A young VC closed a $10 million fund for AI seed startups. Here's what he's looking for and the pitch deck he used.
AI advancements will be "bigger than both mobile and web combined," Awrabi said, in part because "the average person's productivity will be increased 50% to 75% in the coming years."
Awrabi's AI Fund I will operate within his VC firm, Banyan Ventures, named for the tree whose prop roots enable it to spread. The fund specializes in AI infrastructure and software startups that have had the technology at their core since inception.
On the infrastructure front, Awrabi said startups working to reduce AI costs — from inference chips to cooling technology — have a massive opportunity.
" Nvidia is already worth $4 trillion, and we're still in the early days," he said. "Imagine what the new winners across the AI-native infra stack could be worth 30 years from now?"
On the app front, Awrabi seeks startups with "unique data access" and "high-leverage workflows" that could standardize how work gets done in a particular field.
To date, Banyan has invested in 14 companies, including AI inference chip company Positron, GPU server cooling startup Akash, and Italian AI legal assistant Lexroom.
It will invest in 36 startups in seed and pre-seed stages, most of which have already achieved revenue, and will cut checks ranging from $200,000 to $425,000.
Awrabi serves as the fund's only general partner, and he's entering a fiercely competitive AI landscape. Large VC firms dominate funding, though he believes Banyan's specialization in AI gives it a unique edge.
It's also increasingly hard to get in on seed rounds, Awrabi said, because AI startups generally require less funding, are generating more revenue, and are moving to Series A rounds more rapidly.
Having worked in AI technical sales since 2018 at Samsung-owned MissingLink.ai and then at Comet and as an advisor to various AI startups, Awrabi said his long relationships in the field provide a window into prospective deals and talent looking for fresh opportunities.
Here's a look at the pitch deck Awrabi used to raise $10 million for Banyan Ventures' AI Fund I. Some slides and details have been redacted in order to share the deck publicly.
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Banyan Ventures
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
9 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Giving China Chips Derails Trump Decoupling
Supporters of Nvidia's Jensen Huang such as Aaron Ginn insist that selling Nvidia H20 AI chips to China will make Beijing reliant on Washington for this century's most critical technologies ('Don't Surrender China's AI Market,' op-ed, July 18). They ignore decades of reality: in telecommunications, self-driving cars, cranes, and semiconductors, U.S. companies have accused Chinese firms of stealing their technology. These firms then sell the allegedly stolen tech abroad at below-market prices. This pattern, repeated in multiple industries over decades, has trapped America in a dependency on the Chinese Communist Party for some of the 21st century's most critical technologies. The Trump administration is rightfully enacting policies to break Chinese leverage over the U.S. Especially notable was the Pentagon's recent investment in MP Materials to support America's only active rare earth mineral mine that sells to the commercial market. It is an early but critical step toward eliminating Beijing's control of elements on which civilian and military technology rely. This strategic challenge didn't develop overnight. It is the product of decades of economic engagement with China, informed by the belief that trade would reform Beijing and reinforced by U.S. companies that cared more about accessing China's market than the risks of equipping the People's Liberation Army.
