Israel's attacks on Damascus hinder chemical weapons search, Syrian official says
FILE PHOTO: A view of a destroyed building, after powerful airstrikes shook Damascus on Wednesday, targeting the defense ministry, as Israel vowed to destroy Syrian government forces attacking Druze communities in southern Syria and demanded their withdrawal, in Damascus July 16, 2025. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi/File Photo
THE HAGUE - Israeli airstrikes on Damascus are hampering Syria's efforts to find and destroy chemical weapons stockpiled during the rule of toppled ruler Bashar al-Assad, a government adviser said on Thursday.
A planned visit by inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has already had to be postponed, adviser Ibrahim Olabi said.
The OPCW will hold an urgent meeting on Tuesday next week to discuss the situation and impact of the Israeli attacks, Olabi, who is the legal adviser to Syria's Foreign Ministry tasked with the chemical weapons file, said.
The OPCW did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Israel launched powerful airstrikes on Damascus on Wednesday, blowing up part of the defence ministry and hitting near the presidential palace, taking action it said was to protect the Druze minority in southern Syria.
The Syrian defence ministry provided the institutional infrastructure needed to organise and secure visits from OPCW inspectors, Olabi said.
Since March there have been several visits by inspectors to previously unseen production and storage locations for chemical weapons to prepare for the task of destroying remnants of Assad's illegal stockpile. Syria's interim-government has vowed to rid itself of chemical weapons.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Fatal abuse of Myanmar maid in Bishan: Traffic Police officer sentenced to 10 years' jail
Singapore Man charged over manufacturing DIY Kpods at Yishun home; first such case in Singapore
Singapore HSA launches anti-vaping checks near 5 institutes of higher learning
Business 5 things to know about Kuok Hui Kwong, tycoon Robert Kuok's daughter and Shangri-La Asia head honcho
Singapore 'Sex first, then you can sell my flat': Women property agents fend off indecent proposals and harassment
Singapore Jail for elderly man for using knife to slash neighbour, who later died of heart disease
Singapore Maximum $7,000 fine for caterer involved in ByteDance food poisoning case
Opinion Grab tried to disrupt taxis. It now wants to save them
The OPCW, a treaty-based agency in The Hague with 193 member countries, is tasked with implementing the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention. REUTERS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
UK to hold inquiry into miners strike 'Battle of Orgreave' four decades on
FILE PHOTO: A for sale sign stands by the closed Clipstone Colliery in Clipstone near Mansfield, central England, April 9, 2013. REUTERS/Darren Staples/File Photo LONDON - Britain said on Monday it would hold an inquiry into the "Battle of Orgreave", a violent confrontation between police and striking coal miners in 1984 at the height of a year-long industrial dispute with Margaret Thatcher's government. More than 5,000 striking miners clashed with a similar number of riot police who had been drafted in from across the country at the Orgreave coking plant near Sheffield in northern England. It was one of the most violent scenes witnessed during a British industrial dispute, and also a pivotal moment in the strike, launched against Thatcher's moves to close money-losing pits. The miners ultimately lost the broader fight to save their industry. The police have long faced accusations of brutality and using excessive violence at Orgreave on June 18, 1984. TV footage showed charges by officers on horseback and one miner being repeatedly struck on the head with a baton. More than 120 people were injured and 95 miners initially arrested and charged with riot and violent disorder. Those charges were all later dropped after the evidence was dismissed. Campaigners have for years demanded to know who was responsible for the deployment of the large number of police and their tactics, as well as what happened to some official documents. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - Britain's interior minister whose Labour party was in opposition at the time of the strike - said an inquiry headed by Pete Wilcox, the Bishop of Sheffield, would be held to find out the truth. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins? Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers "The violent scenes and subsequent prosecutions raised concerns that have been left unanswered for decades, and we must now establish what happened," she said. Kate Flannery, the Orgreave Truth & Justice Campaign Secretary, said they needed to be sure that the inquiry had the powers to have unrestricted access to all government and police papers. "We have waited a long time for this day and this is really positive news," she said. REUTERS

Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump wants lower rates. Firing Powell could push them higher.
