‘No legal basis': Amidst India-US trade deal talks, America says India has no grounds for retaliatory tariffs at WTO; here's what the issue is about
The US has told the World Trade Organization (WTO) that India has no 'legal basis' to hit out at American tariffs on automobiles, steel and aluminium with retaliatory tariffs. Amidst India-US trade deal talks, the two countries continue to spar over tariffs at the WTO.
The US response follows India's statement that American safeguard measures on steel and aluminium would impact Indian exports worth $7.6 billion to the US, resulting in duty collections of $3.82 billion. Additionally, India has said that these measures would affect automobile product imports valued at $2.89 billion, leading to duty collections amounting to $723.75 million.
The Donald Trump administration has informed the WTO that India lacks legitimate grounds to suggest retaliatory tariffs against American duties on steel, aluminium and automobiles under the guise of safeguard measures, according to an ET report.
Also Read |
Russia oil squeeze: Trump's 100% tariff threat - should India panic?
India-US WTO tussle: What's the problem?
The issue dates back a few years when the United States implemented protective measures on specific steel and aluminium items on March 8, 2018, by levying 25% and 10% ad valorem duties respectively, which became operational from March 23 that year.
Subsequently, on February 10, 2025, the US modified these protective measures on steel and aluminium imports, implementing them from March 12.
Additionally, the United States enforced a 25% ad valorem duty increase on imports of passenger vehicles, light trucks and particular automobile components originating from India.
The regulation concerning automobile components became effective from May 3 and was done so without a specified end date.
The United States defended its tariffs, asserting they were essential and protected under national security provisions as a crucial security exemption. The US maintained that India's suggestion to suspend concessions or other obligations regarding these measures lacked any legal foundation, according to the financial daily's report.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: India wants Donald Trump administration to offer tariff rate lower than Indonesia; eyes competitive advantage
India-US Trade Deal 'Nears'
These matters are under discussion at the World Trade Organization whilst both nations simultaneously engage in negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). Indian commerce representatives are currently in Washington, participating in the fifth round of India-US BTA discussions.
US President Donald Trump has indicated several times in the last few days that the US is close to finalising a trade with India. Reports suggest that America is offering tariff rates less than 20% to India.
The sticky issues of agriculture and dairy products are likely to be left out of the interim trade deal that is expected to be announced ahead of Trump's August 1 tariff deadline.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: India receptive to imports of GM farm products used in animal feed? Mini deal in works as Trump deadline nears
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Crypto sector breaches $4 trillion in market value during pivotal week
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The crypto sector's market value hit $4 trillion on Friday, according to CoinGecko, marking a milestone that reflects its shift from a nascent asset class to a central part of the global investment landscape.A wave of renewed optimism, regulatory clarity in key markets and rising institutional flows have catapulted the crypto sector to a new valuation U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on Thursday to create a regulatory framework for U.S.-dollar-pegged cryptocurrency tokens, known as stablecoins, sending the bill to President Donald Trump , who is expected to sign it into law."The arrival of the Trump legislation signaled an about-turn in attitudes towards the crypto industry, but legislators are still exercising some caution," said Derren Nathan, head of equity research, Hargreaves lawmakers also passed two other crypto bills, sending them next to the Senate for consideration. One lays out a regulatory framework for crypto, while the other seeks to ban the U.S. from issuing a central bank digital $4 trillion milestone underscores how far the crypto industry has come from its speculative, fringe origins. With growing interest from asset managers, new exchange-traded products and broader adoption among retail and corporate users, digital assets are increasingly shaping conversations in global a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a constant value, usually a 1:1 dollar peg, are commonly used by crypto traders to move funds between tokens. Their use has grown rapidly in recent years, and proponents say they could be used to send payments instantly."The Genius Act will go down in history as a law that served as a foundational step in mainstreaming of crypto as an asset class," said Chris Perkins, president, treasury allocations to bitcoin are also gaining pace, with a growing number of public companies adding the token to their balance sheets as a long-term store of sector was last trading at a combined market value of $3.92 trillion, as bitcoin - the world's largest cryptocurrency - fell 1.8%.Bitcoin crossed the $120,000 mark earlier this week, setting a record. Brokerage Bernstein forecast it could climb to $200,000 by the second-biggest crypto token, was last up 4.5%. It has more than doubled over the past three crypto rally also powered gains in linked equities, with Coinbase and Robinhood climbing to all-time highs on Friday. Shares of the crypto exchange were last up 1%, while the retail trading platform, which also supports crypto trades, gained 3%.Ether-focused stocks also saw broad gains.
