Polio lost, but fake records & imperfect vax helped it rear its ugly head
Amid rampant misinformation and immense pressure for the campaign to succeed, Ayaz said, some managers have instructed workers to falsely mark children as immunized. And the vaccines, which must be kept cold, aren't always stored correctly, she added.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
"In many places, our work is not done with honesty," Ayaz said.
The World Health Organization and partners embarked on their polio campaign in 1988 with the bold goal of eradication - a feat seen only once for human diseases, with smallpox in 1980. They came close several times, including in 2021, when just five cases of the natural virus were reported in Pakistan and Afghanistan. But since then, cases rebounded, hitting 99 last year, and officials have missed at least six self-imposed eradication deadlines.
Afghanistan and Pakistan remain the only countries where transmission of polio - which is highly infectious, affects mainly children under 5, and can cause irreversible paralysis within hours -- has never been interrupted. The worldwide campaign has focused most of its attention and funding there for the past decade. But in its quest to eliminate the disease, the Global
Polio Eradication
Initiative has been derailed by mismanagement and what insiders describe as blind allegiance to an outdated strategy and a problematic oral vaccine, according to workers, polio experts and internal materials.
Live Events
Officials have falsified vaccination records, selected unqualified people to dole out drops, failed to send out teams during mass campaigns, and dismissed concerns about the oral vaccine sparking outbreaks, according to documents shared with AP by staffers from GPEI - one of the largest and most expensive public health campaigns in history, with over $20 billion spent and nearly every country in the world involved.
In Afghanistan and Pakistan - which share a border, harbor widespread mistrust of vaccines, and have weakened healthcare systems and infrastructure - local staffers like Ayaz have for years flagged problems to senior managers. But those issues, along with concerns by staffers and outside health officials, have long gone unaddressed, insiders say.
Officials tout the successes - 3 billion children vaccinated, an estimated 20 million people who would have been paralyzed spared - while acknowledging challenges in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Remote villages are hard to reach, some cultural and religious authorities instruct against vaccination, and hundreds of polio workers and security staff have been killed because of their alignment with a Western-led initiative.
Dr. Jamal Ahmed, WHO's polio director, defended progress in those two countries. "There's so many children being protected today because of the work that was done over the past 40 years," he said. "Let's not overdramatize the challenges, because that leads to children getting paralyzed."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
THIS vegetable can increase the risk of type 2 diabetes
About 830 million people are living with diabetes across the world, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Among these, more than 95% of people have type 2 diabetes (T2D). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Lifestyle factors, including play a crucial role in the rising number of incidences. Eating a diet that is rich in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains is one of the most recommended diets to lower the risk of diabetes, and also manage it. But did you know a certain vegetable can actually increase your risk? A new study led by researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that a certain vegetable can increase your risk of type 2 diabetes, but it depends on the preparation. The findings of the study are published in the . A vegetable that can increase the risk of (T2D) The vegetable in question is potatoes! Yes, that's right. But here's the catch: how you cook really matters. Only cooking it in a certain way increases the risk of T2D. And guess what? Most of the population is obsessed with this preparation method. Yes, that's right. French fries were associated with the risk, while other forms, including baked, , and mashed, were not. The researchers also found that swapping any form of potato for whole grains may lower the risk of T2D. French fries are not on your friend's list Though previous studies have shown the link between potatoes and T2D, the evidence was inconsistent. They also lacked the details about the cooking method and the potential effects of substituting with other foods. 'Our study offers deeper, more comprehensive insights by looking at different types of potatoes, tracking diet over decades, and exploring the effects of swapping potatoes for other foods. We're shifting the conversation from 'Are potatoes good or bad?' to a more nuanced—and useful—question: How are they prepared, and what might we eat instead?' lead author Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Nutrition, said in a statement. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The study The researchers studied the diets and diabetes outcomes of over 205,107 participants for more than 30 years. The participants were also given dietary questionnaires regularly to know the frequency with which they consumed certain foods, including French fries, baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes, and whole grains. Their health diagnoses, including T2D, and various other health, lifestyle, and demographic factors, were also documented. During the study, 22,299 participants developed T2D. Findings The researchers found that three servings of French fries a week increased the risk of developing T2D by 20%. They also noted that eating whole grains such as whole grain pasta, bread, or farro instead of baked, boiled, or mashed potatoes could reduce the risk of T2D by 4%. Also, swapping French fries with whole grains can reduce the risk by 19%. Even swapping refined grains for French fries was estimated to lower T2D risk. ' The public health message here is simple and powerful: Small changes in our daily diet can have an important impact on the risk of type 2 diabetes. Limiting potatoes, especially limiting French fries and choosing healthy, whole grain sources of carbohydrate, could help lower the risk of type 2 diabetes across the population,' corresponding author Walter Willett, professor of epidemiology and nutrition, said. 'Kahin Bada, Kahin Chhota': Ravi Kishan Uses Samosa Analogy To Demand Regulation Of Food Prices 'For policymakers, our findings highlight the need to move beyond broad food categories and pay closer attention to how foods are prepared and what they're replacing. Not all carbs or even all potatoes are created equal, and that distinction is crucial when it comes to shaping effective dietary guidelines,' he added.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Nationwide NuNaturals sweetener recall: FDA warns of dangerous label mix-up—stevia and monk fruit swapped, check your pantry now
NuNaturals, a popular brand known for its plant-based sugar substitutes, is at the center of a growing concern after the FDA issued a nationwide Class II recall due to a mislabeling issue involving two of its sweetener products. The mistake, which involves confusing stevia with monk fruit, may lead to unexpected health reactions for sensitive consumers. Here's everything you need to know about this major recall, what it means, and how to stay safe. FDA recalls NuNaturals sweeteners after product labeling mix-up The recall, initiated by NuNaturals Inc. on July 14, 2025 , affects two widely distributed products—Organic Pure Stevia (1 oz) and Pure Monk Fruit Sweetener (0.71 oz). According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), these sweeteners were accidentally switched during packaging, meaning the product inside doesn't match the label outside. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program On August 1, 2025, the FDA escalated the situation by classifying the recall as Class II, which means the mislabeled products could cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health effects, though the probability of serious consequences is considered remote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like It's Genius for Learning Languages [See Why] Talkpal AI Undo Which NuNaturals products are recalled and why it matters The mislabeling issue could pose serious concerns for consumers who rely on specific ingredients—particularly those who are sensitive or allergic to certain sweeteners. Here's a breakdown of the two products involved: Organic Pure Stevia (1 oz bottle) UPC: 7 39223 00204 0 Lot Number: 25104S Best By: April 2028 Issue: Contains monk fruit instead of stevia Pure Monk Fruit Sweetener (0.71 oz bottle) UPC: 7 39223 00187 6 Lot Number: 25104S Best By: April 2028 Issue: Contains stevia instead of monk fruit Both products were shipped with incorrect labels, which means that people who thought they were consuming stevia may have unknowingly consumed monk fruit , and vice versa. Live Events Health risks: Why the NuNaturals recall could affect some users While stevia and monk fruit are generally considered safe, some individuals may experience adverse reactions to these ingredients. The FDA's Class II designation reflects the potential for short-term health issues, such as: Gastrointestinal discomfort Mild allergic reactions Interference with certain dietary or medical conditions The good news? No severe injuries or hospitalizations have been reported as of now. However, due to the increasing popularity of natural sugar alternatives, the recall is being taken seriously across health and consumer watchdog groups. Nationwide recall: Where the products were sold According to available data, both affected NuNaturals products were distributed across the United States. Although specific retailers have not been named, the company confirmed that the mislabeled products reached store shelves and possibly online platforms. If you've recently purchased any NuNaturals product—especially from natural food stores, online retailers like Amazon, or health supplement chains—it's important to check the UPC code and lot number printed on the bottle. What should you do if you purchased the recalled NuNaturals products? If you have either of these sweeteners in your home, here's what the FDA and NuNaturals recommend: Stop using the product immediately. Check the UPC and lot number on the label (look for 25104S). Safely discard the item —there's no need to return it. Contact NuNaturals' customer service for any further assistance or product inquiries. So far, there hasn't been a publicized refund or replacement program, but consumers are encouraged to