
EU sets stage for big battle over long-term budget
And all of this against a backdrop of soaring trade tensions with the European Union's biggest commercial partner, the United States.
The previous 2021-2027 budget was worth around 1.2 trillion euros ($1.4 trillion) and made up from national contributions -- around one percent of the member states' gross national income -- and money collected by the EU such as customs duties.
One of the biggest challenges ahead will be over the size of the budget, as the EU's biggest -- and richest -- countries want to avoid paying more.
But unlike in the previous budget, the EU has debts due from the Covid pandemic, when the bloc teamed up to borrow 800 billion euros to support the continent's economy. These are estimated to cost 25-30 billion euros a year from 2028.
The European Parliament has made it clear that an increase will be necessary.
"We believe that the union cannot do more with the same amount or less. So we believe that in the end, an increase of the budget will be unavoidable," said Siegfried Muresan, the EU lawmaker who will lead negotiations on behalf of parliament.
The commission plans to propose new ways of raising money including taxes on large companies in Europe with annual net turnover of more than 50 million euros, according to a draft document seen by AFP.
Funding farmers
Another area of fierce debate will be the large farming subsidies that make up the biggest share of the budget, known as the common agricultural policy (CAP).
Brussels plans to integrate it into a new major "national and regional partnership" fund, according to another document -- which farmers fear will mean less support.
The CAP accounts for almost a third of the current multi-year budget -- around 387 billion euros, of which 270 billion euros are directly paid to farmers.
Centralising "funding into a single fund may offer some budgetary flexibility, but it risks dissolving" the CAP with "fewer guarantees", pan-European farmers' group Copa-Cogeca has said.
Farmers will put pressure on the commission with hundreds expected to protest outside the building in Brussels on Wednesday.
That will raise fears in Brussels after protests broke out last year across Europe by farmers angry over cheap imports, low margins and the burden of environmental rules.
Muresan, who belongs to the biggest parliamentary group, the centre-right EPP, urged the same level of funding for the CAP, "adjusted for inflation".
The commission has, however, stressed the CAP will continue with its own rules and financial resources, especially direct aid to farmers.
Brussels could also propose reviewing how CAP payments are calculated to better target beneficiaries.
For example, the commission wants to cap aid per hectare at 100,000 euros but this would be a thorny issue unlikely to garner much support.
More money
Facing new costs and competing challenges, the EU wants to tap new sources of funding -- fast.
In one document, the commission suggests the bloc take a share from higher tobacco excise duties and a new tax on non-recycled electronic waste.
Such a move, however, is "neither stable nor sufficient", according to centrist EU lawmaker Fabienne Keller, critical of giving new tasks to Brussels "without the necessary means to accomplish them".
Wednesday's proposal will launch difficult talks over the budget and is expected to "as usual, end with five days of negotiations" between EU capitals, an official said.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
8 hours ago
- Euronews
Anti-immigrantion demonstrations in more than 80 cities across Poland
Anti-immigration protests organised by the far-right Confederation Libery and Independence party took place in more than 80 cities across Poland, including in Warsaw, Krakow, Poznan, Wroclaw, and Bialystok. Demonstrators demanded the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia. "Enough of the years-long policy of 'let everyone in, and who they are will be determined later'," Krzysztof Bosak, one of Confederation party's leaders, wrote on X. "Polish women and men have the right to be concerned about the level of security in their own homeland," he added. In a speech at the start of the march, Bosak demanded the resignation of Donald Tusk's government, the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia to curb illegal immigration, and the permission for soldiers to shoot at people who cross the border illegally. "Without closing Poland to illegal immigration, without launching a deportation operation, without renouncing political correctness, without equipping the Border Guard and the forces responsible for controlling the legality of residence, and without controlling the labour market, security will gradually deteriorate," he said, calling for a change in policy. The protests come shortly after Poland introduced border controls with Germany and Lithuania, which came into effect on 7 July. On the Polish-German border, controls are in place at 52 places and on the Polish-Lithuanian border at 13. The issue of migration has been widely up for debate, and a contentious topic in Polish politics, particularly as the country has experienced a rise in immigration in recent years. In the first round of the presidential elections held in May, candidates of the far-right performed well, with Slawomir Mentzen of