GDT: Dairy prices up 1.1%, cheddar drops 5.6% in latest event
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Global Dairy Trade prices have rebounded 1.1% after four consecutive declines. Photo / Duncan Brown
Prices are up in the latest Global Dairy Trade auction, held overnight, with a 1.1% increase across the board.
While it is a slight rise, it is welcome news after a 4.1% drop at the previous event two weeks ago, which was the largest decline this calendar year.
It also breaks a negative streak of four consecutive price drops.
Whole milk powder, which has the biggest impact on Fonterra's farmgate milk price, lifted 1.7% to an average of US$3928/MT.
At the last event, it plunged 5.1%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Congress approves Trump's $15b cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid
The House gave final approval to President Donald Trump's request to claw back about US$9 billion (NZ$15 billion) for public broadcasting and foreign aid Saturday as Republicans intensified their efforts to target institutions and programs they view as bloated or out of step with their agenda. The vote marked the first time in decades that a president has successfully submitted such a rescissions request to Congress, and the White House suggested it won't be the last. Some Republicans were uncomfortable with the cuts, yet supported them anyway, wary of crossing Trump or upsetting his agenda. The House passed the bill by a vote of 216-213. It now goes to Trump for his signature. 'We need to get back to fiscal sanity and this is an important step,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson. Opponents voiced concerns not only about the programs targeted, but about Congress ceding its spending powers to the executive branch, as investments approved on a bipartisan basis were being subsequently cancelled on party-line votes. They said previous rescission efforts had at least some bipartisan buy-in and described the Republican package as unprecedented. ADVERTISEMENT No Democrats supported the measure when it passed the Senate, 51-48. Final passage in the House was delayed for several hours as Republicans wrestled with their response to Democrats' push for a vote on the release of Jeffrey Epstein files. The package cancels about US$1.1 billion (NZ$1.8 billion) for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and nearly US$8 billion (NZ$13 billion) for a variety of foreign aid programs, many designed to help countries where drought, disease and political unrest endure. The effort to claw back a sliver of federal spending came just weeks after Republicans also muscled through Trump's tax and spending cut bill without any Democratic support. The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the measure will increase the US debt by about US$3.3 trillion (NZ$5.5 trillion) over the coming decade. "No one is buying the the notion that Republicans are actually trying to improve wasteful spending,' said Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. A heavy blow to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting This photo provided by Kanesia McGlashan-Price shows Lauren Adams, general manager of public radio station KUCB in Unalaska, Alaska, in the broadcast studio. (Source: Associated Press) The cancellation of US$1.1 billion for the CPB represents the full amount it is due to receive during the next two budget years. ADVERTISEMENT The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service to support national programming. Democrats were unsuccessful in restoring the funding in the Senate. Lawmakers with large rural constituencies voiced particular concern about what the cuts to public broadcasting could mean for some local public stations in their state. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, said the stations are "not just your news — it is your tsunami alert, it is your landslide alert, it is your volcano alert'. As the Senate debated the bill Wednesday, a 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck off the remote Alaska Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings on local public broadcasting stations that advised people to get to higher ground. Senator Mike Rounds said he secured a deal from the White House that some money administered by the Interior Department would be repurposed to subsidise Native American public radio stations in about a dozen states. ADVERTISEMENT But Kate Riley, president and CEO of America's Public Television Stations, a network of locally owned and operated stations, said that deal was 'at best a short-term, half-measure that will still result in cuts and reduced service at the stations it purports to save'. Inside the cuts to foreign aid Demonstrators and lawmakers rally against President Donald Trump and his ally Elon Musk as they disrupt the federal government. (Source: Associated Press) Among the foreign aid cuts are $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water, and family reunification for refugees, and US$496 million (NZ$1.3 billion) to provide food, water, and healthcare for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. There also is a US$4.15 billion (NZ$6.9 billion) cut for programs that aim to boost economies and democratic institutions in developing nations. Democrats argued that the Republican administration's animus toward foreign aid programs would hurt America's standing in the world and create a vacuum for China to fill. 