Trump orders firing of jobs chief over 'rigged' data claim
US job growth missed expectations in July, Labour Department data showed, and revisions to hiring figures in recent months brought them to the weakest levels since the Covid-19 pandemic.
Trump lashed out at the department's Commissioner of Labour Statistics – Erika McEntarfer – after the report, writing on social media that the jobs numbers "were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad."
In a separate post on his Truth Social platform, he charged that McEntarfer had "faked" jobs data to boost Democrats' chances of victory in the recent presidential election.
"McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months," Trump said, referring to latest data for July.
"Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative," he added.
But he insisted that the world's biggest economy was "booming" under his leadership.
The United States added 73,000 jobs last month, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.2 per cent from 4.1 per cent, said the Department of Labour earlier Friday.
Hiring numbers for May were revised down from 144,000 to 19,000. The figure for June was shifted from 147,000 to 14,000.
This was notably lower than job creation levels in recent years. During the pandemic, the economy lost jobs.
The employment data points to challenges in the key labour market as companies took a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's sweeping – and rapidly changing – tariffs this year.
The numbers also pile pressure on the central bank as it mulls the best time to cut interest rates.
With tariff levels climbing since the start of the year, both on imports from various countries and on sector-specific products such as steel, aluminium and autos, many firms have faced higher business costs.
Some are now passing them along to consumers.
"This is a gamechanger jobs report. The labour market is deteriorating quickly," said Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union.
She added in a note that of the growth in July, "75 per cent of those jobs were in one sector: health care."
"The economy needs certainty soon on tariffs," Long said. "The longer this tariff whiplash lasts, the more likely this weak hiring environment turns into layoffs."
But it remains unclear when the dust will settle, with Trump ordering the reimposition of steeper tariffs on scores of economies late Thursday, which are set to take effect in a week.
The president also raised tariffs on Canadian imports, although broad exemptions remain.
Mortgage Bankers Association economist Joel Kan said that for now, "goods-producing industries saw contraction for the third straight month."
"Service industries involved in trade also saw declines in job growth, potentially a result of the uncertain tariff environment, as businesses either put their activity on pause or pulled back altogether," Kan added in a note.
A sharp weakening in the labour market could push the Federal Reserve toward slashing interest rates sooner to shore up the economy.
On Friday, the two Fed officials who voted this week against the central bank's decision to keep rates unchanged warned that standing pat risks further damaging the economy.
Both Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller argued that the inflationary effects of tariffs were temporary.
They added in separate statements that the bank should focus on fortifying the economy to avert further weakening in the labour market.
Putting off an interest rate cut "could result in a deterioration in the labour market and a further slowing in economic growth," Bowman added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
22 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump tariffs hit India's garment makers as US buyers ask them to move production
Employees at a garment manufacturing facility work on clothes in New Delhi, India, Thursday, Aug. 7, 2025. The prospect of exporters shifting production outside India would be a blow to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "Make in India" policy drive. - AP MUMBAI/CHENNAI: Ever since Donald Trump's tariff salvo on India this week, garment maker Pearl Global - whose US client list includes Gap and Kohl's - has been receiving midnight panic calls with an ultimatum: share the tariff hit or move production out of India. To calm US customers' nerves, Pearl Global has offered to shift production to its 17 factories in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Vietnam and Guatemala to bypass the steep US levies on Indian imports. "All the customers are already calling me. They want us to... shift from India to the other countries," Managing Director Pallab Banerjee told Reuters in an interview. Trump's initial tariff proposals in April - which were lower for India than for the rival Asian garment hubs of Bangladesh, Vietnam and China - had been seen as an opportunity for India to rapidly expand in the US$16 billion apparel exports market. But the tables have turned as relations between New Delhi and Washington have soured, with India now facing a 50 per cent tariff, versus 20 per cent for Bangladesh and Vietnam, and 30 per cent for China. Pearl gets roughly half of its business from the United States. Some clients offered to continue taking products from India if it could share the tariff burden, but that is not viable, Banerjee said, without naming the customers. The 50 per cent US tariff - comprising 25 per cent that kicked in on Thursday (Aug 7) and another 25 per cent due to come into force on August 28 as a penalty for buying Russian oil - has stunned US garment buyers and their Indian suppliers, who say they are considering taking their manufacturing operations beyond Indian shores, even to less-established garment hubs like Ethiopia and Nepal. Some exporters also say they have been asked by US clients to put orders on hold. New Delhi has called Trump tariffs "extremely unfortunate". India's garment sector was already grappling with a labour crunch and limited production capacity. But the prospect of exporters shifting production outside India would also be a blow to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "Make in India" policy drive. While Pearl can use its foreign factories to meet US