logo
Adults can still marry teens at 15 after death of proposed ban in Hawaii

Adults can still marry teens at 15 after death of proposed ban in Hawaii

Fifteen-year-olds can't get a driver's license or vote in elections, but they can get married in Hawaiʻi – one of a shrinking number of states that allows underage marriage.
A bill that would've outlawed the practice, raising the legal age of marriage to 18 without exceptions, passed the Hawaiʻi House of Representatives this year but failed to gain traction in the Senate.
It's the seventh year in a row Hawaiʻi lawmakers have considered a child marriage ban without passing legislation despite a push by national advocacy groups to end the practice. Under Hawaiʻi law, 16- and 17-year-olds can get married with parental permission, and youth as young as 15 can marry with a judge's approval.
'It's a shame, first and foremost for the children of Hawaiʻi who remain in danger of child marriage and all the harm that comes along with it,' said Alex Goyette, public policy manager for the Tahirih Justice Center, a nonprofit advocacy group for women and girls.
The bill's main obstacle in the Legislature is Sen. Joy San Buenaventura, who chairs the health and human services committee and declined to give the measure a hearing.
In a statement, the senator said marriage can provide benefits to youth who are trying to escape an abusive family situation, are pregnant or want to get on their partner's health insurance.
'I am always leery of national advocacy groups who just want to notch Hawaiʻi as a win without taking into account the culture and circumstances here,' San Buenaventura said.
More than 800 minors got married in Hawaiʻi between 2000 and 2022, according to Hawaiʻi Department of Health data analyzed by the advocacy organization Unchained At Last. The vast majority – 686 of them – were girls marrying adult men.
Most of the child brides were 16 or 17, but seven of them were as young as 15. On average, Hawaiʻi youth married adults between three and five years older than them, according to Unchained At Last's data analysis.
In written testimony , the health department characterized most of the state's underage marriages as 'teens marrying teens.' However, the law puts no limits on the age of an adult spouse and there were outliers in which teens married adults 10 to 21 years their senior, the health department testified.
Child marriage in Hawaiʻi is rare, and getting rarer. From 2005 to 2014, there were 329 underage marriages involving residents, and from 2015 through 2024, there were 90, the health department told Civil Beat.
In one 10-year sample of 230,000 marriages in which both partners claimed Hawaiʻi residency, the health department identified only 216 – 153 brides and 63 grooms – who were minors. At a rate of 0.09%, Hawaiʻi isn't one of the states where these marriages are most common.
Still, national groups are seeking to end child marriage entirely. They argue the arrangements can trap youth in relationships that may be exploitative and difficult, legally and practically, for them to escape.
'Even if 49 other states ban child marriage,' Goyette said, 'all American kids are still vulnerable as long as a predator can buy a plane ticket to Hawaiʻi.' A Bride At 15
For Iris Lorenzo, getting married at 15 meant she had to grow up fast.
The ʻAiea resident was a sophomore at Kamehameha Schools in 1975 when she met the man who would become her husband, Edward 'Bully' Lorenzo. He was 21.
Bully proposed just a few months after the couple connected at a local car show.
'He just felt it was right,' she said, 'that I was the right one.'
Iris said she was scared but said yes at the urging of her mother, who was in poor health and worried her only child would be orphaned. Iris' parents were both older, she said, and her father had health issues.
'She was kind of like, trying to have me grow up, but also have somebody who would take care of me and be there for me,' Lorenzo told Civil Beat. 'Mom said, 'This would be good for you.''