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump aides discussed ending some SpaceX contracts, but found most were vital
Elon Musk joined President Trump in the Oval Office in May as his role at the Department of Government Efficiency drew to a close. For the U.S. government, breaking up with Elon Musk is easier said than done. Just days after President Trump in early June raised the prospect of cutting ties with Musk's businesses, the Trump administration initiated a review of SpaceX's contracts with the federal government, according to people familiar with the matter. The review was intended to identify potential waste in the multibillion-dollar agreements the company has with the government, the people said. But administration officials determined that they couldn't eliminate most of those contracts because they are critical to the Defense Department and NASA, the people said. The early assessment underscored the company's dominance as the world's pre-eminent rocket launcher and a major satellite-internet provider. A White House official said the review of government contracts focused on a range of companies with lucrative government contracts. Musk and SpaceX didn't respond to requests for comment. Musk was once one of Trump's closest advisers, overseeing the cost-cutting effort known as the Department of Government Efficiency. But the relationship between the two men ruptured after the billionaire publicly criticized Trump's signature tax-and-spending bill. On June 5, as Musk's social-media attacks turned personal, Trump posted on Truth Social that the easiest way to save federal dollars was to 'terminate" the government contracts for Musk's companies. Days later, a senior General Services Administration official asked the Defense Department to fill out a spreadsheet with all of its current SpaceX contracts and other transaction agreements, according to an email described to The Wall Street Journal. The June 9 email was sent by Josh Gruenbaum, the GSA's commissioner for the Federal Acquisition Service. In the email, Gruenbaum said he planned to share the data with the White House. Gruenbaum also made similar requests for information about SpaceX contracts to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and nearly half a dozen other federal agencies, according to an administration official. The spreadsheets, which are known as 'scorecards," included the value of the SpaceX contracts and whether a competitor could do the same job more effectively, this official said. Instead of terminating SpaceX contracts after reviewing the data, White House and agency officials, including those at the Pentagon, determined that most of the deals were vital to the missions of the Defense Department and NASA, according to some of the people familiar with the matter. One of the people said some SpaceX contracts could face continued scrutiny. SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell met with White House officials in recent weeks as the review was ongoing, people familiar with the matter said. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk gave Donald Trump, then the president-elect, a tour of the company's Starbase facility in Texas before a launch last November. In struggling to find ways to reduce the government's dependence on SpaceX, the Trump administration highlighted how much agencies rely on the company's sophisticated technology. At least for now, the government has limited alternatives for many rocket launches and low-Earth-orbit satellite services, a situation that continues to give SpaceX—and Musk himself—an outsize role in space. The government has been aware of this dynamic for years, and the Trump administration's review is the latest sign that policymakers are wrestling with the situation. SpaceX's dominance has also sparked frustration among industry rivals. Government officials have expanded agencies' work with SpaceX because of the company's technology and prices. They have also pushed other space companies to step up and designed some contracts to stoke competition. Many rivals still have hurdles to overcome as they develop their own space vehicles and satellites, and race to get them into service. Several companies have faced delays and technical challenges as they worked on products that would compete with SpaceX. Setbacks are common as engineers try to mature complex hardware designed for space, and Musk's company has faced its own problems of late with a new vehicle. SpaceX executives have said the company believes strongly in competition, and its rockets often launch rivals' satellites to space. At an investor event in November, Shotwell said that the company has earned its contracts with the government by offering the best prices and executing. This year, the company has won more government contracts and continued working on major missions following the spat between the president and Musk. In April, SpaceX was awarded the most money and launches under a closely watched Pentagon contract, winning 28 national-security flights in a new deal valued at $5.9 billion. It launched an upgraded GPS satellite for the Space Force in May. NASA is planning to have SpaceX fly a new crew to the International Space Station at the end of this month. The company's Falcon rockets, which rely on reusable boosters, have emerged as workhorses for government space missions. SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft is the only U.S. vehicle certified to fly people to and from the space station. Musk's threat—later walked back—to decommission Crew Dragon during his feud with Trump last month sparked worry inside NASA, the Journal previously reported. The agency has long wanted to have two different options for astronaut space-station missions. SpaceX also has a growing business providing high-speed internet to government agencies through its Starlink satellite fleet. A SpaceX division called Starshield provides several national-security satellite capabilities, and secured a major classified deal a few years ago from the intelligence agency that operates U.S. spy satellites. Write to Brian Schwartz at Shalini Ramachandran at and Micah Maidenberg at
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he has ordered the revocation of American visas of eight Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro read more US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly stripped American visas of Brazil's eight Supreme Court judges in a show of support for the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian leader with strong ties with US President Donald Trump is on trial for allegedly masterminding a murderous plot to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Brazil's current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro is expected to be convicted by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the coming weeks and might face a jail sentence of up to 43 years. As the day of sentencing nears, Trump has been increasing pressure on Brazil to help out his 'friend'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In light of this, Trump announced on July 9 that he would impose 50% tariffs on all Brazilian imports as of August 1. The threat triggered nationalist sentiments in Brazil, with Lula threatening reciprocal tariffs. The Brazilian president went on to describe Trump's move as 'unacceptable blackmail'. Who got their visa stripped? On Friday, Brazil's federal police raided Bolsonaro's house and ordered him to wear an ankle tag in a bid to stop him from absconding. Soon after that, Rubio announced further moves in support of the former Brazilian president, who claimed that the case against him is a 'political witch hunt'. Rubio announced the move in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He said that he had ordered visa revocations for the judge leading the investigation into Bolsonaro, Alexandre de Moraes, as well as 'his allies on the court' and their family members. .@POTUS made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) July 18, 2025 While the secretary of state did not mention the names of other judges, Brazilian newspaper Globo identified them as Luís Roberto Barroso, José Antonio Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flávio Dino, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, Luiz Edson Fachin and Gilmar Ferreira Mendes. Interestingly, two other judges who were nominated to the court during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 presidency, André Mendonça and Kassio Nunes Marques, reportedly avoided the sanction along with a third judge, Luiz Fux. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lula hits back Meanwhile, the Brazilian president denounced what he described as 'another arbitrary and completely groundless measure from the US government'. 'Interference in another country's justice system is unacceptable and offends the basic principles of national sovereignty and respect between nations,' the president said on Saturday, adding: 'I'm certain that no kind of intimidation or threat – from whoever it may be – will compromise the most important mission of our nation's powers and institutions, which is to act permanently to defend and safeguard the democratic rule of law.' Meanwhile, Trump's Alex Bruesewitz welcomed Rubio's announcement, describing Bolsonaro's treatment in the country as 'sick and wrong'. Bolsonaro's son, Eduardo, went on to thank Rubio for his decision. 'Thank you very much for this fight in favour of free speech, we do believe in the same values,' tweeted Eduardo, who has been living in the US since February and has reportedly been lobbying officials there over his father's plight," Eduardo said in the post.
