&w=3840&q=100)
FBI scoured Epstein records for Trump mentions, US Senator claims
Five years after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death in prison, questions linger about who else might have been involved in his crimes.
Many are now pointing at President Donald Trump, who earlier this year ordered a full FBI and DOJ review of Epstein's evidence.
The outcome? A quiet DOJ memo released weeks ago, stating no further charges were needed—no new suspects, no infamous 'client list,' just Ghislaine Maxwell, already convicted.
Epstein was arrested in 2019 during Trump's first term, with authorities seizing what they described as a mountain of evidence from his homes, enough to convict Maxwell. Epstein, however, died in his cell before facing trial.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump's supporters expected the Epstein files to be declassified as soon as he began his second term. Instead, in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi distributed binders labelled 'The Epstein Files: Phase I' to right-wing influencers.
Bondi claimed her team was sifting through 'tens of thousands' of videos, promising the full files would eventually be released. But FBI Director Kash Patel, appearing on Joe Rogan's podcast, bluntly stated there was nothing new to share.
Days later, the DOJ's memo confirmed his stance.
Senator Dick Durbin, in letters to Patel posted on his Senate website, has revealed that hundreds of FBI agents were tasked with combing through the Epstein files, specifically looking for mentions of Trump.
'According to information my office received, the FBI was pressured to put approximately 1,000 personnel in its Information Management Division (IMD) … on 24-hour shifts to review approximately 100,000 Epstein-related records in order to produce more documents that could then be released on an arbitrarily short deadline,' Durbin wrote.
This effort, spanning tens of thousands of hours over two weeks in March, culminated in a final memo that wasn't released until June.
'My office was told that these personnel were instructed to 'flag' any records in which President Trump was mentioned,' he added.
The three-month delay between the review and the memo's release has raised questions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What was found, and why hasn't it been made public? Trump, once vocal about declassifying the files, now appears to be urging his team to keep quiet.
Congressman Dan Goldman, in a letter, expressed concern: 'The convergence of your unexplained delay in releasing the Epstein Files … raises serious questions about whether President Trump has intervened to prevent the public release … to hide his own embarrassing and potentially criminal conduct.'
Trump's response has only fueled the fire.
He's lashed out at his own supporters, calling them ' weaklings' and saying he doesn't need their backing. When The Wall Street Journal published an old birthday note from Trump to Epstein, in which Trump wrote they 'have certain things in common' and wished for 'another wonderful secret,' Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the outlet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
The Mission: Tim Weiner's book explains how the CIA lost its way
Throughout The Mission, Weiner hammers on an agency that seems to be repeatedly blinded by its sense of American supremacy NYT THE MISSION: CIA in the 21st Century by Tim Weiner Published by Mariner 452 pages $35 On June 21, President Trump took to the airwaves to announce that his secret directive for the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities had just been carried out. 'Tonight,' he proclaimed, 'I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success,' with those facilities 'completely and totally obliterated.' Trump's triumphalist tone was swiftly undercut by a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analysis that found the airstrikes were likely to set back Iran's nuclear capabilities by a mere few months. The furious president not only doubled down on his 'obliterated' claim but insisted that further analysis would confirm it. Sure enough, his Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director, John Ratcliffe, soon scurried forward to cast doubt on the DIA's assessment and to insist that 'new intelligence' from an unidentified source confirmed the sites had been 'severely damaged,' not quite Trump's adverb of choice, but close. Nothing on the ground is any clearer now, but to many observers one thing is: These events served as yet another example of the rank politicisation of America's pre-eminent intelligence agency. As Tim Weiner demonstrates in The Mission, this trend is likely only to accelerate with Trump in the White House. Both as a one-time reporter for The New York Times and as a book author, Weiner has made tracking the fluctuating fortunes of the American intelligence community his life's work. His masterly 'Legacy of Ashes,' detailing the CIA's first half-century, won a National Book Award in 2007. The Mission picks up where that book left off, narrating the agency's history beyond the fall of communism. It is exhaustive and prodigiously researched, but also curiously ungainly. The