Urgent Care Boost For Dunedin, Invercargill, And Timaru
Press Release – New Zealand Government
This investment means South Islanders will have faster access to care, with shorter trips and more treatment available locally especially outside of normal hours while reducing pressure on emergency departments.
Minister of Health
South Island communities will have better access to urgent and after-hours healthcare as part of a nationwide investment, Health Minister Simeon Brown says.
'Improving access to urgent and after-hours services is a key part of our plan to ensure all New Zealanders – whether they live in cities, towns, or rural areas – can get timely, quality care when they need it,' Mr Brown says.
'Budget 2025 delivers new and enhanced urgent care services across the South Island, making it easier for people to get the care they need closer to home.
'In Dunedin, a new 24/7 service has been identified to ensure the community has round-the-clock access to care every day of the week, easing pressure on the city's hospital. This means people in Dunedin will be able to get urgent care any time of the day and night, while our Government continues to prioritise delivering the New Dunedin Hospital.
'New daytime services have been identified for Invercargill and Timaru, building on existing after-hours services to offer more consistent, reliable care.
'Rural and remote communities will also benefit from improved urgent care access, including better access to diagnostic services, urgent medicines, and on-call clinicians.
'This investment means South Islanders will have faster access to care, with shorter trips and more treatment available locally – especially outside of normal hours – while reducing pressure on emergency departments.
Key Budget 2025 initiatives for the South Island include:
A new 24/7 urgent care service identified for Dunedin by late 2025.
A new daytime urgent care service identified for Invercargill and Timaru, building on the existing after-hours services.
Maintaining all existing urgent and after-hours healthcare services in the region.
Improved after-hour services identified for Alexandra, Ashburton, Balclutha, Golden Bay, Gore, and Oamaru.
Around 30 rural and remote communities to benefit from improved services, including better access to diagnostics, urgent medicines, and 24/7 on-call clinical support.
'This Government is investing more in health than ever before, with a record $16.68 billion over three Budgets to improve health outcomes for Kiwis.
'Alongside new and improved urgent care services, our investment will better support rural clinicians with tools, diagnostics, and more connected care – helping deliver timely, quality services across the South Island,' Mr Brown says.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
The Disgrace Of The Hospice Care Funding Scandal
In the referendum on assisted dying in which it was voted in by a decisive majority (65%) in 2020, I voted against it. This was primarily because much of the argument in support seemed to me to centre on difficulties in accessing palliative care, including in hospices. My view was that the priority was to improve accessibility to palliative care. I would have felt better if palliative care access had been improved but sadly it has further deteriorated to the point of crisis and tipping point. Understanding palliative care and hospices Palliative care is a branch of medicine regulated by the Medical Council. It improves the quality of life of patients and that of their families who are facing challenges associated with life-threatening, including terminal, illness. When a person receives a terminal diagnosis, they can choose to receive hospice care. Annually hospice services in New Zealand provide palliative and holistic wrap around care to over 10,000 people who die, as well as another 9,000 living with terminal illness, and their whānau. Although hospices are not statutory health authorities, everything they provide is free of charge. Roughly there is a 50:50 split between government funding and hospice fundraising. Hospice New Zealand is the national representative organisation of these 32 hospices. Hospice health professionals include doctors, nurses, therapists (physical, occupational and speech) and social workers. Consequently, even more so than hospitals, they are labour intensive. Hospices provide medical care designed for the end of a person's life. The purpose of this care is to improve the quality of the life that these patients have left. It includes pain and other symptom relief, along with emotional, psychosocial, and spiritual help for both patients and their families. Hospice care operates at four levels depending on circumstances – routine home care, continuous home care, general inpatient care, and respite care. Most patients under hospice care are able to stay in their own homes, with brief admissions to hospice for respite or to adjust pain medication. Hospice funding crisis reaches tipping point Unfortunately, despite the invaluable work for the terminally ill that only they as institutions can provide, the funding crisis that hospices face has reached a tipping point. This was brought to the fore by Kathryn Ryan's Radio New Zealand Nine to Noon programme (6 June): Hospice funding crisis. The focus was on one of the largest hospices, Tōtara Hospice, which services the communities of South and South-East Auckland. It has had to formally advise Health Minister Simeon Brown that it is planning to reduce services next month. This action comes after years of warnings from hospices that their funding was unsustainable. This was reinforced by a recent report by the MartinJenkins consultancy which concluded that for the first time the hospice sector won't be able to raise enough money to break even. Expanding the tipping point Radio New Zealand's coverage of the funding tipping point continued three days later on Morning Report in a thorough piece by health journalist Ruth Hill: Collapse of hospices could cost taxpayers millions. Hill reported the hospices warning that funding shortfalls were putting their critical services at risk. Already they were only available to one out of three New Zealanders who were dying. She provided individual examples of this sorry state of affairs. The Government's scuttling of the pay equity claim for hospice nurses also had a negative impact. Hospice New Zealand chief executive Wayne Naylor noted that hospice nurses were currently paid up to 35% less than Health New Zealand nurses. He said: That was a real out-of-the-blue