Save Our Songlines' Raelene Cooper warns UNESCO of government ‘manipulation' Burrup Peninsula Murujuga Aboriginal Corp
Save Our Songlines founder Raelene Cooper also used her submission to the international body – which will decide in the coming days whether to admit the rock art-rich Burrup Peninsula, or Murujuga, on Western Australia's northwest coast to the World Heritage List – to accuse the WA and federal governments of manipulating and misrepresenting scientific findings from a crucial research project.
Federal and WA officials as well as representatives from Murujuga Aboriginal Corp are travelling to Paris this week in an attempt to overturn a draft recommendation against the World Heritage listing of Murujuga, which is home to more than one million ancient rock carvings. The draft finding recommending deferring the listing until the heavy industry on the surrounding Burrup Peninsula, including some of Australia's largest industrial projects, was curtailed.
Ms Cooper and a number of her supporters have also travelled to Paris for the meeting, with Save Our Songlines having prepared a submission for the UNESCO panel to consider.
A statement prepared in recent days by Ms Cooper for UNESCO reinforces her support for the World Heritage nomination and the proposed conditions in the draft decision handed to the body by the International Council on Monuments and Sites earlier this year.
That draft decision recommended referring the World Heritage application back to Australia to allow it to 'prevent any further industrial development adjacent to, and within, the Murujuga Cultural Landscape' and 'develop an appropriate decommissioning and rehabilitation plan for existing industrial activities'.
At the time of the draft decision, Senator Watt criticised what he said were the 'factual inaccuracies' that had influenced the findings. Just days later, he gave conditional approval to Woodside's plans to extend the operating life of the North West Shelf out to 2070.
Ms Cooper told UNESCO that the senator's decision was an example of the Australian government taking action that was contrary to the recommendations presented to UNESCO, with the decision to keep the proposed conditions from the public exacerbating the issue.
'Save our Songlines is currently unable to provide detailed comment on the adequacy of any conditions that may be attached to this approval, because the minister has refused to release the proposed conditions, and they are subject to ongoing negotiation with the proponent (Woodside Energy),' Ms Cooper wrote.
'However, Save our Songlines believes any ongoing operations of the NWS facility are likely to result in unacceptable ongoing impacts to the heritage values of Murujuga, and are contrary to the ICOMOS recommendations for decommissioning and rehabilitation of industrial development at Murujuga.'
While the attempts by the state and federal governments and MAC to salvage the listing will likely centre on presenting the recent findings of a rock art monitoring program, Ms Cooper told UNESCO she questioned the validity of that research.
'Save our Songlines is further concerned that the Australian commonwealth government and West Australian state governments have engaged in manipulation and misrepresentation of scientific research in making the claim that pollution from LNG processing does not put the heritage values at risk,' she wrote.
'Save our Songlines believes this is the latest episode in an ongoing effort by the state party to enable industrial developments which are causing, and will continue to cause, profound and ongoing threats to Murujuga.'
Ms Cooper is a former chair of MAC but quit the organisation's board after she established Save Our Songlines.
Current MAC chair Peter Hicks has been highly critical of attempts to disrupt the listing process, warning that environmental groups had hijacked the process for their own agendas.
Mr Hicks will be joined at UNESCO by WA Environment Minister Matthew Swinbourn and the lead scientist from the rock art monitoring program, Ben Mullins.
Mr Swinbourn said he was travelling to Paris to stand alongside Murujuga's traditional owners as they seek to have the area's outstanding cultural and historical values recognised.
'The scientific evidence shows that industry and cultural heritage can coexist when properly managed, and that current industrial activity is not damaging the rock art.
'Ongoing monitoring, undertaken in partnership between the WA government and MAC, will continue safeguarding this irreplaceable cultural heritage,' he said.
'World Heritage listing will further help protect the ancient rock art and cultural landscapes of Murujuga for generations to come.
'This is about ensuring the unique stories and significance of Murujuga are recognised and celebrated by the international community.' Paul Garvey Senior Reporter
Paul Garvey is an award-winning journalist with more than two decades' experience in newsrooms around Australia and the world. He is currently the senior reporter in The Australian's WA bureau, covering politics, courts, billionaires and everything in between. He has previously written for The Wall Street Journal in New York, The Australian Financial Review in Melbourne, and for The Australian from Hong Kong before returning to his native Perth. He was the WA Journalist of the Year in 2024 and is a two-time winner of The Beck Prize for political journalism. Nation
Zempilas noted Peter Dutton's emphatic defeat in explaining why the WA parliamentary party would not be adopting the positions Indigenous
An academic who said 'Blak activists' were turning Melbourne University into 'an ideological re-education camp' has been mocked for using anti-discrimination laws in a bid to save his job.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
12 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
'A question of when, not if': What happens if Australia recognises a Palestinian state?
