Salam hosts Kuwaiti Deputy PM for High-level talks to strengthen bilateral cooperation
Discussions reportedly focused on strengthening bilateral ties, activating the Lebanese-Kuwaiti Joint Committee, and reaffirming Kuwait's continued support for Lebanon. Regional and international developments were also addressed.
The Lebanese side included Minister of Culture Ghassan Salameh, Minister of Energy and Water Joe Saddi, Minister of Interior Ahmad Hajjar, Secretary General of the Council of Ministers Judge Mahmoud Makkieh, and Lebanon's Ambassador to Kuwait Ahmad Arfa.
The Kuwaiti delegation featured Chargé d'Affaires Mohammad Al-Majed, Minister Al-Sabah's advisor Adel Al-Manawer, Assistant Undersecretary for Criminal Security Affairs Maj. Gen. Hamed Al-Mutairi, and accompanying officials.
Following the meeting, PM Salam and Minister Al-Sabah toured the Grand Serail, recently restored with significant funding from the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. A luncheon was held in honor of the Kuwaiti delegation.
Earlier, PM Salam also met with UN High Representative for the Alliance of Civilizations and Special Envoy for Combating Islamophobia Miguel Ángel Moratinos, and separately with MP Nadim Gemayel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
2 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Interfaith meeting in Aley brings together district's diverse religious leaders
BEIRUT — A significant multi-confessional meeting was held in Aley district's Bater village on Friday at the invitation of sheikh Kamel Daher of the Zreigate Arab tribe, in an occasion meant to mark the strength of the relationships between the region's diverse residents. Attendees included Mount Lebanon Governor Mohammed Mekkaoui, Druze Sheikh Aql Sami Abi al-Mona; Druze leaders Teymour Joumblatt and Talal Arslan; as well as representatives from the Lebanese Forces; representative Youssef Deaibes from the Interior Ministry; a representative of the mufti of the Republic, Abdellatif Deriane; as well as mayors from various Aley municipalities; and local, security and religious figures. Daher emphasized unity between the region's residents, particularly among members of the Arab tribes, Druze, Sunnis and Christians. "We were and will remain one and the same family, whatever the difficulties," he said during the meeting. "And our homes will remain open to all Lebanese." In light of last month's deadly clashes between Druze and Bedouin fighters, and then later Syrian state forces, in southern Syria, Daher praised the "wisdom of political and religious dignitaries, especially Druze leader Walid Joumblatt, Dar al-Fatwa [the highest Sunni authority], and Druze Sheikh Aql, in facing the painful events in Sweida, Syria." Sunni and Druze authorities in Lebanon have ardently emphasized cooperation and unity, nervous that the sectarian violence — in which more than 1,300 people were killed — might spill over into Lebanon. But on the ground, the community's positions with regards to the brutal fighting in Sweida are much more complicated. Within the Lebanese Druze community, the political rivalry between the two Druze leaders Walid Joumblatt and Talal Arslan — enemy cousins whose family names are steeped in history —h as worsened since the May 2018 parliamentary elections, after which Emir Arslan, allied with the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah, received a ministerial portfolio, much to the dismay of the PSP leader, who hoped to appoint all three Druze ministers in the government himself. These tensions were compounded in 2021 by those between the Arab tribes, known for their closeness to former Sunni leader Saad Hariri, and Hezbollah.
L'Orient-Le Jour
2 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
'Coup d'etat' claims and Shiite ministers' criticism: Lebanese press reacts to adoption of the 'Barrack Plan'
Thursday's Cabinet meeting — during which Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's cabinet adopted the 'goals' of a roadmap proposed by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack to restore calm between Lebanon and Israel — divided the Lebanese press. Some outlets welcomed the move, while others harshly criticized the authorities. To signal their disapproval, all Shiite ministers withdrew from the meeting before the vote, including Amal and Hezbollah ministers, as well as Fadi Makki, who is neither affiliated with Hezbollah nor the Amal Movement. The U.S. roadmap calls for 'gradually ending the armed presence of all non-state factions, including Hezbollah, throughout Lebanese territory, both south and north of the Litani,' among 11 measures intended to ensure proper implementation of cease-fire modalities in effect since November 2024. On Friday morning, Nidaa al-Watan, close to the Lebanese Forces (LF), ran a photo of the Shiite ministers who left the Cabinet meeting, with a headline accusing them of 'breaking with the national consensus.' The newspaper claimed the Shiite ministers were receiving instructions via WhatsApp during the session: 'It appeared they were torn between participating in the discussion and consulting instructions received on WhatsApp.' The daily An-Nahar also welcomed the government's decision, headlining: 'The decisive resolution progresses, and the Barrack plan overcomes obstacles.' The newspaper noted that despite their opposition, Hezbollah and Amal did not, this time, resign and withdraw from government, as they did in 2006 following failed talks on forming a national unity government under then-Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. Meanwhile, the moderate daily al-Joumhouriya took a more nuanced tone, noting that the withdrawal of Shiite ministers from Cabinet for the second time exposed the government to a 'disruption of the balance of the National Pact.' 'Bin Farhan government' and American diktats On the other side of the political spectrum, criticism of the government was particularly harsh. Al-Akhbar, close to Hezbollah, described the session as a 'coup d'état,' a term the publication had already used earlier in the week. 'Barrack congratulated Aoun and Salam on the coup d'état,' the newspaper wrote, dubbing the Cabinet the 'Bin Farhan government,' referring to Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud. 'Lebanon remains under the grip of the coup d'état led by Presidents Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam during the ministerial session on Aug. 5,' the newspaper said, adding it was a 'complete capitulation to American-Saudi diktats.' Similarly, Addiyar, once considered close to ousted Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime, said the principles of the 'National Pact' had fallen for the first time under the current presidential term's first government. 'This is an early warning that will have consequences if the country sinks further into divisions because of submission to American diktats, with Washington having succeeded in transferring the problem onto the Lebanese domestic scene,' Addiyar wrote. As for the publication al-Bina, affiliated with the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP), an ally of Hezbollah, it denounced the adoption of the roadmap, saying it proved that 'talk of sovereignty in government rhetoric is merely a slogan used for marketing, promotion, and diversion purposes.'
