Late-night hosts react to cancellation of Stephen Colbert show as Trump says 'Kimmel is next'
Jessica Riga
, ABC
Jacinda Ardern on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in 2018.
Photo:
Scott Kowalchyk/CBS
Late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has blasted television network CBS for cancelling
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert
, as the US president took to social media to revel in the news and warn, "Kimmel is next".
Stephen Colbert announced on Thursday (US time) that his late-night show has not been extended beyond the upcoming broadcast season, meaning it will end in May next year.
CBS executives released a statement calling the move a "purely financial decision", labelling Colbert "irreplaceable".
"[The decision is made] against a challenging backdrop in late night," the statement read.
Fellow late-night hosts have reacted with shock and anger, with Kimmel writing on social media: "love you Stephen. F*** you and all your Sheldons CBS".
Jimmy Kimmel.
Photo:
TOMMASO BODDI
Jimmy Fallon, host of
The Tonight Show
, wrote on social media that he was "just as shocked as everyone".
"Stephen is one of the sharpest, funniest hosts to ever do it. I really thought I'd ride this out with him for years to come," he wrote.
Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump seemed to delight in the announcement, writing on his own social media platform Truth Social, "I absolutely love that Colbert got fired".
"His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert!"
Trump added: "Greg Gutfeld is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show."
US President Donald Trump.
Photo:
AFP / Brendan Smialowski
US media is reporting that CBS's parent company, Paramount, is seeking approval from the US Federal Communications Commission for a merger with Skydance Media, in a deal worth $US8.4 billion (NZ$14 billion).
Paramount also agreed this month to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over an interview with his Democratic challenger in the 2024 presidential race - former vice-president Kamala Harris - that CBS's 60 Minutes programme broadcast in October.
Critics, including Colbert - who often condemns the president's actions on his show - say the company settled primarily to clear a hurdle to the Skydance sale.
In a scathing monologue delivered on Monday, local time, Colbert said he was "offended" by the settlement and joked that the technical name in legal circles for the deal was a "big fat bribe".
In its statement, CBS executive said the cancellation of Colbert's show "is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount."
To the boos of the audience at the news of the announcement, Colbert said, "Yeah, I share your feelings".
"It's not just the end of our show, but it's the end of The Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away."
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a longtime critic of the US president, joined those calling for more transparency around the show's cancellation.
"CBS cancelled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump - a deal that looks like bribery," Senator Warren wrote on social media.
"America deserves to know if his show was cancelled for political reasons."
Senator Elizabeth Warren.
Photo:
AFP / Getty Images
Eleven-time Emmy award winner Julia Louis-Dreyfus defended the late-night host, writing, "I stand with my friend Stephen Colbert".
She then directed a David Graham quote at CBS, Paramount and chairwoman Shari Redstone.
"Institutions that are willing to sacrifice their values for the government's favour are likely to end up with neither," she wrote.
A slew of stars commented on an Instagram post shared by
The Late Show
and Colbert's personal account.
"Love you Stephen. This is absolute bulls***,"
Severance
star Adam Scott wrote.
"And I for one am looking forward to the next 10 months of shows."
Seth Meyers, the host of
Late Night
, also weighed in on Instagram.
"For as great a comedian and host he is, Stephen Colbert is an even better person," he wrote.
"I'm going to miss having him on TV every night, but I'm excited he can no longer use the excuse that he's 'too busy to hang out' with me."
Colbert took over as host of
The Late Show
in September 2015, succeeding veteran broadcaster David Letterman, who launched the programme in 1993 after Jay Leno was named host of NBC's flagship
Tonight Show
.
