The Verstappen problem that F1 fails to acknowledge
Verstappen's racecraft is exceptional. Just look at the way he snatched the lead from Oscar Piastri at the start of the Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix – few drivers actually are able to achieve such a masterful move. It was audacious, confident, precise, clever – exactly the skills the Dutchman can use to get what he wants.
Advertisement
The thing is, there's a dark side to Verstappen. He doesn't even really conceal it, but many in the media, his team and his fanbase pretend not to be aware of it – or just ignore it. This dark side emerged again on Sunday under intense pressure.
After his team asked him to let George Russell through in the Spanish GP, Verstappen slowed down until the Mercedes driver was alongside him, then reaccelerated to hit the Silver Arrow. No honest person can truthfully believe this was anything but deliberate; there is no doubt about it, no possible nuance. Yet, the stewards handled it by handing Verstappen a similar penalty to those given to good-faith racers accidentally causing collisions.
A single occurrence of such a foul move is already a problem but could be forgiven; after all, Sebastian Vettel did cross a line when he intentionally collided with Lewis Hamilton in Baku in 2017, which led to a 10-second stop-go penalty. But this isn't the first time we've witnessed Verstappen's unsportsmanlike driving.
Verstappen brake-tested Hamilton in a tense Saudi Arabian GP in 2021 – an uncouth attempt at taking his title rival out of the race – and repeatedly runs his rivals off the track, like Hamilton in the 2021 Brazilian GP or Lando Norris in the 2024 Mexico race. He doesn't mind losing places in the process, as long as his opponent loses more.
Advertisement
The governing bodies have undeniably failed to address how frequent and intentional Verstappen's behavior is, and they won't even connect the dots to call a spade 'a spade' – to call a deliberate move 'a deliberate move'. Whether they're ignoring it on purpose or through thoughtlessness, nobody knows.
Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing, George Russell, Mercedes
Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing, George Russell, Mercedes
Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images via Getty Images
Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images via Getty Images
The stewards' decision regarding the clash with Russell at Barcelona left much unsaid: 'The driver of Car 1 was clearly unhappy with his team's request to give the position back. At the approach to Turn 5, Car 1 significantly reduced its speed thereby appearing to allow Car 63 to overtake. However, after Car 63 got ahead of Car 1 at the entry of Turn 5, Car 1 suddenly accelerated and collided with Car 63.
Advertisement
'The collision was undoubtedly caused by the actions of Car 1.'
It is standard terminology – though somewhat comical in this context – for stewards to refer to the 'car' instead of the driver, but that's besides the point: they decided not to draw the logical conclusion from their reasoning. Everything in Verstappen's driving shows he intended to hit Russell, so he should have been disciplined taking into account how serious such an act is in racing.
One week prior, in Monaco, stewards established that Russell had 'deliberately' cut the chicane – which is unsportsmanlike but much less dangerous – and they had no qualms about cracking down on the Mercedes driver with a drive-through penalty instead of the usual five or 10 seconds.
At Barcelona, the situation was crystal-clear, yet Verstappen got a standard penalty, more lenient than Russell's in Monaco. Well, not completely standard as he got three penalty points on his licence instead of two. Go figure.
Advertisement
Verstappen has always been an extremely polarizing character, ever since his high-profile F1 debut at just 17 years of age. Many believe – or pretend to – that's just due to his elbows-out racing style, viewed as a logical symptom of his hunger for victory. However, his actions often go far beyond 'hard but fair', and he obviously stands by them given the way he usually speaks post-race.
Some will be keen to deem the Spanish GP incident a mere instance of briefly losing composure, yet it just adds to all previous episodes, when Verstappen didn't get the penalties he deserved. Surely the four-time world champion, who naturally is an extremely confident athlete, is aware – more or less consciously – that when he acts this way, he never loses out.
Read Also:
Why is it so difficult for F1 drivers to say they're sorry?
When anger and desperation take over: F1's most controversial clashes
Advertisement
Penalties on a case-by-case basis have never solved the problem, as his senseless Barcelona move shows. Verstappen brilliantly makes the most of the system's grey areas when he deems it necessary or feels disrespected, taking things way beyond the limits. This is not about whether a move was completed with four wheels off the track, if a driver moved under braking or who was ahead at the apex. This is about colliding on purpose – unsportsmanlike behavior onboard 800kg cars reaching 200mph.
The Verstappen problem is a serious one, and the governing bodies must now diligently address it.