Being a married high schooler was tough, Lorenzo said. She almost immediately got pregnant and had her first son, which made preparing for her final exams a major challenge.
'I'm like, 'Baby, please, go to sleep, so Mommy can study,'' she recalled. 'It was difficult. I'm not going to lie.'
At 16, she had another baby. At 17, another. In between the second and third, somehow, Lorenzo was able to graduate from Kamehameha. But by then, she was socially isolated. All her friends abandoned her after she got married, she said, so her husband was the only person she could confide in.
'That is the one thing that hurt me,' she said.
The couple ultimately had five children, a dozen grandkids and a long and happy marriage, Iris said. This June would've marked their 50th wedding anniversary, but Bully unexpectedly passed away in November.
'My husband and I lived 50 wonderful years together,' she said. 'We had struggles, but we worked through it. And not once did we talk about divorce.'
Looking back though, Iris, now 65, said she wouldn't necessarily recommend her path to today's youth.
If it were up to her, people would wait until at least 21 to get married, she said. At that point, she said, they've finished high school and are better equipped to decide what they want in life.
'I would tell parents you have to let your kid experience everything a child and student needs to experience before they're pressured into making a decision to either get married or start their career,' she said.
'Nowadays, kids, they're not ready for being adults. At all. I was basically ready to be an adult when I was 15. But I look at my grandkids. No, they're not ready. Experience being a kid.' Marriage Puts Kids At Risk, Advocates Say
Ten years ago, child marriage was legal in all 50 states. In 2015, Unchained At Last began spotlighting the issue, and in the years since has organized female protesters wearing wedding dresses and chains in front of statehouses.
The group points to a 2016 U.S. Department of State report that calls child and forced marriage a human rights abuse and to research showing a correlation between early marriage and lost educational attainment and income potential.
Since 2018, 13 states and Washington, D.C. have moved to ban marriages involving minors. Two other states – Maine and Missouri –have passed child marriage bans this year that are awaiting signatures from their governors.
'It costs nothing,' said Fraidy Reiss, the founder of Unchained At Last and herself a forced-marriage survivor. 'It harms no one. But it ends a human rights abuse.'
Children can be forced into marriage by parents or guardians who want to rid themselves of financial responsibility, Reiss said.
'In most of these cases,' she said, 'no one is even asking the kid 'Do you want to marry?' let alone 'Why do you want to get married?''
Parents also sometimes want to prevent their daughters from having premarital sex, Goyette said.
'So in their head, if the child is starting to engage in these behaviors, then what they think the right thing to do for them is to get married,' he said.
Hawaiʻi's acceptance of marriages for 15-year-olds can also conflict with the state's statutory rape law, Reiss noted. The state's age of consent is 16, although there is a 'close in age' exception for individuals within five years of each other.
Unchained At Last's data analysis, spanning 2000 to 2022, found at least one instance of a marriage that would violate that provision.
'That marriage certificate is a Get Out of Jail Free card,' Reiss said, 'because within marriage, that is no longer considered statutory rape if the perpetrator is no less than five years older.'
In some states, minors' limited legal rights can cause problems if they want to leave home, Reiss said.
