Toxic ‘forever chemicals' have infiltrated Antarctic waters: Study
Certain types of 'forever chemicals' are present in ocean areas west of the Antarctic Peninsula at levels comparable to those in the North Atlantic, according to the study, published in Communications Earth & Environment.
These findings, the study authors stated, underscore the importance of considering persistence when weighing environmental risk, while shedding light 'on the impact of the larger pool of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances,' also known as PFAS.
There are about 15,000 types of these so-called 'forever chemicals,' many of which are linked to cancers and other serious illnesses. Known for their ability to linger in the environment, PFAS are found in certain firefighting foams and in a variety of household products, such as waterproof apparel, nonstick pans and cosmetics.
Although previous studies have suggested only a limited presence of PFAS in the Southern Ocean, the authors — from Spain's Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research and the University of Barcelona — were able to challenge this assumption.
The prevailing notion, they explained, reasoned that the 'circumpolar current' that flows clockwise around the Antarctic prevented the transport of PFAS southwards.
Yet at the same time, the researchers recognized that oceans have become 'a major reservoir' of a PFAS subgroup called perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) — and that certain precursors of PFAAs had been identified in the Southern Ocean's atmosphere.
'PFAAs are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical oceans and are extremely persistent in the environment,' the authors stated.
Among the two most notorious types of PFAAs around the world are PFOA and PFOS — carcinogens that have largely been phased out of production but that remain in soil and water resources due to their longevity.
To determine whether these persistent — and often toxic — types of PFAS had in fact infiltrated the Southern Ocean, the scientists conducted on-site water sampling in the area, accompanied by analytical procedures.
In doing so, they identified PFAA concentrations in seawater at Antarctic latitudes of 71 degrees south comparable with those of 37 degrees north — in regions with known PFAS sources across Europe, the Mediterranean, Central Asia and the United States.
Given the circumpolar current's likely role as 'a barrier for the north-south transport of PFAAs by oceanic currents,' the researchers focused on a possible mechanism called 'wet deposition,' when aerosolized pollutants fall from the atmosphere with rain or snow.
The scientists ultimately determined that PFAA compounds are transported via ocean currents from the southern subtropical Atlantic to the sub-Antarctic — the zone immediately north of the Antarctic region.
From there, what likely occurs is a phenomenon known as 'sea-spray mediated grasshopping,' in which PFAA-laden sea spray forms in the atmosphere and then deposits in the Southern Ocean, per the study.
The Southern Ocean, the authors explained, is known for its high wind speeds, and the region in general endures 'incursions' of wet air masses from the north.
Once the compounds have made it into the Antarctic region and have crossed a maritime barrier called 'the Antarctic divergence,' they are generally there to stay, the study found.
This polar PFAS pileup, the authors warned, raises concerns about potential risks posed to the Antarctic ecosystem. They therefore stressed a need for further research into the prevalence of such 'persistent contaminants of emerging concern' across the region.
