Cut property taxes, improve transit? Hillsborough Republican floats a plan
Adria Curioso's commute began at 5:30 a.m.
Before most of the city stirred, she walked from her apartment off Fowler Avenue and 22nd Street to her first bus stop, indicated by a pole beside a six-lane road.
One bus took her south. Another took her west, where she'd sit under an unlit shelter, the sky still dark. The last bus drove north again, finally dropping her off for work as a paraprofessional at Carrollwood K-8 School.
Driving between home and work would take less than 15 minutes. By bus, Curioso spent 90 minutes commuting each way until she changed jobs last year.
'There's certain things I haven't been able to do in my life because of public transit restrictions,' she said. 'I have to plan for the possibility that if I get this job, can I even make it there in a reasonable timeline?'
Thousands of Hillsborough County riders like Curioso rely on a system that barely works. Most bus lines require riders to wait 30 minutes or an hour between buses, often impractical for those due at work.
Less than a decade ago, Hillsborough County boasted the largest budget of the region's transit agencies. But since 2017, Hillsborough has struggled to fund rising expenses, spurring leaders to chop routes while losing thousands of weekday riders. Meanwhile, Pinellas has at times outpaced Hillsborough's transit spending since 2018.
Now Hillsborough is in search of answers to avoid more cuts within three years.
An increase in property taxes to fund the bus system can't even make it to the ballot without Hillsborough Republicans' approval. Commissioners Christine Miller and Josh Wostal have already voiced disapproval with moving a tax increase forward, even if voters would have a final say in 2026.
But Wostal has another idea to cut taxes for some constituents — and raise more funds for transit. It's in line with Gov. Ron DeSantis' proposal to eliminate property taxes in Florida.
What if Tampa could impose its own sales tax to fund public transit within city limits?
Wostal's idea would bolster urban transit while possibly spurring service cuts for the rest of Hillsborough County. Some 1.1 million residents live outside the city of Tampa.
The plan could also save the average homeowner almost $200 per year, according to an agency estimate developed using the median home price in Hillsborough.
The move, in Wostal's mind, would satisfy two parts of his constituency: urban Tampa residents who crave better transit, and car-reliant residents in outer parts of the county — Fish Hawk, Plant City, Brandon, unincorporated parts of New Tampa — who are uninterested in paying for bus service.
Voters in Tampa largely supported a one-cent transportation sales tax in 2018, which would have steered more dollars to Hillsborough buses. Opposition was most intense in east and south Hillsborough County. The measure passed but was later struck down by the Florida Supreme Court.
Tampa currently generates at least half of the sales tax revenue in all of Hillsborough County, Wostal said, citing numbers from the state Department of Revenue. That means a half-cent tax on every dollar spent in the city could raise around $100 million for buses — roughly $20 million more than the entire county generates through property taxes.
There are road blocks to Wostal's proposal. A Tampa-only sales tax would require a change in state law, which could drag out the process for years. And Tampa City Council Member Luis Viera, who chairs the Hillsborough bus agency board, said he's reluctant to support a plan that may curtail service for residents outside city limits.
'I support the rights of cities to have their own sales tax, but as an addition to our mass transit system, not a replacement for it,' Viera said. 'You've got to think county-wide.'
Curioso's past commute illustrates the overlaps between Tampa and the surrounding county. She lived within Tampa, but worked in Carrollwood, an unincorporated community. Limited routes to areas of Hillsborough County like New Tampa have already thwarted job opportunities and narrowed where she can spend her money.
'It helps everyone in the surrounding area to have a connected (bus) network,' she said.
Wostal said Tampa could maintain bus routes into the county and Temple Terrace through inter-local agreements. Or Hillsborough could maintain a smaller property tax to fund important routes.
'It's not even about cuts,' he said. 'It's about reorganizing.'
But some are still concerned about what a different funding system could mean for a fast-growing area like south Hillsborough County.