sideswipe for hospices and hospice nurses in particular, to have our pay equity claim, which was almost completed, just stop. Hospices were being forced to consider two unpalatable alternatives. Naylor described it this way: That then falls back on community to provide more money to support their local hospice. The alternative is that hospices have to make some staff redundant so that they can increase the salaries of other staff, and that leads to a reduction in services. Minister Brown has said that Health New Zealand had enough funding for hospice care. However, Naylor reported that the organisation had told Hospice New Zealand something quite opposite to the Minister: They told us they had no more funding, that they have no contingency that they can call upon, and the people with whom we met said they had no authority to allocate funding from anywhere else. So essentially it's a no to funding from Health NZ right now. Ruth Hill also tellingly cites the MartinJenkins report which that the 28 partially publicly-funded hospices are returning at least $1.59 in health benefits for every dollar of taxpayer money received, including fewer emergency departments and hospital admissions or rest home stays. What is to be done Simeon Brown maintains that he and his government value the services hospices provide. What they provide is as core to the public health system as the services provided in our general practices and public hospitals. Further, many (probably most) of the terminally ill are people who have invested in the public health system for much longer than those who sit around the cabinet table. They have done their bit to ensure their health system has been funded for the benefit not just for themselves and their families. It has also for hugely many more others that are unknown to them. It is only reasonable that hospice care should be available for them in their final weeks or months. It is not just a question of the hospice service being sufficiently funded. It should not have to be financially dependent on charity to survive, let alone function. This is fundamentally wrong. Being dependent on charity only makes sense if governments are so cynical to factor into their calculations that the terminally ill don't amount to many votes and not for very long! It also makes sense if governments are so short-sighted that they can't see the financial return of investing in hospice care! If hospice care being dependent on charity does make sense, then the words 'disgrace' and 'scandal' have no meaning. Ian Powell Otaihanga Second Opinion is a regular health systems blog in New Zealand. Ian Powell is the editor of the health systems blog 'Otaihanga Second Opinion.' He is also a columnist for New Zealand Doctor, occasional columnist for the Sunday Star Times, and contributor to the Victoria University hosted Democracy Project. For over 30 years , until December 2019, he was the Executive Director of Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand.
The Spinoff
12 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The struggles of navigating infertility in New Zealand as a Muslim couple
Where secular New Zealanders make a straightforward medical decision, many Muslims contemplating IVF treatment lack support and care from both medical and religious experts. It was a nice Autumn afternoon half a decade ago when I met with a South Asian couple in their early 40s, who had been trying to have a baby. Let's call them Zainab and Ali. They came to New Zealand many years ago and now call it their home. They had been experiencing compromised fertility their entire married life and had seen a GP who then referred them to a specialist. That specialist suggested they try in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Zainab and Ali are one couple out of 23 Asian and 18 Muslim participants who we interviewed as part of our research project to learn and unpack the accessibility of assisted reproductive technologies(ARTs) in Aotearoa. All participants had experienced either primary (struggling to conceive) or secondary (struggling to conceive again) infertility. We interviewed them from 2019 to 2021 and during that period, some successfully had children. Others remain childless. For non-Muslim or non-religious patients, undergoing IVF is typically a straightforward process and is viewed as a purely medical intervention. However, for practising Muslims, undergoing IVF treatment is not a decision made on their own. They need to consult how Islamic law considers the suggested medical intervention, and interpretations vary among the Islamic scholars (Imams) and sects around this issue. For practising (Sunni) Muslims who follow Islam diligently, surrogacy, third-party donation or sex selection, which is possible through IVF and not via a natural pregnancy, are out of the question. For those who follow a different sect, those options may be permissible. Adhering to Islamic guidelines during IVF relates to ensuring the purity of lineage, the sanctity of marriage, and the nature of procreation. For some Muslims, IVF can be viewed as contradicting the natural order of creation, while others see it as a viable solution for treating their infertility. The issue of head coverings (jilbab/hijab) during treatment and the entire IVF process for Muslim women undergoing IVF was also another concern raised by our Muslim women participants during the interview. This, as well as the fact that they would be undergoing treatment in a secular-based fertility clinic, only increases uncertainty. As such, practicing Muslims often struggle to find appropriate support and religious guidance during fertility treatment. Within their own communities, two key barriers have emerged: Those seeking Islamic rulings on IVF – a commonly recommended fertility treatment – often encounter silence or rejection. Many local Imams, who are typically male, are not easily accessible to Muslim women. At the same time, questions about IVF are frequently dismissed as too sensitive or taboo, even by the broader community. Most participants in our research had been experiencing their fertility journey in a marginalised and isolated way. The isolation is not just in being childless: they are also left behind when it comes to accessing the religious /faith guidance they require when considering medical intervention. The ripple effect Caught between indifference from both spiritual leaders and clinicians, many participants said they withdrew from community life or delayed care. Others turned to YouTube fatwas (rulings on Islamic law) and global WhatsApp groups for guidance. One Muslim man spoke of doing his own research to find out if IVF was halal after being rejected by the local Imam. 