
"Indian minorities are ... hostages": Asaduddin Owaisi and Kiren Rijiju engage in verbal spat over minority welfare issue
In a post on X, Owaisi said that minorities in India have been reduced to 'hostages' rather than even 'second-class' citizens. He also questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi, asking whether it is an 'honour' to be the focus of his 'hate speeches'.
https://x.com/asadowaisi/status/1942151186246742036
'Is it an 'honour' to be the target of hate speeches from no less than the Prime Minister of India? India's minorities are not even second-class citizens anymore. We are hostages', Asaduddin Owaisi said in his 'X' post.
Responding to Owaisi, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju stated that minorities in India do not migrate to other countries, unlike minorities from neighbouring nations who choose to come to India. He said the Prime Minister's welfare schemes are for everyone, including minorities.
'Ok... How come Minorities from our neighbouring countries prefer to come to India & our Minorities don't migrate? Prime Minister Narendra Modi's welfare schemes are for all. The schemes of the Ministry of Minority Affairs provide additional benefits to the Minorities', Rijiju wrote on X.
Owaisi, in another post on Monday, replied that according to Rijiju, if minorities in India do not migrate, it means they are 'happy'.
He also said that Indian minorities do not have a history of 'fleeing'. Referring to past events, Owaisi said that minorities stayed in India during the British era and did not run away even during the Partition.
'According to Hon'ble Minister Against Minorities, if we don't migrate, it means we are happy. We are not in the habit of fleeing: we did not run away from the British, we did not run away during partition, and we did not run away because of Jammu, Nellie, Gujarat, Moradabad, Delhi, etc, massacres. Our history is proof that we neither collaborate with our oppressors nor do we hide from them. We know how to fight for our democratic rights, and we will inshallah. Stop comparing our great nation with failed states like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal & Sri Lanka. Jai Hind, Jai Samvidhan! Thank you for your attention in this matter!', Owaisi's X post added. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bangladesh's Jamaat-e-Islami projects force with a big rally in Dhaka
Hundreds of thousands of supporters of Bangladesh's largest Islamist party rallied in the capital on Saturday to show their strength before an election expected next year, as the nation stands at a crossroads after the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. An interim government headed by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus said that the next election would be held in April. But his administration didn't rule out a possibility of polls in February, which has been strongly demanded by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and its allies. Jamaat-e-Islami, which had sided with Pakistan during Bangladesh's war of independence in 1971, had said that it would mobilize 1 million people on Saturday. While Hasina was in power from 2009 until she was toppled in student-led protests last year and fled to India, top leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami were either executed or jailed on charges of crimes against humanity and other serious crimes in 1971. In late March 1971, Pakistan's military had launched a violent crackdown on the city of Dhaka, which was then part of East Pakistan, to quell a rising nationalist movement seeking independence for what is today known as Bangladesh. The party on Saturday placed a seven-point demand on the Yunus-led administration to ensure a free, fair and peaceful election; justice for all mass killings; essential reforms and the proclamation and implementation of a charter involving last year's mass uprising. It also wants the introduction of a proportional representation system in the election. Thousands of supporters of Jamaat-e-Islami had spent the night on the Dhaka University campus before the rally. On Saturday morning, they continued to stream toward Suhrawardy Udyan, a historical site where the Pakistani army had surrendered to a joint force of India and Bangladesh on Dec. 16, 1971, ending the nine-month war. 'We are here for a new Bangladesh, where Islam would be the guiding principle of governance, where good and honest people will rule the country, and there will be no corruption,' Iqbal Hossain, 40, told The Associated Press. 'We will sacrifice our lives, if necessary, for this cause.' Many young supporters in their 20s and 30s were also present. 'Under Jamaat-e-Islami, this country will have no discrimination. All people will have their rights. Because we follow the path of the holy book, Quran,' said Mohidul Morsalin Sayem, a 20-year-old student. 'If all the Islamist parties join hands soon, nobody will be able to take power from us.' The party's chief, Shafiqur Rahman, said that the struggle in 2024 was to eliminate 'fascism' from the country, but this time there will be another fight against corruption and extortion. Rahman, 66, fainted twice as he addressed his supporters, but quickly returned to continue to speak surrounded by other leaders on the stage. 