logo
What is ‘one in, one out' migrant deal between UK and France?

What is ‘one in, one out' migrant deal between UK and France?

First Post11-07-2025
The UK and France have reached an agreement to try to stem the flow of migrants making the crossing from France to the UK via the English Channel. The development comes against the backdrop of a visit from French President Emmanuel Macron to the United Kingdom for a summit with Keir Starmer. But what do we know about the 'one in, one out' deal? Will it stop the boats? read more
A British police officer stands guard on the beach of Dungeness, on the southeast coast of England, on 15 June, 2022, as Royal National Lifeboat Institution's (RNLI) members of staff help migrants to disembark. (Photo: AFP file)
The UK and France have reached an agreement to stop the flow of migrants.
The development comes in the backdrop of a visit from French President Emmanuel Macron to the United Kingdom for a summit.
This is the first visit of a European leader to the UK since Brexit.
Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer discussed the 'one in, one out' migrant deal during a bilateral meet.
But what do we know about the deal? What do experts say?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Let's take a closer look:
What do we know about the deal?
The deal aims at stopping illegal immigrants from making the crossing from France to the UK via the English Channel.
Under the agreement, asylum seekers who cannot prove they have families in the UK will be returned to France.
The UK, for each migrant returned, will give one migrant from France who can prove a family connection in the UK asylum – hence the name of the programme.
'In exchange for every return, a different individual will be allowed to come here via a safe route - controlled and legal - subject to strict security checks, and only open to those who have not tried to enter the UK illegally,' Starmer said.
The deal is still to get the final assent from European lawyers.
Under the agreement, those who cross the Channel will be detained. Those who come under the programme will be sent back to France.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Starmer said the agreement would come into effect within 'weeks'. File image/AP
However, this will be subject to appeal. After one person is sent back to France, another person applying for asylum legitimately and who has not attempted the illegal crossing will be admitted to the UK.
The programme will be paid for by the Home Office. The programme will be reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Though neither Starmer nor Macron mentioned numbers, some reports stated that around 50 migrants would be sent back per week initially.
However, this would work out to just around 2,600 people per year – a fraction of the numbers that cross.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A deadly journey
Migrants and their families usually make the crossing from France, sans visas and permits, in small inflatable boats.
Over 21,000 people have done so in 2025.
This is a 56 per cent increase over the same period in 2024.
Last year, around 20,000 people made the crossing.
The migrants pay criminal gangs large sums of money to transport them across the channel to the UK.
In March 2025, most migrants arriving by boats were Afghans, Syrians, Iranians, the Vietnamese and Eritreans.
These groups alone comprised 61 per cent of all arrivals.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has estimated that 82 migrants died last year while crossing the channel.
This would make it the most deadliest year on record for such crossings.
The UN agency said at least 18 people had died while crossing the English Channel in 2025.
Since 2018 around 247 people are estimated to have been killing while attempting to cross to the UK.
'Break back of criminal gangs'
He added that the deal is aimed at breaking the back of criminal gangs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We all agree that the situation in the Channel cannot go on as it is so we're bringing new tactics into play and a new intent to tackle illegal migration and break the business model of the criminal gangs', he said.
We 'apply our collective strength and leadership' to the challenges of undocumented migration, the UK prime minister added.
Starmer said the agreement would come into effect within 'weeks'.
'Migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France in short order,' Starmer added.
He called the agreement a 'pilot programme'.
He said that though 'no silver bullet' existed, UK and France could 'finally turn the tables' with 'a united effort, new tactics and a new level of intent'.
French President Emmanuel Macron has blamed Brexit for the increased numbers of people crossing the English Channel. File image/AP