L'Orient-Le Jour
7 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Washington wants to suspend UNIFIL funding, change its mission, Rajji says
Lebanese Foreign Minister Joe Rajji said Friday that the United States is considering halting its funding for UNIFIL and revising the mission's scope, as the peacekeeping force's mandate in southern Lebanon is set to expire at the end of August. The move comes amid growing tensions tied to the domestic Lebanese situation and discussions around Hezbollah's disarmament. "It is now clear that the United States will stop funding the international emergency forces. They also want to change their missions. On the other hand, we are working with France, Britain and Algeria, all three members of the Security Council, to resolve the UNIFIL funding question while preserving its mission without modification, which is what Lebanon wants," he said in an interview with the Arabic-language publication Nidaa al-Watan. Rajji also pointed to what he called UNIFIL's 'paradoxical situation' since its deployment in Lebanon following the adoption of U.N. Resolution 425 in 1978, which placed it between two hostile sides. With an annual budget of half a billion dollars, the mission has over the years created a profitable economic ecosystem in the South, benefiting local communities who, he noted, are 'friendly toward UNIFIL, until incidents arise with Hezbollah, at which point they abandon it.' UNIFIL, for its part, has never directly blamed Hezbollah for the recurrent attacks it faces in southern Lebanon, referring instead in its statements to 'locals.' UNIFIL, which comprises around 10,000 peacekeepers, has been deployed since 1978 to serve as a buffer between Lebanon and Israel. U.N. Resolution 1701, adopted in 2006, calls for the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanese territory and the disarmament of Hezbollah. It forms the basis of the cease-fire agreement that came into effect on November 27, 2024, between the party and Israel after 13 months of war — a truce that is now violated almost daily by Israeli strikes and shelling. Hezbollah, for its part, has refused to disarm. On Wednesday, the Amal-Hezbollah alliance denounced the Cabinet's decision to set a deadline for disarmament as a 'grave sin.' While the United States has already cut funding to numerous international institutions and U.N. bodies since Donald Trump's return to office in January, reports suggest both Israel and the U.S. are now seeking not to renew UNIFIL's mandate. Monopoly on weapons Commenting on the Cabinet's decision during its Tuesday and Thursday sessions to grant the state exclusive control over weapons, the foreign minister noted that this move comes many decades after Lebanon's international recognition in 1943. 'In 2025, the state is still struggling to assert its authority by reclaiming its monopoly on arms,' he said, adding that his own role in this decision amounted to 'a 1 percent contribution.' Regarding the formulation of the decision, Mr. Rajji— who is aligned with the Lebanese Forces party — admitted he would have preferred a reference to 'the handover of weapons' to the state. The foreign minister also considered it a "historic, decisive and final decision, with no possibility of going back." On the deadline set for resolving the arms issue, Rajji noted that ministers refused to "leave the deadline open, which could mean years, and would make the decision difficult to implement." He also recalled the international pressure — particularly from the U.S. and France, along with imminent threats from Israel — that preceded the decision. Following the government's decision, the Lebanese Army must now prepare an implementation plan and present it to the Cabinet by the end of the month. "As the United States has promised, Lebanon hopes to obtain aid for the army to start implementing the decision to seize weapons throughout the territory," Mr. Rajji observed. Finally, when asked about his own views, the Lebanese foreign minister reignited the debate on peace between Lebanon and Israel. "People always say Lebanon will be the last country to make peace with Israel. Fine — but why should that be imposed on Lebanon if it has interests beyond that?" he asked.