'How will the future Bangladesh look like? There will be another fight … We will do whatever is necessary and win that fight (against corruption) collectively by uniting the strength of the youth to eliminate corruption,' Rahman said. It wasn't immediately clear why he fainted. He was later taken to a hospital for tests. The event was the first time that the party was allowed to hold a rally at the site since 1971. To many, the decision signaled a shift supported by Yunus' government in which Islamists are gaining momentum with further fragmentation of Bangladesh's politics and the shrinking of liberal forces. Hasina's Awami League party, in a statement on X, reacted sharply for allowing it to hold the rally on that politically sensitive site. It said that the move 'marks a stark betrayal with the national conscience and constitutes a brazen act of undermining millions of people — dead and alive — who fought against the evil axis (in 1971),' the statement said. Hasina, whose father was the independence leader and the country's first president, is a fierce political rival of Jamaat-e-Islami. The party is expected to contest 300 parliamentary seats and is attempting to forge alliances with other Islamist groups and parties in hopes of becoming a third force in the country behind the BNP, headed by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, and Hasina's former ruling Awami League party. The party had previously shared power with the BNP, and it had two senior Cabinet members under Zia in 2001-2006. After Hasina was ousted, tensions grew between parties over reforms agenda undertaken by the Yunus government, which is facing challenges to establish order in the country. The government has been criticized by Hasina's party and others for using force in a confrontation with protesters in a Hasina stronghold on Wednesday, where four people died. Their families complained that authorities didn't conduct autopsies and hurriedly buried or cremated their relatives. Yunus' office said that the government was doing everything lawfully in Gopalganj, the district where the violence occurred. Jamaat-e-Islami has now established close ties with a new political party formed by students who led the anti-Hasina uprising. Both Jamaat-e-Islami and the students' National Citizen Party also promote an anti-India campaign. The Yunus-led administration has banned the Awami League, and Hasina has been in exile in India since Aug. 5. She is facing charges of crimes against humanity. The United Nations said in February that up to 1,400 people may have been killed during the anti-Hasina uprising in July-August last year.


News18
20 minutes ago
- News18
Modi's Iron Shield: The Vision Behind Bharat's Ballistic Missile Defence
Last Updated: Pakistan continues to view India as an existential threat and is expanding its nuclear arsenal accordingly, whilst simultaneously deepening its military relationship with China. When Pakistan's waves of missiles and drones crashed against India's multi-layered air defence systems during those crucial nights in May, they were met with India's air defence network, which comprehensively neutralised the targets. With its resounding success, India demonstrated to the world not merely our tactical prowess, but the transformation that has unfolded under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership. Pakistan's drones and missiles shattered against a vision that has redefined how India approaches national security in an increasingly volatile neighbourhood. The operation marked a watershed moment: the successful test of an indigenous ballistic missile defence ecosystem that has taken India decisively beyond outdated Cold War nuclear doctrines of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) toward a more secure and responsible future. For decades, strategic thinking regarding Nuclear armaments and use was dominated by the Cold War logic of MAD. As a nation committed to a No First Use nuclear policy, India must, by definition, be prepared to absorb a first strike before retaliating. However, the hostile environment that India confronts today is markedly more complex and dangerous than at any point since independence. Pakistan continues to view India as an existential threat and is expanding its nuclear arsenal accordingly, whilst simultaneously deepening its military relationship with China. The United States Defence Intelligence Agency's 2025 assessment reveals that Pakistan is modernising its nuclear capabilities with substantial Chinese assistance, particularly focusing on battlefield nuclear weapons designed to offset India's conventional military superiority. During the recent crisis, Pakistan's ambassador to Russia explicitly threatened the use of 'the full spectrum of power, both conventional and nuclear" in response to any Indian military action. Such nuclear blackmail represents precisely the kind of coercive diplomacy that ballistic missile defence systems are designed to neutralise. The very fact that Pakistan felt compelled to convene its National Command Authority—which oversees the country's nuclear arsenal—during the crisis demonstrates how atomic weapons remain central to Islamabad's strategic calculus. China's role as the primary enabler of Pakistan's weapons of mass destruction programmes adds another layer of complexity. Foreign materials