
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary Wants Stephen Colbert To Be Fired: 'Whack Him'
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary called on Tuesday for The Late Show host Stephen Colbert to be fired for insulting his employer, days after CBS announced that the show would be canceled in May.
Newsweek was not immediately able to contact Stephen Colbert or his publicist for comment.
Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, speaks before a Senate Committee on China at a hearing in Washington, D.C., on April 9, 2025.
Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, speaks before a Senate Committee on China at a hearing in Washington, D.C., on April 9, 2025.Why It Matters
The call by O'Leary in a CNN panel discussion will likely stir an already heated and polarized debate over the cancellation of The Late Show, and could raise new questions about the prospects of Colbert staying on as host for the next 10 months.
O'Leary is one of the stars of reality TV show Shark Tank, in which aspiring businesspeople present proposals for money-making projects to a panel of prospective investors.
What To Know
CBS announced on Thursday that it was cancelling the long-running The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in May 2026 for financial reasons.
Days before the announcement, Colbert called out Paramount, the parent company of CBS, over a $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump. This was in connection with an accusation by Trump that 60 Minutes had edited an interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee in last year's presidential election, in a "deceitful" way. The show denied that.
Paramount is hoping to merge with Skydance Media, which requires Federal Communications Commission approval under the Trump administration.
CBS executives said the cancellation of The Late Show was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount."
"He's just insulted his bosses," O'Leary told the CNN panel. "Like, what is this guy? Whack him. Whack him."
It was not clear what particular Colbert comment O'Leary was referring to when he called for him to be fired.
Colbert has not pulled any punches when it comes to mocking Trump since the announcement that his show was ending. On the contrary, he has doubled down on his digs at the president and his connections with the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, saying: "The gloves are off."
Colbert has also questioned the CBS assertion that the cancellation of his show was purely the result of a financial decision.
"How could it purely be a financial decision if The Late Show is number one in ratings?" he asked on his show.
What People Are Saying
CNN anchor Abby Phillip, in the discussion about Colbert, said of the comedian: "He does have power in this equation because he knows that he is the public face of this network. Nobody knows who runs CBS, OK? No one knows. But everyone knows Stephen Colbert."
Trump, in a post on Truth Social on Friday, said: "I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings."
What Happens Next
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is scheduled to disappear from screens in May 2026. In the meantime, more questions could arise about the future of other irreverent late-night talk shows in light of its fate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump says Beyoncé should be 'prosecuted' for alleged Harris endorsement payment
Donald Trump still has a political bone to pick with Queen Bey. The president, who has previously voiced criticism of celebrities who showed support for his election counterpart, Kamala Harris, took to social media on Saturday, July 26, to renew his unfounded claim that pop star Beyoncé was allegedly paid $11 million to endorse Harris' presidential bid. In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, the "Cowboy Carter" songstress made her endorsement of Harris official when she appeared at the former vice president's abortion rights rally in her hometown of Houston in October. She also cleared the usage of her 2016 song "Freedom" for Harris, and the tune became the Democratic nominee's official campaign song. "I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats after the presidential election and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, $11 million dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT (she never sang, not one note...)," wrote Trump in a fiery Truth Social post, also citing alleged endorsement payments to media mogul Oprah Winfrey and civil rights activist Al Sharpton. USA TODAY has reached out to a representative for Beyoncé for comment. "Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out!" Trump concluded. "Kamala and all of those that received endorsement money BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter." Trump's digital tirade comes just two months after he accused the Grammy-winning singer and other celebrities of being paid to publicly support Harris' candidacy. In a May Truth Social post, the GOP president announced plans for a "major investigation" into the Harris campaign's celebrity endorsements. Catch up: Trump calls Beyoncé's endorsement of Kamala Harris 'illegal' Did Beyoncé receive payment for Kamala Harris endorsement? At the time of Trump's original allegations in May, the Federal Election Commission had no record of an $11 million payment to Beyoncé from Harris' presidential campaign. Additionally, the agency does not have rules explicitly prohibiting candidates from paying for endorsements. It is unclear where Trump got the unsubstantiated $11 million figure. The Harris campaign last year rejected a rumor that it paid Beyoncé $10 million for her endorsement that spread on social media shortly after the music star's October 2024 appearance with Harris. Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, also pushed back at the $10 million rumor in a November 2024 Instagram post, calling it "false information" and a "lie." She added that the singer "actually paid for her own flights for her and her team." Oprah Winfrey says she was not paid a 'personal fee' for Kamala Harris rally What has Beyoncé said about Kamala Harris campaign? During her October 2024 appearance at Harris' rally, Beyoncé, who was joined by fellow singer and Destiny's Child alum Kelly Rowland, said "It's time for America to sing a new song" when describing Harris' presidential bid. "I'm not here as a celebrity. I'm not here as a politician. I'm here as a mother," the pop star added. "Your freedom is your God-given right, your human right." Harris has long been a fan of Beyoncé. The California-born politician attended the singer's Renaissance World Tour in 2023 just outside of Washington, D.C., after she gifted Harris tickets. Contributing: Caché McClay, Joey Garrison and Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy, USA TODAY


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Gov. Hochul's latest redistricting threat is dangerous and undemocratic
Gov. Kathy Hochul and fellow Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps to win seats for their party. And in mid-decade, no less, in clear violation of the state Constitution. It's sleazy, anti-democratic — and illegal. Even Hochul admits it, but suggests Dems may do it anyway since Texas and Ohio are moving to draw up new districts in their states. Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democrats are again threatening to rig New York's congressional voting-district maps, writes The Post Editorial Board. Andrew Schwartz / 'All's fair in love and war,' she huffed last week. 'If there's other states violating the rules and are trying to give themselves an advantage, all I'll say is, I'm going to look at it closely.' Huh? If Texas and Ohio rig their maps, that doesn't give Hochul & Co. the right to break New York's laws — even if her goal is to offset any advantage Republicans get in those states. Note, too, that Hochul is huffing not about protecting New York's influence in Congress but her party's. And at the expense, presumably, of Republican voters in New York, since the goal would be to draw district lines favorable to Democrats. True, Texas and Ohio Republicans are expected draw lines they hope will favor them. But if those states cheat their Democratic voters, those voters can sue. Hochul and her party are worried that if more Republicans are elected from those states, it'll make it harder for Democrats to win control of the House in next year's midterms. But again, if the donkeys think those states are breaking any laws, they can go to court, too. Meanwhile, if Hochul tried to gerrymander in time for the midterm, she'd be doubly violating the state Constitution. First, redistricting can take place only once every 10 years, after the Census, not mid-decade. Second, in 2014 New Yorkers passed a constitutional amendment that empowered an independent decennial redistricting commission and specifically banned partisan gerrymandering. But Democrats ignored the amendment and tried to gerrymander anyway a few years ago, and it took a ruling by the state's top court to stop them. We don't condone gerrymandering, by either party, in any state. It cheats voters, skews representation and undermines democracy. As even Democratic boss Jay Jacobs warns, 'We need to be careful about democracy,' adding, 'You don't change the rules of the game to your advantage just because you can.' Given the tight timeframe, it's unlikely Democrats could pull this off. But then, if New York Dems were willing to violate the Constitution before, who can be sure they won't 'break the rules' again to push through corrupt new district lines in time? New Yorkers of both parties should demand Hochul take back her threat and obey the law.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Swirling Crises Follow Trump to Scotland on Pivotal Week - Inside Politics with Dana Bash and Manu Raju - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Swirling Crises Follow Trump to Scotland on Pivotal Week CNN Inside Politics 40 mins First: In the rough. As President Trump tees off overseas, he faces urgent questions about a major tariff deadline and deepening starvation in Gaza. Will he make any progress? Plus: No end in sight. As Trump tries to put miles between him and the Epstein saga, could a new tactic by his team backfire? A conservative congressman who's pushing for more information, Eric Burlison joins me live. And: Shake-up. A big win for Democrats as they try to take back Congress. Can they overcome the odds?