the Confederation Libery and Independence party and Grzegorz Braun of Confederation of the Polish Crown party coming in third and fourth, respectively. Many believe that both candidates' successes were due to their hardline stance on migration. Interior ministers agree on asylum rules On Friday, Poland and five other EU countries, agreed a set of targets for tightening asylum rules. During the meeting hosted by Germany's interior minister, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz admitted that he was "pleased that Poland is carrying out border controls." Last year, Poland saw an increase in asylum applications due to the recurring crisis on its eastern border with Belarus, which has been ongoing since 2021. As a result, the Polish parliament passed a law temporarily suspending the right to apply for asylum for those who crossed the Belarusian border. Both Polish and European leaders have long accused Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko of orchestrating the influx of migrants to destabilise the EU. On Saturday morning, the Ministry of Interior and Administration published statistics on the number of approvals issued for special protection for foreigners on X. "In 2024, we issued 40 per cent fewer approvals for special protection for foreigners than in 2021. This is the result of a better managed system, our operations at the border and more efficient procedures," the post read. "The government is pursuing a responsible and well-considered migration policy, taking care of the stability and security of citizens," it added. Counter demonstrations in many cities Counter-manifestations against the Confederation marches were also held in Warsaw, Katowice, Olsztyn and other cities on Saturday. Demonstrators carried banners with the slogans: "Accept the refugees, delete the fascists," "Action Democracy" and "We defend the right to asylum." "Everyone, regardless of their skin colour and origin, should feel comfortable not only in Poland, but also in Europe," Maria Książak of the International Humanitarian Initiative Foundation said during the demonstration.

LeMonde
14 hours ago
- LeMonde
The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US
"Trump always chickens out." The phrase, coined by a columnist at the Financial Times, has been circulating widely in recent weeks. The idea that the US president speaks loudly but does not always follow through on his threats has fueled complacency among stock markets regarding the risks his trade war poses to the global economy. However, accusations of cowardice may not apply to Donald Trump alone. The European Union's hesitance in the face of Trump's maneuvering has also raised questions about whether the 27 member states can truly engage in the kind of power struggle that is now essential. While Brussels believed it was on track to minimize the tariffs on European exports to the United States, Trump dashed the EU's hopes by announcing on July 12 that he would unilaterally impose a 30% tax starting August 1. Is this a final bluff to extract further concessions, or a definitive move that could deal a severe blow to European growth? In any case, as the American president ramps up the pressure, the EU continues to waver, trying to salvage what it still can. European leaders have responded with lackluster retaliatory measures that have done little to deter Trump, who seems indifferent to the economic consequences of his actions. This game of high-stakes bluffing is likely to benefit the party setting the rules, to the detriment of those who are forced to adapt, always a step behind and uncertain of the game's true objective. Setting ambitious goals The confrontation appears to be based on a misunderstanding. The EU seeks to negotiate in good faith, aiming for fair trade based on the principle of comparative advantage between countries. But the US president has little interest in this quest for a mutually beneficial, purely commercial agreement. His ambitions go further. He aims to undermine Europe by any means, because he despises everything it stands for: supranationalism, multilateralism, progressivism and the primacy of law. Yet the EU has no reason to apologize for what it represents, nor to make concessions on its tax policy or the regulatory framework it has established for digital services. In this final stretch of negotiations, Europe must give the talks a political dimension, moving beyond the technical aspects that have dominated the debate so far. The EU should clearly set out its red lines and aim high. Settling for a compromise as unfavorable as the one the United Kingdom accepted in May would be unacceptable. If the 27 member states, as the US's top trading partner, fail to demonstrate that they carry more weight than a single country, it would send a disastrous message about the purpose of the European project. The EU's strategy of absorbing American provocations without actually implementing the retaliatory measures at its disposal has shown its limitations. The "proportionate, robust, and well-calibrated" reprisals promoted by the 27 member states do not measure up to what is a clear act of aggression, one whose aim goes beyond simply rebalancing the US trade deficit – its goal is to subordinate Europe. If Europe were to "chicken out," the consequences would not be purely economic.