'The jobs they have been promised in the UK will no longer exist because of the nationwide crackdown we're delivering on illegal working which is on a completely unprecedented scale', Starmer said.
Macron called the deal a 'good agreement'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He took aim at Brexit for the increased number of crossings.
'Many people in your country explained that Brexit would make it possible to fight more effectively against illegal immigration," Macron said.
'But it's in fact since Brexit [that] the UK has no migratory agreement with the EU. It creates an incentive to make the crossing, the precise opposite of what Brexit had promised.'
He said that British people were 'sold a lie…which is that the problem was Europe, but the problem has become Brexit'.
Britain and France have long been at odds over illegal immigration.
France has claimed that the UK's laws are too lax or not properly enforced.
Macron has claimed that around third of all migrants arriving in France plan to head to the UK.
'Britain must do something to make itself less attractive and change the rules of their labour market because you can work without papers in the UK,' France's justice minister previously said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The UK, on the other hand, has taken aim at France for not doing enough to stop the boats and cracking down on criminal gangs – which Paris hotly disputes.
Hot-button issue
Asylum and immigration has become a hot-button issue in the UK.
Over 51 per cent of people say it is their main concern, according to a recent poll.
The deal was reached because of the increasing number of unauthorised migrants arriving from France to the UK, Peter Walsh, a senior researcher at the Migration Observatory at Oxford University, told Al Jazeera.
Starmer's Labour government had come to power vowing to get illegal immigration under control.
The UK under Rishi Sunak had previously signed a $650 million deal with France to help increase its efforts at cracking down on such illegal immigration.
Former British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak at Westminster Abbey in London, Britain. Reuters/File Photo
Experts remain unsure if the deal will actually work.
'A returns deal may have an impact if it affects enough people. We don't know how many people could plausibly be returned to France under this deal, but there's a risk that if an insufficiently low share of individuals are returned, then people wishing to reach the UK by small boat may see the risk of return as another risk worth taking – alongside the much greater risk of getting in a small boat,' Walsh told Al Jazeera.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The UK previously tried deporting illegal immigrants to Rwanda – a controversial scheme which was blocked by the courts and which it ultimately dropped.
Some slam deal
Opposition figures in the UK have slammed the deal.
Reform leader Nigel Farage has said he did not 'this so-called deal will make any difference at all.'
'If we even try to deport people across the Channel we will run straight into the European Convention on Human Rights as written into British law, in the human rights act. The lawyers will have a field day and will find lots of reasons why people can't be deported.
'Nobody who crosses the English Channel illegally, in a boat, should ever be given refugee status, should ever be given leave to remain, and should be deported and if we did that, it would stop within a fortnight.'
Farage isn't the only one.
Nigel Farage, the leader of the hard-right Reform UK party, has slammed the deal. Reuters
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp of the opposition Conservative Party told The Times newspaper, 'This deal will mean that 94 percent of illegal migrants crossing the Channel will get to stay. That is pathetic and will not deter anyone. By contrast, the Rwanda deterrent would have seen 100 percent of illegal migrants removed and that would have worked to deter people crossing the Channel. Keir Starmer's failure continues.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some French officials have also come out against the agreement.
'We are putting ourselves into the hands of the British without minimal reciprocal elements,' an unnamed French official involved in the know told Le Monde.
Interestingly, the EU and Turkey reached a similar deal in 2016 to return migrants crossing the border for Syrian refugees inside Turkey.
The Migration Policy Institute said the number of asylum seekers arriving in Greece, which was 861,000 in 2015, shrank to 36,000 the year the deal was signed.
However, in 2019 that number increased again to 75,000.
It remains to be seen whether this deal between the UK and France actually stops the boats.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Housing societies in dilemma over NA tax in absence of govt resolution
Housing societies in dilemma over NA tax in absence of govt resolution