'As we did not really get the answers [on IVF] from the local Imams, we then used YouTube of the Ustadz we knew from Indonesia. From him, he explained that IVF is halal as long as the egg and the sperm are from the married couple.' Melon*, an Indonesian woman who has been trying to conceive with her husband for 10 years without success, eventually reached out to her relatives in her home country through WhatsApp. She wasn't alone in using social media for support; Semangka and her husband Ahmad, who were advised to consider IVF, also connected with their Indonesian friends back home to seek clarity on the Islamic perspective. Abla*, an Indian woman in her 30s who had been trying to have her second child, did not even bother to consult or ask the local Imams, as she understood it too well that she would be rejected due to being a woman and also because of the topic. 'I googled it. I didn't really consult any Islamic scholars. I also consulted some people in India [via social media] to learn if IVF was halal for Muslims.' While they proved that Muslims will make use of technology to reconcile their Islamic faith and their desire to parenthood, it also revealed something bigger. Migrant communities, often isolated, experienced structural discrimination in that they cannot access faith-based assisted reproductive technologies. Abla was once advised by her specialist to consider third-party reproduction (in other words, a donor). While the specialist may have intended to present all the options, Abla found this suggestion offensive to her faith, especially since she had made her (Sunni) Muslim identity known to health providers during the treatment. However, she chose to remain silent about her feelings, fearing that expressing her opinion might be perceived as 'rude' or 'asking too much'. For our Muslim research participants, New Zealand fertility clinics currently offer little in the way of faith-based or culturally responsive options for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). As a result, Muslim patients are often left to reconcile medical advice with their religious beliefs on their own. The same is true when they have to face miscarriage or failed insemination. While counselling treatment is offered, the service is secular which, for our participants, does not address their faith needs. While participants were appreciative of all the services and care given by health providers and the government, the lack of support from both religious and medical systems has left many Muslim women and couples feeling isolated and marginalised. What does it mean for Aotearoa? This isn't just a Muslim issue, it's about ensuring Aotearoa's healthcare and communities uplift all who call this land home. Some options: – Imams and doctors collaborating on faith-aware fertility guidelines. – Training programmes to help clinics navigate religious sensitivities. – Community-led initiatives normalising these conversations (this may need to involve the Muslim women organisations). With New Zealand's fertility rates declining and diversity growing, addressing these gaps isn't just compassionate, it's urgent. The country needs more inclusive, culturally aware healthcare and community support structures. Zainab and Ali finally underwent IVF in their home country after navigating the religious and financial aspects, which took a considerable amount of time. Because of the delayed care in Aotearoa, Zainab became too old (40) to apply for public funding for IVF treatment. If the religious guidance they needed had been available to them sooner, Zainab might still have been eligible for funding and been able to access the better medical treatment offered by fertility clinics in Aotearoa. A couple of years later, Zainab and Ali's last treatment in their home country was unsuccessful. They still wanted to try but Zainab was not getting any younger. As they expressed to me before we parted: 'Perhaps we are not blessed to be parents, and there is something better that God will provide to us.' This piece has been written and published as part of a Marsden research project, which investigates the accessibility of assisted reproduction technologies in Aotearoa. The project is led by associate professor Sharyn Graham Davies, who was previously at AUT and is now at Monash University in Australia.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
Radiology Backlog Cleared At Taranaki Base Hospital
Hon Simeon Brown Minister of Health Health Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the clearance of a significant radiology backlog at Taranaki Base Hospital, calling it a practical outcome that puts patients first. 'In March, more than 6,000 x-ray reports were sitting unprocessed at Taranaki Base Hospital. That was causing unacceptable delays for patients needing diagnosis and treatment,' Mr Brown says. 'People in Taranaki deserve access to timely, high-quality healthcare – and that includes getting diagnostic results back quickly. With the backlog now cleared and all results referred back to GPs, patients are now receiving their results.' To address the backlog, Health New Zealand made full use of available public radiology resources and engaged private imaging providers to boost reporting capacity and return results directly to patients' GPs. 'This was a practical, solutions-focused response. By combining public capacity with private sector support, the backlog was cleared efficiently, and care has been sped up for thousands of people.' Outsourcing remains in place to manage ongoing demand and reduce the risk of future backlogs. 'Taranaki Base Hospital will continue to use private capacity where needed – an approach that is consistent with the Government's broader strategy to reduce waitlists across the health system. "Our focus on reducing waitlists has already resulted in more than 8,600 additional elective procedures being delivered through outsourcing. It's a clear example of how we can apply the same approach to diagnostics – using targeted outsourcing to deliver faster care. 'We are committed to practical improvements that reduce delays, support frontline services, and deliver better outcomes for patients. 'This result in Taranaki shows what can be achieved when we stay focused on what matters – making sure New Zealanders get the care they need, when they need it,' Mr Brown says.
