logo
Going high or low? Film festivals ‘Summer Camp' and ‘Bleak Week' open on Sunday

Going high or low? Film festivals ‘Summer Camp' and ‘Bleak Week' open on Sunday

Right now at the movies, Tom Cruise, a Hawaiian island dweller and a genetic lab experiment from space are simultaneously agitating and reassuring millions with tales of apocalypse-thwarting derring-do ('Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning') and a loving family in challenging circumstances ('Lilo & Stitch'). It's good news for theater owners, and the perpetually challenged moviegoing tradition.
This is good news, too: We have a couple of eccentric film festivals opening this week in Chicago, designed to broaden our options and reexamine some movies past, launching the new month in this nervous breakdown of a year with some striking emotional/visual extremes, careening from darkness to giddy intensity in multiple genres.
'Summer Camp' is what the Siskel Film Center calls its 10-film mini-festival of 'extra-ness,' that adjective courtesy of director of programming Rebecca Fons. The series opens at 1:30 p.m., June 1 with 'Written on the Wind,' director Douglas Sirk's feverish Texas hotbed of repression and psychosexual yearning. A huge hit in 1956, coming off Sirk's previous examples of brilliantly skeptical romantic artifice, this is a melodrama that turns 'mambo' into a verb. Oscar winner Dorothy Malone, as the rabidly carnal oil heiress, not just figuratively but literally mambos her disapproving father into a fatal heart attack. It's a great scene in a dozen ripe, contradictory ways. And that, for many, exemplifies the power of camp in the right filmmakers' hands.
From there, the festival struts from a Bette Davis/Joan Crawford smackdown ('Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?' from 1962, directed by Robert Aldrich) to John Waters ('Female Trouble,' 1974, with Divine, of course) to a clever variety of titles ranging from 1933's 'King Kong' and '42nd Street' to the uniquely unhinged 'Boom!' from 1968 and director Joseph Losey. 'Boom!' may star Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, but the real star, in my view, is the Tiziani label of Rome, whose wardrobe for Taylor is the stuff of waking nightmares.
The range of work on screen in 'Summer Camp,' Fons hopes, supports the notion that camp has no fixed definition, only an appetite for life. She says she revisited Susan Sontag's 1964 essay 'Notes on Camp,' which she first devoured in college, for curation tips and as a historical sounding board for her own ideas about cinematic extra-ness.
'I'm always thinking about how movie audiences interact with what's in front of them,' she says. 'For me, camp means a celebration of self, of the extravagance of self. It can be expressed through fashion or just the outward expression of pure emotion, with no shame.'
Though it predates the Victorian era by centuries, 'camp' as we now know it, though its definition remains an argument every time, has its roots in the queer Victorian usage of the word. (There's a really good feature on this posted on the United Kingdom National Archive website.) In her essay, Sontag consciously downplayed camp's political and queer aspects, and its sly revolt against the establishment. Its gradual mainstreaming meant something; it was serious business, in the spirit of outré flamboyance. She defined camp as 'playful, anti-serious,' expressing a fundamentally comic or ironic worldview and 'artifice as an ideal.'
Also starting June 1, 'Bleak Week' at the Music Box Theatre takes things down a notch, while somehow taking it up, too. The festival moniker comes from the American Cinematheque in Hollywood, which has presented 'Bleak Week' in a big, bittersweet way for four years running.
This year, several other art-house and repertory film organizations around the country are getting in on the downbeat, among them the Paris Theater in New York City and the Music Box in Chicago. The 12-film series took a couple of titles from the American Cinematheque's past calendars, while programming the rest with the Cinematheque's blessing. The result is a vivid, surprisingly varied range of bummers, both domestic and foreign, many of them exquisite in their stoic but not heartless dramatizations of a world out to get you, somehow, with forces of doom snaking through the narratives.
Some are Hollywood studio classics of the 1970s, such as director Roman Polanski's 'Chinatown' (1974) or, lesser-known but extraordinarily affecting, Jerry Schatzberg's plaintive road movie 'Scarecrow' (1973), pairing Gene Hackman with Al Pacino in a simple story of drifters with an idea to open a car wash. Simple idea, complex and remarkable performance detail: The film was shot in sequence, allowing Hackman and Pacino, actors and recently anointed stars, the time and rhythm to accommodate, however warily, each other's working methods. It wasn't a hit, but 'Scarecrow' knew the score. The late Hackman frequently cited it as his most gratifying film experience.
Despair can be really funny, too, and the Coen brothers' 'A Serious Man' (2009) piles misfortune atop misfortune for a University of Minnesota mathematics professor (Michael Stuhlbarg), cuckolding him (Fred Melamed's Sy Abelman is the most soothing bastard in modern American cinema) and eventually forcing him into a stern ethical dilemma around grading time, among other catastrophes. It's the Coens' best film, and yes, I'm not forgetting 'No Country for Old Men,' the one everybody admires more because serial killer movies are easier than mordant comedies of unease.
'Bleak Week' spans the globe, with the infamously grotty late-night dare 'In a Glass Cage' (1986) from Spain's Agusti Villaronga and, from Japan, Akihiro Suzuki's newly restored 1999 sexual odyssey 'Looking for an Angel.' Greece's Yorgos Lanthimos and his black-comic penchant for totalitarian nightmares are represented by 'Dogtooth' (2009). The rest of the offerings fill out the slate's idea of what bleak means to this director, and that one, and why despair comes in more than one shade of grey.
The Music Box has big expansion plans, recently announced, thanks to a $1.2 million community development grant from the City of Chicago. The Southport Avenue landmark is adding a 100-seat theater to complement its existing 700-seat auditorium and the 60-seater built a few years ago, located across from the concession counter. The third theater will replace two storefront units immediately south of the Music Box main entrance.
Managing director Ryan Oestreich says it'll be a $2.6 million project overall, as the theater renovates its restrooms to double the capacity. Target completion date is summer 2026.
'We're future-proofing ourselves,' he says, 'because our audience is growing. The new screen will allow us to better juggle the two sides of our programming, the repertory side and the new releases.' 'Bleak Week,' he says, is 'an experiment. But if you play the same hand over and over again, does that help the cinema experience in Chicago? It does not.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The magic of summer camp inspired Charis Cotter's new novel
The magic of summer camp inspired Charis Cotter's new novel

