logo
PBS chief: Funding cuts will be ‘devastating' for rural areas

PBS chief: Funding cuts will be ‘devastating' for rural areas

The Hill3 days ago
PBS CEO and President Paula Kerger said funding cuts to the outlet, expected to pass the House on Thursday, will be 'devastating' for rural areas.
'The Senate just approved a rescissions package that goes against the will of the American people, the vast majority of whom trust PBS and believe we provide excellent value to their communities,' Kerger said in a statement provided to The Hill on Thursday. 'These cuts will significantly impact all of our stations, but will be especially devastating to smaller stations and those serving large rural areas.
Kerger also said most PBS stations, 'which provide access to free unique local programming and emergency alerts, will now be forced to make hard decisions in the weeks and months ahead.
'There is nothing more American than PBS. Despite today's setback, we are determined to keep fighting to preserve the essential services we provide to the American public,' she added.
Overnight into Thursday, the Senate voted to claw back $9 billion in federal funding for worldwide aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which oversees PBS and NPR, sending the package asked for by President Trump to the House for a final vote.
Last week, Trump threatened to withhold his backing for any Republican who opposed the package.
'It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together,' Trump said on July 10. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims
NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims

New York Post

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NY Dem stronghold padded voter rolls with dead people, locals born in the 19th Century, new lawsuit claims

The voter rolls in the heavily Democratic city of Mount Vernon are so shady that they include dead residents and locals who were born as early as 1897, a scathing new lawsuit claims. In just over a year, the number of voters in the small Westchester County city spiked by 30%, with the increase heavily favoring the Democratic majority, City Council candidate Bill Schwartz alleged in the shocking complaint filed against county election officials last week. 'This lawsuit is about more than messy records,' Schwartz, who lost a party primary bid last month, told The Post. 'When the voter rolls are that sloppy and no one at the Board of Elections is answering questions you start to wonder what else is slipping through the cracks — or being pushed through them. Advertisement 5 Bill Schwartz, who lost a Democratic primary bid last month, says there's something fishy in Mount Vernon voter rolls. Facebook/Bill Schwartz for City Council 'I'm asking the court to step in and make sure the November election and future elections are conducted fairly, transparently and by the book,' he said. The lawsuit, filed July 15 in Supreme Court in White Plains, names the Westchester County Board of Elections and its two commissioners, Republican Doug Colety and Democrat Tajian Nelson. Advertisement Nelson could not be reached for comment, but Colety told The Post that the board couldn't comment as it had not officially been served with Scwhartz's complaint. According to Schwartz, the Democrats control the suburban city of about 80,000 residents, traditionally a powerful voting bloc that holds great political influence in the county. 5 The Westchester County city of Mount Vernon has been a powerful Democratic voting block with tons of political clout. Robert Kalfus 5 A new lawsuit claims Mount Vernon voter rolls spiked by 30% in just over a year, including with dead voters listed. Michael Nagle Advertisement Nelson, a Mount Vernon resident, not only holds the election commissioner post, but is also recording secretary for the city's Democratic committee. Her mentor, the late Reginald LaFayette, not only held the commissioner's post for years, but also served as the county and Mount Vernon party chair. Schwartz maintains party bigwigs also call the shots in the city — and not on the up-and-up. He compared voter records from last year and from June of this year and found there had been more than 10,000 new voter IDs in 13 months — a whopping number in a city with just over 41,000 voters. Last year, county board records listed 34,386 unique voter IDs, with 25,900 registered Democrats, 2,167 registered Republicans and the rest either independent or listing other parties. Advertisement 5 Bill Schwartz said he's notified the Westchester County Board of Elections of voter concerns but was ignored. Facebook/Bill Schwartz for City Council The lawsuit said this year there were now 44,021 unique voter IDs, with 31,311 registered as Democrats and just 2,821 Republicans, with the rest independent or registered to minor political parties. Schwartz also said the records were 'deeply problematic,' with the oldest voter listing a birthdate of Oct. 13, 1897, and the earliest registration date listed as Oct. 12, 1927, he said. Some 2025 voters hadn't cast a ballot in over 10 years, while others had their birthdates, addresses and party affiliation changed on the records, the lawsuit claimed. Schwartz cited two city residents now registered to vote — John Gallagher and Gregory Bonaparte — 'who are, in fact, deceased and have been for many years,' the suit said. Another 'active' voter on the Mount Vernon rolls moved to Virginia 12 years ago, another died more than 15 years ago, and yet another died in 2002, according to the lawsuit. 5 The oldest voter on the Mount Vernon rolls was born in 1897, and several others have long since died or moved away. Michael Nagle Advertisement However, Schwartz said the elections board refused to fix the records when the fraud was reported. 'This isn't just about party politics,' he said. 'It's about fairness. If we want people to have faith in our elections, then the rules need to apply to everyone, no matter how connected they are. 'Right now I don't think that's happening,' he added. 'I'm dong what I can to change it.'

