Between censorship and chaos: Syrian artists wary of new regime
For months, the drama happening elsewhere in the country had imposed itself on set: First the rapid-fire disintegration of the ruling regime in December; then, in March, a spate of sectarian massacres in villages just a few dozen miles away from Kasheesh.
'Maybe we'll get a third cataclysm before we're done … a dragon or something descending on us here,' joked Haima Ismail, a veteran Syrian actor, drawing a few cautious chuckles from crew members before her face turned serious.
'I don't know where we're heading. It's like you're falling and can't find the ground.'
That was a common feeling among many artists in the country these days. Though few are sorry to see the downfall of former President Bashar Assad, they fear the Islamist-led authorities now in charge may prove to be just as restrictive in what they allow on screen.
'Before, the difficulties we faced were about the choices in the script, how truthful you could be about what was going on here,' said Nour Al-Ali, one of the series' top-billed Syrian actresses. 'Now I'm afraid we're going to face censorship in a different way.'
A lot of people don't know this, but Syria is a powerhouse maker of serialized television. Well before streaming gained popularity, viewers would gorge on Syrian miniseries — from glamorous telenovelas to historical dramas. Cranked out by the dozen, the shows turned their stars into household names across the Arab world.
The country's 14-year civil war ravaged the industry, but during Assad's reign, many of those series became a particularly potent propaganda tool.
A state-backed production company financed shows emphasizing fealty to the ruler and demonizing Assad's adversaries as jihad-crazed chaos agents. Scripts for private productions were subject to suffocating controls. Celebrity actors and showrunners who strayed from the rah-rah government line, or who broached third-rail topics such as Assad's security forces' culpability in atrocities, found themselves attacked, blacklisted or even forced into exile.
That 'Al-Batal' made it to production at all was a function of director Al-Layth Hajjo's ability to deftly navigate those red lines.
The story focuses on two figures, a school principal and a thug. When war comes to their village, the principal is paralyzed saving a displaced child, while the thug takes advantage of the bedlam to gain influence, assisting villagers by providing goods through smuggling and standing up militias to protect their homes. The series, according to Hajjo, explores the difference between those who are truly heroes, and those who pretend to be so as a result of war.
Ensconced among monitors and other studio equipment in the bedroom of a house for an interior shot, Hajjo, an athletic-looking 53-year-old in a gray polo shirt and red-rimmed glasses, spoke of frequent clashes with the Assad-era censor while writing the script.
'He obsessed over silly details, like if the accent of the policeman hinted at his sect, or that we had a cockroach crawling over the picture of an army soldier,' Hajjo said. Such distractions helped Hajjo subtly slip things past censors. 'You put them in a situation where they just don't pay attention to the important issues you're saying,' Hajjo added, laughing as he spoke.
'He kept telling me, 'There's something in this text. I don't know what it is, but I don't trust your intentions.''
It took a month of cajoling, but the script finally passed. Still, a few weeks after shooting began, Hajjo submitted the first 10 episodes to the censorship board, and the deputy minister, who represented the security agencies, vowed the series would be suspended.
Indeed, it was later suspended, but not in the way the deputy minister would have liked. In December, a rebel coalition led by the Islamist faction Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham began its assault on Assad's forces. In a moment of art imitating life, the 'Al-Batal' crew was filming a scene where villagers salute the Syrian flag during a nearby barrage, even as the rebels advanced on Damascus.
'We're standing there shooting people singing the national anthem with explosions in the background, and we're getting word that Hama city is falling,' Hajjo said.
When the opposition reached the outskirts of the city of Homs, Hajjo, fearing the main road to Damascus would be cut, pulled the plug. On Dec. 7, hours before Assad's escape to Russia, he loaded the cast and crew in buses, and led the way to the capital. Once there, he managed to get Farah Bseiso, a Palestinian-Jordanian actor, and his Polish director of photography, Zbigniew Rybczynski, out of the country.
For the first few weeks, Hajjo, like most Syrians stunned by the lightning-fast implosion of Assad's 54-year-old dynasty, stayed home. But the situation appeared calm, and with Ramadan coming, he decided to approach the new authorities to restart filming.
''Al-Batal' was a cause for me. And I considered what happened to be a golden opportunity to finish what I wanted to say in the series — without censorship,' Hajjo said.
He talked to anyone in the fledgling government he could find, but all appeared perplexed why he was reaching out to them in the first place.
'They kept asking 'So? Go film. What does it have to do with us? Why do you need us?'' Hajjo said. He finally convinced officials to give him the necessary permits.
Some of the cast and crew couldn't return, but most did, including Al-Ali, who had fled to Dubai a few days after the regime's collapse.
Initially, the actor, who had spent much of the war in Syria, thought that it was time now for her to watch events unfolding in her country 'from the outside.' But when Hajjo called, she felt she had to return.
'I wanted to be a part of the show because it spoke in a humanitarian way about the war, where so many were killed even though it had nothing to do with them,' she said.
Twenty-five days after Assad's ouster, the production was back on. Then came the massacres.
