
New Zealand weather events prompt rethink of government housing protections
WELLINGTON (Reuters) -The New Zealand government is considering ending bailouts for homeowners affected by floods and landslides as it develops a framework for addressing the impact of climate change.
The government has often stepped in after natural disasters to buy properties, spending billions of dollars in recent years as climate change-driven severe weather events increase in intensity and frequency.
The government "won't be able to keep bailing out people in this way," New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told state-owned Radio New Zealand this week.
"We need to find a way to manage these events going forward and who takes responsibility and is there a shared responsibility."
His comments come as parts of the South Island start cleaning up after floods this month, which affected roughly 800 homes, according to local authorities. The government on Wednesday announced NZ$600,000 ($356,700) in compensation for flood-affected farmers, growers and forestry owners.
By 2060 at least 14,500 homes worth approximately NZ$12.5 billion could suffer at least one damaging flood, around 300 to 400 homes annually, according to Climate Sigma research.
Climate Minister Simon Watts said in an email that the government has been working to get bipartisan support on a national adaptation framework to give New Zealand certainty.
"This is a complex and challenging work," he said. "It is important that any change is enduring."
Any policy changes would likely be introduced slowly. A recent independent report commissioned by the Ministry of Environment suggested a transition over 20 years to allow pricing to adjust as expectations of government bailouts are tempered.
For Graham McIntyre the problem of flooding is immediate with water surging through his property when it rains heavily.
"It is like a wave that comes through," he said, explaining the land he bought 25 years ago north of Auckland has three rivers running through it.
He wants authorities to buy his house in Taupaki and to relocate the nearby town centre. Both were flooded in 2023.
'CAN'T DO ANYTHING'
Policymakers, researchers and property experts both in New Zealand and Australia have for some time warned climate change is a risk that home buyers have not priced in.
The Ministry of Environment report recommended including the need for more information about the potential impact of natural hazards so owners can make their own decisions about whether to move or stay and bear the costs of that decision.
Property records in New Zealand increasingly note whether there is a flood or landslide risk or history of either and homeowners in vulnerable areas are worried their houses will become less valuable.
"You can't do anything," McIntyre said. "You can't sell up. You can't change it."
Kelvin Davidson, chief property economist at Cotality, said it was difficult to gauge the impact of growing climate risks on property prices due to limited data on events like flooding and varying acceptance of risk by buyers.
"The rubber is not hitting the road in terms of pricing," he said.
($1 = 1.6821 New Zealand dollars)
(Reporting by Lucy Craymer; Editing by Saad Sayeed)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
8 minutes ago
- The Star
Moscow mayor says air defence systems downed two drones en route to Moscow
FILE PHOTO: Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin attends a military parade on Victory Day, marking the 80th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany in World War Two, in Red Square in central Moscow, Russia, May 9, 2025. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov/File Photo


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
ICE races to build migrant tent camps after $45 billion GOP funding boost, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is racing to build migrant tent camps nationwide after receiving $45 billion in new funding, aiming to expand detention capacity from 40,000 to 100,000 beds by year-end, The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday. The agency is prioritizing large-scale tent facilities at military bases and ICE jails, including a 5,000-bed site at Fort Bliss in Texas and others in Colorado, Indiana, and New Jersey, the report added, citing documents seen by WSJ. Top U.S. officials at Homeland Security, including U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, have expressed a preference for detention centers run by Republican states and local governments rather than private prison companies, the report said. The White House and ICE did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. Noem said last week that she was in talks with five Republican-led states to build other detention sites inspired by the "Alligator Alcatraz" facility in Florida. "We've had several other states that are actually using Alligator Alcatraz as a model for how they can partner with us," Noem told a press conference in Florida without naming any of the states. (Reporting by Rajveer Singh Pardesi in Bengaluru; editing by Diane Craft)


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Brazil's Lula condemns US visa curbs as arbitrary, defends sovereignty
BRASILIA: Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has strongly criticized the United States for imposing visa restrictions on Brazilian officials, labeling the move as 'arbitrary' and 'baseless.' In a statement released on Saturday, Lula emphasized that such actions undermine fundamental principles of respect and sovereignty between nations. 'I am certain that no form of intimidation or threat, from anyone, will compromise the most important mission of Brazil's powers and institutions, which is to permanently defend and uphold the democratic rule of law,' he said. The Brazilian leader's remarks come amid rising diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Lula's statement reaffirmed Brazil's commitment to judicial independence and democratic governance, rejecting external pressures that could influence domestic legal processes. The visa restrictions, imposed by the US, have not been publicly detailed, but Lula's response signals a firm stance against perceived interference. - Reuters