Experts recommend doing these two simple things if you can't sleep after a workout
We all have a preference for when we like to exercise, and how. For some, nothing feels better than a late evening sweat session, while others might prefer a jog before the rest of the world rises.
But have you ever struggled to sleep after a workout? You're not alone. Some workouts can impact your ability to fall asleep or your sleep quality, depending on the time of day, so it's good to know that the problem is common and it can be solved.
Experts (and science) recommend a few ways to help you rest better, and the benefits of scheduling a smarter exercise routine.
Can exercise help you get better sleep?
We previously spoke to Dr. Lindsay Browning, a neuroscientist and chartered psychologist with a doctorate in insomnia from the U.K.'s University of Oxford, about the best time to exercise for sleep.
The type of exercise you do and when can impact sleep hygiene, but exercise and plenty of daily activity are linked to better sleep and overall sleep quality, contributing toward higher energy levels and better exercise performance.
Dr. Browning explains that exercise impacts your need for deep sleep, and the more exercise you have, the more deep sleep you get, helping you feel energized and rested when you wake up.
While there's no exact template for sleep and workouts — we all have different routines and sleep requirements — being consistent and making the tweaks below could help you sleep better and stay energized and well-rested.
Move your evening workout to earlier
There are benefits to exercising in the morning: some people feel more awake and energized when they first wake, plus it could be easier for some to exercise early before life gets in the way.
Exercising in the morning can also help reinforce better decision making around lifestyle and diet choices during the day while boosting mood — think about that potent release of dopamine, serotonin, endorphins and oxytocin.
A study published in the Journal of Physiology suggests morning workouts could shift your circadian rhythm, making you sleepier at night and more alert in the morning.
And it doesn't need to be a super early workout, either. It depends on when you prefer exercising — if the morning isn't for you, could you swap to early evening or afternoon?
Make sure that you exercise during the daytime and not too close to bedtime.
Dr. Browning explains that exercising too close to bedtime can disrupt the sleep cycle due to endorphins, cortisol and adrenaline that increase alertness. In some cases, high-intensity training at night could even delay sleep latency, which refers to how long it takes for you to fall asleep.
This certainly rings true for me; whenever I schedule a CrossFit class after 7 p.m., I find it harder to drop off, and the next day, my Oura ring shows a decline in my sleep score.
I'm a bit of a night owl anyway, so I can exercise later and still give myself a few hours to wind down, but if you know you like to sleep early, shifting your workout by an hour or two could do the trick.
A systematic review published in 2018 in Sports Medicine agrees, and found that total sleep, latency and efficiency can all be impacted by vigorous exercise before bedtime, roughly an hour or less before sleep. That said, it doesn't say you shouldn't train in the evening at all, just that timing and intensity matter.
If activities such as weight training, HIIT, CrossFit, or sprinting are your preferred workout method, try leaving at least 90 minutes between finishing a workout and going to bed.
Again, Dr. Browning advises scheduling carefully for the best sleep results: 'Make sure that you exercise during the daytime and not too close to bedtime, as exercise in the evening can sometimes be disruptive to sleep due to the release of endorphins and adrenaline that make you feel more alert."
2. Low-impact activity before bedtime
That's not to say all high-intensity activities must be done when you wake up; some people naturally have more energy as the day progresses (me included), and it's important to find what works best for you to stay consistent.
And in some cases, it may be more beneficial for your body to train as the day goes on. For example, a study published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism suggests that weight training for muscle growth scheduled later in the day could be more effective than in the morning.
Over a 24-week program, results in strength and endurance were better for evening exercisers than morning exercisers.
If you still want to engage in exercise before bedtime, consider switching to low-impact. That could include a bedtime yoga routine, mat Pilates, a walk, or a gentle jog.
This, coupled with a calming nighttime routine, may help bring your body down to a state of rest, repair and calm for a good night's sleep.
Verdict
Exercise and sleep have a close working relationship, both improve the quality of the other and help to bust stress, anxiety and low mood.
If you find late workouts disrupt your sleep, consider shifting high-intensity exercise back a few hours before bedtime and swapping in low-impact and gentle forms of movement before sleep.
While there are pros and cons to exercising in the morning and evening, vigorous exercise should be avoided straight before bedtime with a gap of at least 60 to 90 minutes, while low-impact movement can help the body wind down and relax.
More from Tom's Guide
5 things to avoid right before bed
Forget 10,000 steps — study reveals the real number of minimum daily steps you should take, according to your age
Is there a best way to sleep?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swim sessions introduced for adults with sight loss
Sea Lanes in Brighton has introduced open water swimming sessions for visually impaired swimmers, following a successful pilot with University of Brighton researchers. The sessions, taking place at the "UK's national open water swimming centre", will run weekly from 23 July to 27 August, from 11:00 BST to midday. The pool will be closed to the public during these times to create a "calm, supportive environment" tailored to the needs of swimmers with sight loss, said the University of Brighton. While outdoor swimming is increasingly recognised for its health and wellbeing benefits, many swimming spaces remain inaccessible to people with visual impairments, the university said. The sessions will build on research led by University of Brighton PhD student Sadie Rockliffe, after an initial session was held on 11 June. The university added that the sessions were helping to make "significant steps towards making Brighton's blue spaces more welcoming for all". Sadie said: "I'm absolutely thrilled to see these dedicated sessions coming to life at Sea Lanes. "The pilot swim showed just how powerful and positive these experiences can be when access and inclusion are genuinely prioritised. "It's not just about swimming – it's about creating a welcoming, supportive space for people to connect with the water." Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. More on this story Adults with sight loss invited to open water swim Related internet links University of Brighton Sea Lanes Brighton
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK health service AI tool generated a set of false diagnoses for one patient that led to him being wrongly invited to a diabetes screening appointment
A patient in London was mistakenly invited to a diabetic screening after an AI-generated medical record falsely claimed he had diabetes and suspected heart disease. The summaries, created by Anima Health's AI tool Annie, also included fabricated details like a fake hospital address. NHS officials have described the incident as a one-off human error, but the organization is already facing scrutiny over how AI tools are used and regulated. AI use in healthcare has the potential to save time, money, and lives. But when technology that is known to occasionally lie is introduced into patient care, it also raises serious risks. One London-based patient recently experienced just how serious those risks can be after receiving a letter inviting him to a diabetic eye screening—a standard annual check-up for people with diabetes in the UK. The problem: He had never been diagnosed with diabetes or shown any signs of the condition. After opening the appointment letter late one evening, the patient, a healthy man in his mid-20's, told Fortune he had briefly worried that he had been unknowingly diagnosed with the condition, before concluding the letter must just be an admin error. The next day, at a pre-scheduled routine blood test, a nurse questioned the diagnosis and, when the patient confirmed he wasn't diabetic, the pair reviewed his medical history. 'He showed me the notes on the system, and they were AI-generated summaries. It was at that point I realized something weird was going on,' the patient, who asked for anonymity to discuss private health information, told Fortune. After requesting and reviewing his medical records in full, the patient noticed the entry that had introduced the diabetes diagnosis was listed as a summary that had been 'generated by Annie AI.' The record appeared around the same time he had attended the hospital for a severe case of tonsillitis. However, the record in question made no mention of tonsillitis. Instead, it said he had presented with chest pain and shortness of breath, attributed to a 'likely angina due to coronary artery disease.' In reality, he had none of those symptoms. The records, which were reviewed by Fortune, also noted the patient had been diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes late last year and was currently on a series of medications. It also included dosage and administration details for the drugs. However, none of these details were accurate, according to the patient and several other medical records reviewed by Fortune. 'Health Hospital' in 'Health City' Even stranger, the record attributed the address of the medical document it appeared to be processing to a fictitious 'Health Hospital' located on '456 Care Road' in 'Health City.' The address also included an invented postcode. A representative for the NHS, Dr. Matthew Noble, told Fortune the GP practice responsible for the oversight employs a 'limited use of supervised AI' and the error was a 'one-off case of human error.' He said that a medical summariser had initially spotted the mistake in the patient's record but had been distracted and 'inadvertently saved the original version rather than the updated version [they] had been working on.' However, the fictitious AI-generated record appears to have had downstream consequences, with the patient's invitation to attend a diabetic eye screening appointment presumedly based on the erroneous summary. While most AI tools used in healthcare are monitored by strict human oversight, another NHS worker told Fortune that the leap from the original symptoms—tonsillitis—to what was returned—likely angina due to coronary artery disease—raised alarm bells. 'These human error mistakes are fairly inevitable if you have an AI system producing completely inaccurate summaries,' the NHS employee said. 'Many elderly or less literate patients may not even know there was an issue.' The company behind the technology, Anima Health, did not respond to Fortune's questions about the issue. However, Dr. Noble said, 'Anima is an NHS-approved document management system that assists practice staff in processing incoming documents and actioning any necessary tasks.' 'No documents are ever processed by AI, Anima only suggests codes and a summary to a human reviewer in order to improve safety and efficiency. Each and every document requires review by a human before being actioned and filed,' he added. AI's uneasy rollout in the health sector The incident is somewhat emblematic of the growing pains around AI's rollout in healthcare. As hospitals and GP practices race to adopt automation tools that promise to ease workloads and reduce costs, they're also grappling with the challenge of integrating still-maturing technology into high-stakes environments. The pressure to innovate and potentially save lives with the technology is high, but so is the need for rigorous oversight, especially as tools once seen as 'assistive' begin influencing real patient care. The company behind the tech, Anima Health, promises healthcare professionals can 'save hours per day through automation.' The company offers services including automatically generating 'the patient communications, clinical notes, admin requests, and paperwork that doctors deal with daily.' Anima's AI tool, Annie, is registered with the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as a Class I medical device. This means it is regarded as low-risk and designed to assist clinicians, such as examination lights or bandages, rather than automate medical decisions. AI tools in this category require outputs to be reviewed by a clinician before action is taken or items are entered into the patient record. However, in this case of the misdiagnosed patient, the practice appeared to fail to appropriately address the factual errors before they were added to the patient's records. The incident comes amid increased scrutiny within the UK's health service of the use and categorization of AI technology. Last month, bosses for the health service warned GPs and hospitals that some current uses of AI software could breach data protection rules and put patients at risk. In an email first reported by Sky News and confirmed by Fortune, NHS England warned that unapproved AI software that breached minimum standards could risk putting patients at harm. The letter specifically addressed the use of Ambient Voice Technology, or 'AVT' by some doctors. The main issue with AI transcribing or summarizing information is the manipulation of the original text, Brendan Delaney, professor of Medical Informatics and Decision Making at Imperial College London and a PT General Practitioner, told Fortune. 'Rather than just simply passively recording, it gives it a medical device purpose,' Delaney said. The recent guidance issued by the NHS, however, has meant that some companies and practices are playing regulatory catch-up. 'Most of the devices now that were in common use now have a Class One [categorization],' Delaney said. 'I know at least one, but probably many others are now scrambling to try and start their Class 2a, because they ought to have that.' Whether a device should be defined as a Class 2a medical device essentially depends on its intended purpose and the level of clinical risk. Under U.K. medical device rules, if the tool's output is relied upon to inform care decisions, it could require reclassification as a Class 2a medical device, a category subject to stricter regulatory controls. Anima Health, along with other UK-based health tech companies, is currently pursuing Class 2a registration. The U.K.'s AI for health push The U.K. government is embracing the possibilities of AI in healthcare, hoping it can boost the country's strained national health system. In a recent '10-Year Health Plan,' the British government said it aims to make the NHS the most AI-enabled care system in the world, using the tech to reduce admin burden, support preventive care, and empower patients through technology. But rolling out this technology in a way that meets current rules within the organization is complex. Even the U.K.'s health minister appeared to suggest earlier this year that some doctors may be pushing the limits when it comes to integrating AI technology in patient care. 'I've heard anecdotally down the pub, genuinely down the pub, that some clinicians are getting ahead of the game and are already using ambient AI to kind of record notes and things, even where their practice or their trust haven't yet caught up with them,' Wes Streeting said, in comments reported by Sky News. 'Now, lots of issues there—not encouraging it—but it does tell me that contrary to this, 'Oh, people don't want to change, staff are very happy and they are really resistant to change', it's the opposite. People are crying out for this stuff,' he added. AI tech certainly has huge possibilities to dramatically improve speed, accuracy, and access to care, especially in areas like diagnostics, medical recordkeeping, and reaching patients in under-resourced or remote settings. However, walking the line between the tech's potential and risks is difficult in sectors like healthcare that deal with sensitive data and could cause significant harm. Reflecting on his experience, the patient told Fortune: 'In general, I think we should be using AI tools to support the NHS. It has massive potential to save money and time. However, LLMs are still really experimental, so they should be used with stringent oversight. I would hate this to be used as an excuse to not pursue innovation but instead should be used to highlight where caution and oversight are needed.' This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
RSV vaccine to be offered to premature babies in NI
A vaccination programme to tackle respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is to be extended to cover premature babies born in Northern Ireland. A long-acting injection is to be offered for eligible children from this autumn. RSV is a common, but highly infectious, respiratory virus that affects the breathing system, particularly in young children and older adults. It infects 90% of children by the age of two and is one of the leading causes of hospitalisation in the first year of life. An RSV vaccine has been available to pregnant women in Northern Ireland since last September and is offered from 28 weeks of pregnancy. The new programme will cover those infants born very prematurely and too early to benefit from the RSV vaccination given to their mothers. The single Nirsevimab injection offers about 80% protection and replaces Palivizumab, which gives 55% protection and is administered up to five times. It follows advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. Chief Medical Officer Sir Michael McBride said: "Vaccinations have been extremely effective in eradicating diseases and protecting children and other vulnerable groups from serious illness and death. "Worryingly, we are now seeing a decline in the uptake of childhood immunisations. "Vaccinations offer children the very best start in life. Quite simply, if children aren't vaccinated, they're not protected." Health Minister Mike Nesbitt said the new vaccine would strengthen winter preparedness in the health service and reduce pressures on GPs, emergency departments and hospital admissions.