The Dáil schedule is broken and there appears to be no appetite from politicians to fix it
This results in government business and opposition questioning being crammed into a tight schedule, with late-night sittings almost always an inevitability.
Just recently, the support staff who work in Leinster House said that they didn't get to leave work one night until 2am.
Not only is this just not a great way to foster a nice workplace, it's not family-friendly and it also incurs costs in overtime and transport costs to get people home in the late-night hours.
So why does Leinster House operate this way?
Well, having Mondays and Fridays off is meant to allow politicians tend to their constituency work, while the late start on a Tuesday was also explained away as to allow TDs who live rural areas time enough to make the journey to Dublin.
The Dáil also only sits 33 weeks of 52 in a year. On Thursday this week, the politicians went on holidays and won't be returning until mid-September.
But in a time of great uncertainty and with widespread acknowledgements that we are living in the midst of a housing and cost-of-living crisis, not to mention looming global threats from US tariffs, is it okay for Leinster House to cram its work into a short work-week and to shut up shop for such an extended period of time over the summer months?
Many would say it is not and there's a better, more functional way for our parliament to work.
These observations are not new.
In fact, for over a decade, there has been debate, recommendations and some tinkering around the edges to change things. But nothing has really ever stuck or improved things.
Stretching out the working week
On the back of the 2008 crash, politicians were feeling the heat from the public and pressure was on them to up their game and their workload, but it also meant stretching out the week.
In 2011, it was agreed that that
Dáil would meet more often and sit earlier in the day
in what was viewed at the time as the most significant package of Dáil reforms in decades.
The new rules meant that more TDs were required to sit in the Dáil chamber for the duration of debates, while the formula of sittings also be changed to allow for more daily topical debates.
Advertisement
It stretched-out the working week, with sittings adjourning earlier at night, but continuing into Friday mornings, initially on a once-a-month basis.
Thursday's sittings also included a new session of Leaders' Questions, something that has stuck around since.
At the time, Friday sittings were devoted entirely to allowing opposition parties and backbenchers introduce proposals for new laws.
One of the key changes was also a reduction in the amount of recess time over Christmas, Easter and summer.
Dáíl chamber
Oireachtas / Flickr
Oireachtas / Flickr / Flickr
At the time, the
then Government Chief Whip Paul Kehoe told
The Journal
that the changes resulted in the Dáil sitting around 42% more than it did under the previous administration. He said the changes also allowed for more opportunities for legislation coming from the opposition side of the house to be debated in the Dáil.
At the time, Niall Collins, who is now a government minister, was on the opposition benches as Fianna Fáil's justice spokesperson and was all for the Dáil being utilised more.
Friday sittings
He told
The Journal
in 2011 that the Dáil was not sitting nearly enough. Not only was he in favour of the Dáil sitting on a Friday, he said committees should also, stating:
'If we're going to have the Dáil sitting and the cost associated with it then we must have all aspects of it functioning and not just the optics.'
He dismissed claims that it would costing a huge amount of money – some estimating at the time that it could cost around €90,000 for the Dáil to stay open on a Friday.
Collins said such a claim was 'absolute rubbish', stating that the Dáil is open either way on a Friday.
'The only extra thing you are doing, you have the chamber open and a number of staff. These staff are in the building either way and the more you use a chamber the less it costs. That's the way I would put it,' he said.
In the end, Friday sittings were done away with, along with any momentum to stretch out the Dáil working week.
Fast forward ten years, to 2021, and the discussions around how to make Leinster House more functional and more family friendly were still going on.
In 2021, the former Ceann Comhairle, Fianna Fáil's Seán Ó Fearghaíl published a report from the 'Forum on a Family Friendly and Inclusive Parliament'.
Current politicians such as Social Democrats leader Holly Cairns and Minister of State Neale Richmond, sat on the forum, along with other experts and stakeholders.
Related Reads
Racism, doxxing and assaults among dozens of incidents of abuse of 2024 election candidates
Late-night sitting hours
One of the forum's priority recommendations included:
'Reduce long, late and unpredictable sitting weeks With immediate effect, Members and political parties and groups are to facilitate appropriate flexible working and remote working arrangements for their staff to address the long sitting hours, until other recommendations to eradicate long hours have been implemented.'
It also called on the Houses of the Oireachtas Service to address areas where staff are working very long, late and unpredictable hours to serve sittings.
The report also said that by the end of the 33rd Dáil term, or until a referendum to amend Article 15 can be held, the Houses of the Oireachtas to introduce hybrid sittings of some Dáil, Seanad and Committee business where Members can choose to participate in certain business remotely or to be physically present.
By September 2022, Dáil voting blocks should be moved within the weekly schedule, so that it is taken in the afternoon, the report recommended.
Votes continue to be held late on Wednesday night, with votes in the last week being held after 10pm.
The September 2022 deadline was also given to ensure that the Dáil, Seanad and committees holidays align with school holidays at Easter, Halloween and Christmas, as set out in Department of Education circulars. This is something that largely does appear to be in place now, though there might be mixed views as to whether this is a good or bad idea.
One of the biggest ideas to come from that forum in 2021 was the idea to have a second Dáil chamber in Leinster House. It was viewed as a possible way to make working hours more family-friendly for politicians through parallel sittings.
The idea being that simultaneous Dáil debates and discussions around a bill could be going on but topical issues could be discussed at the same time in another location.
O'Fearghail said at the time that it would allow more work to be put into the week without the anti-social and unacceptable hours.
However, despite €3.7 million being put into fleshing out the project over a three-year period, the plans were shelved earlier this year amid concern about a public backlash.
What has happened since? Nothing. It appears the push to make Leinster House a more functional, family-friendly workplace, is as dead in the water as the second chamber idea.
Maybe in ten years time we'll have another report with ideas to look forward to. It can sit on the shelve with the others to gather dust.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Plans to open historic buildings as Easter Rising visitor centre may take years
Plans to open a number of historic buildings in the capital as a visitor centre commemorating the Easter Rising may still take several years. Junior Minister Kevin 'Boxer' Moran has informed the Dáil that while the project is a priority for his Government, it wasn't yet possible to say when it would be open to the public. The buildings at 14-17 Moore Street have been at the centre of a major campaign to preserve them due to their historical significance to the 1916 Rising. The buildings were the headquarters of the Provisional Irish Government, and it is where a number of signatories of the Irish proclamation, including James Connolly and Patrick Pearse, surrendered from. The Government previously decided to accept the recommendations of the Moore Street Advisory Group to move ahead with a project to conserve the buildings and open it as a visitor site. However, Minister Moran admitted it was still too early to say when that would happen. Kevin "Boxer" Moran Under questioning from Sinn Féin TD, Aengus O Snodaigh, Minister Moran said: 'It is not possible, in advance of the approval of Ministerial Consent, to be precise about the timing of construction works; however, the project at Moore Street is a priority and it is anticipated that there will be meaningful progress onsite in 2026.' Deputy O'Snodaigh said there were concerns about dry rot other causes for the rotting of fabrics in the structure of the national monument . Mr Moran said: 'In response to concerns about fabric deterioration, including issues such as dry rot and timber decay, the OPW has engaged specialist consultants in historic timber, plaster, and wallpaper conservation. 'These experts have conducted targeted surveys and provided professional guidance to identify and mitigate risks to the buildings' most vulnerable features. These reports inform interim protective measures and I can assure the Deputy that the buildings are being carefully maintained and protected.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

The Journal
14 hours ago
- The Journal
The Dáil schedule is broken and there appears to be no appetite from politicians to fix it
DID YOU KNOW that the Dáil only sits three days out of the week, with work on a Tuesday starting at 2pm. This results in government business and opposition questioning being crammed into a tight schedule, with late-night sittings almost always an inevitability. Just recently, the support staff who work in Leinster House said that they didn't get to leave work one night until 2am. Not only is this just not a great way to foster a nice workplace, it's not family-friendly and it also incurs costs in overtime and transport costs to get people home in the late-night hours. So why does Leinster House operate this way? Well, having Mondays and Fridays off is meant to allow politicians tend to their constituency work, while the late start on a Tuesday was also explained away as to allow TDs who live rural areas time enough to make the journey to Dublin. The Dáil also only sits 33 weeks of 52 in a year. On Thursday this week, the politicians went on holidays and won't be returning until mid-September. But in a time of great uncertainty and with widespread acknowledgements that we are living in the midst of a housing and cost-of-living crisis, not to mention looming global threats from US tariffs, is it okay for Leinster House to cram its work into a short work-week and to shut up shop for such an extended period of time over the summer months? Many would say it is not and there's a better, more functional way for our parliament to work. These observations are not new. In fact, for over a decade, there has been debate, recommendations and some tinkering around the edges to change things. But nothing has really ever stuck or improved things. Stretching out the working week On the back of the 2008 crash, politicians were feeling the heat from the public and pressure was on them to up their game and their workload, but it also meant stretching out the week. In 2011, it was agreed that that Dáil would meet more often and sit earlier in the day in what was viewed at the time as the most significant package of Dáil reforms in decades. The new rules meant that more TDs were required to sit in the Dáil chamber for the duration of debates, while the formula of sittings also be changed to allow for more daily topical debates. Advertisement It stretched-out the working week, with sittings adjourning earlier at night, but continuing into Friday mornings, initially on a once-a-month basis. Thursday's sittings also included a new session of Leaders' Questions, something that has stuck around since. At the time, Friday sittings were devoted entirely to allowing opposition parties and backbenchers introduce proposals for new laws. One of the key changes was also a reduction in the amount of recess time over Christmas, Easter and summer. Dáíl chamber Oireachtas / Flickr Oireachtas / Flickr / Flickr At the time, the then Government Chief Whip Paul Kehoe told The Journal that the changes resulted in the Dáil sitting around 42% more than it did under the previous administration. He said the changes also allowed for more opportunities for legislation coming from the opposition side of the house to be debated in the Dáil. At the time, Niall Collins, who is now a government minister, was on the opposition benches as Fianna Fáil's justice spokesperson and was all for the Dáil being utilised more. Friday sittings He told The Journal in 2011 that the Dáil was not sitting nearly enough. Not only was he in favour of the Dáil sitting on a Friday, he said committees should also, stating: 'If we're going to have the Dáil sitting and the cost associated with it then we must have all aspects of it functioning and not just the optics.' He dismissed claims that it would costing a huge amount of money – some estimating at the time that it could cost around €90,000 for the Dáil to stay open on a Friday. Collins said such a claim was 'absolute rubbish', stating that the Dáil is open either way on a Friday. 