
Fate of suspended MPAs in limbo as talks stall
The treasury has linked the restoration of the 26 suspended MPAs with the Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan's final ruling. However, the opposition has warned that its MPAs will not attend any assembly sessions until the suspended lawmakers are restored.
In the third round of talks, the negotiation committee apparently agreed to run the house in accordance with the decisions of the business advisory committee and the Rule 223 of Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab 1997.
An insider wishing not to be named told The Express Tribune that the opposition did not fulfill the demand of the treasury to give documented assurance of the compliance of five conditions placed before them.
The treasury's side was of the view that everyone speaking in the house must be given respect, heard without interruption, sloganeering and noise. The treasury said there should be no room for any abusive and violent conduct.
The opposition said they discourage abusive and violent conduct but protest is their right. The treasury agreed with it but noted that there are democratic ways of protest which need to be adopted.
Talking to the media later, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Mian Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman said the government and opposition sides agreed on few conditions.
However, he said, assembly rules are very clear. "No one in the house including Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz and Opposition leader Malik Ahamd Khan Bhachar will be interrupted," he said.
Bhachar in his media talk did not confirm that the opposition agreed not to stage any protest or chant slogans during anyone's speech in the house.
Sources privy to this matter said it seemed the opposition was given a safe exit in the name of negotiation after strong pressure and criticism over suspension of 26 MPAs.
He quoted opposition lawmakers saying that no one could stop them from exercising their right of protest. No doubt, rules restrain lawmakers from interrupting while someone is speaking but it does not mean that their right of protest will be snatched which the rules allow them.
However, both sides termed the third round of talks as a successful round.
Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmed Khan suspended 26 PTI MPAs on June 27 for creating "disruption, ruckus and chanting indecent slogans" during the speech of Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz in the houseunder rule 210 (3) of the Rules of Procedure, Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997.
After that the speaker received applications from some treasury lawmakers seeking disqualification of aforementioned MPAs under Article 63(2) read with Article 113 of the Constitution.
Speaker Khan provided an opportunity of hearing to the suspended MPA, under Article 10-A of the Constitution, to the PTI's suspended 26 MPAs in his chamber at Punjab Assembly. Later on, a negotiation committee, consisting of PMLN, allied parties and PTI was constituted.
The speaker on Tuesday issued a press release clarifying that members suspended under Rule 210 of the Rules of Procedure 1997 would be entitled to vote in the said election.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Govt, opposition unite to block dissident PTI candidates in Senate elections
Listen to article In a rare show of unity, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government and opposition parties — including Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI-F), Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) — have joined forces to prevent dissident Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) candidates from securing seats in the Senate elections scheduled for July 21. The development comes as several PTI nominees refused to withdraw their candidacies, defying instructions from party leadership and deepening internal divisions. According to Express News, the PTI political committee recently reaffirmed its agreement with opposition parties regarding Senate seat allocations and instructed its nominees to retract their nomination papers. However, many aspirants rejected this decision, refusing to step down. Read More: PTI workers cry foul over Senate tickets A late-night