To read more Motorsport.com articles visit our website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steps the FIA will take to avoid a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 F1 dominance
Next year, both chassis and power unit regulations will undergo sweeping changes. Several technical directors in the F1 paddock have called it the biggest overhaul of the past 50 years. In addition to concerns from drivers about the racing in general, some fear it could pave the way for long-term dominance by a single manufacturer. Memories go back to 2014, when Mercedes' engine proved significantly superior to the rest of the field and the factory team went on to claim every world title through to 2020. Why the FIA doesn't fear a repeat of Mercedes' 2014 dominance The FIA, however, is confident that history won't repeat itself in F1's new era starting in 2026. 'I don't think that we are going to have a situation where a single manufacturer has such a huge advantage as was the case in 2014,' Nikolas Tombazis told The FIA's single-seater director believes the new engine formula is less complex, despite the substantial increase in electrical power: 'The engines are still not as simple as we would have liked. We would have liked to go further, but we had a lot of resistance against simplifying the regulations more. So there are things that we would have liked to be even simpler, but they are still simpler than the current generation of engines. They don't have the MGU-H, and there are a few things that have tighter limits, so we don't think the gaps will be as big as in 2014.' Back then, the MGU-H proved a major performance differentiator - and a very costly one. For both of those reasons it will disappear in 2026, a change that should provide newcomers with a more level playing field while also reducing development costs. How will the concessions' system work? That said, it cannot be ruled out that one manufacturer may still get out of the blocks significantly better than the rest, especially since the FIA acknowledges not all power unit manufacturers are equally transparent or willing to share data about their new engines. Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W05, leads Nico Rosberg, Mercedes W05, Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari F14T, Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB10 Renault, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari F14T, Nico Hulkenberg, Force India VJM07 Mercedes, and Kevin Magnussen, McLaren MP4-29 Mercedes, at the start But even if one manufacturer dominates next year, the FIA has learned from 2014. The new regulations include a safety net, allowing underperforming brands to close the gap through so-called concessions. 'We do have newcomers, and it is always a risk at the start of a new cycle that there is some divergence initially,' Tombazis said. 'Additionally, we have a cost gap for the PU manufacturers now.' It means that manufacturers who are behind cannot simply throw unlimited money at their engine projects. To still offer them possibilities to catch up, the FIA has included a new system into the 2026 regulations. 'For that reason, there is a concept called ADUO, which is an acronym for Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities,' Tombazis explained. 'This concept has been the product of a lot of work. It was already there from day one of the regulations, but in the last few months more detail has been put into it to define exactly how that is going to operate.' This, of course, raises the key question: how does it work? 'Essentially every five, six races there will be an average performance measured for each PU manufacturer. Those who are below a certain level, and depending on how much below they are, will get that benefit accumulating over the year. That benefit would translate into three things: one is additional development money, some more dyno hours and the possibility to make a new homologation of the engine. So people who are behind will have the opportunity to speed up and catch up.' The 2026 technical regulations specify that this assessment will be made after the first five race weekends each season: 'Over the first five Competitions of each Championship Season in the 2026-2030 period, the FIA will monitor the performance of the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) part of all the Power Units supplied by each PU Manufacturer to its customer Competitors. For each ICE supplied by the PU Manufacturers, an average power will be calculated. The methodology to calculate this power can be found in the Appendix to the Regulations. Any PU Manufacturer whose ICE power is more than 3% below that of the highest ICE power recorded amongst all the PU Manufacturers will be granted Additional Development and Upgrade Opportunities.' These extra opportunities relate to a table in Appendix 3 of the technical regulations. A special ADUO column lists which components of the ICE may still be improved if a manufacturer is granted the special status by the FIA. Several of these components are otherwise frozen for development over a specific period of time, but with ADUO status, they may still be modified to close the gap. Nikolas Tombazis, FIA Single Seater Director FIA rejects 'absolutely any suggestion' of Balance of Performance The system is designed to prevent long-term dominance, but Tombazis emphasises that it should not be seen as a Balance of Performance, as is used in series like the World Endurance Championship. 'I want to stress that I completely refute any comment about that being a Balance of Performance or anything like that, because first of all, the regulations are exactly the same for everyone. It's not like we are giving them more cubic capacity, more fuel or whatever. 'Secondly, if there was no cost cap, they would throw a lot of money at it. When Honda were behind in 2016, 2017, for a certain period they had to spend a lot more money to catch up. With a cost cap the risk is that you would never be able to do that, and that you would be behind eternally. You would just be humiliated for a whole regulation cycle, and clearly we don't want that. We don't think that would be fair, and I have to say that PU manufacturers have been extremely collaborative on this topic.' Finally, the FIA is working on a safety net for manufacturers who suffer serious reliability issues — something that cannot be ruled out at the start of a new era. 'There is an additional initiative which addresses the situation where a PU manufacturer has huge reliability issues to start with. Imagine somebody who blows up an engine each race weekend and each engine costs a lot of money. They suddenly find that they are eating their cost cap with blown engines. They have to reduce the development to stay below the cost cap, and you can imagine that would be an awful situation. 'So we've got some initiatives, which are going through the same phase of discussion now, and will hopefully be approved quite soon, whereby once you use more than a certain number of engines, you start having a certain cost cap relief. Read Also: What's got drivers so agitated about "strange" 2026 F1 cars? 'Your engines, once you exceed that number, cost very little from a cost cap point of view. Not in terms of real money, of course, they still cost the same unfortunately, but it means that we protect them from a situation where somebody is in an awful position and has no way to react under the cost cap. That would be really unfortunate.' Combined with the slightly simpler power unit formula, this approach should avoid a repeat of 2014 and has to keep the F1 field competitive - at least on the engine side. To read more articles visit our website.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars?
