinctive about the kingdom, and you don't find it in other countries of the GCC, is the brutal honesty with which the leadership in the kingdom talked about this need.'
The conversation then explored how reforms have reshaped the relationship between the state and its citizens, particularly through the strategic deployment of nationalism, identity, and new narratives of civic responsibility. It also addressed the institutionalization of accountability, transparency, and citizen participation, and concluded with a reflection on the broader regional implications of the Saudi reform experience.
The event concluded with a question-and-answer session that invited reflections on the sustainability, implementation, and broader impact of the reforms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows
Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows

The vast majority of Israelis say they are not troubled by reports of famine and suffering in Gaza, a new poll released by the Israel Democracy Institute shows. The survey shows that 79 percent of Jews in Israel were not troubled, or troubled at all, whereas 86 percent of 'Arab' respondents were somewhat or very troubled by the reports about the war on Gaza. 'Arab' respondents in the survey refer to Palestinian citizens of Israel. When the question was broken down by political affiliation, it shows that there is far greater concern among the left for the suffering and hunger, with 70 percent showing concern, whereas only 32 percent and six percent among the centre and right, respectively, are personally troubled by the reports. The survey was conducted between 27-31 July. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The world's leading hunger monitoring system last week issued a warning that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza due to the Israeli-imposed starvation and siege. 'Latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' the United Nations-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification said in its report. The warning comes as at least 150 Palestinian children and adults in Gaza have succumbed to death from starvation since Israel's onslaught on Gaza began in October 2023. The low number of Israelis concerned about famine and suffering in Gaza may be correlated with the number of people who believe the Israeli army's reporting on the extent of the civilian casualties in Gaza. A clear majority of Israeli Jews, 70 percent, believe the Israeli army's reporting on the number of civilian casualties in Gaza, whereas the vast majority of Palestinian citizens of Israel, 63 percent, do not believe those numbers. The Palestinian health ministry in Gaza counts over 60,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza, with the vast majority of those civilians, women and children. Ministry numbers have been broken down by name, age and gender. 'You can see his bones': In Gaza, parents struggle against child starvation and Israeli war crimes denial Read More » The Israeli army, as of May of this year, puts the count at 30,000, with 14,000 of those labelled 'combatants'. Israel has yet to provide any methodology or verification of those numbers. The health ministry's numbers are widely accepted globally, with the British medical journal, The Lancet, having estimated that the 60,000 number is a vast undercount. When asked about the claim that 'Israel's actions are restricted by the fighting, but it is making substantial efforts to avoid causing unnecessary suffering to Palestinians in Gaza' was correct, the vast majority of Israeli Jews, 78 percent, believed it to be accurate. The Israeli public, however, does not align with the state on the issue of settler violence and accountability against them. Nearly half of the Israeli public, 44 percent, believe security forces are too lenient towards Israeli settler violence, whereas 23 percent think the response is appropriate, and 22 percent think they deal with them too harshly. The majority of Palestinian citizens of Israel, 61 percent, think security forces are too lenient on the issue. Bleak outlook Israel's war on Gaza has carried on for just under two years now, with lower-level armed conflict with other countries in the region, including Lebanon, Iran, Syria and Yemen. The seemingly intractable conflict could be taking a toll on the public's general outlook, as the survey shows that compared to findings in June, there has been a general decline in optimism across all four indicators of national mood. Those four indicators are the future of national security, democratic rule, the economy, and national cohesion. Only a minority of Israelis are optimistic, the survey found. The steepest declines came in security and democracy, which the authors of the survey said are two indicators that Israelis are historically most optimistic about. Just 40 percent of Israelis are optimistic about national security, with that number even lower at 38 percent for the outlook on democratic rule. The lowest level of optimism was reserved for national cohesion, with just 23 percent optimistic about its future and 28 percent optimistic about the country's economic future. According to the authors, the share of optimists among Palestinian citizens of Israel is far lower than that among Israeli Jews. The report's authors caveat this section, saying, "However, as the figure below shows, this does not constitute a new crisis, as these declines have essentially restored the situation that existed two and three months ago; thus, it is possible that the previous month's finding was anomalous." Israel's standing globally has also taken a hit, with the public in the US finding itself increasingly opposed to Israel's war on Gaza and a steady rise in sympathy for Palestinians. Middle East Eye reported on Tuesday that former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said that Israel's reputation in the US was 'in collapse'. Gaza: Family of frail boy killed at GHF site months ago still haven't received his body Read More » Bennett, who served as prime minister from 2021 to 2022 for the New Right Party, accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of turning Israel into 'a leper state'. Bennet cited members of the Make America Great Again movement distancing themselves from Israel, with the country's friends having 'a hard time defending' it in the face of the ongoing starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. Recent data shows that Bennet's assessment of Israel's reputation in the US is correct. In a dramatic 10 percentage point drop since a poll from September 2024, only 32 percent of Americans said they support Israel's war on Gaza, new Gallup polling results released recently showed. As of July 2025, 60 percent of Americans said they disapprove of Israel's military action, and 52 percent said they see Netanyahu in a negative light - a significant shift from a year and a half ago. Netanyahu has also never been viewed this unfavourably in any of its previous polling stretching back to the 1990s, Gallup said, citing a 'continued deterioration in his image'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store