logo
Senate, House leaders agree on 25% property tax cut

Senate, House leaders agree on 25% property tax cut

Yahoo27-02-2025

CHEYENNE – Thursday morning, lawmakers in a joint conference committee signed an agreement to offer a 25% property tax cut to Wyoming homeowners.
The measure still has to pass both the Senate and House of Representatives, and be allowed to become law by Gov. Mark Gordon.
As of Thursday morning, Senate File 69, 'Homeowner property tax exemption,' includes a 25% property tax exemption starting in 2025 on residential structures and improved land up to $1 million of the fair market value. The exemption is not available if a homeowner receives a 50% long-term homeowner exemption passed in 2024, according to Rep. Tony Locke, R-Casper, who sat on the JCC.
Rep. Tony Locke, R-Casper (2025)
Rep. Tony Locke, R-Casper
Beginning in the second year, the exemption extends only to owner-occupied homes, with the consideration that it will also apply to deployed military members. The 25% cut would be ongoing, meaning the bill includes no sunset date.
'It has been clear from the very beginning that the people of Wyoming wanted property tax relief,' Sen. Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, said. 'This is about one of the most important issues in the Legislature, and I want to compliment the House because I know they also wanted property tax relief.'
Sen. Tim Salazar soaks in the moment
Sen. Tim Salazar, R-Riverton, soaks in a moment on the Senate floor Thursday during the 68th Wyoming Legislature's general session.
Salazar said that after negotiations on the bill stalled on Tuesday morning, leaders decided to move forward. Friday is the deadline to send bills to the governor in order to allow time for veto override votes, if necessary.
House Majority Floor Leader Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River, said the House Republican Caucus met on Wednesday to discuss SF 69.
Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River
Rep. Scott Heiner, R-Green River, works at his desk on the floor of the House of Representatives on Feb. 7.
'We also ran a bunch of numbers based on the proposal that was offered Tuesday. We would like to accept the Senate's position that was offered on Tuesday morning,' Heiner said.
He did request that the Senate agree to provide backfill for local governments in the bill, especially considering a Senate announcement Wednesday night that that chamber would not pass a supplemental budget at all.
'With the press release that came out last night that the supplemental budget will not be brought out for consideration, we would like to offer the (House) position on backfill be included in this bill,' Heiner said, adding that special districts, in particular, rely on property taxes and need the backfill.
Salazar responded that while the Senate appreciated the attempt, the body could not agree to a deal on SF 69 that included backfill.
'The Senate position is that backfill is not needed. We were at 50%, and now we are at 25%. We feel that at 25%, the (impact) is negligible,' Salazar said, noting that the supplemental budget is 'off the table and gone.'
Rather than let SF 69 die because of an inability to reach a deal, Heiner said the House would accept the Senate's position.
'This is something that provides immediate tax relief. It is important that we do something this year and not kick the can down the road,' Heiner said. 'So rather than lose the bill, we will withdraw that proposal and go with the Senate position.'
Salazar noted that the bill must still pass on the floor in both chambers. Locke said to expect it that vote today in the House.
If signed by the governor or allowed to become law without his signature, SF 69 would be 'effective immediately,' according to Locke.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds
What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What the 'Big, Beautiful' tax bill means for municipal bonds

JPMorgan raised its forecast for municipal bond sales in 2025 to $560 billion as US lawmakers deliberate over President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill in the Senate. Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-head of municipal fixed income Sylvia Yeh weighs in on what policy changes to the US tax code could mean for municipal bond investors, as well as valuation catalysts in comparison to Treasury yields (^TYX, ^TNX, ^FVX). Goldman Sachs manages several municipal bond ETFs (GMUB, GCAL, GMNY, GUMI). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

TN Republicans' bill would oust officials who release 'confidential' immigration enforcement details
TN Republicans' bill would oust officials who release 'confidential' immigration enforcement details

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TN Republicans' bill would oust officials who release 'confidential' immigration enforcement details