'This is not an America first bill. It's a China first bill because of the void that's being created all across the world,' Jeffries said. The White House argued that many of the cuts would incentivise other nations to step up and do more to respond to humanitarian crises and that the rescissions best served the American taxpayer. ADVERTISEMENT 'The money that we're clawing back in this rescissions package is the people's money. We ought not to forget that,' said Representative Virginia Foxx, chair of the House Rules Committee. After objections from several Republicans, Senate GOP leaders took out a US$400 million (NZ$669 million) cut to PEPFAR, a politically popular program to combat HIV/AIDS that is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under Republican President George W Bush. Looking ahead to future spending fights Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought speaks with reporters at the White House. (Source: Associated Press) Democrats say the bill upends a legislative process that typically requires lawmakers from both parties to work together to fund the nation's priorities. Triggered by the official rescissions request from the White House, the legislation only needed a simple majority vote to advance in the Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to break a filibuster. That meant Republicans could use their 53-47 majority to pass it along party lines. Two Republican senators, Murkowski and Senator Susan Collins of Maine, joined with Democrats in voting against the bill, though a few other Republicans also raised concerns about the process. ADVERTISEMENT 'Let's not make a habit of this,' said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker of Mississippi, who voted for the bill but said he was wary that the White House wasn't providing enough information on what exactly will be cut. Russ Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, said the imminent successful passage of the rescissions shows 'enthusiasm' for getting the nation's fiscal situation under control. 'We're happy to go to great lengths to get this thing done,' he said during a breakfast with reporters hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. In response to questions about the relatively small size of the cuts - US$9 billion - Vought said that was because 'I knew it would be hard' to pass in Congress. Vought said another rescissions package is 'likely to come soon'.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
New Zealand Reaches Deal With Canada In Long-Running Dairy Trade Dispute
Canada has agreed to allow access for New Zealand dairy products following a long running trade dispute, Trade Minister Todd McClay says. Dairy exporters had been blocked from the Canadian market, despite the move being in breach of the CPTPP trade agreement. On Friday morning McClay announced an agreement had been reached. He says Canada has committed to making changes to its dairy quotas which will deliver up to $157 million to New Zealand dairy exporters. New Zealand initiated formal dispute settlement proceedings over restricted access to the Canadian market for dairy exports under the CPTPP in 2022. A dispute panel found in New Zealand's favour, however, Canada failed to fully comply with the panel's ruling. New Zealand threatened further action last year including the imposition of retaliatory tariffs against Canadian exporters. "The government is pleased that this dispute has now been settled, and New Zealand exporters are guaranteed better access to the Canadian market," McClay said. Canada said the changes have been negotiated with "close consultation" with its dairy sector and the amendments will result in "minor policy changes". In a statement Canadian Agriculture minister Heath MacDonald said it was a "mutually satisfactory" resolution. Under the agreement, Canada has committed to changing the way it administers its dairy quotas under CPTPP, including faster and more efficient access to quotas for New Zealand exporters, reallocation of underused quotas, and penalties for importers who misuse quotas. "The CPTPP is a world leading agreement that unlocks significant opportunities for all parties, but its obligations must be upheld. Today's agreement reinforces support for the rules-based trading system," McClay said. He added Canada was a long-stranding friend and trading partner of this country and "constructive engagement" had brought about a resolution. Last year ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar called the dispute a "betrayal of our friendship". She said if Canada could not comply with the CPTPP, it should be "booted out of the deal". Deal welcomed Fonterra is pleased to see the end of a long running trade dispute involving NZ and Canada. Fonterra global external affairs director Simon Tucker told Midday Report Canada has a very protected dairy market and it has taken what he calls "dogged determination" by governments and officials to force Canada to comply with its obligations. He said dairy farmers could sell millions of dollars of products into Canada but it is only a small part of the Fonterra sales which has revenues of more than $20 billion a year. "Canada is one of those high value niches around the world which would be good for Fonterra. "This was the right to do; to use the disputes settlement over this issue. We won, and then governments and officials have worked hard to force Canada into compliance. "This is the right outcome." Tucker said the win opens up opportunities for New Zealand to pursue further moves especially around Canada's protein subsidies which are considered unfair. ExportNZ has also welcomed the deal, saying it will unlock higher export value for Kiwi business. Executive director Josh Tan said the outcome was a win for New Zealand dairy exporters, and a win for the rules-based trading system. "It's essential that our trade agreements function as they were agreed to - particularly in the current global trade context. Likewise, our trade partners should ensure