New York Times
9 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Hostility in Washington Raises Shutdown Worries
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, left, and Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, second from right, meeting with Chinese officials in Geneva in May. In recent years, one of China's biggest requests of American officials has been that the United States relax its strict controls on advanced artificial intelligence chips, measures that were put in place to slow Beijing's technological and military gains. Last week, the Trump administration did just that, as it allowed the world's leader in A.I. chips, the U.S.-based Nvidia, to begin selling a lower-level but still coveted chip known as H20 to China. The move was a dramatic reversal from three months ago, when President Trump himself banned China from accessing the H20, while also imposing triple-digit tariffs on Beijing. That set off an economically perilous trade clash, as China retaliated by clamping down on exports of minerals and magnets that are critical to American factories, including automakers and defense manufacturers. China's decision to cut off access to those materials upended the dynamic between the world's largest economies. The Trump administration, which came into office determined to bully China into changing its trade behavior with punishing tariffs, appeared to realize the perils of that approach. Now, the administration has resorted to trying to woo China instead. Officials throughout the government say the Trump administration is putting more aggressive actions on China on hold, while pushing forward with moves that the Chinese will perceive positively. That includes the reversal on the H20 chip. The H20 decision was primarily motivated by top Trump officials who agreed with Nvidia's arguments that selling the chip would be better for American technology leadership than withholding it, people familiar with the move say. But Trump officials have also claimed that it was part of the trade talks. After telling Congress in June that there was 'no quid pro quo in terms of chips for rare earths,' Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, reversed those comments on July 15, saying that the H20 move was 'all part of a mosaic' of talks with China. 'They had things we wanted, we had things they wanted, and we're in a very good place,' he said. Image A chip from Nvidia. The company's chief executive, Jensen Huang, has gone on a lobbying blitz in Washington, pushing politicians to open China for A.I. chip sales. Credit... Mike Kai Chen for The New York Times A Chinese Ministry of Commerce official seemed to reject that on Friday, saying that the United States had 'taken the initiative' to approve the H20 sales. China believes the U.S. should continue to remove its trade and economic restrictions, the official said. A person familiar with the talks, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that the H20 chip was not specifically discussed in meetings between Chinese and American officials in Geneva and London this spring. But the reversal was part of a more recent cadence of warmer actions the United States and China have taken toward each other. For instance, Beijing agreed in recent weeks to block the export of several chemicals used to make fentanyl, an issue Mr. Trump has been concerned about. Recent events have underscored the influence that China has over the U.S. economy. When Mr. Trump raised tariffs on Chinese exports in April, some top Trump officials thought Beijing would quickly fold, given its recent economic weakness. Instead, Beijing called Mr. Trump's bluff by restricting rare earths needed by American makers of cars, military equipment, medical devices and electronics. As the flow of those materials stopped, Mr. Trump and other officials began receiving calls from chief executives saying their factories would soon shut down. Ford, Suzuki and other companies shuttered factories because of the lack of supply. Mr. Trump and his top advisers were surprised by the threat that Beijing's countermove posed, people familiar with the matter say. That brought the United States back to the negotiating table this spring to strike a fragile trade truce, which Trump officials are now wary of upsetting. That agreement dropped tariffs from a minimum 145 percent to 30 percent, with the Chinese agreeing to allow rare earths to flow as freely as before. The administration's caution when it comes to China has been amplified by Mr. Trump's desire for an invitation to Beijing later this year. The president, who has been feted on other foreign trips, wants to engage in face-to-face trade negotiations with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, has begun recruiting chief executives for a potential delegation, setting off a competition over who will get to ride in Air Force One, according to people familiar with the plans. Craig Allen, a retired diplomat, said both countries were 'clearly preparing for a summit meeting,' adding, 'that's bringing forth measures that the other side wants and it's also holding back measures that the other side doesn't want.' 'It's like a dance,' Mr. Allen said. 'One side makes a move, the other side makes a move to correspond to that.' The Commerce Department declined to comment. The White House, the Treasury Department and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment. 'The government understands that forcing the world to use foreign competition would only hurt America's economic and national security,' John Rizzo, a spokesman for Nvidia, said. A Chinese bargaining chip Opposition to China has fueled bipartisan action for the last decade. Now, Mr. Trump's more hawkish supporters are quietly watching as the president remakes the party's China strategy. Though few are willing to speak out publicly, officials in the Trump administration and in Congress have privately expressed concern that the trade war has given China an opening to finally bring U.S. technology controls onto the negotiating table. Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, said the fact that the United States was now negotiating over what were supposed to be security restrictions was 'a significant accomplishment for the Chinese.' 