story begins in the 1990s. Grasping for a new mission in the wake of the Cold War, the CIA played a supporting role in the war on drugs, and then, after the 9/11 attacks, the war on terror. Agents hunted for the Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan and tortured high-value prisoners in hopes of gaining information on future attacks. Much of the testimony, Weiner writes, was gathered by a quickly raised army of often inexperienced interrogators. At the same time, Weiner notes, intelligence officers often felt their intelligence was beside the point. As one former CIA Iraq operations chief insists, 'These guys would have gone to war if Saddam had a rubber band and a paper clip.' Throughout The Mission, Weiner hammers on an agency that seems to be repeatedly blinded by its sense of American supremacy. In the past decade and a half, the CIA has been caught off guard again and again, including in China, where the country's intelligence services apparently excel at rooting out and killing American assets. The agency was also back-footed by the onset of the Arab Spring uprisings in 2010, Weiner writes, because US spies depended on the accuracy of information coming from aging counterparts within the dictatorial regimes that were about to crumble in the unrest. Weiner saves his greatest scorn, however, for the first Trump administration, detailing both the vast web of contacts between his campaign staff and Russian intelligence officials as well as Trump's subsequent efforts to bring the CIA to heel, even as he leaned on his intelligence advisers to vet his rash proposals. 'How would we do,' Trump's first CIA director, Mike Pompeo, later recalled the president musing, 'if we went to war with Mexico?' There is something simultaneously illuminating and saddening in contemplating the course the CIA has travelled during the past quarter-century. In this regard, one episode Weiner recounts stands out. In 2007, the CIA gathered compelling evidence that Syria, no friend of the US, was well on its way to building a nuclear weapon. The news set off a spirited debate within the Bush administration over whether it should launch a pre-emptive strike to eliminate the site. The idea was vehemently opposed by one of Bush's closest advisers — 'We don't do Pearl Harbors' — and the bombing scheme was shelved (though it was taken over by a country willing to do the job: Israel). Compare that with Trump's 'Pearl Harbor' assault on Iran's nuclear facilities even though the CIA and almost every other Western intelligence agency had concluded that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon. The attack starkly underscored just how shamelessly the American intelligence community has already succumbed to Trump's will. In this regard, Weiner's warnings about the peril facing both the CIA and the US seem prophetic.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
EU plans retaliation strategy as US hardens trade stance before deadline
European Union envoys are set to meet as early as this week to formulate a plan for measures to respond to a possible no-deal scenario with US President Donald Trump, whose tariff negotiating position is seen to have stiffened ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. The overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of next month's deadline. Still, efforts have yet to yield sustained progress following talks in Washington last week, according to people familiar with the matter. Negotiations will continue over the next two weeks. The US is now seen to want a near-universal tariff on EU goods higher than 10 per cent, with increasingly fewer exemptions limited to aviation, some medical devices and generic medicines, several spirits, and a specific set of manufacturing equipment that the US needs, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. A spokesperson for the European Commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, said they had no comment to make on the ongoing negotiations. The two sides have also discussed a potential ceiling for some sectors, as well as quotas for steel and aluminum and a way to ring-fence supply chains from sources that oversupply the metals, the people said. The people cautioned that even if an agreement were reached it would need Trump's sign off – and his position isn't clear. 'I am confident we'll get a deal done,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday. 'I think all these key countries will figure out it is better to open their markets to the United States of America than to pay a significant tariff.' Lutnick added that he had spoken to European trade negotiators early Sunday. Trump's Letter The US president wrote to the EU earlier in the month, warning that the bloc would face a 30 per cent tariff on most of its exports from Aug. 1. Alongside a universal levy, Trump has hit cars and auto parts with a 25 per cent levy, and steel and aluminum with double that. He's also threatened to target pharmaceuticals and semiconductors with new duties as early as next month, and recently announced a 50 per cent levy on copper. In all, the EU estimates that US duties already cover €380 billion ($442 billion), or about 70 per cent, of its exports to the