
Why the Famous Hiroshima Cenotaph's Wording Concerned Justice Pal
Decades ago, Indian jurist Radhabinod Pal (1886–1967) raised concerns about the inscription. He argued that the wording was misleading, as it could be interpreted to suggest that the Japanese were responsible for the atomic bombing. His criticism contributed to the creation of a second cenotaph in Hiroshima.
A few hundred meters east of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, across a main avenue, stands the gate of Honsho-ji Temple, founded more than 400 years ago. In front of the temple is a stone pillar inscribed in Japanese: "Memorial Monument by Dr Radhabinod Pal, Judge Representing India at the Tokyo Trials." Cenotaph for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb in Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. (Photo ©Sankei by Koki Yata)
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East, also known as the Tokyo Trial (1946–1948), was established to prosecute leaders of the former Empire of Japan for war crimes. Justice Pal was the only judge who found all the defendants not guilty. He rejected what he saw as victors' justice motivated by revenge.
In November 1952, just a few years later, Pal visited Hiroshima to attend the Asian Congress of the World Federalist Movement. While there, he offered flowers and a silent prayer at the cenotaph.
When he read the inscription, Pal asked his interpreter, Nair, several times to clarify its meaning. His expression, marked by both doubt and anger, revealed his discomfort.
According to Justice Pal: Declaration of Peace , a Japanese book compiling Pal's lectures, academic writings, and a travel account by his companion Masaaki Tanaka, Pal questioned who the phrase "we shall not repeat the evil" was referring to. He emphasized that the bomb had not been dropped by Japan and said he could accept the message only if it clearly identified the responsible party and included a personal vow not to repeat the act. Indian jurist, Dr Radhabinod Pal
Pal also criticized the inscription's vague wording. He felt it failed to clearly distinguish between the perpetrators of the bombing and its victims, saying it neither offered comfort to those who suffered nor supported the nation's recovery.
The inscription had been drafted by Professor Tadayoshi Saika of Hiroshima University. He was a scholar of English literature and an A-bomb survivor. In 1952, then-mayor Shinzo Hamai commissioned him to create a message of prayer and commitment.
According to a book published by alumni of the former Hiroshima High School, Saika heard the mayor's request and drafted the inscription that same day. He completed it the next day. The English translation was finalized after discussions with American scholars.
The Japanese phrase "過ちは繰返しませぬから" was translated as "For we shall not repeat the evil." The subject — "we" — was intended to refer to all of humanity, not only to the Japanese people.
In response to Justice Pal's criticism, Professor Saika sent a rebuttal, arguing that a narrow-minded view could not prevent another tragedy like the atomic bombing. He also included the English translation to clarify his intent.
The city of Hiroshima has explained that the term "evil" refers to war itself. However, Pal rejected that interpretation. According to Justice Pal: Declaration of Peace , he believed that Japan was not solely responsible for the war. He argued that its origins lay in Western colonial aggression in Asia.
While in Hiroshima, Pal was approached by Yoshiaki Kakei, the 25th head priest of Honsho-ji Temple. Kakei, who had a long-standing friendship with Nair, asked Pal to write an alternative inscription.
According to another book by Tanaka, Pal spent a night composing a new epitaph in Bengali. It was later translated into Japanese and engraved on the "Monument to the Tragic Aspiration of Greater East Asia," located on the temple grounds. The "Monument to the Tragic Aspiration of Greater East Asia" on the grounds of Honsho-ji Temple, with Chief Priest Yoshinari Kakei. July 7, Naka Ward, Hiroshima. (©Sankei by Koki Yata)
The English version of the inscription reads: "For the peace of those departed souls who took upon themselves the solemn vow at the salvation ceremony of oppressed Asia, 'Oh! Lord thou being in my heart, I do as appointed by you.'"
Yoshinobu Kakei, the grandson of the late priest and current head of Honsho-ji, believes the words, though abstract, express remembrance for those who died in war and in the bombing. He also sees it as a statement of pan-Asian solidarity.
Pal wrote his inscription in April 1952, just six months after the end of the American occupation of Japan. Yoshinobu reflects that Dr Pal gave voice to thoughts that many Japanese at the time wanted to express but could not. A handwritten inscription draft by Professor Tadashi Saiga of Hiroshima University, held at the Hiroshima City Archives. This draft, created before the final English translation was finalized, renders the phrase in question as "for to repeat the fault we shall cease." (Courtesy of the Archives)
The debate over the cenotaph's inscription, sparked by Pal's remarks more than 70 years ago, resurfaced in May 2025 — 80 years after the atomic bombing and the end of World War II. Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker Shoji Nishida reignited the issue, arguing that if the "we" in the inscription is understood to mean the Japanese, its meaning changes completely.
The city of Hiroshima has stood by its original interpretation. It maintains that the inscription is a vow made by all people: to honor the victims of the atomic bomb and to never again repeat the tragedy of war.
Unveiled on August 6, 1952, the cenotaph was built as part of Hiroshima's reconstruction as a city of peace. It commemorates those who died in the world's first atomic bombing. The central stone chamber contains the registry of victims' names.