The recognition of a Palestinian state offers prospects of "a future recovery", experts say, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faces pressure to accelerate Australia's position. Hardening its resolve in recent days, the Albanese government has stated its intention to recognise Palestinian statehood but has laid out several preconditions, including the demilitarisation of Hamas, before committing. On Wednesday, several frontbenchers, including Anika Wells and Julian Hill, said it was "a question of when, not if". Ben Saul, United Nations special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, said growing calls are the result of two years of international law violations by Israel. "I think it indicates the growing impatience of the international community with Israel's failure to support the conditions necessary for a Palestinian state," he told SBS News. The Coalition argues recognition of a Palestinian state needs to come at the end of a peace process. "We're worried he's putting the cart before the horse. We need a peace agreement, we need to see the hostages released, we need to see Hamas dismantled. Hamas cannot be part of a Palestinian state," Opposition defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said. So what would recognition mean in practice, including for the people of Gaza? The significance of recognising a Palestinian state Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh, director of the Middle East Studies Forum at Deakin University, says Australia recognising a Palestinian state would send a strong message to the United States that the "global dynamic is changing". In April 2024, the United States vetoed a resolution that would have granted Palestine's bid to become a full member of the United Nations. He told SBS News that the US needs to "exert its leadership role and exert pressure on Israel to push along the two-state solution". Akbarzadeh argues that "international sympathy for Israel after October 7" has turned into "international sense of disbelief that any state could behave this way", resulting in the likes of the UK and France changing their policies. "To put a total population under military control, blockading a total population and depriving them of food, of medicine, of water. It is a sense of global disbelief." Israeli officials, including its embassy in Canberra, deny that starvation is occurring in the Gaza Strip, stating reports of the deaths of malnourished children are a "false campaign" from Hamas. Saul said Palestinian statehood is not entirely dependent on the United States as long as international law criteria is met, including a population, a territory and an effective independent government. On Wednesday, Australia joined 14 other nations and signed a joint statement committing to a pathway for Palestinian statehood. It includes the Palestinian Authority's calls for the disarmament of Hamas, release of all remaining hostages, and the undertaking of elections within a year. The vote represented a shift in position after abstaining on similar motions for two decades, and Labor ministers said it was an important step towards a two-state solution. What are the practical implications? Beyond symbolism, Saul said Palestinians are legally entitled to having their a state under international law, labelling recognition "a win-win" which would allow Australia "full-blown diplomatic relations with Palestine". "It also means Palestine gets certain rights under Australian domestic law as well, in terms of diplomatic and state immunities of Palestinian officials," Saul said. However, Shahram says practical consequences are "quite limited" until the UN Security Council allows Palestine to become a full member. These full member benefits include having its armed forces under the protection of a state, conducting diplomacy, establishing relations with other countries like trade ties and mounting legal claims against Israel in all international bodies under state sovereignty. "But legal sovereignty is managed and basically curtailed by the political power and military power of the United States and Israel, so that the reality of power overrides the legality of the future Palestinian state," he said. What is the impact on Palestinians in Gaza? Akbarzadeh said Palestinian statehood opens up "prospects for future recovery and reconstruction". "The impact on the daily life of Gazans is nothing because Gaza is still under military occupation and blockaded by Israel," he said. While the opening up of borders to allow food and medicine aids the starving population, Akbarzadeh argues, "you want to give them [Palestinians] hope". "You want to give Palestinians an avenue for self-expression and autonomy. So that's when statehood and sovereignty come in. The two are related, but recognising Palestinian sovereignty does not give Palestinians in Gaza food," he said. Saul agrees that statehood won't fix the "humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza", stating only Israel can offer a solution that includes allowing the flow of humanitarian aid. "Israel has to respect its obligations under humanitarian law. It has to respect human rights law," he said. He highlighted that countries supporting Israel, like the United States and Germany, have to respect their obligations too. Two-year-old Yazan Abu Foul with his mother Naima. Yazan suffers from severe malnutrition due to the acute shortage of food caused by the blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip and the closure of border crossings. Source: EPA / Haitham Imad "Obligations under international law is not to transfer weapons or ammunition to a country that would use them to commit war crimes," Saul added. Where do other Western nations stand Overnight, the UK warned Israel it would follow France, and more than 140 United Nations members, to recognise Palestinian statehood, unless it takes immediate action to relieve suffering in Gaza. Germany said on Friday it was not planning to recognise Palestinian statehood in the short term; rather, its priority was to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution — Israel and a Palestinian state co-existing in peace. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said on Saturday that recognising the State of Palestine before it is established could be counterproductive. Last year, Ireland, Norway and Spain recognised a Palestinian state with its borders to be demarcated as they were before the 1967 Middle East war, when Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. However, they also recognised that those borders may change in any eventual talks to reach a final settlement, and that their decisions did not diminish their belief in Israel's fundamental right to exist in peace and security.
