logo
Burnt cash case: What lies ahead as impeachment set into motion

Burnt cash case: What lies ahead as impeachment set into motion

How is impeachment done?
A notice for the removal of a judge has to be signed by not less than 100 members in the Lok Sabha and 50 in the Rajya Sabha. The motion can either be accepted or rejected by the Speaker or the Chairman.
According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, when notices of a motion are submitted on the same day in both the Houses of Parliament, a committee to examine the charges levelled against the judge will be constituted by the Lok Sabha Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman.
The Act states that no committee shall be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses.
Committee members
The committee comprising a senior judge of the Supreme Court, a sitting chief justice of a high court and a distinguished jurist will then probe the charges against Justice Varma and will be asked to come out with a report in three months.
The inquiry report will be tabled in Parliament, followed by a discussion in both Houses after which there will be voting on the motion for the removal of Justice Varma.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 held for attack on Suvendu's convoy in Cooch Behar
7 held for attack on Suvendu's convoy in Cooch Behar

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

7 held for attack on Suvendu's convoy in Cooch Behar

1 2 Kolkata/Jalpaiguri: Seven people were arrested by Cooch Behar Police on Wednesday in connection with the attack on the convoy of Bengal leader of opposition Suvendu Adhikari. Sources said the arrested included TMC workers and Trinamool Yuva functionaries. The arrested were remanded to five days' judicial custody. Meanwhile, Bengal BJP president Samik Bhattacharya moved a notice in Rajya Sabha under Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of State (Rajya Sabha), seeking a discussion on the attack, which he described as "an attack on democracy". Adhikari's convoy came under attack in Cooch Behar on Tuesday, when he arrived to attend a protest rally and submit a memorandum to the SP regarding alleged assaults on BJP workers. As the convoy reached Khagrabari, a group of alleged TMC supporters attacked the convoy. In his complaint, Adhikari named 41 persons, including state minister, Udayan Guha. "We are not going to leave them. If Udayan Guha was directly involved in the incident, the police's role cannot be ruled out," Adhikari said at a meeting on Wednesday. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata According to an agency report, Union home minister Amit Shah spoke to Nisith Pramanik, former Union Minister of state for home affairs, seeking details about the incident. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Your Best Life: The 20 Top-Ranked Cities to Move to in 2024 Learn More Undo Guha said the identities of those arrested demonstrate that the allegations made by Adhikari — that the attack on his convoy was carried out by illegal Rohingya and Bangladeshi infiltrators — are unfounded. "Not a single Rohingya or Bangladeshi Muslim was named in complaint or arrested. His comments were baseless and he should apologise. Those who disrespect Bengalis and the Bengali language will be shown black flags," Guha said.

BCD warns advocates against online, YouTube solicitation
BCD warns advocates against online, YouTube solicitation

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

BCD warns advocates against online, YouTube solicitation

New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) The Bar Council of Delhi has issued a stern notice cautioning advocates against advertising or soliciting legal work through social media platforms. The regulatory body has flagged the increasing trend of lawyers and self-proclaimed 'legal influencers' posting promotional videos, client interactions, and other content online, which it deemed unethical and in violation of Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. While issuing a notice, BCD Chairman Surya Prakash Khatri emphasised the seriousness of the matter and stated that such conduct undermines the dignity and sanctity of the legal profession and poses a risk of spreading misinformation, particularly when done by individuals who lack proper legal qualifications or licensing. The Council's notice directs all advocates currently engaged in such activities to take down their content with immediate effect. Failure to comply, it warned, could invite disciplinary action under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, including suspension or cancellation of their license to practice law. The Bar Council reaffirmed its commitment to upholding the ethical standards of the legal profession and cautioned members of the Bar to refrain from indulging in direct or indirect forms of advertisement or self-promotion that could erode public trust in the legal system. UNI SNG SS 'What is legal and constitutional is moral': Justice Abhay Oka's powerful call for judicial integrity and constitutional morality 06 Aug 2025 | 11:24 PM By Sangeeta Sharma New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) 'Traditional morality is shaped by popular opinion. But judges are bound only by the Constitution.' In a thought-provoking keynote address that struck at the heart of judicial ethics, Justice Abhay S. Oka, former judge of the Supreme Court of India, delivered a scathing and insightful critique of the misuse of personal moral convictions in legal decision-making. see more.. 'One human pulling another is inhuman': Supreme Court bans hand-pulled rickshaws in Matheran 06 Aug 2025 | 11:08 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court today condemned the continued use of hand-pulled rickshaws, calling the practice inhuman and violative of the right to dignity guaranteed by the Constitution. The Court held that such manual labor, which involves a human being pulling another, must be abolished immediately, especially after 78 years of Independence and 75 years of the Constitution. see more.. PM Modi expected to visit China for SCO Summit, in another thaw in bilateral ties 06 Aug 2025 | 10:12 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China to attend the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, to be held in Tianjin, from August 31 to September 1. see more.. 06 Aug 2025 | 8:58 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) As US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25 percent tariff on India, taking the total to a high of 50 percent, India termed the move as unfair, unjustified and unreasonable, and reiterated that it will take all actions necessary to protect its national interest. see more.. 06 Aug 2025 | 8:47 PM New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) India and Russia today reaffirmed their Strategic Partnership and shared commitment to deepen bilateral industrial and economic cooperation. see more..

Under HC lens, Punjab govt puts land pooling policy on hold for a day
Under HC lens, Punjab govt puts land pooling policy on hold for a day

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Under HC lens, Punjab govt puts land pooling policy on hold for a day

Chandigarh: The Punjab govt on Wednesday informed the Punjab and Haryana high court that its contentious Land Pooling Policy 2025 would be kept on hold and no further steps taken until the next hearing on Thursday. The state govt's decision came in response to a petition challenging the policy, which aims to acquire thousands of acres of land for developing residential and industrial zones. When the matter came up for hearing, the advocate general, Punjab, requested time to address the contentions in the petition challenging the policy. A bench, headed by Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal, directed the Punjab govt to clarify whether the policy includes provisions for the rehabilitation of landless labourers and others dependent on the land for their livelihood. The bench further questioned the state on whether a social impact assessment was conducted before the policy was notified. It also referred to a Supreme Court verdict in a case of Residents' Welfare Association and another versus Union Territory of Chandigarh emphasising the need for an environmental impact assessment before urban development. The petition was filed by Gurdeep Singh, a 72-year-old resident of Ludhiana, who claimed to have inherited six acres of agricultural land. He argued that the policy is illegal and violates fundamental rights by bypassing mandatory procedures under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR Act). Singh's plea stated that the land notified for the policy is multi-cropped and irrigated, and that the state failed to follow the necessary provisions of the LARR Act. MSID:: 123143951 413 |

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store