'I do know that if we only plan for Tampa in terms of raising this revenue, we're missing out on three-quarters of the county that we're expected to have an astronomical level of growth over the next 20 to 25 years, and we're going to end up right in (this) same position, if not worse,' said Gary Hartfield, a citizen appointee to the bus agency board.
With an operating budget of $117.3 million, the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority is on track to spend less this year than Orlando's and Pinellas County's transit systems.
Pinellas spends about $124 per resident on its bus system. Hillsborough spends just $74 per person. Compared to other top metro areas in different states, Hillsborough falls even further behind. Austin, Texas, spends more than double per person compared to Hillsborough. Denver, Colorado spends five times as much.
Part of the problem is how little Hillsborough can collect for transit from property taxes. Pinellas imposes a 75-cent transit tax per each $1,000 of assessed property value, generating around $70 million.
Hillsborough's tax, two-thirds of what Pinellas imposes, brings in only slightly more revenue for a bus agency that must serve around 500,000 more people.
The bus system is collecting the same from each home that it was in 2012.
Fortunately, Hillsborough County also has more than 300,000 new residents since 2012, some of whom are adding more money to the pot. But their contributions of 50 cents per $1,000 of assessed property value aren't enough to fund basic operations into 2030.
If Hillsborough made its transit property tax the same as Pinellas's, 16 routes would see increased frequencies, including popular routes along Florida and Nebraska avenues, according to a presentation by Temple Terrace Republican Gil Schisler this month.
If Hillsborough doubled its current transit tax, it could restore 14 routes that were cut in the last decade.
As Hillsborough has shed routes, riders have disappeared. In 2017, 50,000 people boarded the bus during the weekday. Now it's down to less than 35,000.
The short answer: it would take years, and lots of political buy-in.
Florida's counties are the only local authorities that can levy sales taxes. Cities can't impose them, according to current state law.
To give cities their own sales tax authority, the state would have to change how it administers such taxes. Sales taxes are currently assessed by zip code. Many of Tampa's zip codes include portions of the city and unincorporated county, Schisler said.
Changing state statutes 'could be done, but it's not going to happen anytime soon,' Schisler said. 'It would be a major philosophical overhaul to the state of Florida Department of Revenue.'
Wostal is more optimistic. He said he's spoken to four members of the Legislature representing Hillsborough County and gotten positive feedback so far. But it will be harder to earn their public support, he said, when changing tax laws could benefit Tampa's liberal City Council.
Wostal's goal is to get a bill revamping the tax code through next year's legislative session. From there, it would be up to the local bodies that constitute Hillsborough County — the county board and three city councils — to agree on a plan to remake the bus agency. Cooperation is far from guaranteed.
Some local officials seemed intrigued by Wostal's proposal.
Making Tampa pay for most of the area's transit? 'Sounds brilliant,' said Miller, a Republican Hillsborough commissioner.
'I'm open to any ideas that would increase funding for transit in the City of Tampa,' said Lynn Hurtak, who sits on Tampa City Council.
But Schisler argues time is running out now, before Hillsborough must cut bus service yet again.
