Data show biggest jump in global military spending since Cold War
European nations' collective spending increased by 17% to $693 billion amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, the organization's data show.
Russia's government increased its military spending by 38% to an estimated $149 billion last year, while Ukraine's grew by 2.9% to $64.7 billion. The Ukrainian spending amounted to 34% of the country's GDP, the largest military expenditure by percentage of GDP of any nation last year, according to SIPRI.
"Russia once again significantly increased its military spending, widening the spending gap with Ukraine," said Diego Lopes da Silva, a senior researcher at SIPRI. "Ukraine currently allocates all of its tax revenues to its military. In such a tight fiscal space, it will be challenging for Ukraine to keep increasing its military spending."
All NATO member nations increased their military spending, too, with 18 countries spending at least 2% of their GDP during 2024, which SIPRI said was the highest number of NATO members to hit that threshold since the alliance adopted it as a spending guideline in 2014.
"The rapid spending increases among European NATO members were driven mainly by the ongoing Russian threat and concerns about possible U.S. disengagement within the alliance," said Jade Guiberteau Ricard, another SIPRI researcher. "It is worth saying that boosting spending alone will not necessarily translate into significantly greater military capability or independence from the USA. Those are far more complex tasks."
In the Middle East, Israel and Lebanon significantly increased their military spending. Israel boosted its defense investment by 65% to $46.5 billion, while Lebanon increased its own by 58%, to $635 million.
"Despite widespread expectations that many Middle Eastern countries would increase their military spending in 2024, major rises were limited to Israel and Lebanon," said SIPRI researcher Zubaida Karim. "Elsewhere [in the region], countries either did not significantly increase spending in response to the war in Gaza or were prevented from doing so by economic constraints."
SIPRI said Iran's military expenditure fell in real terms by 10% to $7.9 billion, despite its involvement in regional conflicts.
U.S. military spending grew by 5.7% to $997 billion, amounting to 66% of NATO spending in 2024 and 37% of global military spending.
China was the world's second largest military spender last year behind the U.S., accounting for half of all military spending in Asia and Oceania, SIPRI said. China increased its spending by 7% to $314 billion.
"Major military spenders in the Asia-Pacific region are investing increasing resources into advanced military capabilities," said Nan Tian, the director of the SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Program. 'With several unresolved disputes and mounting tensions, these investments risk sending the region into a dangerous arms-race spiral."
Kristi Noem says she's "very confident" undocumented migrants stole her purse
Ashlie Crosson named 2025 National Teacher of the Year
Supreme Court appears poised to side with student with disability in school discrimination case
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Karl Rove warns Ukraine defeat could be Trump's Afghanistan withdrawal
Republican strategist Karl Rove on Thursday underscored the stakes of the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, saying failure to come to a resolution could be the downfall of President Trump's presidency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove outlined the three possible outcomes from Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine: a successful peace deal; a failure to reach a deal, resulting in continued conflict; and a Russian victory over Ukraine. Rove compared the third possibility — which Rove said would result from either no agreement or from an agreement that Russia breaks — to the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021, when President Biden's poll numbers tanked and never recovered. 'In addition to being the worst possible outcome morally and geopolitically, this third possibility is the worst scenario for the president and the GOP,' Rove wrote in the op-ed. 'The disastrous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and subsequent Taliban takeover broke President Biden's reputation with voters. He never recovered. Mr. Biden was at 50% approval in Gallup in July 2021; he dropped precipitously after Kabul fell the following month. He bottomed out at 36% in July 2024 before he withdrew from the presidential race,' Rove continued. 'The defeat of Ukraine by Russia would be similarly disastrous for Mr. Trump,' he added. Rove noted that Trump promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. Since then, Rove said, Trump has 'put himself at center stage' with his approach to dealmaking and his engagements with foreign leaders. 'The president can't abandon his starring role even if he wants to,' Rove said. 'Public opinion in America and the rest of the civilized world would rightly blame Mr. Putin for the invasion itself—but Mr. Trump for allowing it to succeed.' Rove said that the first outcome—a successful deal—is within reach for the U.S. president, and he touted Trump's steps so far in defense of Ukraine. He also said Trump's pressure on NATO countries to spend more on defense 'is paying off.' Rove urged Trump to become 'as tough on Mr. Putin as he has been on' Zelensky, saying that approach could get the warring countries 'to arrive at a deal that results in a durable peace.' 'Mr. Trump can bring about a reasonably successful conclusion to this catastrophic war by doing what Mr. Putin fears most: rejecting the Russian dictator's flattery and demands and insisting he make a fair, enforceable deal with Mr. Zelensky. Or else,' Rove said. 'Anything less would be a stain on Mr. Trump and on his party, for which they'd rightly pay a high political price,' he continued.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Will Putin ‘wriggle out' of Zelensky meeting?