Top Tennessee Republican lawmakers have proposed a bill that would make it a felony and grounds for removal if public officials jeopardize the safety of federal law enforcement officers or disrupt federal immigration enforcement by revealing confidential operation details. The bill, filed by House Speaker Cameron Sexton and Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson on June 9, comes after a weeklong operation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Nashville in early May. The operation led to hundreds of traffic stops, in coordination with the Tennessee Highway Patrol, and nearly 200 arrests. Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell has been under scrutiny from state and federal Republican leaders over his response to the arrests. During the operation, O'Connell updated an existing executive order that requires city departments to report communications with federal immigration officials to the mayor's office, tightening the timeline for those reports. Even in its original version, the executive order included a provision that those communications be posted online for transparency. When O'Connell's office posted that list in late May, it originally included the names of some officials who called. Those names have since been removed from the version of the spreadsheet posted online. During the sweeps in Nashville, O'Connell also repeatedly asked federal officials to release the names and charges of the people arrested, but to no avail. Some community members, meanwhile, were outspoken in their opposition to the operation. Immigrant rights groups and other Nashvillians showed up to protest at Nashville's ICE office not long after the sweeps began on May 4. That opposition extended to further protests several weeks later, an appearance from New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and a volunteer effort to monitor and verify ICE activity. U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles and other D.C. Republicans have since called for a federal investigation into O'Connell, which was officially initiated on May 30. Meanwhile, Sexton called for O'Connell to rescind his executive order, saying it risks the safety of federal immigration agents. "The people of Tennessee expect their elected leaders to protect law enforcement — not endanger them," Johnson said in a June 9 news release. "When a public official like Mayor O'Connell chooses political activism over public safety, especially by interfering with federal immigration enforcement, he has no business holding office in this state." Johnson said he hopes the legislation "sends a message" to O'Connell and other "blue city" leaders that may act similarly. 'Mayor O'Connell's public refusal to rescind his executive order makes the need for this legislation unmistakably clear to prevent future political defiance that undermines the rule of law and puts law enforcement at risk,' Johnson said in the release. Sexton and Johnson did not provide any examples of O'Connell's interference with immigration enforcement operations. The bill would make it a Class E felony for state or local officials to "negligently release" information that identifies officers tasked with immigration enforcement and paves the way to oust those who violate the law, according to the release. Additionally, it expands provisions under the Tennessee Public Records Act to protect undercover officers and sensitive enforcement activity and beefs up penalties for unauthorized disclosures of protected law enforcement information. The bill is backed by top Senate Republicans, including Lt. Gov. Randy McNally, Speaker Pro Tempore Ferrell Haile, Republican Caucus Chair Ken Yager and Finance Committee Chair Bo Watson. It is set to be taken up in the 2026 legislative session. O'Connell's office had not responded to The Tennessean's request for comment by 11 a.m. on June 10. The move by Tennessee Republicans comes a few days after U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee, introduced legislation to make it illegal to 'dox' federal law enforcement officials. She said the bill is a direct response to the spreadsheet published by O'Connell's office detailing recent communications between city departments with federal immigration agents. Blackburn filed the Protecting Law Enforcement From Doxxing Act on June 4, explicitly naming O'Connell as the impetus. That bill would make it illegal to 'publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration operation.' An individual found guilty of doing so would face a fine and imprisonment of five years. In their joint news release on June 9, Sexton and Johnson praised Blackburn's efforts and say their proposed legislation complements her proposal. "Tennessee has always stood with law enforcement and we will not allow politically motivated actors to put officers' lives in danger simply to score political points with the far left," Sexton said in the release. "Tennessee will not become California, and Nashville will not become LA or San Francisco on our watch." Typically, "doxxing" refers to the act of publicly providing personally identifiable information about an individual or organization, usually via the internet, such as their home addresses, private contact information and names of family members. As for the public availability of law enforcement officers' names, they are not typically considered private information. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TN bill would punish officials who reveal immigration enforcement details

Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says
Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says

USA Today

time43 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says

Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for defying Trump, Speaker Johnson says 'I'm not gonna give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested. But he ought to be tarred and feathered,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters in the U.S. Capitol. Show Caption Hide Caption Los Angeles residents take pride in their city amid ICE protests USA TODAY spoke with Los Angeles residents about recent ICE raids and protests. House Speaker Mike Johnson is piling onto the Republican attacks aimed at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, telling reporters on June 10 that the state Democrat should be 'tarred and feathered' for challenging President Donald Trump over immigration enforcement. 'That's not my lane. I'm not gonna give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested. But he ought to be tarred and feathered,' Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in the U.S. Capitol during his weekly news conference. On June 9, Trump said "it would be a great thing" if his border czar Tom Homan arrested Newsom. The governor has challenged Trump's decision to call the California National Guard to Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration enforcement. Trump has also ordered 700 Marines be sent to the nation's second-largest city. In his news conference, Johnson said Newsom is keeping the Trump administration from implementing federal law. "He's standing in the way of the administration and the carrying out of federal law. He is applauding the bad guys and standing in the way of the good guys. He is a participant, an accomplice in our federal law enforcement agents being not just disrespected, but assaulted," Johnson said. "This is a serious problem." Newsom quickly responded on social media. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700's style forms of punishment. A fitting threat given the (Republicans) want to bring our country back to the 18th Century.' Johnson on Newsom lawsuit: 'What a joke' Johnson also criticized Newsom for filing a lawsuit against Trump for sending the California National Guard to Los Angeles over his objections. "What a joke," Johnson said. "Do your job, man." The House speaker also said protests can quickly get out of hand in large cities. "If local and state officials are unwilling or unable to do their job, the president of the United States will do his and we support that fully," Johnson said. The last time a president called in the National Guard over the objections of the state governor was in 1965 when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to escort civil rights marchers participating in the Selma-Montgomery March in Alabama.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store