'They've been after this for decades, and now they've succeeded,' he said. 'I assume the Chinese are going to demand more concessions on export controls in return for whatever we want next.' Mr. Trump was the first to harness the power of U.S. export controls, by targeting Chinese tech giant Huawei and putting global restrictions on American technology in his first term. But the Biden administration expanded those rules. Concerned that China's growing A.I. capacity would advance its military, Biden officials cracked down on exports of Nvidia chips, seeing them as the most effective choke point over Chinese A.I. capabilities. Image President Trump and Mr. Huang at the White House in April. Mr. Huang argues that blocking U.S. technology from China has created more urgency for China to develop its own technology. Credit... Pete Marovich for The New York Times Since then, when Chinese officials raised their objections to U.S. technology controls in meetings, U.S. officials had responded by insisting that the measures were national security matters and not up for debate. But in the meeting in Geneva in May, China finally had a powerful counterargument. Beijing insisted that its minerals and magnets, some of which go to fighter jets, drones and weaponry, were a 'dual-use' technology that could be used for the military as well as civilian industries, just like A.I. and chips. It demanded reciprocity: If the United States wanted a steady flow of rare earths, Washington should also be ready to lessen its technology controls. It's not clear exactly what the United States agreed to in Geneva: The agreement has never been made public. But when the United States put out an unrelated export control announcement the day after the Geneva summit concluded, China responded angrily, saying the statement 'undermined the consensus' the countries had reached. In a notice on May 13, the Commerce Department said that using Huawei's A.I. chips 'anywhere in the world' was an export control violation. The notice was directed at other nations considering purchasing Huawei chips, people familiar with the move said, not the Chinese. The announcement appeared to take other parts of the Trump administration by surprise, and within hours, the language in the release was walked back, though no policy changes were made. Mr. Bessent and Jamieson Greer, the trade representative, expressed concerns that such moves could damage trade talks with China, people familiar with the incident said. China once again clamped down on rare earth exports. Trying to find its own leverage, the United States responded by restricting exports of semiconductor design software, airplane parts and ethane. The two sides restored their truce in a meeting in London in June. Since then, trade in those products has restarted. But U.S. companies complain that Chinese licenses for rare earth magnets are limited to six months, and that the Chinese government is requesting proprietary information to obtain those shipments. Beijing has also continued to build out its export controls. On June 15, the day after Nvidia said it would be permitted to sell the H20 in China, Chinese officials announced new restrictions on exports of battery technology. The United States has been trying to decrease its dependence on China for rare earths, but there is no quick solution. China has a powerful hold over numerous industries, ranging from pharmaceuticals to solar panels to drones. 'The challenge for the Trump administration is, how do they get out of this quagmire?' said Jimmy Goodrich, a senior adviser for technology analysis to the RAND Corporation. 'It appears some competitive U.S. actions are now at the whims of Beijing, who can now determine the time, place and nature of U.S. tech and trade policy toward China.' Deal makers in the White House The change in the relationship with China has coincided with a separate shift in the administration, in which officials who favor technology controls on China have been sidelined in favor of those who support the tech industry's ambitions to sell abroad. Mr. Lutnick and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state who has long been an ardent China critic, have hewed closely to the position of the president, who is more of a deal maker than a national security hawk. And hawkish members of the National Security Council have been fired in recent months, after being accused of insufficient loyalty. Their absence has paved the way for officials like David Sacks, the White House A.I. czar, who has criticized export controls, to push for tech companies to have freer rein. Nvidia's chief executive, Jensen Huang, has gone on a lobbying blitz in Washington, pushing politicians to open China for A.I. chip sales. Mr. Huang has contended that blocking U.S. technology from China has backfired by creating more urgency for China to develop its own technology. He has argued that the Chinese military won't use Nvidia chips, and pushed back against Washington's consensus that China is an adversary, describing it a 'competitor' but 'not our enemy.' Image The change in the U.S. relationship with China has coincided with a separate shift in the Trump administration, in which officials who favor technology controls on China have been sidelined. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Others have challenged those assertions, pointing to past research that the Chinese military has placed orders for Nvidia chips. Scientific papers published earlier this year also showed Chinese researchers with ties to military universities and a top nuclear weapons lab using Nvidia chips for general research. Mr. Rizzo, the Nvidia spokesman, said in a statement that 'non-military papers describing new and beneficial ways to use U.S. technology promote America.' In a letter on Friday, John Moolenaar, the Republican chairman of the House Select Committee on China, said the H20 chip had aided the rise of the Chinese A.I. model DeepSeek and would help China develop A.I. models to compete with American ones. These arguments do not appear to have persuaded the president. In an Oval Office meeting with Mr. Huang in July, Mr. Trump agreed with Nvidia that keeping American chips out of China would only help Huawei, and decided to reverse the H20 ban. People familiar with Mr. Trump's views say he has always viewed export controls more transactionally. In his first term, Mr. Trump agreed to roll back U.S. restrictions on ZTE at the urging of Mr. Xi. In this term, Mr. Trump and his advisers have begun using America's control over A.I. chips as a source of leverage in negotiations with governments from the Middle East to Asia. With China, Mr. Trump has his own longstanding aspirations. He believes that U.S. businesses have been getting ripped off for decades, and that he can be the one to fix it, particularly if he negotiates directly with Mr. Xi. His advisers have begun strategizing toward a more substantial trade negotiation with China focused on market opening, as well as the potential visit this fall.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Forget About Share Buybacks and Dividends: Here Is How Apple Can Win Growth Investors Back