'This unexpected accumulation evidences the global risk posed by persistent chemicals,' the authors added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

E&E News
a day ago
- E&E News
Warming waters raise toxic algae levels in Arctic whales
Arctic whales are ingesting higher levels of toxic algae as warming waters create more suitable conditions for microorganisms to thrive, according to newly published NOAA research. That poses risks for those who hunt and consume the whales. The study, published in Nature, found that 'potent neurotoxins' that can cause serious illness and death in humans are increasingly present in fecal samples from bowhead whales that live in Arctic and sub-Arctic waters, including areas with sea-ice coverage. Researchers affiliated with NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center found the prevalence and concentrations of two forms of toxins produced by algae — domoic acid and saxitoxin — in whale feces 'increased significantly' between 2004 and 2022, a period of rapid warming in the Arctic that continues today. Advertisement 'This is like a sleeping giant awakening,' Kathi Lefebvre, a research scientist at NOAA Fisheries' Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the study's lead author, said in a release. 'These are new risks that were previously unknown.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies'
Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies' Hawai'i's volcanic peaks, tropical blooms, and sparkling waters are world-famous, but beneath the surface, something troubling is happening. Thick mats of red algae are rapidly smothering coral reefs in the protected Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, throwing the region's delicate ecosystem out of balance. Now, scientists say they've made a key breakthrough that could help stop the spread of this reef-killing invader. What's happening? In the shallow waters of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, an aggressive algae species, Chondria tumulosa, is taking over, as shared. First identified in 2016, it has since expanded at a rate of nearly 45 square kilometers a year, according to satellite images from 2015 to 2021. Unlike typical marine algae, C. tumulosa forms tumbleweed-like mats that easily break off and drift with the current, rapidly colonizing new areas and suffocating coral reefs. Because scientists haven't been sure where it came from, it's been hard to stop — until now. "Understanding the origin of this potentially invasive species is crucial for developing effective management strategies," the study's lead author stated. In the new study published in PeerJ Life & Environment, researchers used genetic modeling to trace its potential source. Their goal? To give reef managers the tools they need to track, predict, and contain the algae more effectively. Why is this species concerning? Hawai'i's reefs aren't just stunning — they're essential. Reefs protect shorelines from storms, sustain local fisheries, and shape the island's culture and way of life. When something like C. tumulosa moves in, it's not just coral that suffers. These invaders can disrupt entire ecosystems. Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species? Definitely Depends on the animal No way Just let people do it for free Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Invasive species often outcompete native plants and wildlife for space, nutrients, and sunlight. That throws nature off balance and makes the system more vulnerable to disease and climate stress. What's being done about the algae? Thanks to this new research, conservation teams now have a significantly better chance of staying ahead of the problem. By determining where the algae originates and how it spreads, they can take more targeted steps to prevent it from growing out of control. Locals and visitors can also help by avoiding the transport of marine life, supporting reef-safe tourism, and learning more about critical climate issues. Every effort counts, and protecting native species is key to keeping Hawai'i's reefs and our shared future alive and thriving. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword


Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
Targeting Macrophages in Peritoneal Colorectal Cancer
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hello. I'm David Kerr, professor of cancer medicine from University of Oxford. I'd like to talk today about peritoneal carcinomatosis and some of the underpinning biology that makes this such a dismally prognostic feature of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. There's a fantastic group out of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam with Louis Vermeulen and his colleague, Dr Grootjans, the group leaders there, who've done some lovely work in dissecting the immune microenvironment of peritoneal deposits. They discovered that peritoneal resident macrophages constitute, or create, a very immunosuppressive environment in metastatic peritoneal colorectal cancer. It's difficult to treat. If we look at response rates to conventional chemotherapy, the response rate is one third in the peritoneum compared to that in the liver or lungs. I've often long considered it a pharmacologic sanctuary site. Perhaps it's to do with drug access, drug distribution, and so on. They've shown, using a mixture of biopsies from patients and in some compelling mouse models, that these resident macrophages play a very important role in suppressing the immune microenvironment. Of course, they've characterized the macrophages very carefully. We can see the immunosuppressive cytokines, like interleukin-10 and VEGF, so that the whole story is very plausible. Equally as important, in a very relevant mouse model of peritoneal metastasis, they showed that this immunosuppressive phenotype can be reversed by using a CSF1 receptor antagonist. This is of interest to me because for a long while, we were interested in a very rare tumor type called tenosynovial giant cell tumor, which can be treated very successfully with CSF1 receptor inhibitors. These drugs exist. They've been approved for the treatment of that very rare macrophage-driven disease, and it looks as if, building on the biology demonstrated by this excellent Amsterdam group, there may be a therapeutic intervention that we could make that's rational and based on depleting these resident macrophages that seem to be the dominant, contributory factor to this rancorous immune microenvironment. This is another opportunity to build on very plausible biology from an outstanding group with drugs that we may already have available. There's a challenge to those who are using the drugs to treat tenosynovial giant cell tumors. Can we actually bring these into the clinic in some way and consider whether we should give the drugs systemically or even locoregionally by giving them intraperitoneally? I think that would be a really interesting experiment to do. Have a look at the paper. There are very clever signs, as you would expect, but think about the potential therapeutic implications. You heard it here first. As always, thanks for listening. I'd be very grateful for any comments or anything you might like to add to this. For the time being, as always, Medscapers, over and out.