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The magic of summer camp inspired Charis Cotter's new novel

Charis Cotter says some of her earliest memories are of attending summer camp as a child in Ontario. "We'd have dress-up nights and skits. I loved the skits. And singing, the singing was great. To me [it] was just magical," she said. She draws on these magical memories for her latest novel The Mystery of the Haunted Dance Hall, which tells the story of a girl who goes to summer camp for the first time and encounters a ghostly mystery. The prolific and award-winning author of children's books moved to Western Bay, Newfoundland, about 15 years ago, after spending most of her life in Toronto. She believes the move gave her the same sense of vitality she used to experience in the summers of her childhood. "Growing up in the city, but going out and being in the country, I just felt like I came alive. It was where I belonged. It inspired me," she said. Living next to a large cemetery in Toronto, and then moving into a house situated between two cemeteries in Western Bay, she has always been drawn to the sense of wonder graveyards inspire. "I always want there to be more to life than what you can see and touch, that there's something more mysterious happening, and magical," she said. In her writing, she approaches the idea of the supernatural with a sense of playfulness rather than fear. "To me it's a key to get into a child's imagination. It's with grownups, too. You start talking about ghosts, and immediately everyone is listening." Cotter has authored more than a dozen books for young readers, garnering accolades from the Newfoundland and Labrador Book Awards and the Atlantic Book Awards for children's literature, plus national and international awards. Yet, her first passion was acting, and she still brings that early love to her craft through engaging presentations. Cotter especially enjoys visiting children in classrooms. Drawing on her theatre training — she studied acting in Toronto and London, England — she presents dramatic readings in character and helps children learn to tell their own stories. Among her many personas, she has given readings dressed as Queen Elizabeth II and as a housecleaning ghost from Scottish lore. She also does creative writing workshops with school children. Two of her titles, The Ghosts of Baccalieu and The Ghosts of Southwest Arm, are collections of stories arising out of these classroom writing workshops. "I want to stimulate kids' imaginations," she said. "I want them to be creative and lose themselves in daydreams and use their imaginations because I just think it's vital to human existence and creativity." In The Mystery of the Haunted Dance Hall, the young protagonist feels different from other kids and is nervous about attending summer camp for the first time. In fact, many of Cotter's novels feature characters who feel out of step with their peers. "I think a lot of kids feel that way," she said. "I think kids can relate on some level to that feeling of not being sure of yourself and not being sure of your friends … or feeling that you're weird or different." What inspires her to write about these young characters? Cotter believes she is a 10-year-old at heart. "Everybody has an age that they are inside that's not their chronological age, it's their psychological age or the age that they operate from and see the world around them. And I always say that I'm 10 inside," she said. "There's insecurity, hesitation, but the world is opening up." Whether she's writing a new ghost story or telling tales to a room full of fifth graders, Cotter is driven by a deep empathy for the children she engages with. "I want their emotional experience of life to be validated," she said. Sometimes in a classroom setting, a child will disclose their real-life experience of grief. "Somebody will say, my father died last year, or my grandmother died. And then I have to try to respond to them in a way that isn't just playing, it's something more. And it's very moving when that happens." Ultimately, Cotter's goal is to inspire delight in her young readers. "My books are always to do with ghosts, and ghosts have to do with death. So, there is a sadness in my books. But my main purpose in writing is always to give the reader a good time, to entertain them and have fun, and pull them into another world," she said. In the coming months, Cotter will offer signing events in Newfoundland and Ontario. She also hopes to do another school tour in the fall. Copies of The Mystery of the Haunted Dance Hall are available in all bookstores. Her next local book signing will take place at Coles in the Village Mall in St. John's on Saturday, June 14, from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Click here to visit our landing page.