- ABC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
10 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Half-smiles as Trump offers Ukraine limited aid
There was rejoicing when US President Donald Trump announced that he was going to let Ukraine have weapons after all, but it was conspicuously contained joy. Half-smiles and sighs of relief were plentiful; cheers were absent or faked. The Ukrainians were relieved because this is the first time they will be getting weapons actually ordered by Trump. The stop-go dribble of arms that the US has sent Ukraine at intervals in the past five months was really the tail-end of Joe Biden's last package, although Trump had to approve each shipment. What Trump is willing to send now remains unclear, but at least it's on his own initiative and $US10 billion has been mentioned. And Ukrainians don't care that the money will really be provided by other Nato members, who will buy the weapons from the US but pass them on Ukraine's armed forces. What does concern Ukrainians is that Trump's threatened "secondary tariffs" (more accurately secondary sanctions) on countries like India and China that are still buying cut-rate Russian oil and gas and supporting Moscow's war economy will not start for 50 more days. That gives Russian President Vladimir Putin 49 more days to bomb Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with impunity, and Trump is notorious for shifting his deadlines to later dates. (Taco, as they say — "Trump always chickens out".) Moreover, Trump warned Ukraine not to attack Moscow in return. So, the Russian reaction to Trump's apparent change of heart was relief that it wasn't worse. It is mostly "hot air", wrote Konstantin Kosachev, a senior Russian politician, on Telegram. "A lot can change in 50 days — on the battlefield and in the mindset of those in power, both in the US and in Nato." That's mostly correct, but not so much about Nato, most of whose other members have privately concluded that the United States under Trump is no longer a trustworthy ally. That leaves them dreadfully exposed if Russia conquers Ukraine and they become the next item on Putin's agenda. The historical division of labour within the Nato alliance has left the Europeans lacking in key military categories like aerial surveillance, satellite data and nuclear deterrence. Trump imagines that the recent commitment of most Nato countries to spend 5% of GDP on defence — twice or more than they were spending two years ago — was a response to his demands. It was really a decision to achieve strategic independence from the United States. They have realised they are on their own. Their problem is that it will take at least five years of strenuous effort to reach that goal, and until then they will still need US support — which explains the fake adulation and fulsome flattery they offer Trump at every opportunity. Boot-licking is hard work, and they probably can't keep it up for five years, but every month makes a difference. Most European decision-makers understand that a Russian victory in Ukraine must be avoided at all costs, and that they must therefore do whatever they can to keep Trump on side. Is that really possible? Not if the slide of the United States into a "soft fascism" accelerates. Not if China invades Taiwan and panics the US into a global war. Not if Putin dies or is overthrown, only for an even more ruthless and reckless ruler to take his place. The negative possibilities are big and plausible — but so are less disastrous outcomes. It is still possible to draw a credible scenario in which the current stalemate in Ukraine endures for another year or so and then reaches an "in-place" ceasefire like the one that has lasted in Korea for 72 years. It is possible that the US can be kept in Nato long enough for the European members plus Canada to get their act together and become an independent strategic body. It is possible that China will retain its half-hearted loyalty to the international rule of law and not become another rogue state. It is likewise possible that the United States, having spent some time under a capricious and authoritarian government, will return to its democratic roots, which run very deep. Regime change in Russia might reawaken the desire for democracy that was so prominent in the late 1980s and early '90s. It's not over until the fat lady sings. It's not even over after the fat lady sings. We are heading into a period where all bets are off because climate change will change all other calculations, and the only rational response will be co-operation on a global scale. No promises, but despair is rarely the right move. — Gwynne Dyer is an independent London journalist.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Five questions about the relationship between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
By Aaron Blake , CNN Composite image of Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. Photo: AFP / NEW YORK STATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY/HANDOUT Analysis - A Wall Street Journal report earlier this week added new scrutiny to President Donald Trump's relationship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The Journal reported that Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell asked Trump and many others to submit letters for an album for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. A letter bearing Trump's name included a lewd outline of a naked woman and an imagined conversation between Trump and Epstein, according to the Journal. In the conversation, the two men reflect on how they share some kind of secret knowledge about how there's "more to life than having everything." "Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret," Trump concludes in this imagined conversation, according to the Journal. The president has denied he wrote the letter, and on Friday (US time), he filed a libel lawsuit against the publisher of the Wall Street Journal and the reporters who wrote the story. "This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story," Trump told the Journal in an interview earlier this week. "I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women." Trump added in a social media post after the story published: "These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures." It's been no secret that Trump and Epstein were friendly in the period