City to identify ‘drop' hazards at Britannia Beach following safety audit
A lifeguard works at Britannia Beach in Ottawa, on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang
The City of Ottawa is implementing changes to the swimming area at Britannia Beach following an audit conducted to reduce the risk of drowning or injuries.
The Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario recommended the 'lifesaving audit' at city beaches last year after three people drowned at Britannia Beach between 2020 and 2023 from standing or wading close to a 'drop off' area where water depth drops from two feet to 10 feet.
In July 2024, a 9-year-old boy died after being found unresponsive in the Ottawa River at the popular west end beach.
In a memo to the mayor and councillors Monday afternoon, the city's general manager of recreation, cultural and facility services Dan Chenier says several changes have been made to better define the beach's swimming area and to improve markings at drop off points.
The modifications include installing swimming buoy lines at least 300 millimetres from the start of the dredged swimming area and marking the sloped areas with a lane rope.
Anchored cautionary buoys will also be changed to an orange/yellow colour instead of white to enhance visibility. Larger sized buoys will be used to replace the buoy line rope used in prior years, Chenier writes.
Britannia Beach
A map showing the new buoy line indicating drop off points at the Britannia Beach swimming area. (City of Ottawa/Provided)
The city engaged Stantec Consulting Ltd. to review, assess and recommend measures to address river bottom variations and sandbars in proximity to the swimming area.
'Stantec has provided the City with four options for the modification of the beach and adjacent areas. The recommended option is to reduce underwater slopes combined with the filling of the deeper zones within and near the buoyed swim area,' the memo says.
The bottom of the Ottawa River changes through the season due to the spring freshet, currents, wind and rain, leading to naturally occurring and shifting sandbars at Britannia. The city says conditions will be reviewed regularly by staff and will adjust buoy lines if needed.
Residents are encouraged to only swim within designated swimming areas.
The lifesaving audit was conducted on Aug. 7-8 of last year at Britannia, Mooney's Bay and Petrie Island beaches. Westboro Beach was not included as it had been closed since 2022.
'Overall, the City was found to provide a reasonable standard of care,' Chenier says.
Some of the other changes this season include a new flag and signage system at all city beaches to better indicate lifeguard supervised zones and swimming areas.
Red over Yellow flags – indicate the designated supervised swimming area
Green flag – Lifeguards are supervising the designated swimming area
Red flag – Lifeguards are not supervising the designated swimming area
The Coroner had also recommended the City of Ottawa consider staffing lifeguards 'during daylight hours' and to conduct annual lifesavings audits at the start of every season.
The buoy line at Petrie Island (Centre East Beach) was adjusted last year to contour the river bottom inside the drop off area.
City beaches will open for supervised swimming daily from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. June 21 to Aug. 24.
Lifejacket loaner program
Lifejackets will be available for use at all city beaches starting this season.
Approximately 25 Transport Canada approved lifejackets in child, youth and adult sizes will be on hand during supervised lifeguard hours of operation at each beach until the end of the season.
The city says the service will be positioned in a 'prominent location' at each site with staff available to provide advice on proper fitting and adjustments along with water safety tips.
Residents can also donate any new Transport Canada approved lifejacket or Personal Floatation Device (PFD), which will be inspected before they are added to the on-site inventory.
The service will be free of charge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
13 minutes ago
- CTV News
Daily Dish: hidden gem in Vanier
Ottawa Watch Your newest hidden gem in the heart of Vanier; Anina's cafe is serving up breakfast food and coffee.