political committee meeting saw members defending the shortlist released by party founder Imran Khan. While acknowledging Irfan Saleem's long service to PTI, the committee stood firm on Khan's final candidate list. Although some objections were raised over Mishael Yousafzai's candidacy, she was approved out of respect for the founder's selections. Despite endorsing the compromise with the opposition, the committee failed to persuade dissenting candidates to withdraw and is now considering issuing notices to non-compliant nominees. In response, discontented candidates—including Irfan Saleem, Syed Irshad Hussain, Khurram Zeeshan, Aisha Bano, and Waqas Orakzai—held their own meeting. They unanimously rejected the committee's instructions and vowed to contest the Senate elections. لا الہ الاللہ بات سینیٹ الیکشن سے بہت آگے نکل چکی ہے۔ جس فارم 47 کی ناجائز ٹٹوؤں سے خان صاحب بات تک نہیں کرنا چاہتے ان کے ساتھ گٹھ جوڑ نامنظور! اب سامنے وہ درواہا ہے جہاں ہمیں لازمی مزاحمت یا مفاہمت یعنی سیاسی مصلحتوں، گٹھ جوڑ، بند کمروں کی بندر بانٹ میں سے کسی ایک کا انتخاب… — Khurram Zeeshan (@khurramzeeshan) July 19, 2025 Khurram Zeeshan released a video message stating the issue had surpassed a mere Senate contest. He criticized alliances with 'illegitimate' individuals named on Form 47, accusing the party leadership of betraying Imran Khan's principles. 'We stand at a crossroads: resistance or compromise through political horse-trading,' he said, pledging steadfast opposition and declaring, 'We do not do politics; we do jihad.' Irfan Saleem voiced concerns over alleged collusion with establishment-backed figures during the K-P Senate polls, asserting that PTI members derive legitimacy from Imran Khan's mandate and pledging to expose any attempts to compromise party ideology. Aisha Bano called the Senate seat the party's honour and questioned entrusting it to individuals accused of wronging Imran Khan and PTI workers. 'This is not just an election; it is the front of our movement,' she said. Saleem added that he would consult party workers and colleagues before deciding on contesting the Senate election papers. The dissidents' defiance highlights a widening rift within PTI ahead of the upper house elections. Also Read: Court orders arrest of K-P CM Gandapur in arms, liquor case Following these developments, both the opposition and government benches in the K-P Assembly have devised a joint strategy to ensure the success of their 11 agreed candidates. Sources revealed that special panels are being formed to manage the voting process, with provincial ministers tasked to oversee four government-aligned panels. Lawmakers from the ruling party will be gathered at the Chief Minister's House and sent to the assembly in groups under ministerial supervision to cast their votes. ہم اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے اس گندے کھیل کا حصہ نہیں بنیں گے ہم عمرانی نظریہ کے تحفظ کی خاطر آخری بال تک لڑیں گے۔ — Irfan Saleem (@_IrfanSaleemPTI) July 19, 2025 On the opposition side, three panels will be supervised by parliamentary leaders of their respective parties. Members of the seven total panels will be instructed to vote separately for general, women, and technocrat candidates to avoid confusion or crossover. The entire process will be monitored jointly by Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Opposition Leader Dr Ibadullah. Opposition candidates will also receive support from government ranks, with votes coordinated through mutual understanding. In the event of any deviation, such as votes cast in favour of rebel PTI candidates, both sides have agreed to launch a thorough joint investigation to hold responsible lawmakers accountable. Read: PA speaker tosses disqualification bid of 26 MPAs into judicial arena Party insiders confirmed senior PTI leaders will be present in the assembly on polling day to oversee proceedings, with key opposition figures also expected to attend. Opposition sources expressed satisfaction with the government's commitment and arrangements. 'We are hopeful that no issues will arise and all 11 candidates will be elected smoothly,' one source said. It was further decided that any complaints or irregularities during the polling process would be immediately reported to the chief minister and opposition leader to ensure timely action.


