logo
Research project at Churchill facility raises alarm about potential impact of oil spill in Arctic waters

Research project at Churchill facility raises alarm about potential impact of oil spill in Arctic waters

CBC7 days ago
A natural remedy that has previously helped counter oil spills will be too slow to "do any useful work" if there's a spill in the Canadian Arctic, increasing chances of "catastrophic" harm, researchers say.
Preliminary findings from the GenIce II research team, led by Eric Collins from the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, suggest oil-degrading microbes respond very slowly to oil-contaminated Arctic waters.
"We do see that it takes at least a few weeks or a month for the microbes to respond and actually start to break down the oil, and that's just too long in the case of a real oil spill," said Collins, who has a doctorate in biological oceanography and is a Canada Research Chair in Arctic Marine Microbial Ecosystem Services.
In November, the GenIce II research team (GenIce is short for genomics and ice) began work at the $45-million observatory in Churchill, Man., to better understand and observe the potential impact of an oil spill in the Arctic marine environment.
Collins said the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill served as a "wake-up call" for researchers to study the impact of "natural microbial communities" in oil-contaminated water.
It is believed that during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, microbes cleaned up nearly 10 times more than humans did. The spill released more than half a billion litres of oil into the Gulf of Mexico over an 87-day period, killing thousands of marine species and contaminating the natural habitat.
Collins's research team is focused on how microbes respond to oil in Arctic waters, as opposed to water in warmer regions like the Gulf of Mexico, where the Deepwater Horizon spill happened.
With the shipping season in the Hudson Bay extending due to melting Arctic ice and an expected increase in shipping and marine traffic through the bay, experts say the chance of an oil spill is increasing.
An oil spill near the coastline is particularly concerning to Collins because the current circulation in Hudson Bay could spread the contamination all along the coastline, endangering the ecosystem and, in turn, surrounding communities, many of which depend on the natural environment for sustenance.
Collins' team is conducting research at the new Churchill Marine Observatory — without which Collins says the GenIce II project "wouldn't be possible."
"There's no way we would get permission to put oil directly into the water in order to test the effects of an oil spill on the Arctic community, so the fact that we have these large tanks that we can pump water from Hudson Bay into and do the experiments in a controlled setting is really important," Collins said.
The facility runs seawater through a pumphouse into two pools where the experiments occur. One pool remains uncontaminated, while oil is placed in the other pool; after the experiment is complete, the oil is removed and the water is cleaned using an on-site wastewater treatment facility, and then released back into the ocean after a third party tests its cleanliness.
Feiyue Wang, who heads the Churchill Marine Observatory, says the facility's ability to perform controlled experiments in natural Arctic waters is unique.
Since plans for the facility were announced in 2015, it has captured the attention of international researchers, particularly from Arctic countries, Wang said — interest he expects will lead to more collaborative research with international partners.
"We're [other Arctic countries] facing similar types of challenges and opportunities," said Wang, who has a doctorate in environmental geochemistry and is a Canada Research Chair in Arctic Environmental Chemistry. "What's happening in Hudson Bay is really just a forecast of what's happening elsewhere in the Arctic."
According to a government study in 2022, over the past 30 to 40 years, it has taken three to four days longer each decade for ice to cover Hudson Bay fully. Over the course of each decade, the ice cover has started to break about five days earlier in spring.
The ice cover in that inland sea has required more time to develop into a fully established ice cover (an increase of three to four days per decade). Ice break-up initiation has begun earlier in the Spring/Summer, i.e. that shift is estimated at about five days per decade.
Wang says Hudson Bay is on track to be "essentially ice-free" by the end of the century.
"As a country, as scientists, we want to get ahead of the potential issues," Wang said. "The observatory is really geared toward studying opportunities and challenges associated with socioeconomic development in a changing environment as the Bay becomes more open."
The observatory became operational nearly 10 years after plans were announced and roughly six years after it was expected to be completed. Complications with ownership of the Port of Churchill, a major flood in 2017 that impacted the railway to Churchill, COVID-19 and the passing of David Barber, a key figure in the establishment of the facility, all led to delays in construction.
The original location of the observatory changed after the Port of Churchill changed ownership.
With help from the federal and provincial governments, the facility was built at a new location, which did garner some criticism from the community, because it was built on traditionally significant land.
"We tried everything we could, including the input from the community, to try and minimize the disturbance to the landscape," Wang said. "So that is an ongoing dialogue, an ongoing collaboration that we'll be dealing with and working with the community to make sure that their concerns are addressed."
Efforts are also being made to incorporate traditional Indigenous knowledge into the research being done at the marine observatory, Wang said.
"They're an integral part of what we do," Wang said. "They know the lands, they know the ice, they know the marine ecosystem, and so we always work together."
The GenIce II team also worked closely with the community in Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut, to help monitor the environment, watch for oil spills and research the responsiveness of Arctic microbes to oil.
"Inuit people in Chesterfield Inlet are particularly worried about oil spills coming from ships that are going there to the mines in Baker Lake, where they're extracting gold," Collins said.
"There's a lot of ship traffic up there, and if there was an accident, then that could release a lot of oil, and they depend on the animals that live in the water for their subsistence."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wildfires send Canada's carbon emissions soaring. And our peatlands emit even more
Wildfires send Canada's carbon emissions soaring. And our peatlands emit even more