orders, exporters that rely on domestic factories are set to be hit much harder. RichaCo Exports has shipped US$111 million of garments to the US this year, with clients such as J. Crew Group, customs data shows. All were made in its more than two dozen factories across India. Around 95 per cent of its annual Indian revenues come from the United States, said general manager Dinesh Raheja. "We're exploring setting up a manufacturing base in (Nepal's capital) Kathmandu," he said. "The industry is in the doldrums." Earlier this week, India's biggest jeweller and watchmaker Titan told Reuters it was looking at shifting some manufacturing to the Middle East to maintain low-tariff access to US markets. Amit Agarwal, finance chief of top Indian garment maker Raymond, said he was pinning hopes on the company's one factory in Ethiopia - which faces just a 10 per cent US tariff and could possibly add more production lines within three months to cater to US clients. The tariff threat comes as India was emerging as a big alternative for US garment buyers like Walmart, as Bangladesh faces a political crisis, and companies look to diversify supply chains beyond China. Indian garment hub Tiruppur in the south, considered the country's knitwear capital and which accounts for nearly one-third of apparel exports, was bullish about the future earlier this year when Reuters visited and talked to exporters. Panic has now descended on the hub. Some factories in Tiruppur have been asked by customers to hold orders, while some plan to ship as many goods as possible before the full 50 per cent tariff kicks in, said Naveen Micheal John, executive director at Cotton Blossom India. "An importer, which had placed orders for underwear, has come back saying that if you haven't purchased yarns... keep it on hold for now," he said. Some garments in Tiruppur cost US clients as little as US$1, while a women's or men's T-shirt can vary from about US$3.5-US$5, which could soon face 50 per cent tariffs, said N. Thirukkumaran, general secretary of the Tiruppur Exporters Association. - Reuters
The Star
22 minutes ago
- The Star
Relief in Taiwan as Trump's 100% chip tariff fails to bite, but it's too early to relax
TAIPEI: Taipei heaved a temporary sigh of relief even as US President Donald Trump said that he would slap a shocking 100 per cent tariff on imports of semiconductors, the crucial components that form the backbone of Taiwan's economy. That is because companies that commit to making chips in the US would be exempted, according to Trump, which would mean that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the crown jewel of the island's tech industry, would likely be spared. The firm, which is the world's largest contract manufacturer of chips, has so far pledged US$165 billion (S$212 billion) in investment to build six state-of-the-art fabs, or semiconductor plants, in the US state of Arizona. But while things don't look too dire now, the impact of the tariff on Taiwan's chip industry could yet be far-reaching. Large clients of smaller Taiwanese chip suppliers could demand that they move some of their production to the US to sidestep the punishing duties. This could lead to a decline in Taiwan-based chip production and affect the island's position as a key part of the global tech supply chain, say analysts. And while MTrump's latest tariff measure is part of a push to boost domestic chip manufacturing, it could lead to higher prices of electronic devices such as smartphones, which could in turn depress demand for such devices and the chips that drive them. Such an outcome would mean uncertainty for Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Still, on Aug 7, TSMC stocks surged nearly five per cent to close at a record high of NT$1,180 (US$39.53), reflecting investor confidence in the wake of Trump's announcement. Officials in Taiwan were also cautiously optimistic. Speaking to lawmakers during a parliamentary briefing on Aug 7, National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching argued that a steep 100 per cent tariff rate would not necessarily be disastrous, even for Taiwan's smaller chipmakers that do not have a US presence. 'Taiwan currently holds a leading position in the world (in chipmaking) and I believe that if the leader and competitors are all on the same starting line, the leader will continue to lead,' he said. The island is a global powerhouse in chipmaking, with 60 per cent of the world's chips and almost all of the most advanced ones produced there. But experts warned that the lack of details about how the new tariff would be applied means that it is still early days yet to assess its full impact. 'The scope and mechanism of the chip tariff remain unclear. Further developments will need to be closely monitored,' said Joanne Chiao, assistant research manager at Trendforce, a Taiwanese tech research firm. For starters, how much manufacturing a company would need to commit to the US to qualify for a tariff exemption is unclear. It is also unknown if Trump's exemption would cover only chips produced entirely on domestic soil, or also the semiconductors that foreign companies with a US presence, such as British firm Arm, or American companies import from overseas. American chip designers such as Qualcomm typically send their designs to TSMC to be manufactured in Taiwan before the chips are imported into the US. Moreover, more clarity is needed on whether the new tariff would apply to raw semiconductors and integrated circuits, or also chips in end devices such as smartphones and laptops. During the first quarter of 2025, only around four per cent of Taiwan's total exports of electronic components, including semiconductors, were shipped directly to the US. The vast majority of Taiwan-made chips were sent to other countries where they were assembled into consumer electronics. Professor Julien Chaisse, an international trade expert at City University of Hong Kong, said that it would be 'misleading' to think this would mean that Taiwan's chip exports could be naturally immune to Trump's tariff measure. 'The US government doesn't need a direct shipment to apply pressure – it can change how it interprets rules of origin,' he told The Straits Times. 