'Now, the signals coming from Russia are simply outrageous,' Zelensky wrote on X. 'They are trying to wriggle out of holding a meeting. They don't want to end this war. They continue their massive attacks on Ukraine and their ferocious assaults along the frontline.' The remarks came after Russia on Thursday launched a massive attack on Ukraine that struck an American-owned electronics factory. Officials said the barrage included more than 600 drones and missiles across the country, in what Zelensky called an 'anti-record.' Trump posted a cryptic message later in the day, raising the prospect of Ukrainian attacks into Russia and predicting 'interesting times ahead.' The U.S. president on Monday indicated that Russian President Vladimir Putin was open to a meeting with Zelensky, but Russia has since sought to slow-walk the process. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking to reporters Thursday, said Putin was 'ready' for a meeting with Zelensky, but only if unspecific conditions were met. Lavrov also questioned Zelensky's 'legitimacy' in such talks and railed against NATO discussions about post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. 'All the different [ideas], all the unilateral [moves] are an absolutely hopeless venture,' Lavrov said, according to Reuters. 'As the current discussions between the West and the Ukrainian side are essentially linked to providing guarantees in the form of the foreign military intervention of a certain part of the Ukrainian territory.' Russian officials said earlier this week that any top-level talks between Putin and Zelensky would require layers of lower-level preparations. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed that Putin had agreed to NATO-like protections for Ukraine during previous talks. However, Lavrov and other Russian officials have made no such indication in public remarks this week. Trump dropped his demands for a ceasefire in Ukraine after a meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, insisting the two sides were making progress toward a peace deal and suggesting Putin and Zelensky could meet within days. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday said the president had canceled his August vacation to his Bedminster resort to work on talks to end the war. 'He's a man on a mission. He wants to move. Get things done quickly,' Leavitt said. 'He wants to strike when the iron is hot.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taiwan to massively hike 2026 defence budget as US presses spending increase
By Yimou Lee, Ben Blanchard and Jeanny Kao TAIPEI (Reuters) -Taiwan plans to boost defence spending by a fifth next year, surpassing 3% of gross domestic product, as it invests billions more in new equipment to better face down China and convince the United States it takes seriously calls to bolster its military. The move comes as China, which views democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory, has ramped up military and political pressure over the past five years to assert its claims, which Taipei strongly rejects. But Taiwan also faces calls from Washington to spend more on its own defence, mirroring pressure from the United States on Europe. This month, President Lai Ching-te said he wanted to boost defence spending to more than 3% of GDP next year. Taiwan Premier Cho Jung-tai told reporters that 2026 defence spending would reach T$949.5 billion ($31.27 billion). At 3.32% of GDP, the figure crosses a threshold of 3% for the first time since 2009, government figures showed. "This is another concrete demonstration to the world and to our people of our determination and ability to safeguard national sovereignty and security, maintain stability and security in the Indo-Pacific region, and fulfil our shared responsibilities to the world," Cho said on Thursday. Taiwan was following the "NATO model" to include spending on the coast guard and veterans in total defence expenditure, he added. That represents a rise of 22.9% over this year, Hsieh Chi-hsien, head of the defence ministry's comptroller bureau, told reporters. The plans included several special defence budget proposals totalling T$117.6 billion, for new fighter jets and boosting naval defences among others, which had been widely expected from the defence ministry in the coming parliament session this year. Taiwan was including spending for the coast guard in its total defence budget for the first time, two senior officials briefed on the matter separately told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. "They are standing on the frontline," said one, referring to the coast guard, which figures in regular stand-offs with China's coast guard and would, in time of war, be pressed into the navy's effort to defend Taiwan. "Facing new types of threat, including grey-zone tactics, it is necessary to include the coast guard in defence spending," the official said, referring to Chinese pressure tactics such as regular coast guard patrols near Taiwan's islands. Taiwan's government has made military modernisation a key policy platform and has repeatedly pledged to spend more on its defences given the rising threat from China, including developing made-in-Taiwan submarines. China's air force flies almost daily missions into the skies near Taiwan, and holds periodic war games, the last in April. China is also rapidly modernising its armed forces, with new aircraft carriers, stealth fighter jets and missiles. In March China unveiled a rise of 7.2% in this year's defence spending, to 1.78 trillion yuan ($248.17 billion), outpacing its 2025 economic growth target of about 5%. ($1=30.3650 Taiwan dollars) ($1=7.1724 Chinese yuan) Solve the daily Crossword