US. Before Trump's letter, the EU had been hopeful it was edging toward an initial framework that would allow detailed discussions to continue on the basis of a universal rate of 10 per cent on many of the bloc's exports. The EU has been seeking wider exemptions than the US is offering, as well as looking to shield the bloc from future sectoral tariffs. While it's long accepted that any agreement would be asymmetrical in favor of the US, the EU will assess the overall imbalance of any deal before deciding whether to pull the trigger on any re-balancing measures, Bloomberg previously reported. The level of pain that member states are prepared to accept varies, and some are open to higher tariff rates if enough exemptions are secured, the people said. Any agreement would also address non-tariff barriers, cooperation on economic security matters, digital trade consultations, and strategic purchases. Move Quickly With the prospects of a positive outcome dimming and the deadline looming, the EU is expected to start preparing a plan to move quickly if it can't reach a deal, said the people. Any decision to retaliate would likely need political sign-off from the bloc's leaders because the stakes are so high, the people added. Countermeasures of any substance would likely provoke an even wider transatlantic trade rift, given Trump's warnings that retaliation against American interests will only invite tougher tactics from his administration. The bloc has already approved potential tariffs on €21 billion of US goods that could be quickly implemented in response to Trump's metals levies. They target politically-sensitive American states and include products such as soybeans from Louisiana, home to House Speaker Mike Johnson, other agricultural products, poultry, and motorcycles. The EU has also prepared a list of tariffs on an additional €72 billion of American products in response to Trump's so-called reciprocal levies and automotive duties. They would target industrial goods, including Boeing Co. aircraft, US-made cars, and bourbon whiskey. It's also working on potential measures that go beyond tariffs, such as export controls and restrictions on public procurement contracts. Anti-Coercion Tool Bloomberg reported last week that a growing number of EU member states want the bloc to activate its most powerful trade tool, the so-called anti-coercion instrument (ACI), against the US should the two sides fail to reach an acceptable agreement and Trump carries through with his tariff threats. The ACI would give officials broad powers to take retaliatory action. Those measures could include new taxes on US tech giants, or targeted curbs on US investments in the EU. They could also involve limiting access to certain parts of the EU market or restricting US firms from bidding for public contracts in Europe. The anti-coercion tool was designed primarily as a deterrent, and if needed, a way to respond to deliberate coercive actions from third countries that use trade measures as a means to pressure the sovereign policy choices of the 27-nation bloc or individual member states. The commission can propose the use of the ACI, but it's up to member states to determine whether there's a coercion case and if it should be deployed. Throughout the process, the EU would seek to consult with the coercing party to find a resolution. Member states were briefed on the status of trade talks with the US on Friday.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Trump, Xi might meet ahead of or during October APEC summit in South Korea
US President Donald Trump might visit China before going to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit between October 30 and November 1, or he could meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC event in South Korea, the South China Morning Post reported on Sunday citing multiple sources. The two countries have been trying to negotiate an end to an escalating tit-for-tat tariff war that has upended global trade and supply chains. Trump has sought to impose tariffs on US importers for virtually all foreign goods, which he says will stimulate domestic manufacturing and which critics say will make many consumer goods more expensive for Americans. He has called for a universal base tariff rate of 10% on goods imported from all countries, with higher rates for imports from the most 'problematic' ones, including China: imports from there now have the highest tariff rate of 55%. Trump has set a deadline of August 12 for the US and China to reach a durable tariffs agreement. A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment about the reported plans for a meeting with Xi in the fall. The two countries' most recent high-level meeting was on July 11, when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had what both described as a productive and positive meeting in Malaysia about how trade negotiations should proceed. Rubio noted then that Trump had been invited to China to meet with Xi, and said that both leaders 'want it to happen.' On Friday, China Commerce Minister Wang Wentao said China wants to bring its trade ties with the US back to a stable footing and that recent talks in Europe showed there was no need for a tariff war