How to watch ‘Beckham and Friends Live' Champions League final with Tom Cruise for free
How to watch ‘Beckham and Friends Live' Champions League final with Tom Cruise for free

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

How to watch ‘Beckham and Friends Live' Champions League final with Tom Cruise for free

New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. There's nothing impossible about this mission: watch and comment on one of the biggest sporting events of the year. Just days after contributing to a record-breaking Memorial Day box office with the eighth (and final?) 'Mission: Impossible' installment, Tom Cruise will join David Beckham live on 'Beckham and Friends Live' during this afternoon's UEFA Champions League final between Inter Milan and Paris Saint-Germain. 'Beckham and Friends Live' is an altcast (similar to ESPN's 'Manningcast,' which airs during select Monday Night Football games) that debuted on Paramount+ earlier in this year's Champions League cycle featuring the soccer legend, with former celebrity guests including Stanley Tucci, Guy Ritchie, Joseph Fiennes, and James Corden. Advertisement During the altcast, Beckham and his guests watch, comment on, and react to the game in real time. Kate Scott, host of CBS Sports' 'UEFA Champions League Today' show is also on hand to host. In addition to Cruise, Beckham will also be joined by Super Bowl winner Odell Beckham Jr. during today's Champions League final broadcast. What time is 'Beckham and Friends Live' and the Champions League final on? Today's edition of 'Beckham and Friends Live' with Tom Cruise begins at the same time as the Inter Milan vs. PSG match: 3 p.m. EST today (May 31). How to watch 'Beckham & Friends Live' for free: Advertisement 'Beckham and Friends Live' is an original broadcast exclusive to Paramount+, so you'll need a subscription to stream it. Paramount+ offers two plans. The ad-supported plan costs $7.99/month, while the ad-free plan costs $12.99/month. If you subscribe through Amazon Prime Video Channels, you can take advantage of a seven-day free trial to watch the series. How does this work? First, you'll need to be an Amazon Prime member (but if you aren't, you can get started with a 30-day free trial). From there, you can add a Paramount+ subscription to your Prime Video membership. Advertisement You can also stream the regular broadcast feed of the Inter Milan vs. PSG match with a Paramount+ subscription. How to watch 'Beckham & Friends Live' from anywhere: If you want to tune into the Paramount+ exclusive 'Beckham and Friends Live' broadcast from anywhere in the world, consider using a VPN. It's easy to use a VPN, which masks the IP address on your device and lets you select a new virtual location to stream from. Whether you're in the UK, Canada, Mexico or anywhere else in the world, you can access virtually anything using a VPN. Our favorite is NordVPN, which is currently offering up to 76% off with plans starting at just $3.39/month. Why Trust Post Wanted by the New York Post This article was written by Angela Tricarico, Commerce Writer/Reporter for Post Wanted Shopping and New York Post's streaming property, Decider. Angela keeps readers up to date with cord-cutter-friendly deals, and information on how to watch your favorite sports teams, TV shows, and movies on every streaming service. Not only does Angela test and compare the streaming services she writes about to ensure readers are getting the best prices, but she's also a superfan specializing in the intersection of shopping, tech, sports, and pop culture. Prior to joining Decider and The New York Post in 2023, she wrote about streaming and consumer tech at Insider Reviews