Married youth who flee their spouse could be considered runaways, and those who help them could be charged with custodial interference , which is the crime of taking in a minor without the 'right to do so.' Domestic violence shelters often don't accept unaccompanied youth, Reiss said. And in some places, minors cannot file for divorce on their own. They need an adult representative.
However, these concerns may not apply to Hawaiʻi. In the islands, married minors are considered emancipated individuals with all the rights and responsibilities of an adult, including entering into legal proceedings. And Hawaiʻi passed a law last year that allows island homeless shelters to take in unsheltered youth without necessarily informing their parents or guardians. Hawaiʻi Lawmaker Blocks Child Marriage Ban
Hawaiʻi's legislation, House Bill 729 , had widespread support in the House of Representatives, with more than two dozen introducers. While it was promoted by national groups, it also had support locally from the Hawaiʻi Commission on the Status of Women and local chapters of Zonta International, a women's rights organization.
It received almost unanimous testimony in support, with the exception of one person who said marriage is 'not a function of the state' but of the church.
It was sent to the Senate in early March and was assigned to the health and human services committee headed by San Buenaventura. That's where it died.
In an email, San Buenaventura told Civil Beat that marriage has provided a unique opportunity for young people to access needed benefits. Hawaiʻi only passed an emancipation law in 2024, she said, allowing young people to obtain the rights and responsibilities of adulthood.
'Until last year, the only way for a teen to be independent was to get married,' she said.
The senator cited the health department data showing that most cases of underage marriage involve people close in age. From that, San Buenaventura said she's drawn several conclusions.
'This means that either they want to escape an abusive situation through self-help because we had no emancipation procedure at that time OR more likely, it was a pregnant teen wanting to get married to her boyfriend,' she said.
The young person could just cohabitate with their partner, but that robs them of several benefits, the senator said, including their spouse's health insurance.
To that, Reiss said: 'Medicaid – not marriage.' Having minors enter into an adult sexual relationship to escape an abusive home or get health care is 'profoundly dangerous public policy,' she said.
'The idea of telling a kid who's in an abusive home 'Well, we'll get you out, let's just find you a husband,'' Reiss said, 'I mean, I grew up in an abusive home. I was forced to marry as a teen. That didn't solve the problem. That's just out of the frying pan, into the fire.'
But San Buenaventura has stood firm. The lawmaker said she's heard that some medical treatments are not covered by Medicaid but could be paid for through a spouse's employer-provided health care.
'Why should the Legislature deny a pregnant teen health insurance or relegate her to taxpayer paid health insurance just because a national advocacy group claims that she is better off cohabiting without marital benefits?' the senator said. 'Remember, unlike most states, Hawaiʻi has employer-mandated health insurance.'
If the relationship between the teen and their partner dissolves, San Buenaventura said the young person is better protected through marriage than cohabitation alone. The youth would potentially be entitled to spousal support, spousal Social Security, inheritance and property rights.
'All benefits denied her by cohabiting,' San Buenaventura said.
Now that Hawaiʻi has an emancipation law, San Buenaventura said she wants to see how it plays out. For the moment, her view on the child marriage legislation hasn't changed. The legislative session ended on Friday, but the bill will have another chance next year.
___
This story was originally published by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'
Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'