Thune warns Schumer may let govt shut down as ‘struggling' Dems scramble to appease far-left
Thune warns Schumer may let govt shut down as ‘struggling' Dems scramble to appease far-left

New York Post

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Thune warns Schumer may let govt shut down as ‘struggling' Dems scramble to appease far-left

Senate Majority Leader John Thune warned that Congress may be careening towards a partial government shutdown this fall because of pressure from the far-left flank of the Democratic Party. Thune (R-SD) observed that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has faced intense pressure from his base and mused that a few upcoming votes will provide more clarity about the risks of a partial shutdown. 'I think he [Schumer] probably thinks that it's beneficial to their political base, the far left of the Democrat Party, and you can kind of see what's happening up there in New York politics,' Thune told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' In March, Schumer faced fierce progressive backlash after he declined to block a GOP-backed spending patch to avert a partial government shutdown. The blowback was so pronounced that Schumer was forced to reschedule parts of his book tour as progressives demanded Democrats in Congress put up more of a fight against President Trump. 3 Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated that a few upcoming votes on appropriations bills will help determine the likelihood of a government shutdown. Getty Images 3 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced progressive backlash when he moved to avert a partial government shutdown in March. AP Government shutdown showdowns are one of the few instances in which Democrats have leverage with the Trump administration, given that they are the minority party in both the House and the Senate. Every new fiscal year, which starts on Oct. 1, Congress is required to fund the government via 12 appropriations bills or through a continuing resolution in order to avoid a shutdown. Both avenues are subject to the Senate fillibuster, which requires 60 votes to overcome. Republicans only have 53, which means they need cooperation from Democrats. At the moment, Congress has funded the government via a continuing resolution, which essentially means that it is running on autopilot until the fall. 'This is a party struggling for an identity. This is a party that's completely out of step with the mainstream of this country,' Thune added. 'We're going to be waiting to see anxiously what Chuck Schumer and other leaders on the Democrat side decide to do.' Earlier this month, Schumer railed against Republicans for advancing a rescissions package, which allows them to cancel previously approved spending without support from Democrats. Schumer argued that such a move jeopardizes negotiations over the government shutdown showdown. 'We are doing everything we can to keep the bipartisan appropriations process going,' Schumer told reporters earlier this month. 'And they're undermining it with rescissions, with pocket rescissions, with impoundment and every other way.' The implication from Schumer is that Democrats can't trust Republicans to stick to the terms of a bipartisan appropriations deal because they've shown a willingness to bypass them via rescissions and presidential impoundment, when Trump decides not to spend certain authorized funds. On the Republican side, GOP leaders, particularly in the House, have long struggled to get fiscal hawks on board with either a continuing resolution or the 12 appropriations bills. There's been a strong push from the right flank for deeper cuts to spending, something that is a dealbreaker for Democrats. 3 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hasn't said what her 2028 intentions are yet. LP Media Schumer also has to navigate dicey progressive politics. The Democratic establishment was upended last month when Zohran Mamdani bested former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. The top Senate Democrat is up for reelection in 2028 and hasn't said whether or not he will run amid the threat of a challenge from 'Squad' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). 'Ultimately, keeping the government funded is good for the country, and hopefully we will have bipartisan cooperation to do that,' Thune added. 'If their recent track record is any indication, they're under a tremendous amount of pressure from that far left wing of the Democrat Party to shut the government down.' The last partial government shutdown, which lasted 35 days, took place between late 2018 and early 2019 due to a feud between Trump and Democrats over border wall funding.

House Democrat: Trump ‘made an enormous mistake' by putting blame of war on Ukraine
House Democrat: Trump ‘made an enormous mistake' by putting blame of war on Ukraine

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House Democrat: Trump ‘made an enormous mistake' by putting blame of war on Ukraine

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said Sunday that President Trump 'made an enormous mistake' in blaming the Russia-Ukraine war on the Ukrainians. 'I think the Trump administration made an enormous mistake during the campaign and then from the election forward by putting the blame on Ukraine for the war,' Smith told anchor Shannon Bream on 'Fox News Sunday.' 'It seems that President Trump honestly thought that it was Ukraine that was forcing forward the conflict.' 'And if he just talked to Zelensky and put pressure on Zelensky, then everything would be fine, which nobody who was paying any attention to the situation would have agreed with. Putin has been driving this conflict,' Smith added. Ever since his return to office a few months ago, the president and his administration have pushed for an end to the war in Ukraine, without much success. In February, President Trump seemingly blamed Ukraine's leaders for the war with Russia, stating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky 'should have never started it.' Russia began a full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago, after massing troops on the border and pushing for a ban on Ukraine ever becoming a part of the NATO alliance. Last week, Trump said that the U.S. would be sending Patriot air defense munitions to Ukraine, restating his dissatisfaction with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump would not say how many Patriot systems or missiles would go to Ukraine, but stated the U.S. would not be paying for the munitions. 'I haven't agreed on the number yet, but they're going to have some, because they do need protection — but the European Union is paying for it. We're not paying anything for it, but we will send it,' Trump told reporters last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store