'We already have a funding mechanism in place with' property taxes, he said. 'Use it.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
8 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' cracks down on Biden's student loan 'scheme,' top Republican says
The chairman of a key Senate panel is claiming victory against former President Joe Biden's student loan plans as part of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill." "The Biden administration was attempting to forgive student loans for people who willingly took on the loan and required the taxpayer, including people who never went to college and would never make what the person who took the loan would ever have the hope to make," Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, R-La., told Fox News Digital. "So we end that transfer of that student loan on the taxpayers, and that's probably our biggest savings." Cassidy's committee released its portion of the Trump agenda bill late on Tuesday. A press release for the legislation said it "ends Biden's student loan schemes that transfer debt onto the 87 percent of Americans who chose to not go to college or already paid off their loans" and "also prevents future Democrat administrations from implementing schemes." The bill specifically takes aim at Biden's expansion of Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations and Closed School Discharge regulations, which Republicans have held up as costly policies that shift federal student loan borrowers' burdens onto other taxpayers. Various versions of Biden's plans had previously been struck down in court. The bill would also eliminate federal Grad PLUS loans, a program used by graduate-level and professional students to pay for their studies, which can be used for graduate students' entire cost of attendance. It would instead keep in place a $20,500 annual limit for Federal Direct Unsubsidized Loans on graduate degrees, capped at $100,000 total, excluding undergraduate loans. For professional degrees, it keeps a $50,000 annual unsubsidized loan limit and a $200,000 total cap. The legislation is also aimed at cracking down on taxpayer funding subsidizing degrees from lower-performing universities. Colleges that see people with undergraduate degrees earn less than the typical high school graduate in their state, or graduate programs where attendees then earn less than the normal bachelor's recipient, would be blocked from federal student loan programs. "What we've got was a situation where people can borrow more money than they can effectively pay back, and that destroys their life, leaving them with a debt burden which keeps them unable to do other things in life. And there's at least some sense that universities offering these programs know that's the case. And so we attempt to fix that," Cassidy said. "So we have provisions that would say that if the degree being acquired does not end up paying more, the person receiving that degree doesn't get more on average than a person who did not get that degree, then the federal government is not going to lend them money." To encourage more people to pursue non-collegiate degrees, the bill would also establish a Workforce Pell Grant. Pell Grants are currently aimed at low-income students pursuing bachelor's degrees and are generally not repaid. "For example, a student gets a commercial driver's license. They're going to go out and make $100,000 a year after a couple of years of driving, I am told. And so we want to enable those people to accomplish that," Cassidy said. Foreign income would be taken into account when evaluating Pell Grants, while farm and small business assets would not, under the GOP bill. Those and several other measures in the legislation would add up to roughly $300 billion in taxpayer savings, Cassidy said. Senate Republicans are currently working through their version of Trump's massive agenda bill, which passed the House late last month. Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to pass a sweeping bill advancing Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt. They are also working to use it to bring down the national debt – nearing $37 trillion – with the aim of cutting $1.5 trillion in federal spending. Reconciliation allows the party in power to completely skirt the minority, in this case Democrats, by lowering the Senate's threshold to advance from 60 votes to 51. The legislation must adhere to a specific set of rules, however, including measures that deal with the budget, taxation, or the national debt. Both the House and Senate must agree to identical versions of the bill before it gets to Trump's desk for a signature. The House's version passed 215 to 214, and leaders there have implored the upper chamber to change as little as possible. Cassidy acknowledged there were some changes made but was optimistic about how they'll be met in the House. "There's several things, but one thing I think that they're going to like is that we do fully fund the Pell Grant program. You know, we address the shortfall there. And so I think they're going to like it," he said. "It's going to give low-income students access to career education. We need those kind of career type jobs to make sure that all this manufacturing and construction has a workforce to address it. And so we think it helps the needs of society. We think it helps the needs of the student." House and Senate GOP leaders had previously set a goal of having a bill on Trump's desk by the Fourth of July. Cassidy declined to comment on whether that was a feasible benchmark but argued that lawmakers should be ready to extend that timeline – and possibly shrink their summer recess – to get the final product. "As far as I'm concerned, the most important thing is to get it right. So if there is a delay, the president said it today – if there is a delay, that's not that big of a deal. The most important thing is we get it right," he said.