In early March, Assad loyalists launched a series of attacks on the new government's security forces. Government forces and thousands of fighters — including from Sunni jihadist factions — beat back the loyalists but also hunted down Alawites, who share Assad's religion and were seen by many Syrians as complicit in his policies. More than 1,000 civilians were tortured and executed, rights groups say.
Al-Ali was at her family's home in Jableh, a coastal city that saw some of the worst massacres. She livestreamed a selfie-video, where she appears teary-eyed and terrified as pro-government gunmen roam the streets below, asking if someone is Sunni or Alawite before shooting those who answer the latter.
When things calmed down Al-Ali returned to Kasheesh to finish filming. But the optimism she and others felt during the first heady months after Assad's fall was shattered; the violence seemed a harbinger of a new dictatorship dominated not by Assad's ideology but by Sunni religious fervor.
The government's recent moves have done little to change that perception. Critics point out that the newly appointed Cabinet is dominated by Islamists, with some ministers espousing a hard-line interpretation of Sharia law. The culture minister, meanwhile, already managed to draw criticism for dismissive views on non-Arab Syrian minorities and their languages. Sulaf Fawakherji, a Syrian actor known for her pro-Assad views, was recently removed from the actors' syndicate for denying the former government's crimes.
'Look, in our theater we have Shakespeare, things from American and Russian everyday life, scenes that require a certain kind of dress, or a kiss, or depicting sexual harassment — I don't know if all this will become forbidden,' said Bashar Sheikh Saleh, a 25-year-old acting student at the state-backed Higher Institute for Dramatic Arts, who was acting in 'Al-Batal' as part of his graduation project.
Yet so far, authorities have mostly hewed to the if-it-ain't-broke approach. Officials at the institute in Damascus are still unclear what will happen to their funding, but those interviewed said they received encouraging signs from the government. Elsewhere, cultural performances continue, with hitherto banned books appearing in the stalls of sidewalk bookstores. Films that were once surreptitiously passed around via bootleg videos are getting their first theatrical run in the country.
But Hajjo worries this will change.
'Their priority today is how to convey themselves positively to the street. They think actors and shows can do that,' he said. 'My fear is that, after a while, when they consolidate control, they won't need us anymore.'
The sun was setting, and the cast assembled for the final crowd scene. It was the one part of the show that had undergone substantial rewrites, Hajjo said, to account for the regime's collapse, which was why some crowd members carried Syria's new flag, a tricolor with bands of green, white and black, the green replacing red.
Al-Ali got into position. Once filming was done, she would go to Dubai once more.
'I'm going to leave,' she said, her tone subdued, before she quickly added: 'Not forever. When things are stable, I'll return.'
She fell silent for a beat, her eyes downcast.
'But you know, I used to say this before: Throughout the war, I said I would leave for good,' she said. 'And I always returned.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
26 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
21 States Sue Justice Department for Tying Crime Victim Funds to Immigration Enforcement
A coalition of 21 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia sued the Justice Department on Aug. 18, accusing the federal government of illegally tying federal crime victim funds to cooperation with immigration enforcement. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Rhode Island on Aug. 18, challenges conditions the Justice Department placed this summer on the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA), which provides more than $1 billion each year to states for services such as domestic violence shelters, funeral expenses, trauma counseling, and crime scene cleanup.


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Which States Are Sending National Guard Troops to D.C.
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Six states are now sending National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in an effort to help President Donald Trump's administration combat crime and violence. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) via email Monday for comment. Why It Matters The deployments represent an unprecedented federal intervention in the District of Columbia's local policing and prompted legal challenges, public protests and sharp criticism from D.C. officials who said the move violated home rule. The shift raised questions about the use of the National Guard for domestic law-enforcement support and the scope of presidential emergency powers. What To Know As of Monday evening, six states have agreed to send troops to the nation's capital. Those states include West Virginia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Ohio. According to The Associated Press, West Virginia said it would pledge 300 to 400 troops, South Carolina offered 200, and Ohio said it could pledge 150 troops. Louisiana's Governor Jeff Landry said the state would send 135 soldiers to the capital, along with 200 from Mississippi and 160 troops from Tennessee. The AP notes that the states were responding to requests from the Trump administration in sending the troops, but it is immediately unclear why the additional support is needed. Below is a map of the states: About 800 Guard members had already been activated in the District before additional state authorizations, with governors from multiple Republican-led states saying they would send troops at the administration's request. President Donald Trump declared a public-safety emergency for Washington and ordered a federal operation that included federal agents and National Guard personnel to traverse city streets in an effort to restore law and order and restore the capital's beauty, the president said. What People Are Saying Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves, a Republican, on X on Monday: "I've approved the deployment of approximately 200 Mississippi National Guard Soldiers to Washington, D.C., to support President Trump's effort to return law and order to our nation's capital. "Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it. Americans deserve a safe capital city that we can all be proud of. I know the brave men and women of our National Guard will do an excellent job enhancing public safety and supporting law enforcement." Governor Landry on X on Monday: "I have approved the deployment of approximately 135 @LANationalGuard soldiers to Washington DC to assist in President @realDonaldTrump's mission of restoring safety and peace in our nation's capital. We are a nation of law and order. Our capital is a reflection of our nation's respect, beauty, and standards. We cannot allow our cities to be overcome by violence and lawlessness. I am proud to support this mission to return safety and sanity to Washington DC and cities all across our country, including right here in Louisiana." Trump on Truth Social on Monday: "D.C. gave Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety. This is a very bad and dangerous thing to do, and they are under serious investigation for so doing! Until 4 days ago, Washington, D.C., was the most unsafe 'city' in the United States, and perhaps the World. Now, in just a short period of time, it is perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour! People are flocking to D.C. again, and soon, the beautification will begin!" D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser on X last week: "Let us be clear about what the law requires during a Presidential declared emergency: it requires the mayor of Washington, DC to provide the services of the Metropolitan Police Department for federal purposes at the request of the President. We have followed the law. In reference to the U.S. Attorney General's order, there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official." What Happens Next Washington officials filed litigation seeking to block aspects of the federal takeover and a court directive prompted a partial rollback of an attempt to place the city's police department under federal command.

USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
National Guard from Republican states heading to DC: What you need to know
Deployments by troops from Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia will nearly double the force that Trump has already deployed to Washington, D.C. amid a crackdown on crime. Hundreds of National Guard members from Republican-led states will join federal troops on the ground in Washington, D.C., as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. Trump seized control of the District's police force and mobilized 800 soldiers from the Washington, D.C. National Guard on Aug. 11, declaring crime was "out of control." Advocates, lawmakers and many residents have pushed back on that characterization, which defies crime data. Republican governors have opted to bolster Trump's forces by sending their own guardsmen to Washington beginning with Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia. "South Carolina is proud to stand with President Trump as he works to restore law and order to our nation's capital and ensure safety for all who live, work, and visit there," said South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster on Aug. 16 in a statement about sending 200 guardsmen to D.C. The mobilization of troops from Republican-led states will bring the total number of guardsmen in the capital to over 1,000. Here's what else to know about the growing force on the ground in Washington. How many soldiers are Republican governors sending? The three Republican states sending members of the National Guard to Washington, D.C. have mobilized around 750 troops: 150 from Ohio, 200 from South Carolina and between 300 and 400 from West Virginia. Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio called sending troops from the Buckeye State the "right thing to do." He said the deployment comes in response to an Aug. 15 request from Secretary of the Army Daniel P. Driscoll. "The initial decision to deploy D.C. National Guard was not my decision. That was the president of the United States' decision," DeWine told the statehouse bureau. "But when the secretary of the Army asks for backup support to our troops that are already deployed, yes, we will back up our troops." West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrissey said on Aug. 16 the state's deployment of troops also came at Trump's request. Morrissey said their deployment reflects our "commitment to a strong and secure America." Troops are expected to arrive on 30-day deployments that the secretary of the Army could ask to extend. South Carolina Gov. McMaster said he would recall guardsmen in the event of a hurricane or other natural disaster. How big of a force will be in D.C.? The troops from Republican-led states deploying to the District will nearly double the size of the force Trump has already deployed, from 800 to 1,550 in total. Federal troops will work alongside the city's already 3,100-officer-strong police force. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said last week that the city's police department was understaffed and was supposed to have 3,800 officers. But she says understaffing hasn't stopped the city from achieving its lowest levels of violent crime in 30 years. "Crime levels are not only down from 2023, but from before the pandemic," Bowser said at a televised community meeting on August 12. "Our tactics are working, and we aren't taking our foot off the gas." Trump 'has the authority to do what he did,' Ohio gov says DeWine shot back at Bowser and others questioning Trump's deployment of the guardsmen. "The people who don't like it in D.C. don't have the authority. The president of the United States has that authority," DeWine said. "Anybody can argue whether or not he should or shouldn't have the authority, but it's very clear. There is no debate he has the authority to do what he did." Trump was able to deploy about a third of the 2,400 National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. because of the city's unique status as a federal district. In the rest of the country, the president cannot deploy troops in a policing capacity without the consent of the state's governor though he deployed thousands of troops to Los Angeles over objections from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Vermont 'politely' declines Trump request: Reports Not all who have heard the call have responded by sending in troops. Gov. Phil Scott, the Republican leader of Vermont, "politely declined" to send a request to send guardsmen to Washington, D.C., according to reporting by Vermont Public, a National Public Radio affiliate. Jason Gibbs, the governor's chief of staff, told Vermont Public on Aug. 15 that sending Green Mountain State troops to Washington was too far outside the scope of what the soldiers typically do. "In the absence of an immediate emergency or disaster that local and regional first responders are unable to handle, the governor just does not support utilizing the guard for this purpose, and does not view the enforcement of domestic law as a proper use of the National Guard," Gibbs said, according to Vermont Public. Scott's office did not immediately respond to USA TODAY requests for comment. Contributing by Cybele Mayes-Osterman, a National Security & World Affairs Reporter with USA TODAY; and USA TODAY Network reporters Jessie Balmert of The Columbus Dispatch and Bella Carpentier of The Greenville News.