National Post
14 minutes ago
- National Post
128-year-old shipwreck on Vancouver Island charred by fire
A shipwreck that has been part of Vancouver Island's history for more than a century is a charred skeleton after a fire this month. Article content Photographer Geoff Johnson said he went to look after hearing of the fire at the wreck that has been sitting on Big Beach in Ucluelet for almost 130 years. Article content 'It was really dramatic,' recalled Johnson in an interview, adding that the wooden wreckage seemed to be 'more corpse-like now than it was before.' Article content Article content Ucluelet fire chief Rick Geddes said crews attended the fire in the early morning of June 10, and that the cause of the blaze is being investigated. Article content Article content The shipwreck suffered 'significant damage' from the fire, although it's still very much intact, Geddes said. Article content 'It's not uncommon for us to get called to beach fires that have been abandoned overnight,' said Geddes, 'But it was somewhat uncommon for us to attend and have an issue with actual wreckage of this ship that's been on the beach for 100 plus years.' Article content The history of the vessel, where it sailed from, and how it was stranded, has been lost. Article content An information plaque set up next to the wreck says it's believe the ship was swept ashore by storms in 1896. Article content The plaque says the ship was probably built somewhere on the northwest coast of the Americas in the mid- to late 1800s, based on its Douglas fir timber, wooden pegs and iron 'drift-pin' fastenings. Article content There's no name, no destination and no hint if it was intentionally grounded and disassembled to build houses, or if it was a victim of a storm, Johnson said about the history of the vessel, which is just a block from his home. Article content Article content 'So, that's part of the interesting story, is that anybody you know can make up what they think the story that shipwreck was about, and it makes it a little bit more of a romantic thing to sit there and look at and think about.' Article content Article content Johnson said he's grown to love the beachside artifact and it was 'gut-wrenching' to see in burned. Article content He would use it as a seat to take sunset photos, and sitting there felt like hanging out with a 'friend who had just been in a bad accident,' he said.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Despite housing crisis, Ontario's social assistance rates favour people living alone
While moving in with a romantic partner seems like a go-to next step for some long-term couples, the decision is not so straightforward when one or both people are on social assistance, a recent study shows. Government programs meant to financially support people, such as Ontario Works (OW) and the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP), tend to benefit single people more than couples, according to research from a former government benefit designer. "Usually if two people move in together, they save money because they save their shelter costs, whereas for people who are on assistance, the opposite happens and they're actually worse off when they lived together," said John Stapleton, who worked for the Ontario government for more than 20 years and is now a consultant at Open Policy. "What recipients often find is that it's economically better for them to stay apart," he said. "The programs are designed to produce a sort of legislative loneliness." Stapleton's study, which is based on real-life conversations he had with Ontario couples considering moving together, found that in some situations, partners would make about 20 per cent less than they did living alone. In one example, two residents receiving OW each got $733 a month, which totalled $1,466. However, if they lived together as a couple, Stapleton said, their earnings would go down to a total of $1,136. Even with a reduced rent split among the two of them, the couple would have less money available than when they lived separately, the study showed. In London, there are 10,800 people receiving Ontario Works, according to City of London data collected at the end of 2024. More than 7,000 of them are single and another nearly 2,500 are single with dependents. About 1,200 of them are couples or couples with dependents. "Obviously a lot of them are single people who are single, but then there's going to be people who are in couple relationships who have made the decision not to live together," Stapleton said. CBC News reached out to the Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services for comment and will update the story with the response. Balancing the budget Londoner Diane Devine has been living alone for three years now, using money from ODSP and the Canada-Ontario Housing Benefit (COHB) to pay her rent. She said she knows of others who could not make ends meet living together. She lived with a partner for six years, and while the decision to live alone was not based on cost, she did say in her case, the amount of savings that one might expect from living with a partner is not much different from what she pays now as a single person. "Just because you're living with somebody doesn't mean your cost of living goes down," she said. "Each individual still has the same amount of living expenses." Changes to cost of living Nicole Davis, a community advocate at LifeSpin in London, said the topic comes up in her line of work. "The system is essentially penalizing people for being in relationships," she said. "It kind of forces individuals to choose between financial stability and pursuing a supportive relationship, so it almost [discourages] cohabitation with each other." Stapleton said he understands why welfare programs were originally designed so that people living together would not receive as much financial assistance, but times have changed. "Now we're in a housing crisis and we've got a bunch of fairly poor people who are staying in their own apartments because they're better off to do that than actually move in together," he said. "People are occupying deeply affordable housing on their own when they'd really rather be together, and of course the landlord or the rooming house operator would love to have that unit freed up so they could run it to another person." Davis agreed, adding that it is already a challenge for many Londoners to find available units. "Right now, I feel like programs operate on outdated assumptions that don't really reflect the realities of poverty, disabilities and the high cost of living especially in a city like London," Davis said. Stapleton said with new realities comes a need for new policies. These include raising social assistance rates for couples, allowing them to pool any earning exemptions and letting new couples continue with the rules relating to singles during their first year living together. Until then, Stapleton said, couples are not incentivised to become a unit.