Key Points For many years, Apple has been considered reliable for its dividend and stock buybacks. Since AI emerged, Apple has done little to explore the tech beyond a partnership with OpenAI. With plenty of cash on hand, Apple might consider an acquisition to reignite investor excitement. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › More than 20 years ago, the world was introduced to a portable device that changed music consumption forever. Not long after, the way people communicate was completely revolutionized by way of a next-generation smartphone. From the iPod to the iPhone, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) was once considered the pinnacle of innovation. For quite some time now, however, the company has fallen short at creating a sense of excitement. Products such as Vision Pro flopped, and the once-upon-a-time technology darling has been suspiciously late to the artificial intelligence (AI) party. With growth in core segments stalling, Apple has managed to keep investors happy through ongoing share buyback programs and dividend payments. But in the age of AI, these rewards are becoming less enticing. Let's explore Apple's activity in recent years and why the company's investment in AI has so far failed at captivating investors. From there, I'll explore how Apple may be able to turn things around and reignite the business. Share buybacks and dividends just aren't cutting it anymore The chart below illustrates Apple's dividend and stock buyback activity over the past 10 years. On the surface, it's hard to complain about a company that consistently rewards shareholders by raising its dividend and simultaneously buying back its own stock -- which might imply that management thinks shares are undervalued. Nevertheless, even one of Apple's largest supporters, Warren Buffett, has reduced exposure to the iPhone maker over the past year through continuous stock sales. At some point, investors need more reasons than dividends and share buybacks to stick around. Apple's foray into AI has been uninspiring so far Ironically, however, ever since the AI megatrend burst onto the scene a few years ago, Apple's once-innovative impulses have remained muted. Its most direct foray into AI has been through a partnership with ChatGPT maker OpenAI. OpenAI is integrated into Apple Intelligence, which was supposed to be a major selling point for the company's newest devices. It wasn't long ago that some on Wall Street thought that Apple Intelligence would usher in a new wave of iPhone upgrades and propel Apple into a leading AI investment opportunity. While concerns surrounding new tariff policies and an uncertain economic outlook are likely playing a role in Apple's mundane growth profile at the moment, my view is that Apple Intelligence is just not enough of a value-add feature to inspire mass device upgrades. As such, I think Apple needs to open the pocketbook and begin allocating capital in more strategic ways beyond dividends and stock buybacks. What can Apple do to get investors excited again? Wedbush Securities technology research analyst Dan Ives recently suggested the idea that Apple should acquire Perplexity. Perplexity is a large language model (LLM) akin to ChatGPT. Given the rise of ChatGPT and the popularity of LLMs over traditional search in general, I think integrating Perplexity as a native component of Apple's operating system makes a lot of strategic sense. There are multiple ways that Apple could strengthen its services through a product such as Perplexity. For example, adding Perplexity as a new layer of Siri could help Apple create more sophisticated voice assistant functionality across its installed base. In addition, Apple could use Perplexity in Safari to power AI-generated answers to search queries -- ultimately opening the door to more directly rivaling Microsoft Copilot or Alphabet's Google search. Beyond Perplexity, I see two moonshot opportunities that Apple could consider exploring. First, Safe Superintelligence could be somewhat of a logical fit, as one of its co-founders actually used to lead AI projects at Apple. Unlike OpenAI, Anthropic, or Perplexity, Safe Superintelligence is still very much in research and development (R&D) mode. While it would be interesting for Apple to buy the company, I think the road to monetization would still be years away. Another interesting area for Apple could be to join its "Magnificent Seven" peers Nvidia, Tesla, and Amazon in the world of AI-powered robotics. Humanoid robotics start-up Figure AI is one of the more mainstream businesses breaking ground in this pocket of the AI realm. The drawback I see with humanoid robotics is that it does not directly complement Apple's roster of hardware products and the services they provide. Much of Apple's technology is either easily portable (iPhone, MacBook Pro) or wearable (AirPods, iWatch). To me, Figure AI opens up a lot of doors for Apple, but ultimately may be a distraction from the company's consumer electronics empire. Overall, I agree with Ives that Apple should make an acquisition to supercharge its position in the AI race. Should you buy stock in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $687,149!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,060,406!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Forget About Share Buybacks and Dividends: Here Is How Apple Can Win Growth Investors Back was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