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Housing societies in dilemma over NA tax in absence of govt resolution

1 2 3 4 5 6 Pune: Nearly ten months after the state cabinet announced abolition of non-agricultural (NA) tax for urban housing societies, confusion prevails over it due to absence of a formal govt resolution (GR) in this regard. The managements of housing societies across the state said they are not sure whether they should continue paying the tax till official guidelines are issued in this regard. The state cabinet, under Eknath Shinde-led govt, had approved scrapping of the NA tax in October 2024, ahead of the state assembly elections. The move was aimed at providing relief to societies in urban areas like Pune and Mumbai, where residents have been paying both property tax and NA tax. Housing societies have now approached the state government to issue a formal GR in this respect. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune "We have informed the housing societies that the NA tax has been scrapped. However, many have received payment notices post-October. There is widespread confusion on the issue. We urge the govt to issue a GR in this regard immediately," said Suhas Patwardhan, chairperson, Maharashtra State Housing Federation. The NA tax, which dates back to the British era, is levied on properties situated on agricultural land within the municipal corporation or council limits, excluding those located in designated gaothan areas. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo The abolition was a long-standing demand of housing society federations. Despite the cabinet decision, lack of an official GR has left societies in a dilemma. Some have stopped paying tax based on the cabinet announcement, while others continue to pay to avoid potential penalties. Senior revenue department officials acknowledged the delay, attributing it to the timing of the assembly elections. "The law and judiciary department deferred the issue of GR last year, citing code of conduct during elections. Later, it was left to the new govt to issue the GR," a revenue department official told TOI. A senior official confirmed on Saturday that the GR is likely to be taken up in the next cabinet meeting and could be notified before August 15. "We understand the practical difficulties societies are facing. Clear directives will be issued through the GR shortly, which would give clarity to those who have paid NA tax and those who have not," the official added. In the meantime, housing societies remain divided in their approach. "We are aware that the tax has been scrapped, but without an official GR, we are hesitant to stop payment," said a senior committee member of a housing society in Kondhwa. "We have not received any directive from the state govt. Until the GR is issued, we cannot provide clear instructions to officials or societies," said a senior district administration official. The housing federation said that the issue affects thousands of housing societies and called on the govt to issue a resolution in this regard without any further delay. "This is a critical issue for middle-class homeowners. The longer the delay, the more confusion it will create. The govt must act swiftly," said Patwardhan. Pune: Nearly ten months after the state cabinet announced abolition of non-agricultural (NA) tax for urban housing societies, confusion prevails over it due to absence of a formal govt resolution (GR) in this regard. The managements of housing societies across the state said they are not sure whether they should continue paying the tax till official guidelines are issued in this regard. The state cabinet, under Eknath Shinde-led govt, had approved scrapping of the NA tax in October 2024, ahead of the state assembly elections. The move was aimed at providing relief to societies in urban areas like Pune and Mumbai, where residents have been paying both property tax and NA tax. Housing societies have now approached the state government to issue a formal GR in this respect. "We have informed the housing societies that the NA tax has been scrapped. However, many have received payment notices post-October. There is widespread confusion on the issue. We urge the govt to issue a GR in this regard immediately," said Suhas Patwardhan, chairperson, Maharashtra State Housing Federation. The NA tax, which dates back to the British era, is levied on properties situated on agricultural land within the municipal corporation or council limits, excluding those located in designated gaothan areas. The abolition was a long-standing demand of housing society federations. Despite the cabinet decision, lack of an official GR has left societies in a dilemma. Some have stopped paying tax based on the cabinet announcement, while others continue to pay to avoid potential penalties. Senior revenue department officials acknowledged the delay, attributing it to the timing of the assembly elections. "The law and judiciary department deferred the issue of GR last year, citing code of conduct during elections. Later, it was left to the new govt to issue the GR," a revenue department official told TOI. A senior official confirmed on Saturday that the GR is likely to be taken up in the next cabinet meeting and could be notified before August 15. "We understand the practical difficulties societies are facing. Clear directives will be issued through the GR shortly, which would give clarity to those who have paid NA tax and those who have not," the official added. In the meantime, housing societies remain divided in their approach. "We are aware that the tax has been scrapped, but without an official GR, we are hesitant to stop payment," said a senior committee member of a housing society in Kondhwa. "We have not received any directive from the state govt. Until the GR is issued, we cannot provide clear instructions to officials or societies," said a senior district administration official. The housing federation said that the issue affects thousands of housing societies and called on the govt to issue a resolution in this regard without any further delay. "This is a critical issue for middle-class homeowners. The longer the delay, the more confusion it will create. The govt must act swiftly," said Patwardhan.