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PA speaker tosses disqualification bid of 26 MPAs into judicial arena
Listen to article Speaker Punjab Assembly, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, has declared inadmissible the applications submitted by treasury lawmakers seeking the disqualification of 26 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) MPAs suspended for alleged abusive and violent conduct. Instead, he advised the petitioners to obtain a declaration from a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before approaching the Speaker again. Speaker Khan made the decision under Rule 210(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab, 1997. The 26 PTI lawmakers had been suspended following their disruption of Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's speech on 27 June. In his detailed ruling, the Speaker stated, 'Though serious legal and constitutional violations, including breach of constitutional oath, have been alleged by the applicants, these violations first need to be established in a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction before I could decide whether a question of qualification has arisen in terms of Article 63(2) of the Constitution and refer the question to the Election Commission of Pakistan.' Read More: Punjab speaker moves to disqualify 26 MPAs He further added, 'The people are the source of all power, and through their vote, they confer trust—not to be undone without the gravest reasons. To disqualify a representative is not merely to silence a voice—it is to disenfranchise people. For an elected House is not only a chamber of laws; it is the echo of the people's will. That voice must not be silenced.' Speaker Khan rejected the reliance placed by applicants on precedents such as the Panama Papers case and related jurisprudence under Articles 199 and 184(3), calling such comparisons 'not maintainable for constitutional and democratic reasons.' He warned that entertaining such petitions would erode the freedom of speech within the House and effectively nullify the opposition's role. Citing Article 19, he emphasised that robust—even abrasive—debate is protected, 'subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law,' which are outlined in assembly rules, not by threats of permanent disqualification. He said, 'Let the welfare of the people be the supreme law. The Assembly must remain a forum where dissent is voiced, not extinguished. The electorate is best served when the House disciplines disorder internally while preserving the electorate's chosen representation.' Highlighting the need for improved legislative performance, the Speaker noted that many members lack awareness of assembly rules, legislative procedures, and the effective use of standing committees. He stressed the importance of targeted training to ensure the Assembly upholds parliamentary supremacy and serves the public interest. 'As elected representatives, we must legislate responsibly, put an end to political victimisation, and work together to uphold the supremacy of the people's Assembly and protect our democracy,' he said. Calling for inter-party dialogue in the spirit of the Charter of Democracy, he said, 'Political parties are the true guardians of democracy. There should be meaningful dialogue among all parties on the effective functioning of the Assembly to ensure that it serves the interests of the people and remains a forum for genuine debate and cooperation.' Also Read: Punjab speaker agrees to dismiss references against suspended PTI MPAs Speaker Khan strongly criticised certain constitutional provisions, particularly Articles 62, 63, and the defunct Article 58(2)(b), labelling them as relics of authoritarian regimes. 'These provisions, imposed by dictators such as General Zia-ul-Haq, have historically been weaponised to unjustly target elected politicians. We must end this vicious cycle. The Panama Case must not become another tool like Article 58(2)(b), or we risk falling into a nihilistic cycle where we repeat the same mistakes,' he said. He warned against disqualifications based on mere allegations or technicalities, which violate the presumption of innocence and erode parliamentary legitimacy. Citing past examples such as the Public Representative Offices Disqualification Act of 1949 and the Elective Bodies Disqualification Order (EBDO) of 1959, he said such 'backdoor tools' have consistently served non-democratic elements, often with political parties complicit. He termed the Panama case a 'show trial' and said its use as a precedent undermines constitutional rights to political association and representation under Article 17. 'This destructive chain must be broken,' he said. 'The very fact that the Constitution has been exploited this way means such challenging questions can be—and have been—raised.' He concluded by vowing to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative democracy: 'During my tenure as Speaker, I will work to uphold parliamentary rule and the principles of representative constitutional democracy, as envisioned by our great Islamic Republic's founding fathers.'


Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Judges' transfer: IK challenges order of SC CB
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan on Friday challenged the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court's order in the transfer of judges to the Islamabad High Court (IHC). The former prime minister, on Friday, filed an Intra-Court Appeal (ICA) under Section 5 of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, read with Article 184(3) of the Constitution, praying to set aside the impugned order dated 19-06-2025. The Constitution Bench on June 19, 2025 by majority of 3 to 2 held that transfer of judges under Article 200 is within the framework of the Constitution, and transfer (permanently or temporarily) cannot be construed as a fresh appointment. The bench without upsetting the notification of transfer of judges in the IHC remanded the matter of seniority to the president of Pakistan to determine the seniority after examining/vetting the service record of the transferee judges as soon as possible, including the question of whether the transfer is on a permanent or temporary basis. The petitioner contended that the constitutional bench erred in remanding the matter to determine whether the transfer was 'temporary' or 'permanent'. This is a judicial question, and delegating it to the president undermines judicial autonomy and violates the principle of separation of powers. He stated that the Constitutional Bench failed to appreciate the distinction between the term 'functions' and 'powers' of the president under the Constitution. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025