News.com.au
12 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Create more risk, not less': Expert's warning after YouTube added to social media ban
'Rushed, vague and politically motivated.' That's how one expert has described the federal government's decision to include YouTube in its controversial under-16s social media ban, warning it could cause 'more risk, not less' to young Australians. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed on Wednesday the government had reversed an earlier decision to exclude the platform from its world-leading restrictions under the banner of educational material, on the advice of eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant. Research conducted by Dr Inman Grant's office found that of 2600 children, 4 in 10 reported exposure to 'misogynistic or hateful material, dangerous online challenges, violent fight videos, and content promoting eating disorders'. From December, children will be barred from creating their own YouTube accounts – but will still be able to access the site in either a logged-out state or through a parent or other adult's account. The video-sharing giant, which is owned by Google, has since threatened the government with a High Court challenge, arguing it is 'not a social media service' and 'offers benefit to younger Australians' – a move Swinburne University media expert Dr Belinda Barnet labelled 'a last-ditch attempt to get out of the regulation'. 'I hope the government does not back down,' Dr Barnet added. 'YouTube absolutely is a social media platform like the others – it is not a special case. It also represents equivalent risk of harm as the others.' Other experts spoke to in the wake of the government's announcement, however, were less inclined to agree. Director of Queensland University of Technology's (QUT) Digital Media Research Centre and Professor of Digital Communication, Daniel Angus, said the restrictions on access to YouTube in a logged-in state – rather than to the site as a whole – could actually achieve the opposite of what the government ban is intended to, 'alienating young users rather than meaningfully protecting them'. 'Logged-in access alAlows for personalised experiences, safety controls like restricted mode, and content curation through subscriptions and algorithmic recommendations,' Professor Angus said. 'Ironically, removing that logged-in functionality for under-16s may increase their exposure to harmful content by stripping away those safety features and pushing them into unmoderated, anonymous browsing – a shift that could create more risk, not less. 'This remains to be seen, but it underscores how poorly thought-through these proposals are. 'The main concern with YouTube is that the algorithms that recommend new videos to users are opaque, and we know that YouTube's recommendation system has served content that is sexually-explicit and otherwise distressing to young viewers,' University of Sydney lecturer in Media and Communications, Dr Catherine Page Jeffrey, said. 'Yet including (it) in the ban will not necessarily preclude this.' Dr Page Jeffrey, who said she disagreed with both YouTube's inclusion in the ban and 'the legislation more broadly', stressed the 'important role' the platform plays in the digital lives of teenagers for education, entertainment, information and community. 'Young people have a right to engagement in the digital world, and (to) simply live out parts of their lives online,' she added. 'Sure, there are risks – but the approach to mitigating these risks should not be excluding young people (from these platforms) altogether.' Failure to differentiate the specific risks posed by each platform and instead lump them 'under a generic 'social media' label is a fundamental flaw in the government's approach', Prof Angus said. 'YouTube's … user dynamics differ significantly from, say, Snapchat or TikTok,' he continued. 'There are certainly harmful elements … but these require nuanced and holistic responses, not blunt bans. Targeted moderation, transparency of algorithms and platform processes, and digital literacy education are more effective and proportional strategies.' Though the ban will 'hopefully (act as a) wakeup call' to social media platforms on what – and how – they algorithmically push users, Deakin University Senior Lecturer in Communications Dr Luke Heemsbergen said it won't be enough to 'stop teenagers from finding things they want to online'. 'Unfortunately, it is also already setting new precedents around policing and surveilling online spaces that break rights and privacy in new ways – ironically offering more power to the big platforms in how we get to live and connect.' At a press conference on Wednesday, Communications Minister Anika Wells – who ultimately made the decision to include YouTube in the legislation – said that parents helping their children navigate the internet 'is like trying to teach (them) to swim in the open ocean with the rips and the sharks, compared to at the local council pool'. 