CBC

time3 minutes ago

  • CBC

Wildfires send Canada's carbon emissions soaring. And our peatlands emit even more

Social Sharing It's been another smoky summer, with estimates suggesting that 2025 is set to be Canada's second-worst wildfire season year. Already, more than 5.5 million hectares have burned, almost triple the 10-year average for this time of the year. But it's not just the forests that are burning. Canada is home to a quarter of the world's peatlands — boggy wetlands that are a rich store of carbon from millions of years of decaying plant and animal life. They are burning, too. But the scale of emissions from fires in the peatlands is not accounted for in current government statistics. However, that's all about to change, with a new government effort to estimate peatland emissions and their impact on climate change. "The better able I am to quantify these impacts, the better able we might be able to mitigate them," said Kelly Bona, who is leading the effort to produce a Canadian model for peatland emissions at Environment and Climate Change Canada. Bona said the new data could be included as early as next year in Canada's official greenhouse gas reporting to the UN. Its inclusion would provide a new look at the severity of the problem, which researchers say is getting worse. Why peatland fires are a climate problem Much of Canada's peatlands are in the boreal forest zone, where trees like black spruce — which are prone to burning — are common. The presence of those trees, along with rich carbon deposits in the soil, can make peatlands very flammable, especially during dry periods. Peat fires also smoulder over longer periods, rather than going up in one giant flame. Some of these fires can burn for months or years, according to researchers, releasing large amounts of their stored carbon into the atmosphere. Greg Verkaik, a peatlands researcher and PhD candidate at McMaster University, collects post-fire field measurements to estimate the emissions. He painstakingly measures the depth of the peat at various points to figure out how much has been burned. His time in the field provides him with a close look at the impact of climate change and worsening wildfires. "You get days where you just can't go into the field because everything's smoky and it's hard to breathe and it's not safe for you to be out there," he said. "You are sort of seeing that more frequently, especially over these last couple of fire seasons where it's been really bad." Wildfire emissions don't count toward Canada's anthropogenic (human-caused) totals, but they are still reported to help inform the public and keep track of how forests are doing. In recent years, the statistics have been sobering — wildfire emissions in 2023, the worst fire year in Canada's history, reached one billion tonnes — significantly more than the 694 million tonnes of emissions attributed to human activity. The feedback loop is that climate change has made fire weather more frequent and severe, and those fires are worsening climate change itself. In the peatlands, research has shown wildfires speed up permafrost melt, which in turn releases carbon, according to David Olefeldt, a peatlands researcher and assistant professor at the University of Alberta. Olefeldt also said that peatlands continue emitting carbon long after a fire, as all the carbon in the soil takes longer to be lost to the atmosphere. "If you want to understand the full impact of wildfire, you need to understand what happens in the years and even the decades after the fire," he said. A study published in 2024 used the Canadian-developed model to estimate greenhouse gas emissions from Canada's boreal and temperate peatlands. Preliminary results suggest that fire-related emissions are about 11.5 million tonnes annually but noted estimates can vary significantly from one year to the next. Wildfires over the past few years highlight those variations. 2020 was a mild fire year, with emissions of only 13 million tonnes, while 2021 was a more severe season, with emissions skyrocketing to 270 million tonnes. According to the study, peatlands are generally a carbon sink, absorbing and storing more carbon than they emit, therefore helping counteract the effects of climate change. But during a severe fire season, they become a carbon source, and release more than they absorb. How could better peatland emissions numbers be used? The new data would have a range of practical uses, both for resource development as well as conservation in the peatlands. Bona said the data could be used in conducting environmental assessments for peatland projects. Olefeldt noted that knowing more about peatland emissions — including identifying ones those that are most at risk — could help aid in discussions about protecting them. Maria Strack, a professor at the University of Waterloo who leads Can-Peat, a major research collaboration on the peatlands, pointed out that most peatlands are in regions where there's an interest in resource extraction. The new data could help inform future decisions on developing mines and other infrastructure in those areas, she said. "There's risks of mining disturbing more peat and all the infrastructure like roads to access those mines will also change the hydrology of peatlands, which could lead to more emissions." She also sees them as a nature-based solution to combating climate change. "We have about one-fourth of all the world's peat soil carbon stock, and I just think most Canadians don't even know what a peatland is," she said.