and technology supporting Pakistan's WMD capabilities are acquired primarily from Chinese suppliers, often transshipped through intermediaries. This creates a dangerous convergence where Pakistan's tactical nuclear weapons, enabled by Chinese technology, pose an immediate threat to India's security infrastructure. The China Factor The relationship between China and India has evolved from mere border disputes to a comprehensive rivalry encompassing nuclear capabilities. China's nuclear modernisation programme, whilst ostensibly directed at the United States, poses a direct threat to India given the geographical intimacy of the subcontinent. The majority of Chinese nuclear-capable missiles cannot reach the American mainland but could easily strike Indian population centres. China's ballistic missile defence capabilities add urgency to India's programme. The People's Republic of China has developed advanced systems, including the HQ-19 and HQ-29, which significantly enhance the People's Liberation Army's capabilities to protect Chinese critical infrastructure. China's BMD capabilities serve as a strong defensive shield against nuclear-armed missile attacks, potentially neutralising India's deterrent capability. This creates a dangerous imbalance, giving China a significant damage-limitation capability and lowering the threshold for nuclear adventurism. In the 21st century, true deterrence requires not just the promise of punishment but the capacity for survival. The triangular nuclear dynamic between China, India, and Pakistan arguably poses a more serious threat of nuclear conflict than any other regional arrangement globally. South Asia remains the only place in the world where three nuclear-armed nations sit in such proximity and are bound by violently contested borders. Operation Sindoor: Where Atmanirbhar Bharat Won Operation Sindoor served as a comprehensive validation of India's defence indigenisation policies under the Atmanirbhar Bharat vision. The operation demonstrated how indigenous systems performed under actual combat conditions, providing real-world proof of concept for India's ballistic missile defence ecosystem. The multi-layered air defence system that protected India during the crisis consisted of several indigenous components. During the onslaught, a unified grid directed a tiered defence: the inner layer, comprising Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) and Man-Portable Air Defence Systems (MANPADS), neutralised low-flying drones. The next layer of short-range missiles like the Spyder and Pechora provided point defence for critical assets, while the medium-range, indigenously developed Akash and Indo-Israeli MRSAM systems formed the backbone of area defence. The outermost layer, consisting of the formidable S-400 'Sudarshan' system and combat air patrols by fighter jets, engaged threats at long range. The operation showcased the maturity of India's indigenous defence ecosystem. The Akashteer air defence system, developed by Bharat Electronics Limited and integrated with IACCS, provided seamless and unified air situation awareness accessible to the lowest units of the Army Air Defence. The successful deployment of loitering munitions and precision strike capabilities demonstrated India's advancement in offensive systems as well. Indigenous platforms executed strikes without loss of Indian assets, underscoring the effectiveness of surveillance, planning, and delivery systems developed under the Make in India initiative. DRDO's Ballistic Missile Defence Programme: India's Ballistic Missile Defence programme represents one of the most ambitious technological undertakings in the country's defence history. The programme, sanctioned in 2000 following the Kargil conflict, has evolved through systematic phases designed to address increasingly sophisticated threats. Phase I of the BMD programme is now complete and has been successfully deployed. This phase includes the Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) missile for exo-atmospheric interception and the Advanced Air Defence (AAD) missile for endo-atmospheric ranges. The system demonstrates the capability to intercept ballistic missiles with ranges up to 2,000 kilometres, providing robust protection against medium-range threats. The recent successful testing of Phase II represents a quantum leap in capabilities. On July 24, 2024, DRDO successfully flight-tested the Phase-II Ballistic Missile Defence System, demonstrating indigenous capability to defend against ballistic missiles of the 5,000-kilometre class. This achievement places India in an exclusive club of nations with advanced BMD capabilities. The two-stage solid-propelled ground-launched system incorporates state-of-the-art indigenous technologies developed by DRDO. The Revolution In Defence Production The transformation of India's defence sector under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative has been nothing short of revolutionary. Defence production has surged 174% since 2014, reaching Rs 1.27 lakh crore in 2023-24. Defence exports provide compelling evidence of this transformation. From Rs 1,940 crore in 2014-15, exports soared to Rs 23,622 crore in 2024-25. The country now exports defence equipment to over 85 countries, including sophisticated markets like the United States and France. The