before Epstein was charged with solicitation of prostitution in the mid 2000s. There are plenty of photos of them together. But the new report - along with Trump's demands that his supporters stop pursuing questions about Epstein in the wake of his administration's botched handling of promised disclosures - has rekindled interest in the matter. Trump has now relented a bit on disclosure, instructing the Justice Department to seek to unseal "any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval." (The DOJ moved to do that on Friday, but it's possible that won't reveal much or happen anytime soon, given grand jury testimony is typically kept secret. And that testimony is only a small piece of the relevant information.) So, what do we know so far about Trump and Epstein's relationship? Here are some key questions. There are conflicting signals on this. And Trump's strained efforts to downplay their ties have raised plenty of questions. After Epstein was arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors in 2019, Trump distanced himself. "Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him," Trump told reporters during his first term. "I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan." Trump then repeated twice more that he had not been "a fan" of Epstein's. Donald Trump jokes with Jeffrey Epstein at a Mar-a-Lago party filled with women in 1992. Photo: Screengrab / YouTube His account of not speaking to Epstein since the 2000s is backed up by reporting. The Washington Post has reported that the two men had a falling-out while competing over the same Palm Beach oceanfront property in 2004. That would place the falling-out before Epstein began getting in serious legal trouble; in 2006, Epstein was charged with soliciting a prostitute, and that same year reports surfaced that he had been under investigation for allegedly having sex with minors. But Trump's suggestion that his relationship with Epstein was more incidental and his claim that he "was not a fan" of Epstein's has been called into question, including by Trump's own commentary. Their relationship appeared to stretch back to the 1980s. Trump flew on Epstein's jets between Palm Beach and New York, according to flight logs. They socialised at each other's properties. The New York Times reported that, in 1992, Mar-a-Lago played host to a "calendar girl" competition in which about two dozen women were flown in. But the only guests present were Trump and Epstein, according to a Florida businessman who organised the event, George Houraney. (Trump's White House didn't comment to the Times for the 2019 story.) Most infamously, Trump in 2002 told New York magazine that Epstein was a "terrific guy." "He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump said. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it - Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Former Trump aide Sam Nunberg told the Washington Post in 2019 that he had pressed Trump about his ties to Epstein in 2014 when Trump was considering a presidential run. "Bottom line, Donald would hang out with Epstein because he was rich," Nunberg said, assuring Trump had severed ties long ago. Precisely how close Trump and Epstein were isn't totally clear. Was this just a situation of powerful men occasionally partying together and sharing Epstein's private plane because that's what rich guys do? These are social situations tough for most Americans to understand. But even if Trump really was somehow "not a fan," he's made other dodgy claims. In January 2024, he said on social media: "I was never on Epstein's Plane ..." In fact, flight logs had already shown Trump flew on it seven times in the 1990s. Trump also claimed in 2019 that he didn't "know Prince Andrew" of Britain, who has been the subject of Epstein-related allegations, despite a number of photos showing Trump with the Duke of York. Trump often lies and misleads in his public statements. And he certainly has reason to downplay his ties to Epstein. But going too far in that direction undercuts your credibility and feeds suspicion about what you might be hiding. Precisely what the Journal's story will mean going forward isn't clear - although it's already rallied MAGA influencers who were critical of the administration's handling of the Epstein files to Trump's side. The idea that Trump would submit a letter for Epstein's birthday album isn't that surprising, given this was when the two of them were seemingly on better terms (2003) and that dozens of other letters were reportedly solicited. The idea that Trump would be lewd in that letter also tracks, given his past. (See: The "Access Hollywood" tape .) But Trump - and many of those vocal supporters - have said this doesn't sound like him or something he would create. Far-right activist Laura Loomer - who'd called for the administration to appoint a special counsel to look into the handling of the Epstein files - quickly came to Trump's defence Thursday night. "Everyone who actually KNOWS President Trump knows he doesn't type letters. He writes notes in big black Sharpie," she posted on X. But while Trump maintains he doesn't draw pictures, his drawings have surfaced before. A signed Trump sketch of the Manhattan skyline sold at auction in 2017 for more than $29,000. (The sketch was reportedly from 2005, two years after the letter in question.) Another 1990s Trump sketch of the Empire State Building auctioned off the same year. And Trump in a 2008 book recalled donating an autographed doodle every year to a charity. Of course, none of that proves he wrote this letter and drew the accompanying picture. But again, Trump is undercutting his own credibility. Why lie about doodling - especially since it's easily disprovable? And it's possible we could learn more about this. There has been some talk about having Maxwell - who the Journal reported solicited the letter - testify before Congress. Trump's efforts to quiet chatter about Epstein have only furthered suspicion in some corners that his name could be in the files his administration has failed to produce. We already know that Trump's name was in Epstein's flight logs. An Epstein personal address book that leaked in 2009 contained 14 phone numbers for Trump, Melania Trump and Trump's staff, according to media reports. A 2005 search of Epstein's Palm Beach mansion produced two written messages about phone calls