When Mission: Impossible Had No Mission
When Mission: Impossible Had No Mission

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

When Mission: Impossible Had No Mission

Every major movie franchise has boxes to check. In Jurassic Park, dinosaurs must run amok; in Planet of the Apes, apes have to meditate on intelligence; in The Fast and the Furious, Vin Diesel absolutely has to evangelize the benefits of family, Corona beers, and tricked-out cars. But Mission: Impossible took four films to fully establish its franchise must-have: the ever more blurred lines between its death-defying, stunt-loving star, Tom Cruise, and the superspy he plays. For more than a decade, the series was defined instead by its lack of definition—at least, beyond having Cruise in the lead role as Ethan Hunt, and Ving Rhames recur as Hunt's ally. Each installment felt made by a director with a specific take on the material, and Cruise was their versatile instrument. But the four Mission: Impossible films that followed—culminating in the eighth and purportedly final installment, now in theaters—have taken a different approach. Instead of relying on a select few characters and story beats to link the films together, the movies have abided by a stricter canon. Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning, which earned a record-setting $63 million at the box office over its opening weekend, represents the most aggressive pivot away from the saga's more freewheeling origins: It self-seriously inserts supercuts of footage from its predecessors, reveals the purpose of a long-forgotten plot device, and turns a bit player from 1996's Mission: Impossible into a crucial character. In the process, it streamlines those earlier, delightfully unpredictable stories to the point of overlooking their true appeal. That tactic may be familiar to today's audiences, who are used to cinematic universes and intersecting story threads, but the Mission: Impossible franchise initially distinguished itself by eschewing continuity. New cast members came and went. Hunt lacked signature skills and catchphrases. The movies were messy, and didn't seem interested in building toward an overarching plan. Yet in their inconsistency, they prove the value of ignoring the brand-building pressures that have become the norm for big-budget features today. [Read: The unbearable weight of Mission: Impossible] Like the 1960s television show on which they're loosely based, the early Mission: Impossibles were stand-alone stories. The first two movies in particular stuck out for their bold authorial styles. First came Brian De Palma's film, which he drenched in noir-ish flair while also deploying vivid color and Dutch angles. It arrived at a time when blockbusters such as Independence Day and Twister leveled cities and prioritized world-ending spectacle. Without a formula in place, De Palma got to challenge genre conventions—for instance, by mining tension out of mere silence during the central set piece, which saw Hunt's team staging a tricky heist. The second film, 2000's Mission: Impossible II, went maximalist under the direction of John Woo, who punctuated almost every sequence with slow-motion visuals and dizzying snap zooms. The filmmaker also asserted that Hunt himself was malleable: Whereas in the first film, he fights off his enemies without ever firing a gun, in Woo's version, he's a cocksure Casanova mowing down his targets in hails of bullets. Woo also indulged in the action pageantry that De Palma had avoided—Mission: Impossible II seemed to contain twice the amount of explosions necessary for a popcorn film—but the climactic stunt is perhaps the smallest Cruise has ever had to pull off: When the villain stabs at Hunt with a knife, the point stops just before reaching his eye. The two films that followed conveyed a similar sense of unpredictability. For 2006's Mission: Impossible III and 2011's Mission: Impossible—Ghost Protocol, Cruise, who also served as a producer, picked unconventional choices to direct: J. J. Abrams, then best known for creating twisty TV dramas such as Alias and Lost, took on the third entry, while Brad Bird, who'd cut his teeth in animation, handled Ghost Protocol. Like their more accomplished predecessors, both filmmakers were entrusted by Cruise and company to treat Mission: Impossible as a playground where they could demonstrate their own creative strengths. [Read: The sincerity and absurdity of Hollywood's best action franchise] Where De Palma and Woo focused on visual panache, Abrams and Bird stretched the limits of tone—and in doing so, revealed the adaptability of the franchise. Mission: Impossible III is unnervingly sobering amid its shootouts and double crosses; the film features a memorably chilling Philip Seymour Hoffman as the villain, a character's disturbing death, and a subplot about Hunt getting married. Ghost Protocol, meanwhile, is essentially a screwball comedy: Simon Pegg's character, Benji, provides a humorous button to many of the film's biggest scenes, and Bird treats Hunt like a marble caught in a Rube Goldberg machine packed with goofy gadgets, whether he's pinballing through a prison or being launched out of a car in the middle of a sandstorm. (Hunt even declares 'Mission accomplished,' only for the film to play the line for laughs.) In the years since Ghost Protocol, much of big-budget filmmaking has come to feel made by committee. Studios offer fans remakes, legacy sequels, and spin-offs that connect disparate story threads, bending over backwards to ensure that viewers understand they're being shown something related to preexisting media. (Just look at the title of the upcoming John Wick spin-off.) The new Mission: Impossible suffers by making similar moves. It struggles to make sense of Hunt's story as one long saga, yielding an awkwardly paced, lethargic-in-stretches film. The Final Reckoning insists that every assignment Hunt has ever taken, every ally he's ever made, and every enemy he's ever foiled have been connected, forming a neat line of stepping stones that paved the way for him to save the world one more time. Taken together, the first four Mission: Impossibles were compellingly disorganized, a stark contrast with Hollywood's ever more rigid notion of how to construct a franchise. They didn't build consistent lore. Each new installment didn't try to top the previous one—a popular move that's had diminishing returns. Although some observers critique their varying quality, the lack of consensus emphasizes the singularity of each of these efforts. They remind me of the instances of an individual filmmaker's vision found amid major cinematic properties these days, such as Taika Waititi putting his witty stamp on a Thor sequel, Fede Alvarez turning Alien: Romulus into a soundscape of jump scares, and on television, Tony Gilroy ensuring that the Star Wars prequel Andor never included a single Skywalker. If the older Mission: Impossible movies now feel dated and incongruous—whether within the franchise itself or as part of the cinematic landscape writ large—that's to their benefit. They let creative sensibilities, not commercial ones, take the lead. Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store