establishment of Defence Industrial Corridors in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu has created concentrated centres of excellence for defence manufacturing. The implementation of Positive Indigenisation Lists has provided guaranteed markets for domestic manufacturers, encouraging investment in research and development. Over 14,000 items have been indigenised under the SRIJAN initiative, with an additional 3,000 items covered under the Positive Indigenisation Lists. The Defence Production and Export Promotion Policy aims to achieve Rs 1.75 lakh crore in defence manufacturing by 2025, demonstrating the government's commitment to scaling indigenous capabilities. In addition, the success of Atmanirbhar Bharat in developing critical defence technologies validates the potential for technological sovereignty in an increasingly multipolar world. This achievement encourages other developing nations, especially in the Global South, to invest in indigenous capabilities rather than accepting permanent dependence on foreign suppliers. Deterrence Through Defence top videos View all As Prime Minister Modi declared following Operation Sindoor, 'India will not be intimidated by nuclear threats". And the evolution and progress of India's defence system under his leadership show that India is ready to deliver on it. The psychological impact of effective missile defence is clear. Pakistan's reliance on nuclear blackmail as a tool of statecraft becomes significantly less effective when India possesses credible defensive capabilities. The knowledge that India can neutralise a significant portion of incoming threats alters the strategic calculus that Pakistan or even China must consider. As India moves toward complete defence autonomy by 2047, the ballistic missile defence programme stands as a testament to what can be achieved when visionary leadership, technological capability, and national will converge in service of a secure and prosperous future. The iron shield that protects Bharat today is the delivery of Modi's promise to the citizens and is the foundation for India's emergence as a responsible global power. About the Author Sohil Sinha Sohil Sinha is a Sub Editor at News18. He writes on foreign affairs, geopolitics along with domestic policy and infrastructure projects. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 20, 2025, 10:15 IST News india Modi's Iron Shield: The Vision Behind Bharat's Ballistic Missile Defence Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


New Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Nimisha Priya case: Blood money and the cost of forgiveness
KOCHI: On July 14, the Centre told the Supreme Court that reaching a blood money settlement is the only option left for saving Nimisha Priya, an Indian citizen on death row in. The woman, a trained nurse from Kerala who opened her own clinic in Sanaa in partnership with a Yemeni citizen, Talal Abdo Mahdi, was convicted of murdering her business partner in 2017. She was sentenced to death after an allegedly shoddy trial conducted in Arabic, without being provided an interpreter or proper legal counsel. Since then, the 38-year-old woman has been languishing in a jail in the Yemeni capital city, which is under the control of the Houthi rebels. She was due to be executed on July 16, but it was postponed amid intense backchannel negotiations to save her from the jaws of death. The pause in the execution, though a temporary relief, has opened a new window of hope to try and secure pardon from the victim's family, which will pave the way for her release from prison. However, at least one member of Mahdi's family has so far refused to do so. Efforts are on to convince them to accept blood money and pardon Priya. A lifeline Under Islamic law, victims of crimes, or their families, can have a say in the punishment of the offender. In case of a murder, the victim's kin can 'forgive' the accused in exchange for monetary compensation, known as diyah or blood money. While grieving families are prone to seek vengeance, accepting blood money is encouraged to bring an amicable closure to the case. The concept is rooted in the idea that it can end the cycle of violence by promoting reconciliation, justice, and mercy. The aim is to provide financial support to the affected family while encouraging forgiveness and maintaining social peace. It is not about punishment but balancing justice with compassion, emphasising the value of mercy alongside accountability. While there is no concept of blood money under Indian laws, it is an accepted legal practice in several Islamic countries including Yemen. These countries give an opportunity to the victim's family to pardon the offender in exchange for monetary compensation. If diyah is accepted, then the death sentence will be lifted, though the accused may have to spend time in jail if the government decides to go ahead with other forms of punishment. The process varies from country to country and can be complicated if the case involves foreigners. Usually, the victim's immediate family members are approached, through mediators — clerics, NGOs, or government departments— to persuade them to issue pardon. It often takes multiple rounds of meetings mediated by multiple stakeholders to secure pardon and arrive at the amount of blood money.