from Trump. Protestors hold signs calling for the release of files regarding late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on 17 July 2025. Photo: Ronaldo Schemidt / AFP So, it's not inconceivable he's in the files his supporters have been clamoring for. Merely being named, of course, wouldn't mean Trump had done anything wrong. But it could create political headaches - as the fallout from the Journal story shows - and as demonstrated by Trump's very public reluctance to release more documents. Former top Trump adviser Elon Musk alleged last month while lashing out at Trump that the president was indeed in the Epstein files, adding, "That is the real reason they have not been made public." But he provided no evidence for his claims and later deleted the post. Trump was asked Tuesday if Attorney General Pam Bondi had told him his name was in the files, and he didn't directly answer. "She's given us just a very quick briefing in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen," Trump said. Trump's 2002 comment about Epstein's taste for women "on the younger side" has also loomed over him, furthering theories that he might have known something about what Epstein had been up to. That remains speculative and unproven. Trump also said nothing about underage girls; he cited young "women." But questions about who knew what and when with Epstein's conduct have long lingered. Trump's Mar-a-Lago property was a backdrop to some of Epstein's misdeeds. And Epstein and Trump's social connections often revolved around women. According to Nunberg's 2019 account to the Washington Post, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago because of misconduct. Nunberg said Trump said he did so because Epstein had recruited a young woman who worked there to give him massages. This was years before the Epstein investigation became public knowledge, according to the Post. "He's a real creep, I banned him," Nunberg said Trump had told him. Multiple reports, including a 2020 book by reporters for the Miami Herald and Wall Street Journal, have linked Epstein's ban from Mar-a-Lago to alleged overtures to the teenage daughter of a Mar-a-Lago member. Late Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre said she was recruited into the sex-trafficking ring while working at Mar-a-Lago in 2000. Houraney also told the Times in 2019 that he raised concerns to Trump about Epstein's conduct ahead of that 1992 "calendar girl" event. "I said, 'Look, Donald, I know Jeff really well, I can't have him going after younger girls,'" Houraney said. "He said, 'Look I'm putting my name on this. I wouldn't put my name on it and have a scandal.'" Trump appears to have been helpful to those probing Epstein's conduct, but we know little about what he said because he was never deposed. One attorney for Epstein's alleged victims has said Trump in 2009 was a very willing interview subject. The attorney, Brad Edwards, said Trump "gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever." While Trump in 2019 quickly distanced himself from Epstein, his commentary the following year after Maxwell was charged was different - and somewhat bizarre. "But I wish her well, whatever it is," Trump told reporters in late July 2020. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Photo: Handout / US District Court for the Southern District of New York / AFP Despite significant criticism of that - wishing an accused (and later-convicted) child sex trafficker well - Trump a couple weeks later doubled and tripled down when pressed by then-Axios reporter Jonathan Swan on how odd that sounded. "Yeah, I wish her well," Trump told Swan. "I'd wish you well. I'd wish a lot of people well. Good luck. Let them prove somebody was guilty." Trump added, when pressed again: "I do wish her well. I'm not looking for anything bad for her. I'm not looking bad for anybody." Even for a president who often says weird things, this ranks near the top. - CNN
1News
9 hours ago
- 1News
Late night hosts in solidarity with Stephen Colbert after show cut
Stephen Colbert received messages of support and affection from his fellow late-night hosts after announcing that CBS was cancelling his show, The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, next May. Jimmy Fallon said he was "just as shocked as everyone," and Seth Meyers called him a great host and comedian but an even better person. John Oliver said he was excited to see what Colbert and his team would do during the final 10 months of the program. Jimmy Kimmel directed an expletive at CBS, and Andy Cohen said it was a sad day for the network. As for US President Donald Trump — a frequent target of Colbert's comedy — he said on Truth Social that "I absolutely love" that Colbert was "fired." John Oliver ADVERTISEMENT "I love Stephen, I love his staff. I love that show. It's incredibly sad. I am partly excited to see what they're going to do for the next 10 months. It's terrible, terrible news for the world of comedy. "Late-night shows mean a lot to me, not just because I work in them, but because even growing up in England, I would watch Letterman's show, which of course was Stephen's show, and think about what a glamorous world that was. "So to have got to be on Letterman's show and Stephen's show has been always one of the most fun things, so it's very, very, very sad news. "I look forward to seeing what he's going to do next because that man will not stop." — the HBO Last Week Tonight host during an appearance in Erie, Pennsylvania, on Saturday. Jimmy Fallon "I'm just as shocked as everyone. Stephen is one of the sharpest, funniest hosts to ever do it. I really thought I'd ride this out with him for years to come. "I'm sad that my family and friends will need a new show to watch every night at 11:30." — the NBC Tonight Show host, on Instagram ADVERTISEMENT Seth Meyers "For as great a comedian and host (as) he is, @stephenathome is an even better person. "I'm going to miss having him on TV every night but I'm excited he can no longer use the excuse that he's 'too busy to hang out' with me."— the NBC Late Night host, on Instagram Jimmy Kimmel "Love you Stephen." — the Jimmy Kimmel Live! host, on Instagram Andy Cohen "It is a very sad day for CBS that they are getting out of the late-night race. I mean, they are turning off the lights after the news." — the Watch What Happens Live host, in an interview.