'If Washington starts insisting that any product with a certain percentage of Taiwanese-made components falls under the tariff, then the effect spreads quickly,' he said. Prof Chaisse added that Trump's tariff also posed a threat to Taiwan's future position in the global tech supply chain. 'Larger buyers may start demanding more Taiwanese capacity be built inside the US, just to sidestep tariffs,' he said, noting that this would, in turn, drain investment from domestic expansion in Taiwan. 'This will have consequences for how Taiwan grows its chip sector over the next five years,' he added. Ultimately, Trump's push to rebuild chip manufacturing in the US will drive up costs for everyone in the supply chain. 'A high tariff on chips would inevitably raise the price of smartphones and laptops, which would also hurt demand for electronic products,' said Liu Pei-chen, an analyst at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research. 'This will bring a lot of uncertainty to the chip industry,' she added. For now, however, Taiwan retains a major advantage – the US will still need to rely on the island for its semiconductor needs, particularly for advanced chips. Taiwan's intricately connected semiconductor ecosystem, which was built up over decades, is not easily replicated. The island's dominance in the sector extends to the technical prowess and efficiency among its chip engineers, which means it is not a simple matter of plonking a factory wherever one wishes. 'Even with the big investments happening in US fabs, it will take years before local production can cover demand,' said Prof Chaisse. 'In the end, this feels like pressure aimed at getting more investment from Taipei. Not because Taiwan is a threat, but because Trump wants quick wins he can point to.' - The Straits Times/ANN
The Sun
22 minutes ago
- The Sun
FBI to assist in tracking Texas Democrats over redistricting dispute
WASHINGTON: The FBI has agreed to help track down Democratic Texas lawmakers who fled the state to thwart Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts, Republican U.S. Senator John Cornyn said on Thursday, but it was unclear whether federal agents would take action. The FBI has not deployed any resources yet, a source familiar with internal discussions said. A Justice Department official, granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations, said the FBI had committed to provide help if asked by Texas law enforcement. Such a request had not yet been made as of Thursday afternoon, the official added. Legal experts expressed skepticism that the FBI has any legitimate authority to step in. A spokesperson for Cornyn referred questions to the FBI, which declined to comment. The Democratic lawmakers, who have mostly been open about their whereabouts, have not been charged with any crimes. Earlier this week, the Republican speaker of the Texas House of Representatives issued civil warrants for the absent lawmakers - most of whom have gone to Democratic-led states including Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, in part to escape Texas jurisdiction - to be brought back to Austin. But the warrants apply only within the state and are based on House rules, not criminal law. 'Director Kash Patel has approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats,' Cornyn said in a statement, referring to the FBI director. JB Pritzker, the Democratic governor of Illinois, has brushed off the idea that the FBI could be deployed to round up legislators in his state, calling it 'grandstanding' and warning that state troopers 'protect everybody in Illinois.' Barbara McQuade, a University of Michigan Law School professor and former U.S. attorney, said talk of involving the FBI appeared to be saber-rattling. 'Although federal agents do have authority to assist local law enforcement officials in tracking down fugitives, that requires a filed criminal charge,' she said. More than 50 Democrats from the Texas legislature left the state ahead of Monday's legislative session, denying Republicans a quorum necessary to vote on the redistricting plan that has been championed by President Donald Trump. The rare mid-decade redistricting is intended to flip five Democratic seats in next year's midterm elections, when Republicans will defend their razor-thin majority in the U.S. House. The Texas fight has spread to other states, with the balance of power in Washington at stake. Democratic governors in states including California, Illinois and New York have threatened to redraw their own congressional maps to counteract Texas. FLORIDA, INDIANA EFFORTS The Republican speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, Daniel Perez, announced on Thursday he would create a select committee for congressional redistricting, according to local media reports. Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana on Thursday, where he was expected to discuss redistricting with Republican leaders, a White House official said. Other Republican states that could target Democrats include Missouri, Ohio and New Hampshire. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has suggested that Democrats who raise money to help pay for fines levied due to their absence could be violating state bribery laws that prohibit officials from accepting money in exchange for avoiding their duties. In a letter to Patel on Tuesday urging the FBI to assist the state's local law enforcement in tracking the absent Democrats down, Cornyn wrote that he feared 'legislators who solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offenses.' The FBI has tools to help state law enforcement when parties cross state lines to flee 'a scene of a crime,' Cornyn wrote. One of the Texas Democrats who left the state, Armando Valle, told reporters on Thursday during a briefing organized by advocacy group Sabotaging Our Safety that the FBI has 'no authority' to act. David Froomkin, a professor at the University of Houston Law Center, said Abbott's threat was an 'egregious violation of the separation of powers' and called the bribery theory 'laughably weak.' He noted that the Texas Supreme Court has previously ruled that legislators are legally permitted to break quorum. 'If there's no legal duty, then there's no criminal bribery,' he said. - Reuters