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump wants the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. Firing Mr Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, could have precisely the opposite effect, pushing up costs for homebuyers, businesses and other borrowers. Mr Trump in recent days has intensified his long-running attacks on Mr Powell, whom he has criticised for holding interest rates at a relatively high level even as inflation has cooled and economic growth has slowed. On July 15, the president asked a group of House Republicans whether he should fire Mr Powell, and showed off a draft of a letter that would do so. Asked on July 16 whether he intended to fire Mr Powell, Mr Trump said he had no immediate plans for a removal, though he refused to rule it out. If he took such a step, it is unclear whether he would succeed. Mr Powell has indicated his intention to serve out his term as chair, and many legal experts say the law is on his side. Even if Mr Trump did manage to oust Mr Powell, the move might prove counterproductive. A new chair might be able to persuade enough other Fed officials to lower the short-term interest rates that the central bank directly controls. But the rates that matter to most borrowers are long-term rates, particularly those on 10-year and 30-year federal government bonds, which are the basis for what borrowers pay for mortgages, auto loans and lines of credit for most businesses. The Fed's decisions influence those rates, but it is investors, through their buying and selling of government bonds, who set them directly. Firing the Fed chair – and, in so doing, undermining the central bank's long-standing independence – could send them soaring, economists warn. 'If my sole objective were lowering borrowing costs, this would not be the way I would go about it,' said Mr Glenn Hubbard, a Columbia University economist who served as an adviser to President George W. Bush. 'It's not going to work.' Sure enough, yields on federal bonds – which reflect the interest rates that investors demand to lend the government money – rose sharply on July 18 after news about Mr Trump's threats broke. They moderated after the president suggested a decision wasn't imminent. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins? Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers Firing Mr Powell could push up long-term interest rates for two reasons. The first is inflation: If Mr Trump moves to take more direct control of the Fed's policy decisions, bond investors may expect more inflation in the years ahead and, as a result, demand higher interest rates. The Fed, like central banks in most advanced economies, is meant to be insulated from political influence in order to give policymakers the freedom to fight inflation even if doing so is painful in the short term. That is what Mr Powell did during the Biden administration as prices spiked. The Fed raised interest rates to their highest level in decades in order to bring inflation under control, even as forecasters predicted – wrongly, it turned out – that doing so would cause a recession. 'The Fed's credibility and independence was critical in getting Covid-19 inflation back down quickly,' said Mr Joseph E. Gagnon, a former Fed economist who is now at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. If Mr Trump undermines that independence, investors may lose confidence in the Fed's willingness to take unpopular positions – like keeping interest rates high to stamp out price gains. That could lead investors to expect inflation to be higher on average than it has been in recent decades. The second reason that firing Mr Powell could backfire has to do with the US government's debt. Mr Trump has said in recent weeks that, by keeping rates high, Fed policymakers are costing taxpayers 'trillions of dollars in interest cost.' That's because the central bank influences – albeit indirectly – how much interest the government owes on its nearly US$30 trillion in debt. Such comments imply that Mr Trump sees it as the Fed's job to help the government pay its debts, rather than as the job of Congress and the president to set tax and spending policy in a responsible manner. That could encourage even more borrowing when most economists already believe the United States is on an unsustainable fiscal path, in part because of the enormous tax-and-spending bill that Mr Trump signed into law this month. 'Lowering interest rates so there's less debt and more ability to do things like tax cuts is an extremely dangerous and scary goal for a central bank to have,' said Mr Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former adviser to President Barack Obama. 'Every central bank that has embarked on that path, it's ended very, very badly.' If investors lose faith in the government's ability to make good on its obligations, they could demand a higher rate of return to compensate them for that risk, said Ms Tara Sinclair, an economist at George Washington University who studies the Fed. 'This idea that debt service is going to be somehow lowered by a more politically intervened Fed is exactly wrong,' she said. She noted that, even before last week, bond yields had been rising in ways that suggested mounting concerns from investors. Mr Powell's term as chair expires in May, so Mr Trump will soon have an opportunity to appoint a new top policymaker even if he does not follow through on his recent threats. The president, who has indicated in recent weeks that he will select someone who promises to cut interest rates, is sure to apply pressure to ensure his pick follows through. NYTIMES

Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump threatens Washington stadium deal unless NFL team re-adopt Redskins name
A view of the defunct Robert F. Kennedy Stadium in Washington, DC, on April 28. The Washington Commanders NFL team and the city announced an agreement to build a new stadium at the site where the team formerly played from 1961 to 1996. The team currently play at Northwest Stadium in Landover, Maryland. US President Donald Trump on July 20 threatened to interfere with a deal to build a new football stadium in Washington, DC, unless the local National Football League team, now known as the Commanders, changes their name back to Redskins. The American football team dropped the name Redskins in 2020 after decades of criticism that it was a racial slur with links to the US genocide of the indigenous population. Mr Trump had called for a return to the name Redskins - and for the Cleveland Guardians baseball team to once again adopt the name Indians - on other occasions, but on July 20, he added that he may take official action. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' he said in a post on his Truth Social platform. The team moved from Washington to suburban Landover, Maryland, in 1997, but earlier this year reached an agreement with the local District of Columbia (DC) government to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030. Mr Trump has limited authority to intervene under the current home-rule law governing federal oversight of the District of Columbia, but he has raised the prospect of taking more control, telling reporters in February, 'I think we should take over Washington, DC'. Representatives of the Commanders did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers Asia Japan PM's future in doubt after election debacle Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins? Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers Some fans have advocated readopting the name Redskins out of tradition, but leading indigenous rights organisations have opposed the name, including the National Congress of American Indians, the Association on American Indian Affairs, and Cultural Survival. At least one group, the Native American Guardian's Association, has supported the name Redskins and the 'respectful use of Native American names and imagery in sports, education and public life'. REUTERS