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP advances first 2026 funding bill out of committee
House Republicans early Wednesday morning advanced legislation that calls for more than $450 billion to fund the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction and other programs for fiscal year 2026. The bill advanced out of the GOP-led House Appropriations Committee along party lines, as Democrats came out in strong opposition to the plan. It marks the first of the 12 annual funding bills House GOP appropriators are hoping to move out of committee before Congress leaves for its August recess. The bill calls for about $152 billion in discretionary funding for fiscal 2026, marking a 3 percent increase compared to current levels. Overall, the bill would provide about $453 billion for the VA, including $300 billion for mandatory programs. Among the increases Republicans have highlighted in the measure are boosts to the VA, military construction and family housing, and funding for a new homelessness program. In his opening remarks on Tuesday, Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), the head of the subcommittee that crafts the annual funding bill, said the bill ensures 'veterans get the benefits and care they've earned.' 'The bill does that while also addressing other issues affecting veterans, including homelessness, mental health services and taking care of our women veterans,' he said. 'The bill also makes crucial investments totaling nearly $18 billion in the infrastructure of our service members need to work on to live.' Democrats, however, have railed against the plan, needling Republicans for not including advanced funding for the Toxic Exposure Fund in the proposal, which they also said falls nearly $1 billion short of the funding needed for military construction. Democrats have also accused Republicans of seeking to privatize medical care for veterans. 'This bill hurdles us towards VA privatization, a top project 2025, priority that undercuts what veterans consistently ask for, which is the high quality medical care at VA, by transferring record funding from VA medical services to community care,' Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), the top Democrat on the veterans' funding subcommittee, said. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) has emphasized as the committee ramps up its funding work that the legislation currently being considered will look different when eventual bipartisan spending talks begin. Senior GOP appropriators have also acknowledged that further changes are possible during the annual process as they await more information from the Trump administration about the president's vision for government funding for fiscal 2026 and beyond. 'As this process moves forward and we receive further documentation on the OMB budget, we will take it under consideration, put forward a product that best addresses the needs of our service members and veterans,' Carter said during the meeting on Tuesday, referring to the Office of Management and Budget. The bill comes about a week after hardline conservatives urged top appropriators to write bills 'consistent' with President Trump's budget request and to 'include adjustments initiated' by his Department of Government Efficiency. In a slim budget request released earlier this year, Trump called for cutting funding for domestic programs by more than $160 billion for fiscal 2026. As appropriators await more details from the administration, the committee also approved interim subcommittee allocations for a third of the annual funding bills. 'These interim allocations will allow us to begin our work. As we move forward, this committee is prepared to do the hard work – line by line – to uphold fiscal discipline and effective governance,' Cole said. However, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, criticized Republicans over the process, saying negotiators are 'beginning the appropriations process without a total funding level.' 'We are flying blind and handcuffed into the critical work of providing discretionary funding for programs and services across the government that help to grow the middle class, protect the working class, support small businesses, and grow our economy – this is important business that cannot be done responsibly without a complete vision for how we plan to fund the government.'


CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Speaker Mike Johnson to address Israeli parliament June 22
Washington — House Speaker Mike Johnson announced Wednesday he will travel to Israel later this month to address the Israel's parliament, known as the Knesset, in Jerusalem. "It will be one of the highest honors of my life to address the Israeli Knesset at this fateful moment," Johnson said in a statement announcing the June 22 address. "Our ties run deeper than military partnerships and trade agreements. We're bound by the same beliefs, the same psalms, and the same sacred pursuit of liberty." Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has led House Republicans in their staunch support of Israel in the war in Gaza that began following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack. Johnson's speakership began weeks later, after the ouster of his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy also addressed the Knesset during his speakership in May 2023. And for Johnson, the overseas trip marks one of a small number he's taken since becoming speaker. His first trip abroad since taking the gavel came in September when he attended the G7 summit in Italy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson address the media after a meeting in the U.S. Capitol on Friday, February 7, 2025. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images The visit comes 20 months after the conflict between Israel and Hamas began. The U.S. has long been engaged in ongoing negotiations to broker a ceasefire between the two, and President Trump has expressed optimism in recent weeks. Meanwhile, Israel has faced intense criticism in recent months for a blockade on aid deliveries into Gaza. Johnson met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington in February. The speaker reiterated Wednesday that "it is our moral imperative to stand by our sister democracy" amid "grave threats" to Israel and Jewish people. "As terror and vile antisemitic ideology threaten Western Civilization, Israel must know that when America said, 'Never Again,' we meant it," Johnson added.