'The only extra thing you are doing, you have the chamber open and a number of staff. These staff are in the building either way and the more you use a chamber the less it costs. That's the way I would put it,' he said. In the end, Friday sittings were done away with, along with any momentum to stretch out the Dáil working week. Fast forward ten years, to 2021, and the discussions around how to make Leinster House more functional and more family friendly were still going on. In 2021, the former Ceann Comhairle, Fianna Fáil's Seán Ó Fearghaíl published a report from the 'Forum on a Family Friendly and Inclusive Parliament'. Current politicians such as Social Democrats leader Holly Cairns and Minister of State Neale Richmond, sat on the forum, along with other experts and stakeholders. Related Reads Racism, doxxing and assaults among dozens of incidents of abuse of 2024 election candidates Late-night sitting hours One of the forum's priority recommendations included: 'Reduce long, late and unpredictable sitting weeks With immediate effect, Members and political parties and groups are to facilitate appropriate flexible working and remote working arrangements for their staff to address the long sitting hours, until other recommendations to eradicate long hours have been implemented.' It also called on the Houses of the Oireachtas Service to address areas where staff are working very long, late and unpredictable hours to serve sittings. The report also said that by the end of the 33rd Dáil term, or until a referendum to amend Article 15 can be held, the Houses of the Oireachtas to introduce hybrid sittings of some Dáil, Seanad and Committee business where Members can choose to participate in certain business remotely or to be physically present. By September 2022, Dáil voting blocks should be moved within the weekly schedule, so that it is taken in the afternoon, the report recommended. Votes continue to be held late on Wednesday night, with votes in the last week being held after 10pm. The September 2022 deadline was also given to ensure that the Dáil, Seanad and committees holidays align with school holidays at Easter, Halloween and Christmas, as set out in Department of Education circulars. This is something that largely does appear to be in place now, though there might be mixed views as to whether this is a good or bad idea. One of the biggest ideas to come from that forum in 2021 was the idea to have a second Dáil chamber in Leinster House. It was viewed as a possible way to make working hours more family-friendly for politicians through parallel sittings. The idea being that simultaneous Dáil debates and discussions around a bill could be going on but topical issues could be discussed at the same time in another location. O'Fearghail said at the time that it would allow more work to be put into the week without the anti-social and unacceptable hours. However, despite €3.7 million being put into fleshing out the project over a three-year period, the plans were shelved earlier this year amid concern about a public backlash. What has happened since? Nothing. It appears the push to make Leinster House a more functional, family-friendly workplace, is as dead in the water as the second chamber idea. Maybe in ten years time we'll have another report with ideas to look forward to. It can sit on the shelve with the others to gather dust. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Thousands take part in march for Palestine in Dublin
Around 10,000 people are taking part in a march in support of Palestine on the streets of Dublin. The National March for Palestine, organised by the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign, began at Parnell Square this afternoon and is making its way to Leinster House for a rally outside the Dáil. Groups representing trade unions, political parties as well as churches are taking part and carrying banners showing their group's support for the cause. A group from GAA Palestine is also taking part in the march after the club made a call for those who are in Dublin for the All-Ireland hurling final tomorrow to show their support. The marchers have been chanting "Ban all Trade with Israel" and "Genocide Bonds No More" which refers to their call for the Central Bank to stop facilitating the sale of Israeli government bonds. A stage has been set up outside Buswells Hotel on Molesworth Street, across the road from Leinster House. The organisers said he purpose of the march is to "protest the Irish Government's absolute refusal to hold Israel accountable for a genocide in which the apartheid state has slaughtered more than 58,000 Palestinians". They said the march will call for an end to the "Central Bank of Ireland's role in funding the genocide" as well as calling on the Government to pass the full Occupied Territories Bill including goods and services. Protesters are also seeking an end to the use of Irish airspace for transporting weapons, and for the Irish Government to enact sanctions to hold Israel accountable. Dunnes Stores striker Mary Manning is set to speak at the rally, 41 years to the day after she refused to handle the sale of grapefruit from South Africa, in protest against the country's apartheid regime. Two survivors of Israel's attacks on Gaza, Marah Nijim and Mohamed Migdad, are also set to speak as is Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon, Director of the Irish Traveller Movement Bernard Joyce and Conor O'Neill of the Pass the Occupied Territories Bill Campaign.