Manitoba researchers part of team working to unravel mystery of largest black hole merger ever detected
Manitoba researchers part of team working to unravel mystery of largest black hole merger ever detected

CBC

time17 hours ago

  • CBC

Manitoba researchers part of team working to unravel mystery of largest black hole merger ever detected

A group of Manitoba researchers were involved behind the scenes of an international effort that this week revealed how two massive black holes careened into one — happily, billions of light years from Earth. University of Manitoba astrophysicist Samar Safi-Harb, the Canada Research Chair in Extreme Astrophysics, and her team are collaborators on the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA program, which on Monday published evidence of what Safi-Harb says is "the most massive binary black hole detected to date." Another surprise from the detection, originally made in November 2023, was the breakneck speed at which each black hole was spinning at the time they crashed together — "close to the maximum possible [speed] allowed by theory," said Safi-Harb, who is also a professor of physics and astronomy at the Winnipeg-based U of M. "So not just they are massive, they're spinning like crazy — 400,000 times the Earth's rotation speed." Her team wasn't directly involved in this detection, but they're part of the community of thousands of researchers globally involved in LIGO — the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, which operates detectors in Washington state and Louisiana. The team includes U of M postdoctoral fellow Nathan Steinle, who specializes in gravitational wave astrophysics and modelling the collision of black holes, while postdoc Labani Mallick works on electromagnetic observations of black holes. Safi-Harb's PhD student, Neil Doerksen, is focused on improving the sensitivity of detectors used in gravitational wave detection technology, and PhD student Lucas da Conceição works on detection of neutron star gravitational waves. Studying wild extremes All five research wild extremes — extreme temperatures, extreme gravity, extreme magnetic fields exhibited by astrophysical systems. Those just happen to be associated with the deaths of stars — which Safi-Harb is fascinated by because of what they can tell us about where everything comes from. Stellar explosions lead to the creation of some of the heaviest elements in the universe: the calcium in your bones. That gold engagement ring your grandmother left you. The platinum in the catalytic converter stolen from your buddy's sedan. It all came from a beautiful kaboom in the vacuum of space. The more commonly understood way black holes are born is the collapse when a massive star reaches the end of its life. Its stellar corpse morphs into this mysterious, incredibly dense pack of matter, with gravity so intense not even light can escape. That basically makes black holes invisible to conventional light-based telescopes, which is why traditional studies have homed in on the indirect effects black holes have on their surroundings. X-ray telescopes allow scientists to, for example, infer the presence of a black hole by studying the gravitational effects they exert on nearby stars, or by finding materials like gas and dust that forms in disks around black holes. But when it comes to hunting for black hole collisions, different tools are needed. LIGO is designed to look for gravitational wave signatures first predicted to exist by Albert Einstein over a century ago. Einstein's general theory of relativity postulated that these waves rippling through space-time are produced by the motion of accelerating objects. Big, big ones. "If you throw a rock or a stone into a lake, you observe those ripples," said Safi-Harb. "When you have a black hole, it is so dense that it causes these ripples in space-time." If two black holes orbit one another and get closer and closer, they accelerate, "and that leads to really strong gravitational waves," she said. Einstein's prediction remained rooted in the theoretical realm until a decade ago, when scientists managed to observe gravitational waves for the first time through LIGO. Scientists now know of 300 black hole collisions, said Safi-Harb. The latest, dubbed GW231123, is the most massive yet. Scientists detect gravitational waves for 1st time 9 years ago Einstein theory proven more than 100 years later The original pair of black holes had masses 100 and 140 times greater than our sun, and the end product of the merge is in the range of 225 solar masses. That sounds massive, and it is, but on the spectrum of black holes it may fall somewhere in the middle. There are three classes of black holes, including those in our cosmic backyard, known as stellar mass black holes. They can be in the order of 10 to 60 times the mass of our sun. Then there are the supermassive black holes. They reside at the centres of galaxies and can be millions to billions of times more massive than our sun. Some even have names — the dark heart of our Milky Way galaxy is known as Sagittarius A. And evidence has emerged in recent years of the third class — intermediate mass black holes — that may fall between hundreds to thousands of solar masses, like GW231123 and the parent black holes that made it. The fact the parents, and GW231123, all fall into the in-between-zone is exciting — but also a bit of a head-scratcher. "These masses are believed to be 'forbidden,' or not expected to happen, because standard stellar evolution does not predict such black hole formation," said Safi-Harb. It may be that each of those parent black holes were born from mergers of even smaller black holes, said Safi-Harb. "What this discovery is teaching us is that we know that some smaller black holes can make bigger black holes, and maybe bigger black holes collide to make even bigger black holes, and if these are in dense environments, they can make things like our galaxy," she said.