As electric vehicles gain traction in the luxury market, many consumers are weighing the financial benefits of going electric. With volatile gas prices and growing environmental concerns, the question of electric versus gas-powered luxury vehicles has become increasingly relevant. Read More: Find Out: The Rivian R1T pickup and R1S SUV represent premium electric options, but how do their operating costs compare to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi models? Here's how monthly Rivian charging costs compare to fueling traditional luxury vehicles. Rivian Charging Costs The cost to charge a Rivian varies significantly based on location and charging method. Home charging typically costs about half of a gas tank fill-up. Discover Next: Home Charging Economics According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the national average electricity rate is around $0.15 per kWh, though regional variations range from $0.10 to $0.30+ per kWh. The Rivian R1T has battery capacities of 135 kWh (Large pack) or 106 kWh (Standard pack), per Rivian's official specifications. Based on the real-world efficiency of 2.5 miles per kWh: Monthly Home Charging Costs (1,000 miles): At $0.15/kWh: $75-$95 At $0.20/kWh: $100-$125 At $0.30/kWh: $150-$190 Public Charging Electrify America charges around 48 cents per kWh for fast charging. Heavy public charging users can expect $150-$250 monthly costs. Luxury Gas Car Comparison Most luxury vehicles require premium gasoline. According to AAA's Gas Prices, regular gas averages $3.15 per gallon nationally, making premium fuel approximately $3.50-$3.75 per gallon. Monthly Fuel Costs for 1,000 Miles: Luxury SUVs: BMW X5 (19 mpg): $189 Mercedes GLE (20 mpg): $180 Audi Q7 (19 mpg): $189 Luxury Sedans: BMW 5 Series (25 mpg): $144 Mercedes E-Class (26 mpg): $138 Audi A6 (25 mpg): $144 The Bottom Line For drivers charging primarily at home, Rivian offers significant monthly savings: Potential Monthly Savings: vs. Luxury SUVs: $85-$115 vs. Luxury Sedans: $45-$70 Annual savings: $540-$1,380 However, those relying heavily on public charging may find costs approaching efficient luxury sedans. Regional Impact Geographic location significantly affects this comparison. States with low electricity rates and high gas prices heavily favor electric vehicles, while areas with expensive electricity and cheap gas narrow the gap. Beyond Monthly Costs Additional Rivian advantages include minimal maintenance requirements, no oil changes, reduced brake wear, and potential HOV lane access. Traditional luxury cars offer established service networks, no range anxiety, and faster refueling. Conclusion Rivian ownership typically offers $80-$100 monthly savings compared to luxury SUVs for most drivers with home charging access. The key is understanding your usage patterns, local utility rates, and charging infrastructure before making the switch from premium gasoline to premium electrons. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Rivian Monthly Compared To Gas for Other Luxury Cars? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Hypebeast
a day ago
- Hypebeast
Calling an Uber? The Virgil Abloh Maybach Is Now an Option
Summary Update:Not all Chicago Uber users are reporting seeing the Virgil Abloh Maybach as a bookable fare on their Uber apps, leaving the validity of the rideshare component unclear. Don C is, however, renting out his Maybach for rides in Chicago. Original Story:There are only 150 'Virgil AblohMaybachs' in the world, the storied two-tone sedan that Abloh designed alongside Mercedes' Gorden Wagener as part of Project MAYBACH. Now, the long-sought-after, limited-edition Mercedes-Maybach S-Class S 680 can be yours – for just an hour or so, that is – asDon Chas listed his personal Virgil Abloh Maybach on Uber as a fully bookable offering. With a price set at $500 USD an hour, Chicago Uber riders can book Don C's car on the app now. The listing's description indicates that only two riders can sit in the Virgil Abloh Maybach, with each ride accompanied by a professional driver. The Virgil Abloh Maybach was officially released to its select upper echelon clientele back in 2022, defined by its two-toned body, custom wheels, and sleek Abloh x Maybach co-branded hits throughout both the car's interior and exterior.