No safety for girls in TN, claims AIADMK chief Palaniswami
No safety for girls in TN, claims AIADMK chief Palaniswami

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

No safety for girls in TN, claims AIADMK chief Palaniswami

Nagapattinam (Tamil Nadu), Jul 19 (PTI) AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami on Saturday claimed crimes against women were increasing in Tamil Nadu and that even young girls were not safe. He alleged that criminals were getting emboldened and flayed the ruling DMK for not ensuring safety for girls and women. Addressing a rally here as part of his statewide campaign to 'protect people, and redeem Tamil Nadu", Palaniswami said, 'the culprit who allegedly raped a ten-year-old girl in Gummidipoondi is yet to be arrested. Young girls, women and even elderly persons are not safe in the DMK rule." 'Do you want such a government to continue?" the former CM asked, and the crowd replied with a thunderous 'no". Speaking at Vedaranyam, famous for the salt sathyagraha against the British, Palaniswami said people were 'disillusioned' on all fronts with the present DMK regime and 'they are ready for another Satyagraha – this time against the DMK to vote out that party in next year's Assembly election." Earlier, Palaniswami, accompanied by party seniors, visited the Basilica of Our Lady of Health, also known as the Velankanni church, lit a candle and offered prayers. While addressing a roadshow in Nagapattinam, he paused for a few minutes from his campaign vehicle till the Muslims in the neighbourhood completed their evening prayers. PTI JSP KH First Published: July 19, 2025, 23:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Ceasefire order fails to halt fighting in Syria's Druze heartland
Ceasefire order fails to halt fighting in Syria's Druze heartland

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Ceasefire order fails to halt fighting in Syria's Druze heartland

Syrian Bedouin and their allies fought Druze fighters in the community's Sweida heartland for a seventh day on Saturday (July 19, 2025) despite a ceasefire ordered by the government following a U.S.-brokered deal to avert further Israeli military intervention. Clashes were reported in the west of the provincial capital as Druze fighters battled armed Bedouin supported by tribal gunmen from other parts of Syria. The Interior Ministry announced that internal security forces had begun deploying in Sweida province, and AFP correspondents saw them manning checkpoints trying to prevent more people from joining the fighting. Israel had bombed government forces in both Sweida and Damascus earlier this week to force their withdrawal after they were accused of summary executions and other abuses against Druze civilians during their brief deployment in the southern province. More than 900 people have been killed in Sweida since Sunday as sectarian clashes between the Druze and Bedouin drew in the Islamist-led government, Israel and armed tribes from other parts of Syria. Druze fighters said those who arrived to support the Bedouin were mostly Islamists. One armed tribesman, who identified himself only as Abu Jassem, told AFP that "we will slaughter them (the Druze) in their homes". U.S.-brokered deal The deal between the Islamist-government and Israel was announced by Washington early on Saturday Damascus time. U.S. pointman on Syria, Tom Barrack, said interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "have agreed to a ceasefire" negotiated by the United States. Mr. Barrack, who is U.S. ambassador to Ankara, said the deal had the backing of Turkey, a key supporter of Sharaa, as well as neighbouring Jordan. "We call upon Druze, Bedouins and Sunnis to put down their weapons and together with other minorities build a new and united Syrian identity in peace and prosperity with its neighbours," he wrote on X. The U.S. administration, which has sided with Turkey and Saudi Arabia in forging ties with the Islamist president despite his past links with Al-Qaeda, was critical of its Israeli ally's air strikes on Syria earlier this week and had sought a way out for his government. Sharaa followed up on the U.S. announcement with a televised speech on Saturday in which he renewed his pledge to protect Syria's ethnic and religious minorities. "The Syrian state is committed to protecting all minorities and communities in the country... We condemn all crimes committed" in Sweida, he said. The president paid tribute to the "important role played by the United States, which again showed its support for Syria in these difficult circumstances and its concern for the country's stability". The European Union welcomed the deal between Syria and Israel, saying it had been "appalled" by the deadly sectarian violence of recent days. But Israel expressed deep scepticism about Sharaa's renewed pledge to protect minorities, pointing to deadly violence against Alawites as well as Druze since he led the overthrow of longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December. In Sharaa's Syria "it is very dangerous to be a member of a minority -- Kurd, Druze, Alawite or Christian", Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store