Canada will feel the impact ‘severely' if NASA cuts funding: expert
Canada will feel the impact ‘severely' if NASA cuts funding: expert

CTV News

time18 hours ago

  • CTV News

Canada will feel the impact ‘severely' if NASA cuts funding: expert

York University's Paul Delaney breaks down how $6-billion in cuts to NASA's funding may pave the way for China to dominate the space race. As NASA faces the threat of US$6 billion in cuts under U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request, one astronomy expert says Canada will certainly feel the impact if the drastic financial reductions go through. Paul Delaney, former director of the Allan I. Carswell Astronomical Observatory, told CTV Your Morning on Thursday the budget cuts will severely impact every single program in NASA, making it the largest financial assault on the space agency in history. In turn, it could position other countries, namely China, to take the lead in space exploration. China is swiftly pushing forward in space exploration, with plans to put humans on the moon by early 2030. 'There is little doubt that…(NASA) will take second place,' Delaney said. He also expects that the financial threat to the space agency will lead to more privatization in the sector. Delaney said the cuts to NASA's budget will directly impact not just the Canadian Space Agency, but all researchers that are involved in space science. One item that Delaney says may be on the chopping block is the latest version of the Canada Arm, or Canadarm3, which is the country's contribution to the U.S.-led Gateway project, a space station in lunar orbit. 'The impact on Canada, in terms of both hardware generation, as well as research, could be extremely significant, forcing us of course to go elsewhere to lend our expertise,' he said. Delaney adds that the fall out from the budget cuts will run deeper than putting 'boots on Mars'. 'Your cellphone technology has been powered in very large measure by the types of activities we've developed going into space,' he said. 'The spin-offs are almost incalculable.' CNN reported on Thursday that more than 2,000 agency employees are set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's 'deferred resignation' program, introduced by former Trump ally Elon Musk, who is CEO of NASA's largest contractor, SpaceX.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store