they are playing by the rules." Canada was a valuable trading partner for New Zealand, Tan said. The Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand congratulated the Government for settling the dispute, which was first initiated under the previous Government. Executive director Kimberly Crewther said the outcome proved that dispute mechanisms were still a valid and viable approach to be taken. She said Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade estimated $157 million of trade revenue was not able to be used, due to breaches of the CPTPP. "Previously, it was giving the majority of export licences under these quotas to its own processors, many of whom had very little interest in seeing imports occur and they could hold on to those export licences and not use them without any penalty," Crewther said. "The changes introduce penalties... so that's a good improvement and we hope that it will lift the utilisation rates." She said Canadian dairy farmers received subsidies, which brought low prices to global dairy trading among nations without farmer subsidies, like New Zealand. "They're skewing the global dairy trade playing field quite significantly," she said. "Unfortunately, Canada's not a stranger to having these sizeable impacts on trade opportunities for New Zealand exporters. "Canada has a reputation for being amongst the most protectionist of dairy countries in the world, and they do that in a way that makes their market very difficult to access even with these CPTPP quotas, it remains 95 percent closed." Crewther said New Zealand had "virtually no tariff protections" on dairy into the market, and openly imported dairy into the country. "So we operate on an open basis, our farmers are not receiving direct subsidies and we are we're trading fairly in the world." She said its first preference is an on-demand licensing system which ensured those applying for the quotas would utilise them appropriately. "It's really important to hold them to account. This case has shown that dispute settlement can and does work, and it's important that New Zealand continues to move forward and uses these mechanisms where we need to."
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government ponders radical power reforms as prices rise
Back then, the person leading the prosecution was none other than Willis herself, and she was ruthless in her disallowance of Grant Robertson's excuses. Pressing Robertson on skyrocketing mortgage costs, Willis asked the following: 'Is it seriously his position that international factors are to blame for this growth in a core component of New Zealanders' cost of living?' The answer then, as it is now, is sadly yes. The international factors that were responsible for a third or more of the post-Covid inflation spike, according to Treasury research, are much the same as the factors weighing on Willis' growth prospects in 2025. These have caused Treasury to revise its forecasts for GDP growth in the coming year from an impressive and possibly election-winning 3.3% to a less impressive 2.9% at the most recent Budget. That follows revisions to its GDP estimates for the year to the end of June, which Treasury tweaked from a gloomy 0.5% growth to a decidedly grim 0.8% contraction. Voters may be slightly more forgiving of first-term Willis than they were of second-term Robertson – but only slightly. Like frustrated parents, voters tend to care less about who made the mess than they do about who will clean it up. National, a party elected on a mandate of getting New Zealand 'back on track', will begin the election year presiding over an economy that's on the same high inflation, slow growth track voters rejected in 2023. There's not a lot of space for the Government to move. Witness the performative outrage over butter prices, which Willis will raise in a meeting with Fonterra boss Miles Hurrell when she meets him next week. These high prices are the result of a good thing: high commodity prices that are buoying rural economies. The problem is that incomes are so low people cannot afford to pay them. The Government knows these prices are a good thing (Willis certainly does, having spent five years at Fonterra) and so does most of the Opposition. As recently as April, it celebrated them, with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon then telling the Taranaki Chamber of Commerce the economic recovery was being led by farming. 'What has been exciting to see is dairy prices are hitting an all-time high,' he said. Finance Minister Nicola Willis applauds the regional economic recovery but has to manage the high consumer prices that have followed it. Photo / Mark Mitchell Fonterra may be being naughty, potentially fattening the margins of its consumer products to make that side of the business attractive for sale, but the key driver of those prices is the high value of commodities at the moment – and that's a good thing for the country. You can slightly forgive the Government for not saying this. Celebrating high butter prices does have a Marie Antoinette-ish aspect to it. However, they perhaps did not need to point the finger so vigorously in the other direction. The problem with affordability is only half to do with prices. The other half is wages. While it seems an affront to our identity that people of a dairying nation like ours cannot afford butter, the more serious question is why New Zealand incomes struggle to keep up with those of international consumers who are willing to pay for our products. There's a reason why everyone turns their guns on Fonterra and the farmers for high prices, and that's because it's easier to blame producers than it is to solve the manifold crises that have held back New Zealanders' wages. Act Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour at a rally last weekend. Photo / Alex Burton This browbeating of corporate New Zealand is becoming a coalition issue. Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour had a go at critics of the supermarkets and banks in his rally speech last Sunday. 'It would be the easiest thing in the world for me to give a speech saying they're crooked and need to be punished somehow. They should be taxed somehow, have their businesses broken up, or be watched over by even toothier watchdogs. It's the curse of zero-sum thinking,' he said. The remarks were not just directed at Labour and the Opposition, but at the rest of the coalition, which, since coming into office, has engaged in enthusiastic supermarket bashing. In the backdrop to all of this is a looming cost-of-living decision that will likely be made in the next few months and could have a big influence on the election campaign. In February, Energy Minister Simon Watts and his Associate Minister Shane Jones selected offshore economics consultancy Frontier to be the lead reviewer of the electricity market (the review was announced in November 2024). The terms of reference are bold, saying the firm needed to look at foundational parts of the market such as generation investment incentives, efficiency, and effective wholesale and retail markets. The report came back some weeks ago and is sitting on the desks of ministers. Watts has told media a decision can be expected before the end of September. One idea is to revive Contact Energy's 2021 Thermal Co plans. Frontier has worked with Contact before, writing evidence on the firm's behalf for its proposed acquisition of Manawa. That idea would be for a company, 'Thermal Co', to own, operate and eventually retire the major power companies' thermal generation assets. The price of thermal energy sets the price for the rest of the electricity market. This new entity, potentially with a large Crown stake, would have a large influence over prices and over the incentive for firms to bring forward renewable generation, the only long-term fix to the predicament of high prices. The move would be incredibly interventionist, which is perhaps why NZ First seems so keen on it and why no one in the Act Party seems to know the report is back. National is caught in the middle. It knows something is wrong in the market but wonders whether radical reform is quite what's needed to fix it. After all, six years of radicalism from the oil and gas ban, to the 100% renewable electricity generation target, to Lake Onslow are at least partly responsible for the mess the market's in at the moment. Those decisions were unhelpful. Labour's own appointed working group told the Government in 2019 the 100% target would lead to 'large increases in retail electricity prices from today's levels' and would undermine decarbonisation efforts by putting up prices – advice that turned out to be prescient. Do we really want another few years of radicalism? National may seek to make a virtue out of mild, stable reforms that bring stability to the market and encourage private investment in more generation. The challenge here is that this new generation needs to be in firming and, in the short to medium term, there's a good chance this will involve fossil fuels (Jones floated the idea of a new coal station in the House this week). That's going to be unpopular. Other ideas floating around the coalition include changing ETS settings to reduce the Government-imposed cost of burning coal, a cost that is reflected in the wider electricity price. That might fix one broken market by undermining another. Something needs to happen and not just because high prices are weighing on households. The coalition, or at least the National and Act parts of it, appears ready to campaign on asset sales at the next election. That argument is going to sound a lot less persuasive if the gentailers, part-privatised in the last major asset selloff, are squeezing consumers. Treasury papers gush about the fact that the mixed-ownership companies, Air NZ, Genesis, Mercury, and Meridian, are basically the publicly-owned companies that are performing well. Consumers, feeling fleeced by all of them, probably disagree. And that's the trouble with this economic recovery. It might look okay from the Beehive – even good. The recovery is under way and it's a good one. For once, we are seeing an economic recovery driven by exports and not immigration and house prices, which continue to fall. As Chris Bishop said this week, New Zealand would be a better country were it to 'destroy' the idea that the economy is linked to growing house prices. He's right, the country would be better off if we did. Sadly, the record of the electorate is that house prices, where two-thirds of New Zealand households have stashed the vast bulk of their wealth, seem to be the main indicator they care about. The Key Government, often remembered as a time of relative economic prosperity, presided over years of high unemployment. The unemployment rate didn't fall below 5% until the quarter before that Government was voted out of office. Inflation, however, was almost always below 2% and house prices were rising. House prices made people feel richer. It wasn't good, but it worked – and it wasn't just Key, the Ardern Government turned a blind eye to unsustainable house prices too. Unfortunately for National, this is probably the 'track' many households are keen to get back on – and not the one currently being taken by the coalition. You can hardly blame them for feeling the surest sign of economic recovery is in their own balance sheets. The Government's challenge is to persuade people that its own 'track' is the better one.
