logo
India-US trade deal: India Inc's America plans on hold; clarity on Donald Trump's tariffs on India, agreement awaited

India-US trade deal: India Inc's America plans on hold; clarity on Donald Trump's tariffs on India, agreement awaited

Time of India4 days ago
Bilateral trade agreement discussions between India and the US remain ongoing. (AI image)
India-US trade deal: As talks between India and the US for an interim trade deal continue, India Inc is faced with uncertainty for their America plans. Corporates are in a wait-and-watch mode to finalise plans looking for clarity on tariff rates applicable on India if an interim deal is reached with the Donald Trump administration.
Extended trade negotiations between India and the US are impacting Indian businesses, affecting export orders, operational strategies, and the acquisition of new American clients, according to an ET report.
Bilateral trade agreement discussions between India and the US remain ongoing. The US administration extended a 90-day suspension on reciprocal tariffs for most trading partners to August 1 from July 9. The US had on April 2 suggested a 26% tariff rate for India.
Trade Deal: India Inc on Hold Mode
Industry leaders report that global companies are exercising caution, awaiting the results of the trade deal discussions. This cautious approach is evident across key industries including electronics, textiles, apparel, seafood, and gems and jewellery sectors.
Leading electronics manufacturers such as Bhagwati Products (owned by Micromax), Karbonn Group, and Dixon Technologies have indicated that whilst existing US exports continue, new orders are suspended pending clarity on trade talks.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Benefits of Trading Bitcoin CFDs
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: India receptive to imports of GM farm products used in animal feed? Mini deal in works as Trump deadline nears
"Prospective clients who wanted to manufacture in India for the US are in a wait-and-watch mode, expecting clarity on where India stands vis-a-vis China and Vietnam in terms of US tariff," Atul Lall, managing director at Dixon Technologies told ET. Dixon produces Motorola smartphones for exports to the US.
Final Call Awaited on Trade Deal
Karbonn Group managing director Pardeep Jain noted the prevailing high level of uncertainty regarding the US market.
"Brands have made it clear that if there is no substantial duty difference between India and China, they are unlikely to shift manufacturing to India. Discussions are still continuing," he said.
Trade deal uncertainty is also affecting India's extended export commitments in the gems and jewellery sector, particularly relating to the Christmas and end-of-year retail season.
"The process of placing orders for Christmas usually begins in June from the JCK Show of jewellery at Las Vegas; first with sample line orders followed by the full orders in September-October," said Sabyasachi Ray, executive director, The Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council according to the financial daily.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump says 'another deal coming up, maybe with India'
According to Ray, American purchasers are engaging in price discussions, anticipating reduced demand if Indian jewellery prices increase due to higher tariffs. He noted that certain buyers are discussing ways to distribute the additional costs.
The textile industry's representative body CITI's secretary general Chandrima Chatterjee expressed short-term optimism about India securing a favourable deal, with competitive tariffs compared to its main rivals.
"However, this optimism may not completely translate into orders in the medium term due to the vague scenario about applicable product specific tariffs that will unfold," she told ET . "There is cautious optimism. The buyers are holding back on big orders as the sectoral or category-wise tariff rates could vary significantly."
The seafood export sector is experiencing a decline in orders recently, with international buyers questioning suppliers about their willingness to accept additional tariff costs.
"There is a slowdown in exports from the past three weeks as new orders are not coming," said Pawan Kumar G, president, Seafood Exporters' Association of India.
Also Read |
Trump tariff war: Deal or no deal - why it won't matter much for India
India-US Trade Deal Soon?
US President Donald Trump indicated on Wednesday that an agreement with India might be concluded shortly. Trade relations between India and the United States are substantial, with bilateral commerce reaching $131.84 billion in FY25, establishing the US as India's main trading partner.
Under a new agreement, the US has implemented a 19% tariff on Indonesia and 30% on the European Union starting August 1. Trump has issued tariff notifications to approximately 24 nations, including Canada, Japan, and Brazil, with rates ranging from 20% to 50%, alongside a 50% tariff on copper. For smaller nations, the anticipated rate is approximately 10-15%.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' Stadium Over Name Change
Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' Stadium Over Name Change

Mint

time20 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' Stadium Over Name Change

President Donald Trump threatened to block the Washington Commanders' bid to build a new stadium in the District of Columbia, escalating his feud with the NFL franchise over its decision to change its name from the Redskins. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,'' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.' Trump has previously complained about the football team's decision to change its name amid concerns the old name was a slur against Native Americans. Earlier Sunday, he had asserted there was a 'big clamoring' to switch it back. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' Trump posted. 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The Commanders didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump also leveled criticism at the Cleveland Guardians, the Major League Baseball team that changed its name from the Cleveland Indians in 2021. Trump has sought to reverse other name changes done in an effort to be racially or culturally sensitive. Trump is limited in what he can do about sports teams outside Washington, DC. But the Commanders plan to build a new stadium on land that has been managed by the US National Park Service. The tract's RFK Stadium was home to the team for roughly three decades until 1996. With assistance from Nathan Risser. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Shahid Afridi breaks silence on India-Pakistan match fiasco: There is one rotten egg
Shahid Afridi breaks silence on India-Pakistan match fiasco: There is one rotten egg