France 24
17 hours ago
- France 24
Bolsonaro's son, known as Number 3, pushes for US pressure on Brazil
Eduardo Bolsonaro is causing more commotion than he initially planned. The third son of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has been living in the United States since February while under investigation in Brazil for allegedly meddling in his father's coup-related case. Nicknamed "Number 3" by his father in a military-like manner, the 41-year-old has been in close contact with the White House, successfully lobbying for sanctions against the president of Brazil 's Supreme Court, Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing his father's prosecution for allegedly plotting a coup in 2022 following now-President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva 's victory. Moraes is also known for having temporarily banned Elon Musk's social media platform X in Brazil over its refusal to comply with court orders linked to widespread disinformation posted during the 2022 presidential race. US President Donald Trump has thrown his support behind Bolsonaro, first sending a letter to Lula demanding that the charges against Bolsonaro be dropped, and finally pulling out his favourite card since entering the White House: tariffs. Trump has threatened a 50 percent levy on Brazilian goods, calling the prosecution a 'witch hunt' that 'should end immediately'. On Friday, Brazil's Supreme Court issued search warrants and restraining orders against Jair Bolsonaro, banning him from contacting foreign officials for allegedly courting Trump's interference in the case. Federal police raided Bolsonaro's home and he was ordered to wear an ankle monitor. Bolsonaro was also banned from using social media and approaching embassies, according to the decision issued by Moraes, who cited a "concrete possibility" of the former president fleeing the country. The Supreme Court judge defended the measures as necessary given what he described as the father and son's "hostile acts" against Brazil. Washington responded by hitting Moraes with visa restrictions. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Moraes' court orders a "political witch hunt" that had prompted him to make immediate visa revocations for "Moraes and his allies on the court, as well as their immediate family members". Trump's tariff threats seem to have bolstered the ruling Brazilian left, said Nicolas Saldias, a Latin America analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit to the The Guardian. Saldias said that Lula, who has started wearing a blue cap with the words "Brazil belongs to the Brazilians," stood to benefit significantly from Trump's pro-Bolsonaro intervention. "He's going to be seen as the defender of Brazilian nationalism, a kind of progressive nationalism," he said. For his part, Bolsonaro has been trying to protect his image in the eyes of the Brazilian public, saying on Tuesday that he and his son 'would've opposed the tariffs'. The former president also told Brazilian daily Poder 360 that he could fix the problem that he believes is escalating due to what he described as Lula's provocation of the US, but added that his current circumstances made it difficult. 'I don't even have a passport,' he said. Who is the 'diplomat' behind it all? Jair Bolsonaro may not have a passport, but his 'Number 3', born in Rio de Janeiro and a federal deputy for the state of Sao Paulo since 2015, clearly does – and has been making strategic use of it. In a video recorded outside the White House and posted Thursday on the federal congressman's YouTube channel, which has more than 6 million subscribers, Eduardo Bolsonaro announced that he had just wrapped up a series of meetings with US officials. 'Decisions are being made,' he said, alluding to possible sanctions against Moraes. Paulo Figueiredo – a far-right influencer who has been charged with taking part in the alleged coup – said on Wednesday that he had met with US officials and that decisions towards Brazil were not only "on the table" but were 'a priority' for the US president. It isn't the first time that Number 3 has worked as a 'diplomat' for his father's agenda. Eduardo, the only member of the Bolsonaro family fluent in English, quickly became an informal ambassador abroad during his father's campaign. His role representing Brazil's far right on the international stage began with the family's connection to Olavo de Carvalho, the late far-right ideologue who lived in the US, and Filipe Martins, one of Olavo's closest disciples with ties to white supremacists. Martins later became an international advisor to Bolsonaro. The Brazilian congressman embraced Carvalho's network, later aligning with figures such as Steve Bannon – Trump's former strategic advisor – helping introduce Trump-style populism into Brazilian politics. In a 2019 interview with Brazilian Piaui magazine, Eduardo Bolsonaro described his bond with Bannon as based on shared conservative values and a common worldview, saying the accusations of racism or extremism against Bannon had never bothered him. "Everyone who is right-wing and steps outside of political correctness receives these labels," he said. "When I heard this kind of accusation against him, in my mind it was a positive point in favour of Steve Bannon." Back in 2019, Bolsonaro announced his intention to nominate his son as Brazil's ambassador to Washington. Eduardo then began meeting with senators to gather support for the appointment, which required Senate approval. But he faced strong resistance from some lawmakers, and the government was never able to secure the necessary votes. Facing mounting pressure, Eduardo ultimately withdrew his candidacy, declaring in a Chamber of Deputies speech that he would remain in Brazil to defend conservative values and support his father's government. 'I'm staying to ensure the tsunami of the 2018 election becomes a permanent wave,' he said. A narrative he has clung to relentlessly for the past seven years.