'We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks – and that is why we will not be intimidated by legal threats (from Google) when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids,' Ms Wells said. Invoking the Minister's analogy, Dr Heemsbergen said it was 'pretty hard to tell if YouTube's 'currents' of content are any worse than other services – so I'd rather teach my kids to swim and what to do when they hit a rip, than try to ban them from this beach or that beach'. 'We – as a society – can do a lot to clean the beach up, for sure, but the water is always going to be there, and it remains our responsibility to make sure our kids understand and act accordingly,' he said. It's 'unlikely' the ban will be effective, Prof Angus said, pointing to 'international experience that shows children can – and do – find ways to circumvent age verification systems'. After the UK introduced its own mandatory age verification systems on porn sites, Reddit and X last week, virtual private network (VPN) use skyrocketed. Research conducted by Prof Angus' own team has also indicated tools like facial age estimation 'are unreliable, biased, and potentially discriminatory, especially against already marginalised groups'. What's needed, he said, 'is a shift in thinking away from trying to protect children from the internet, and toward protecting children within the internet': building age-appropriate digital spaces, enhancing media literacy, ensuring access to comprehensive sex and relationship education, and involving them in the design of the policies that affect them. 'Policies like this one, rushed, vague, and politically motivated, risk doing more harm than good,' Prof Angus said.
The Australian
37 minutes ago
- The Australian
NT moves to jail more kids despite evidence it creates 'career criminals'
'If you want to make a monster, this is how you do it.' This was the warning three years ago from lawyer turned children's court president Hylton Quail after he examined conditions at Perth's juvenile detention centre. Judge Quail asked for the log books for one boy, a 15-year-old burglar, and learned he had been kept in a glass cell for 79 days over the previous summer. Governments have been busy making monsters all over Australia since then, and rocketing Indigenous youth incarceration rates should terrify us. We are creating career criminals. Angry ones. In the Top End, the public has had enough of youth crime so the Finocchiaro government is bringing back spit hoods. The jurisdiction that has turned failure into a business model wants to jail 10 year olds again. What could go wrong? As the NT parliament prepares to consider legislative change that will make it easier to jail children and jail them younger, they are being urged to look at evidence on what works. The quiet and careful work of crime prevention could be a night patrol in a remote town that takes children off the streets and into the care of youth workers who figure out what is going on in their lives. It could be a family responsibility agreement that delivers help and support to a struggling parent who has made a commitment to work towards change. There must be much more of it. National Children's Commissioner Anne Hollonds acknowledged the angst in the NT about youth crime on Wednesday when she said: 'We all want communities to be safe places where children can thrive'. The NT government's proposed actions, she said, flew in the face of what is known about making communities safer. 'We know that making the justice system more punitive does not work to prevent crime by children. What the evidence shows is that when children are locked up and brutalised by the justice system, they are more likely to go on to commit more serious and violent crimes. This does nothing to make our communities safer,' she said. Last year, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Katie Kiss took the trouble to listen to children from troubled families – many Indigenous – and wrote a report that caught the attention of Coalition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Kerrynne Liddle. She is enthusiastic about Kiss's Help Way Earlier report for its message from children that authorities should not wait. They should help, way earlier. Back in Perth, the 15-year-old burglar is now 18. And in adult jail. Nobody is at all surprised. Paige Taylor Indigenous Affairs Correspondent, WA Bureau Chief Paige Taylor is from the West Australian goldmining town of Kalgoorlie and went to school all over the place including Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory and Sydney's north shore. She has been a reporter since 1996. She started as a cadet at the Albany Advertiser on WA's south coast then worked at Post Newspapers in Perth before joining The Australian in 2004. She is a three time Walkley finalist and has won more than 20 WA Media Awards including the Daily News Centenary Prize for WA Journalist of the Year three times.