India Today

time28 minutes ago

  • India Today

Shahid Afridi breaks silence on India-Pakistan match fiasco: There is one rotten egg

Controversial Pakistan cricketer Shahid Afridi stoked fire on Sunday, July 20 against the Indian team, which pulled out of their match against Pakistan at the World Championship of Legends (WCL 2025). Multiple players from the Indian team opted out of the exhibition game against Pakistan due to the presence of Shahid Afridi, who had made some problematic statements against India during the tensions between the two to the local media on Sunday, the day that the match was scheduled to be played, Shahid Afridi claimed that even the Indian cricketers were disappointed to not play the game and blamed the pull-out on Shikhar Dhawan, who had publicly announced that he would not play the exhibition match if Afridi was part of the Pakistan line-up. Afridi called Dhawan a 'rotten egg' and blamed him for 'spoiling' the rest of the Indian cricketers. "...Sports brings countries closer. If politics comes between everything then how will you move forward? Without communication, things cannot be solved. The idea for these kinds of events is also to meet one on one. But you know, there is always one rotten egg, which spoils everything," Shahid Afridi told the media on Sunday, July further added fuel to the fire by insinuating that Dhawan was an embarrassment for his nation. He went on to add that the Indian team should have stayed home if they did not want to play cricket at the WCL 2025."They trained a day before the match. I think that they pulled out just because of one guy. Even the Indian team is very disappointed. They were here to play. I am telling you, you should be a good ambassador for the country, not an embarrassment," Afridi said. Shahid Afridi's Double StandardsThe words of sports diplomacy come in sharp contrast to the comments made by Shahid Afridi in the month of April, where he had alleged that the Indian government carried out attacks on its own citizens in Pahalgam."The terrorists continued to kill people in Pahalgam for an hour, and not a single Indian soldier out of 8 lakh showed up. But when they did, they blamed Pakistan," Afridi had told local reporters in Pakistan."India carries out terrorism itself, kills its own people, and then puts the blame on Pakistan," he Sunday, Afridi turned up in another avatar, stating that he was there as an ambassador of cricket and was hugely disappointed that the match did not take place at were very excited to play the second match (vs India). I thought we would be at the ground. We were expecting 17,000–18,000 fans, who would have enjoyed the match. But yeah, it is quite disappointing that we did not play," he said on further claimed that if he had known that the Indian team had problems with his presence, he would have removed himself from Sunday's game."If they did not play for me, I would have stayed home. Cricket should have continued. Who is Shahid Afridi in front of cricket? No one. If they did not want to play why did they come here? Go sit at home and play between yourselves," he India vs Pakistan match at WCL 2025 was supposed to be the first cricketing event between India and Pakistan since Operation Sindoor. However, the match was called off after a massive backlash from Indian citizens on social media, who questioned the former cricketers for participating in an event alongside Pakistan cricketers amid cross-border tensions with the neighbouring state.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Illegal: Russia's biggest oil producer slams EU sanctions on India's refinery
Illegal: Russia's biggest oil producer slams EU sanctions on India's refinery

India Today

time29 minutes ago

  • India Today

Illegal: Russia's biggest oil producer slams EU sanctions on India's refinery

Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil producer, condemned the European Union's sanctions on Nayara Energy, an Indian oil refinery partly owned by Rosneft. The company called the EU's move "unjustified" and "illegal," warning that these restrictions threaten India's energy security and could hurt its EU announced the sanctions on Friday as part of its 18th package of restrictions against Russia, targeting its oil trade to pressure Moscow over the Ukraine invasion. Nayara Energy, located in Gujarat, processes crude oil and is partly owned by Rosneft, which holds 49.13% of the refinery. The EU's goal is to cut Kremlin revenues by limiting Russia's crude exports to countries like said in a statement that Nayara Energy is an "important asset" that ensures a steady supply of petroleum products to India's domestic market. Rosneft also clarified that it holds less than half of Nayara and does not control the company, which is run by an independent board. The company called the EU's reasons for the sanctions "far-fetched and false." It pointed out that Nayara is an Indian legal entity focused on developing its assets and reinvesting profits to grow the refinery and its petrochemical Energy runs a large refinery with a capacity of 400,000 barrels per day and owns nearly 7,000 fuel outlets across India. It is also working on a new petrochemical plant near its refinery to expand its production REJECTS EU SANCTIONSIndia's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has also criticised the EU sanctions. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that India "does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures" and reaffirmed that India only recognises sanctions decided within the United Nations framework."We have noted the latest sanctions announced by the European Union. India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. We are a responsible actor and remain fully committed to our legal obligations," Jaiswal said in a statement posted on BLAMES EU FOR VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL LAWRosneft accused the EU of ignoring international law and interfering with the sovereignty of third countries like India. The Russian oil giant called the sanctions part of a broader attempt to destabilise global energy markets and create unfair ownership of Nayara Energy is shared between Rosneft and the Indian investment group SPV Kesani Enterprises, along with other retail investors. Reports suggest Rosneft is looking to exit the Indian venture because sanctions have made it difficult to send its earnings out of said it expects Nayara to protect the interests of its shareholders and customers. It also said that Russia and India's governments would support the company in dealing with these challenges.- EndsWith inputs form AgenciesMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store