A key senator on the Foreign Relations committee called Donald Trump's Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin a 'disaster' Sunday and blamed the U.S. president for legitimizing his Russian opponent in front of the world. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States. It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted,' said Chris Murphy, the ranking Democratic member of the Foreign Affairs subcommittee on European security cooperation. Murphy told NBC's Meet the Press that Trump was forced to abandon his main commitment — a call for a ceasefire — during the meeting and was similarly unable to convince Putin to drop demands for Ukraine to cede more territory, something the senator from Connecticut said was 'stunning' to see a U.S. president consider. 'He wanted to be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. He was invited to the United States — war criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy said. Trump 'walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal. And I'm not even considering sanctions,'' the senator continued. 'And so Putin walks away with his photo op, with zero commitments made, and zero consequences. What a great day for Russia.' Murphy's comments to NBC come as two top Trump officials who traveled with the president to Alaska for the summit Friday, Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, did the rounds on separate Sunday morning programs defending the outcome of the president's meeting with Putin. The optics of the meeting are being endlessly scrutinized in the mainstream press, partly due to the few specifics released so far about what the two men discussed. Among those moments been picked apart by analysts included the arrival of the Russian president, which was preceded by U.S. troops, in uniform, rolling out a red carpet on the tarmac. On Sunday, Witkoff told CNN'S State of the Union that the U.S. secured what he claimed was a 'game-changing' development in the discussions: Putin's willingness to consider accepting a U.S. security agreement protecting the future sovereignty of Ukraine's borders. This was the first time negotiators were able to gain ground on the issue, he explained. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," he said. Witkoff wouldn't specify whether the security guarantee could lead to what Trump and his followers have long opposed — a promise to directly engage U.S. troops in defense of Ukraine should Russia continue crossing Trump's red lines. Murphy, on Sunday, seemed to imply that such a guarantee would be the bare minimum standard necessary for any peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. 'That [security guarantee] is an essential element of a peace agreement because any commitment that Vladimir Putin makes to not invade Ukraine again isn't worth the paper that it's written on,' said the senator. 'He's made that commitment many times. So yes, there has to be a guarantee that if Putin were to enter Ukraine after a peace settlement, that there would be some force there, a U.S. force, a U.S.-European force there to defend Ukraine.' He would go on to hammer Trump over reports that Witkoff wouldn't confirm when pressed by CNN's Jake Tapper, which revealed that Trump had signaled his own willingness to accept Russian demands for Ukraine to cede the entire occupied Donbas region as part of a potential agreement. Murphy said that the reported development was 'another sense that Putin is just in charge of these negotiations.' Chris Van Hollen, another Democrat on the Foreign Relations panel, was equally critical of Trump's meeting with the Russian president during an interview with ABC's Martha Raddatz on This Week. Heading into Friday's summit, Trump warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia continued to oppose peace efforts and said that he was working towards an immediate ceasefire. Afterwards, he claimed in a Truth Social post that "It was determined by all [in attendance] that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Van Hollen called this news a 'setback' for the U.S.'s European allies and Ukraine, while accusing Trump of being 'flattered' by Putin. 'There's no sugarcoating this. Donald Trump, once again, got played by Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin got the red carpet treatment on American soil. But we got no ceasefire, no imminent meeting between Putin and Zelensky,' said Van Hollen. Jake Sullivan, national security adviser to the Biden administration, agreed. "President Trump's stated goals were very simple, get an immediate ceasefire, and in the absence of a ceasefire, impose what he called severe consequences," Sullivan said. "Well, the summit has come and gone. There is no ceasefire. There are no consequences.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Monday with European leaders including Finnish president Alexander Stubb, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, French president Emmanuel Macron and the UK's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Stubb is known for his personal relationship with Trump, and is poised to be on-hand to quell any disputes between Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will also be in attendance. Zelensky is reported to be wholly opposed to any demand to recognize Russian occupation of the Donbas as legitimate.

DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district
DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district

CNN

time7 hours ago

  • CNN

DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district

In southeast Washington, DC, children stood in line Friday to receive new backpacks filled with school supplies, while community organizers passed out free hot dogs and hamburgers to teenagers to celebrate the last few days of summer before. But just a few blocks away, the sight of National Guard trucks cut into the celebration — a reminder that the school year will begin under the shadow of federal troops. 'This is not going to go off well … most middle school kids walk to school by themselves. They're going to have to walk through soldiers and police,' Dara Baldwin, a DC-based activist on the Free DC advisory council, told CNN. 'They're going to be fearful for their lives. … They're either not going to want to go to school, or they're going to react to these people in their space.' President Donald Trump's deployment of federal law enforcement to the nation's capital to combat what he has described as 'roving mobs of wild youth' has ignited fear among parents, activists and youth advocates that Black and Latino teens will face heightened policing as they return to class next week. When Trump announced he was placing the District of Columbia's police department under federal control and deploying National Guard troops, he argued that youth crime in DC demanded urgent intervention. According to a report from the DC Policy Center, the juvenile arrest rate in DC is nearly double the national rate. Data from the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, an independent DC agency that tracks public safety statistics, shows that total juvenile arrests during the first half of 2025 have largely remained consistent with the number in the first half of each year since 2023, when there was an increase after the Covid-19 pandemic. Looking specifically at juvenile arrests for violent offenses, which includes robberies, aggravated assaults and assaults with a deadly weapon, between 2019 and 2020, they dropped from 585 to 347, as did the overall number of arrests in DC during the beginning of the pandemic. That decline was short-lived: The numbers began climbing again in 2022, rising from 466 arrests for violent offenses to 641 in 2023 before dropping again in 2024 to 496, according to the data from the CJCC. Youth advocates cite the city's investment in more resources and programs targeting young people as part of the reason for the drop in arrests for violent offenses. In 2023, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser issued a declaration of a juvenile crime emergency which focused city resources on addressing the issue. This year the DC Council approved stricter juvenile curfews that also give the city's police chief the ability to double down with even stricter emergency short-term curfews. She used those curfews recently around Navy Yard, an area near the Washington Nationals ballpark and the waterfront. 'It's clear that the target is the inner-city youth,' Kelsye Adams, an activist for DC statehood and director of DC Vote, told CNN at a rally outside of the Metropolitan Police Department headquarters on Friday. 'And what I've seen on the news from where the police checkpoints and the neighborhoods that they're going in, they are directly attacking young, Black and brown kids.' The White House says the administrations policies are aimed at making DC safer. 'Washington DC leaders have failed the city's youth – juvenile crime has been a serious concern for residents and local leaders even before President Trump's intervention to Make DC Safe Again,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, told CNN in a statement. 'The status quo of ignoring kids committing violent crimes has not worked, it has only exasperated the situation – President Trump is making DC safe again for everyone.' The DC Metropolitan Police Department did not respond to CNN's request for comment. CNN has spoken to more than a dozen DC residents about Trump's crime crackdown and whether it will impact the children in their communities – and some parents say the extra presence could reduce violence. 'I got mixed reactions with that,' Kim Hall, 45, a longtime district resident who has three children in the DC public school system, told CNN at the backpack event in Anacostia. 'To me, it actually makes the street more safe, because a lot of the crime that goes on, especially over there in southwest and southeast, is happening while the kids are going to school or they're coming out of school.' 'If the police is around, there won't be so much of the gun violence,' she added. Anthony Motley, 76, a DC resident who has 10 grandchildren in the school system, told CNN that young people are 'the future, and we need to protect the future. So, whatever we need to do to protect our future, I'm for that.' Others CNN spoke with, including Sharelle Stagg, a DC resident and educator in the public school system, aren't convinced that increased patrols and law enforcement are going to help their children. 'I'm not certain this is the best strategy, especially when you think about just the way that it was rolled out and kind of presented to communities,' Stag said. Tahir Duckett, executive director of the Center for Innovations in Community Safety at Georgetown Law School, agrees that Trump deploying National Guard troops to DC could make violence worse, not better. 'When you have these major shows of force, and you have people who feel like the police aren't actually part of the community, but are more of an occupying force, then you tend to see people not want to cooperate with the police,' he said, which 'can lead to increased crime rates.' Youth advocates also told CNN they are young Black and Brown men will be the most impacted by the larger law enforcement presence. Black children make up more than half of DC's youth population, according to census data. 'I've been brought up into the community where we've seen this often. So it might look different to some other people, but not me, not the community that I come from, and our communities have been targeted for years,' Carlos Wilson, who works with Alliance of Concerned Men, a group that helps inner-city youth and hosted the back to school event in southeast DC, told CNN. He argued that Trump could use the funding for more resources to help young people in this city instead of on an increased law enforcement presence. 'That's what's gonna make it better, more programs, more opportunities for the younger folks. I think that's what's gonna make our community better. Not police presence. We need resources. We need help, not people coming in.'

DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district
DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district

CNN

time7 hours ago

  • CNN

DC students head back to school amid Trump focus on cleaning up juvenile crime in the district