report any health concerns to the FDA's MedWatch Safety Information system . Monk fruit vs. stevia: Why accurate labeling matters more than ever This situation sheds light on a growing issue in the natural food and supplement industry—the increasing demand for sugar alternatives like monk fruit and stevia has led to a wider range of products, but also greater room for human error in labeling and manufacturing. Though both monk fruit and stevia are used as calorie-free sweeteners, they differ significantly: Monk Fruit is derived from a Southeast Asian melon and is known for its intense sweetness without a bitter aftertaste. Stevia comes from a South American plant and may have a slightly licorice-like flavor. For people with dietary restrictions, diabetes, or allergies, knowing exactly which sweetener they're consuming is crucial for managing their health. Consumer trust and FDA oversight under spotlight This incident comes at a time when consumer awareness and trust in health brands is paramount. While NuNaturals has responded promptly by issuing the recall, the fact that 78 mislabeled bottles made it to market underscores the need for stricter quality control and regulatory checks. The FDA's prompt escalation to a Class II health risk warning is a sign that even small-scale errors in labeling can have significant consequences, especially in industries involving food and wellness products. Stay safe and read your labels This NuNaturals recall highlights key takeaways for today's health-conscious shoppers: Always check UPC codes and lot numbers when purchasing supplements or food products. Be wary of labeling issues in natural sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit. Monitor FDA recall alerts regularly for your safety. If in doubt, reach out to customer support or dispose of questionable products. As health trends like sugar-free diets , plant-based lifestyles , and natural food alternatives grow in popularity, it's more important than ever to stay informed and cautious. Stay alert as natural food recalls rise The NuNaturals recall is a reminder that not all health food products are error-proof, even from reputable brands. Whether you're a diabetic seeking low-glycemic options or simply avoiding artificial sweeteners, the quality and accuracy of ingredients matter. Consumers should remain vigilant, read product labels carefully, and stay updated on FDA recall alerts. In the meantime, if you have questions about the recall or your health, consult a healthcare provider or nutritionist. FAQs: Q1: Why did the FDA recall NuNaturals sweeteners? Because stevia and monk fruit bottles were mislabeled, posing health risks. Q2: Which NuNaturals sweetener products are recalled? Organic Pure Stevia and Pure Monk Fruit from lot 25104S with April 2028 expiry.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
OpenAI's GPT-5 shows potential in healthcare with early cancer detection capabilities
OpenAI's latest language model, GPT-5, is showing measurable progress in the field of healthcare, specifically in AI cancer detection and medical support. During its official launch event, OpenAI showcased the model's performance on internal health evaluations, noting that GPT-5 scored higher than any of its predecessors. The health benchmark referenced was developed with the input of more than 250 physicians and tested GPT-5 on real-world medical scenarios, including diagnostic interpretation and patient communication. The model's ability to understand and contextualize health-related input was a central focus of the demonstration. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Also read: OpenAI's next-generation ChatGPT-5 is here — is this the AI moment we've all been waiting for? by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brought to you by Undo One featured example involved a user named Carolina, who was diagnosed with three types of cancer within a single week. After receiving a complex biopsy report, she pasted the content into ChatGPT to understand the medical language. 'That moment was really important,' she said. 'Because by the time I spoke with my doctor three hours later, I already had a baseline understanding of what I was dealing with.' Throughout her treatment process, Carolina continued using the model to interpret medical terminology, weigh treatment options, and prepare questions for her healthcare team. In one notable case, she used GPT-5 to help assess whether to undergo radiation therapy, a decision that was not unanimous among her doctors. Live Events AI cancer detection through patient-centered communication tools According to OpenAI, GPT-5 healthcare capabilities are not limited to information delivery. The model is designed to interpret nuance, identify potential gaps in diagnostic reports, and suggest relevant next steps. This context-awareness makes it function more like an assistant than a search engine, according to OpenAI representatives. Carolina and her husband said the tool's ability to explain medical details in an accessible way made them feel more involved in the care process. 'It helped me become an active participant in my care,' she said. While GPT-5 is not classified as a medical device and does not replace licensed professionals, OpenAI positions it as a health literacy support tool . It can help users better understand their medical situations, especially in high-stress or time-sensitive circumstances.
