Trans student sues University of Kansas after being fired for speaking to media about housing policy
TOPEKA — An interview with a news outlet cost a former University of Kansas resident assistant his job and his home. Now, he's suing the university for violating his free speech rights.
The lawsuit filed in federal court Thursday says KU restricted Anthony Alvarez' speech and fired him without cause in retaliation.
Alvarez, who is trans, talked to a media outlet on Feb. 26 during a campus protest over the university's decision to end Grace Pearson Scholarship Hall's gender-inclusive living arrangements. Alvarez, a 21-year-old student, expressed his frustration with the elimination of inclusive spaces where students feel safe. While he identified himself as a proctor, akin to a resident assistant, he did not claim to speak in his official capacity as a resident assistant for KU.
The university placed Alvarez on probation for failing to refer media inquiries to senior KU staff. Before the window to appeal the probation closed, Alvarez was subsequently fired from his position, and he was forced to rescind an offer to continue as a proctor the next academic year.
'I think it's a bad sign that for infractions as little as this, you could get fired and kicked out and very quickly find yourself in a position where you have to find a place to live,' Alvarez told Kanas Reflector in April.
The lawsuit argues Alvarez 'engaged in protected speech by speaking to a member of the media in their capacity as a private citizen on a matter of public concern — specifically by criticizing Defendant KU's policies and practices related to housing policies for LGBTQ+ community members as applied to recent state and federal legislative directives.'
Precedent for resident assistants, who are students and employees of a university, fired for speech is largely undeveloped. However, First Amendment challenges, added restrictions and demands for universities and rollbacks of LGBTQ+ rights are becoming commonplace under President Donald Trump's second administration.
A vocal advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, Alvarez testified in January against a bill in the Kansas Legislature that bans gender-affirming care for minors and restricts the use of state funds for promoting gender transitioning. The bill made it through the House and Senate, was vetoed by Gov. Laura Kelly and ultimately became law after the Republican-controlled Legislature overrode the veto.
Representing Alvarez is Barry Grissom, former U.S. Attorney for Kansas, who argued in the complaint that as a result of KU's actions, Alvarez experienced a 'loss of living quarters, income, reputational damage, emotional distress, and the deprivation of constitutionally protected rights.'
Grissom filed suit not only to address the university's retaliation toward Alvarez but also to garner a judgment from the court on whether the policy that led to Alvarez' probation and termination is constitutional, Grissom said in a Thursday news release.
'Terminating a public employee after they speak to the media and criticize that employer's policies is certainly in line with some of the challenges we have seen of late to the First Amendment, one of the bedrock principles of the American legal system,' Grissom said in a statement to Kansas Reflector.
He continued: 'Speech that the government does not agree with is exactly the kind which the First Amendment was intended to protect — yet each day, there are seemingly more people affected by policies like the one which cost Mr. Alvarez his job.'
The lawsuit names KU; Sarah Waters, executive director of KU housing and resident life; and Emily Chellgren, assistant director of resident life, as defendants. Multiple attempts beginning Friday morning to reach KU for comment for this story were unsuccessful. By Friday afternoon, most staff members had set up out-of-office messages for Memorial Day weekend. KU also did not respond to requests to comment in past coverage of this story.
Alvarez is asking for a jury trial in Kansas City, Kansas, and compensation for damages and attorney and case-related expenses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two redistricting bills into law on Thursday evening after a Democratic-controlled Legislature passed them earlier in the day. Why it matters: The legislation is in direct response to Texas' Republican-controlled House passing a new congressional map at the urging of President Trump, and the consequences of both could prove pivotal in the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
NYC mayoral hopefuls shrug off latest corruption allegations engulfing Adams team
Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist state assemblymember, has argued he'd aggressively resist Trump's policies while Cuomo keeps the president close. Despite his inexperience and far-left policies, he looks poised to be the next mayor and took a cautious, low-profile approach to the latest corruption scandals buffeting City Hall. His statement about Lewis-Martin's indictment stuck to the affordability theme that propelled him to the Democratic nomination. 'While New Yorkers struggle to afford the most expensive city in America, Eric Adams and his administration are too busy tripping over corruption charges to come to their defense,' Mamdani said. 'Corruption isn't just about what a politician gains, it's about what the public loses.' Adams gave no indication Thursday that he plans to leave the race for mayor. Even if he does, Mamdani would remain the frontrunner albeit with Cuomo as steeper competition, said Democratic strategist Trip Yang, who is not working on any of the mayoral campaigns. 'If Adams drops out, polling has shown that most of the support goes to Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo goes from maybe a 20-point deficit to a 10-point deficit,' Yang said. 'If Adams drops out, it'll give Andrew Cuomo a lot more energy than Cuomo's new videos for sure.' Yang was referencing the social media videos the former governor has been posting that seek to emulate how Mamdani reached younger, more online voters in the primary. New York City Council Member Lincoln Restler, a longtime Adams adversary, told POLITICO, 'He appears so deluded and disconnected from the reality of the failures of his administration that I really do believe he's going to run through the tape and get 7 percent of the vote.' City Council Member Chi Ossé, a Mamdani supporter, said the Lewis-Martin indictment might not even hurt Adams that much in the race. 'He is polling under 10 percent as the currently elected mayor,' Ossé told POLITICO. 'Those who are with him are with him despite all of his corruption — and I'm sure they'll continue to be with him after this.' Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate for mayor who's polling ahead of Adams in Democrat-dominated New York City, knocked both the mayor and the former governor as elected officials shrouded by corruption. Top Cuomo adviser Joe Percoco was convicted on federal bribery charges but the U.S. Supreme Court tossed the case in 2023. The former governor himself faced calls to resign amid sexual harassment allegations four years ago and has more recently said he regrets stepping down. 'For him to start attacking Eric Adams as being in charge of a corrupt administration, well, if he's pointing one finger, two fingers are pointing back at him,' Sliwa said. But even Sliwa didn't want Adams to drop out, saying he trusts the voters of New York to make the right choice. Jeff Coltin contributed to this report.