In southeast Washington, DC, children stood in line Friday to receive new backpacks filled with school supplies, while community organizers passed out free hot dogs and hamburgers to teenagers to celebrate the last few days of summer before. But just a few blocks away, the sight of National Guard trucks cut into the celebration — a reminder that the school year will begin under the shadow of federal troops. 'This is not going to go off well … most middle school kids walk to school by themselves. They're going to have to walk through soldiers and police,' Dara Baldwin, a DC-based activist on the Free DC advisory council, told CNN. 'They're going to be fearful for their lives. … They're either not going to want to go to school, or they're going to react to these people in their space.' President Donald Trump's deployment of federal law enforcement to the nation's capital to combat what he has described as 'roving mobs of wild youth' has ignited fear among parents, activists and youth advocates that Black and Latino teens will face heightened policing as they return to class next week. When Trump announced he was placing the District of Columbia's police department under federal control and deploying National Guard troops, he argued that youth crime in DC demanded urgent intervention. According to a report from the DC Policy Center, the juvenile arrest rate in DC is nearly double the national rate. Data from the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, an independent DC agency that tracks public safety statistics, shows that total juvenile arrests during the first half of 2025 have largely remained consistent with the number in the first half of each year since 2023, when there was an increase after the Covid-19 pandemic. Looking specifically at juvenile arrests for violent offenses, which includes robberies, aggravated assaults and assaults with a deadly weapon, between 2019 and 2020, they dropped from 585 to 347, as did the overall number of arrests in DC during the beginning of the pandemic. That decline was short-lived: The numbers began climbing again in 2022, rising from 466 arrests for violent offenses to 641 in 2023 before dropping again in 2024 to 496, according to the data from the CJCC. Youth advocates cite the city's investment in more resources and programs targeting young people as part of the reason for the drop in arrests for violent offenses. In 2023, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser issued a declaration of a juvenile crime emergency which focused city resources on addressing the issue. This year the DC Council approved stricter juvenile curfews that also give the city's police chief the ability to double down with even stricter emergency short-term curfews. She used those curfews recently around Navy Yard, an area near the Washington Nationals ballpark and the waterfront. 'It's clear that the target is the inner-city youth,' Kelsye Adams, an activist for DC statehood and director of DC Vote, told CNN at a rally outside of the Metropolitan Police Department headquarters on Friday. 'And what I've seen on the news from where the police checkpoints and the neighborhoods that they're going in, they are directly attacking young, Black and brown kids.' The White House says the administrations policies are aimed at making DC safer. 'Washington DC leaders have failed the city's youth – juvenile crime has been a serious concern for residents and local leaders even before President Trump's intervention to Make DC Safe Again,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, told CNN in a statement. 'The status quo of ignoring kids committing violent crimes has not worked, it has only exasperated the situation – President Trump is making DC safe again for everyone.' The DC Metropolitan Police Department did not respond to CNN's request for comment. CNN has spoken to more than a dozen DC residents about Trump's crime crackdown and whether it will impact the children in their communities – and some parents say the extra presence could reduce violence. 'I got mixed reactions with that,' Kim Hall, 45, a longtime district resident who has three children in the DC public school system, told CNN at the backpack event in Anacostia. 'To me, it actually makes the street more safe, because a lot of the crime that goes on, especially over there in southwest and southeast, is happening while the kids are going to school or they're coming out of school.' 'If the police is around, there won't be so much of the gun violence,' she added. Anthony Motley, 76, a DC resident who has 10 grandchildren in the school system, told CNN that young people are 'the future, and we need to protect the future. So, whatever we need to do to protect our future, I'm for that.' Others CNN spoke with, including Sharelle Stagg, a DC resident and educator in the public school system, aren't convinced that increased patrols and law enforcement are going to help their children. 'I'm not certain this is the best strategy, especially when you think about just the way that it was rolled out and kind of presented to communities,' Stag said. Tahir Duckett, executive director of the Center for Innovations in Community Safety at Georgetown Law School, agrees that Trump deploying National Guard troops to DC could make violence worse, not better. 'When you have these major shows of force, and you have people who feel like the police aren't actually part of the community, but are more of an occupying force, then you tend to see people not want to cooperate with the police,' he said, which 'can lead to increased crime rates.' Youth advocates also told CNN they are young Black and Brown men will be the most impacted by the larger law enforcement presence. Black children make up more than half of DC's youth population, according to census data. 'I've been brought up into the community where we've seen this often. So it might look different to some other people, but not me, not the community that I come from, and our communities have been targeted for years,' Carlos Wilson, who works with Alliance of Concerned Men, a group that helps inner-city youth and hosted the back to school event in southeast DC, told CNN. He argued that Trump could use the funding for more resources to help young people in this city instead of on an increased law enforcement presence. 'That's what's gonna make it better, more programs, more opportunities for the younger folks. I think that's what's gonna make our community better. Not police presence. We need resources. We need help, not people coming in.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store