( Read the article in Japanese . )
Author: Koki Yata, The Sankei Shimbun
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada News.Net
13 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Analysts criticize U.S. tariff hikes for undermining global trade order
Many political leaders and analysts believe that the United States, to maximize unilateral interests, is using tariffs to pressure other economies into making concessions in trade agreements. BEIJING, Aug. 7 (Xinhua) -- The U.S. modified tariffs with dozens of its trading partners are set to take effect on Thursday, amid widespread concern across the globe that the new rates of levies, ranging from 10 percent to 40 percent, will harm the global trade order. Many political leaders and analysts believe that the United States, to maximize unilateral interests, is using tariffs to pressure other economies into making concessions in trade agreements. Under the new tariff measures, the basic tariff for goods entering the United States will remain at 10 percent. However, the 10 percent rate will only apply to countries with which the United States has a trade surplus. For countries with which the United States has a trade deficit, a 15 percent rate will serve as the new tariff floor. Still, for more than a dozen other countries, the tariff rates are higher than 15 percent. Last month, Trump imposed unilateral tariffs on imports from Brazil, Canada and India, with rates up to 50 percent. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on imports from India in response to the country's purchases of Russian oil, according to a White House statement. The order, effective 21 days after the announcement, will bring the combined tariffs imposed by the United States on Indian goods to 50 percent. Similarly, Trump has increased the tariff on Canada from 25 percent to 35 percent and imposed an additional 40 percent tariff on Brazilian goods, bringing the total tariff to 50 percent. For those that have struck a trade deal with the United States, the clauses are far from being fair. On July 30, Trump announced a "full and complete" trade deal with South Korea, setting 15 percent tariffs on imports from the country. South Korea also agreed to invest 350 billion U.S. dollars in U.S.-owned projects and purchase 100 billion dollars of U.S. energy. On July 27, Trump announced a deal with the EU imposing a 15 percent tariff on EU goods, while U.S. strategic exports enjoy zero-tariff access. The EU pledged to buy 750 billion dollars in U.S. energy and invest an additional 600 billion dollars in the United States. On July 22, Trump said the United States had reached a deal with Japan, imposing a 15 percent tariff on Japanese goods. Japan will invest 550 billion dollars in the United States, which will receive 90 percent of the profits. Trump's handling of such trade deals and his use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on trading partners have sparked extensive criticism. U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that the tariffs are a "trade war on the American people," and that there has been "chaos and uncertainty" and "no one knows what's coming when Donald Trump has no plan, no strategy, and he's not honest about what he presents." "Our businesses ... need some degree of certainty, and all they're getting is chaos and inflation. So the Trump tariff trade war is a trade war on the American people. We've seen this week the chaos and uncertainty," he said. In response to the EU's deal with the United States, German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil criticized the bloc's negotiating stance, saying it was "too weak" in talks over new tariffs. "I think we were too weak. We can't be satisfied with the result that was achieved," Klingbeil said on Monday. Meanwhile, India reacted sharply to the U.S. announcement of an additional 25 percent tariff on its imports, calling the move "unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable," and declaring that New Delhi would take all actions necessary to protect its national interests. "The U.S. has in recent days targeted India's oil imports from Russia. We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India," said Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal in an official statement. By erecting these extremely high tariff barriers and undermining and weakening the WTO, the Trump administration has seriously damaged the world trading system, said Time Magazine, adding that consequently, it might end up pushing the rest of the world away and sowing the seeds of America's own isolation and irrelevance.


Winnipeg Free Press
13 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Japan deploys its first F-35B fighter jets to bolster defenses in the south
TOKYO (AP) — Japan's first three F-35B stealth fighter jets arrived Thursday at an air base in the south of the country, its latest move to fortify defenses as tensions in the region grow. The new arrivals are three of the four F-35Bs scheduled for deployment at the Nyutabaru Air Base in the Miyazaki prefecture. The fourth jet is set to arrive at a later date, the Air Self-Defense Force said. The jets, which have short take-off and vertical landing functions, are to operate from two Japanese helicopter carriers, the Izumo and the Kaga, that were modified to accommodate the F-35B. The Defense Ministry has said four more F-35Bs will be delivered to Nyutabaru by the end of March 2026. Japan considers China as a regional threat and has accelerated its military buildup on remote islands in the southwest. Japan is currently constructing a runway on a new air base on the island of Mageshima, 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of the Nyutabaru base, for F-35B flight exercises. However, the drills will have to be conducted at Nyutabaru until around 2030 due to construction delays, triggering protests from local residents concerned about aircraft noise. Japan plans to deploy a total of 42 Lockheed Martin F-35Bs and 105 of the conventional take-off and landing, or CTOL, F-35As, making the country the biggest F-35 user outside of the United States.


Toronto Star
14 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Indian authorities in Kashmir ban books by eminent writers and scholars
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — Indian authorities have banned 25 books in Kashmir that they say propagate 'false narratives' and 'secessionism' in the disputed region, where strict controls on the press have escalated in recent years. The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield.