Photos Show US Ally Flexing Missile Power Amid China Threat
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Japan—a key United States ally in the Western Pacific—showcased its ship-sinking and air-defense capabilities during live-fire drills in Australia amid China's growing military threat.
The live-fire events were part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025—an ongoing multinational war game involving the U.S. and 18 other countries from the Indo-Pacific, North America, and Europe—designed to test and rehearse capabilities in support of regional stability.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Why It Matters
China has expanded its military presence—particularly its navy—across the Western Pacific in recent years, raising alarms among the U.S. and its regional allies. It has also built up a large missile arsenal capable of striking Japan, including U.S. military bases located there.
Japan—a key element of the U.S. island chain strategy to contain China in the Western Pacific—has been bolstering its defenses against potential Chinese aggression by upgrading its ship-killing weapons and acquiring advanced warships capable of intercepting missiles.
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 has previously featured two live-fire events involving anti-ship missiles, including a strike on a maritime target by a U.S. land-based missile system.
What To Know
Photos released by the Australian military on Tuesday show that the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force conducted a "live-fire surface engagement" at the Beecroft Weapons Range in New South Wales, on the east coast of Australia, firing two Type 12 anti-ship missiles.
A Type 12 anti-ship missile is launched by the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force at Beecroft Weapons Range near Jervis Bay in Australia on July 22, 2025.
A Type 12 anti-ship missile is launched by the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force at Beecroft Weapons Range near Jervis Bay in Australia on July 22, 2025.
PTE Alex Brown/Australian Department of Defense via AP
The missiles were launched from a truck-mounted platform and flew toward a floating target located 18.6 miles offshore in Jervis Bay, following different trajectories. Exercise director, Australian Brigadier Damian Hill, said both missiles struck the target simultaneously.
The Type 12 anti-ship missile is capable of hitting maritime targets approximately 124 miles away. An upgraded version—with a modified missile shape—extends the flight range to at least 559 miles, and eventually up to 745 miles, according to the specialist outlet Naval News.
Prior to the anti-ship missile drill, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force's Type 03 medium-range surface-to-air missile system conducted firing at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland, northeastern Australia, on July 14, according to released footage and imagery.
"Through anti-aircraft firing training targeting cruise missiles and other threats, we aim to enhance our firing capabilities while strengthening coordination with participating countries, including the United States and Australia," the Joint Staff of Japan's Defense Ministry said.
The Type 03 surface-to-air missile is a land-based air defense system with a reported range of 31 miles, capable of engaging targets such as cruise missiles, fighter jets, and helicopters.
What People Are Saying
Lieutenant General Joel B. Vowell, deputy commanding general of the U.S. Army Pacific, said in a press release on July 13: "By rehearsing, by practicing together, by staying in tune with each other, we are providing that readiness to our armies, our navies, our air forces, our space forces, our cyber forces."
Japan's defense white paper 2025 read: "China has been swiftly increasing its national defense expenditures, thereby extensively and rapidly enhancing its military capability in a qualitative and quantitative manner and intensifying its activities in the East China Sea, including around the Senkaku Islands, and the Pacific."
The Senkaku Islands are an islet group in the East China Sea, ruled by Japan but claimed by both China and Taiwan as the Diaoyu Islands and the Diaoyutai Islands, respectively.
A Type 03 medium-range surface-to-air missile is launched by the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Australia on July 14, 2025.
A Type 03 medium-range surface-to-air missile is launched by the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Australia on July 14, 2025.
Australian Department of Defense
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether additional live-fire drills will be conducted during Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, which began on July 13 and is scheduled to conclude on August 4.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
40 minutes ago
- Politico
Some questions about that global AI race
Just how far is the U.S. ahead of China in the AI race? The conventional wisdom is that the U.S. has an edge on China in artificial intelligence — and President Donald Trump's ambitious new AI policy is built around keeping it. 'America is the country that started the AI race,' Trump said during a speech in July. 'And as president, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.' But some big questions are swirling around that whole argument — like, how far ahead the U.S. really is, and what it means to have a lead at all. 'When people make claims like that, they're making political statements,' said Chris Miller, a Tufts University economic historian who wrote the book 'Chip War.' What it means to have an 'edge' is ill-defined: it could be technological, economic or geopolitical. 'I don't know how to answer that,' said Suresh Venkatasubramanian, who served in the Biden White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy, when DFD asked if the U.S. is ahead. 'There's so many dimensions.' 'American [AI] models are about 3 [to] 6 months ahead of Chinese models,' White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks told DFD in a statement — though he added that when it comes to semiconductors, the U.S.' lead 'grows to years.' There's also the proposition that China is ahead in some ways — in part because the U.S.' chip export controls arguably led DeepSeek, a Hangzhou-based startup, to make breakthroughs in developing more efficient AI algorithms. Depending on which dimension you care about, the race could steer policy in very different directions. In general, it's hard to argue that America isn't currently leading the AI race. The San Francisco Bay Area is unquestionably the global AI talent and business capital. The largest AI companies are American, and so are their biggest customers. OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude are the most popular generative AI systems among users worldwide. Under the hood, American AI chips are the most advanced in the world (though they're largely manufactured in Taiwan). China is hungry for America's semiconductors, undertaking extensive smuggling operations to get around U.S. restrictions. Even chips purposefully designed to be less advanced than their cutting-edge models are a hot commodity — the president lifted bans on their sales to China in trade negotiations. America also has better computing infrastructure, with around ten times more data centers than China. However, China has proved in recent months that it's within striking distance of the U.S.' AI models. While Silicon Valley's chatbots still top performance charts, China's are running ahead on some metrics. DeepSeek set off shockwaves in January when it unveiled its V3 model that uses a tenth of the computing power required for those in America. In July, the Beijing-based company Moonshot AI released its Kimi K2 model, which could outperform ChatGPT and Claude in coding at a fraction of the cost. Alibaba, also based in Hangzhou, debuted a model just a couple of weeks ago that bested American LLMs in logical and mathematical problem solving. China is making strides in computing power as well. Huawei came out with a showstopping processing system known as CloudMatrix 384 in late July, which trumps Nvidia's competing product in memory capacity and bandwidth. (AJ Kourabi of the research firm SemiAnalysis offered a caution on its importance in the AI race, telling DFD it's 'still extremely difficult to train on.') Pinpointing exactly where the U.S.-China race is getting close isn't just a high-tech debate exercise. It's driving policy. Some of the concerns are clearly baked into Trump's AI Action Plan. China's easy access to electricity is what enables systems like CloudMatrix 384 to run — it's packed with a ton of less efficient chips, but you can brute force performance with more energy. You can draw a straight line from that concern to the plan's warning that China has 'rapidly built out their grid,' and its recommendations to further loosen environmental regulations so that the U.S. can keep up. The plan also suggests taking the brakes off the AI industry by overriding state laws (a controversial idea that showed up in the Big Beautiful Bill this summer). And during a speech on the plan, Trump blamed copyright laws for slowing down training of AI models. Though the plan itself doesn't address copyright, AI companies have long complained the rules stifle their competitiveness. The debate over chip exports is also a point of tension — one where national security hawks are in direct conflict with the go-go business types, though both have an argument that they're helping the American cause. Tighter restrictions on high-end chips mean that China lacks access to the best technology, and is hamstrung at the most advanced end of AI development — but pro-business officials and influential CEOs argue that disseminating chips more broadly gets the world hooked on the U.S.' AI tech stack. In some ways, however, this 'AI race' framework isn't all that helpful for setting priorities, and could ultimately be self-defeating. We don't really know what we're sprinting towards. 'This is an infinite race,' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in April. Also, beating China could be a pyrrhic victory. Trump's AI plan writ large looks a lot like a centrally planned industrial policy: companies buy closeness to Trump, and get rewarded for it. The AI plan fuses state and industry in a way that leaves out a lot of the AI debate that Americans arguably would prefer to have. Data centers are causing utility bills to rise and drying up well water for the people living around them, and AI has been increasing unemployment rates. Many critics of the AI rush think the U.S. may be boosting the industry by shutting off dialogue about those things — winning the race, but becoming less American in the process. A senator questions Intel on ties to China Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) is inquiring into reports about Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan's involvement with China-backed semiconductor firms and a criminal case regarding one of his former companies, POLITICO's Anthony Adragna reports. Cotton sent a letter on Tuesday to the chair of Intel's board of directors, Frank Yeary, about the 'security and integrity of Intel's operations.' Cotton asked whether the company knew about subpoenas issued to Tan's previous company, Cadence Design Systems, before it hired him. The company pleaded guilty last week on charges that it illegally exported chip design tools to a university linked to the Chinese military, and agreed to pay more than $140 million in penalties. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson said in a statement. Intel was awarded up to $7.86 billion in federal grants under the 2022 CHIPS Act, in addition to another $3 billion for the secure enclave program. California strikes down an election deepfakes ban A federal judge in California struck down one of the country's strictest laws on AI-generated deepfakes in a win for Elon Musk's X, POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. Judge John Mendez on Tuesday overruled a law prohibiting online platforms from hosting deceptive election-related deepfakes during the runup to a vote. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law last year after chiding Musk for sharing a manipulated video of then-Vice President Kamala Harris on X. The creator of the video, Christopher Kohls, brought the legal challenge on First Amendment grounds. X later joined the case. Mendez did not rule on the First Amendment arguments raised in the case, but rather made the decision based on Section 230 of the Communications Act, which shields platforms from liability for content posted by third parties. Mendez also signaled that he intends to overturn another law requiring labels on digitally altered campaign materials. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican questions new Intel CEO's ties to China
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Tuesday pressed the chair of Intel's board about its CEO's ties to China, voicing concerns about the integrity of the semiconductor firm and U.S. national security. In a letter to Intel board chair Frank Yeary, Cotton pointed to recent reporting on Lip-Bu Tan's investments in hundreds of Chinese tech firms, at least eight of which have ties to the Chinese military, according to Reuters. Tan was tapped to lead Intel in March, after former CEO Pat Gelsinger stepped down last December following a 'challenging year' for the company. Before joining Intel, Tan was CEO of Cadence Design Systems — another point of concern raised by Cotton. The software company produces electronic design automation (EDA) technology, which is used to design chips. It agreed to plead guilty and pay $140 million last month for violating export controls by selling the technology to a Chinese military university. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Cotton wrote, noting Intel's nearly $8 billion grant under the CHIPS and Science Act. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations,' he added. Cotton asked Yeary what measures Intel has taken to address concerns about Cadence's activities, which occurred during Tan's tenure, and whether it has required him to divest from China-linked semiconductor firms or other 'concerning entities.' The Arkansas Republican also questioned whether Tan has disclosed his China investments and ties to the U.S. government given Intel's involvement in a Pentagon program to build chips for defense and intelligence needs.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
NATO Country Issues Nuclear War Warning
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Germany marked the 80th anniversary of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings with a stark warning that nuclear war "cannot be won and must never be fought," as Foreign Minister Wadephul condemned growing threats to the global nuclear order. In a statement released Wednesday, Johann Wadephul criticized Russia for engaging in "nuclear blackmail," warning it undermines decades of arms control efforts and poses a threat to global security. He reaffirmed Germany's commitment—alongside France and the U.K.—to strengthening the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The remarks reflect mounting concern within NATO that global nuclear stability is eroding amid escalating geopolitical tensions. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
