logo
John Healey ‘misled' Parliament over Afghan data leak

John Healey ‘misled' Parliament over Afghan data leak

Telegraph2 days ago
John Healey has been accused of misleading Parliament over the Afghan data breach.
Three days ago, the Defence Secretary told MPs that no serving member of the Armed Forces had been put at risk by the leak.
However, it emerged on Thursday that the identities of more than 100 British officials, including members of the special forces and MI6, had been compromised.
Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, demanded Mr Healey come before the House of Commons to face questions on whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.
'Three days ago, John Healey claimed no one serving in the Armed Forces was put at risk by the data breach,' he said. 'Today, we found out that appears to be false.
'We need to know if any serving members of the armed forces were impacted, and the Defence Secretary must urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.'
The information about the effect of the data breach on UK personnel was kept secret by an super-injunction until Thursday, when the order was lifted in part by a High Court judge.
It allowed media organisations to reveal that detailed case notes in the database contained personal data of special forces and spies.
The Government had already admitted on Tuesday that the data of nearly 19,000 Afghans who worked with the British during the 20-year war in Afghanistan and applied to resettle in the UK had been inadvertently leaked.
Many were judged to be at risk of serious harm or even death as the Taliban sought retribution against those who had worked with the British government during the conflict.
The data breach occurred in February 2022 but was not discovered by the government until August 2023, when someone in Afghanistan obtained the data and posted part of it on Facebook.
The data on UK personnel that was leaked involved their names, but there were no contact details such as addresses, telephone numbers or email addresses.
It comes after Sir Grant Shapps, who was defence secretary when the injunction was first put in place, said he would 'do the same thing all over again'.
He added: 'You simply can't release everything and this was one of those times where, faced with a decision of protecting lives, both Brits and Afghanis, I would do the same thing all over again.'
Mr Healey made his comment in the Commons in response to a question from Ian Roome, a Lib Dem MP and member of the defence select committee.
He said: 'To the best of my knowledge and belief, no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk by the data loss.'
Speaking on Friday morning, Mr Roome said: 'The Defence Secretary gave me his assurances just three days ago that no serving members of our Armed Forces were put at risk by this appalling data breach. I am very concerned to find out that this appears not to have been correct.
'It is really important to restore public trust, and he now clarifies his remarks. It is the least that our brave armed forces personnel, along with the thousands of Afghans impacted, deserve.'
Downing Street said the Defence Secretary's statement to the Commons that 'no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk' by the Afghan data leak was 'accurate' despite Sir Ed's accusations to the contrary.
Asked if Mr Healey misled the House, a No 10 spokesman said: 'The Defence Secretary's statement to the House… I believe it was an accurate statement.'
He said the Government is 'committed to transparency', adding: 'In terms of security of our personnel, we take that extremely seriously, particularly those in sensitive positions.
'We always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'It's long-standing policy of successive governments to not comment on special forces.
'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas lawyer called for ‘copycat' Palestine Action groups
Hamas lawyer called for ‘copycat' Palestine Action groups

Telegraph

time6 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Hamas lawyer called for ‘copycat' Palestine Action groups

A lawyer who represented Hamas called for 'copycat' direct action groups to spring up to replace the banned Palestine Action. Franck Magennis was one of three lawyers who worked on an unsuccessful application to remove Hamas from the Home Office's list of proscribed organisations. It has now emerged that Mr Magennis spoke at a conference in the days before Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist group, and called for copycat groups to pick up the mantle. Mr Magennis, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, reposted a video of himself making the speech at the Socialist Workers' Party's Marxist Festival on the day the ban came into effect. In the video he calls for: 'Copycat direct action groups… to spring up everywhere… We mustn't let the British Empire, that is participating in this genocide, push us around. They do not have the power to stop us.' He also tells the audience Zionism is in a 'serious crisis' and encouraged supporters to 'kick it to death' He said: 'It [Zionism] is in a serious crisis; it looks like it is not long for the world, but that doesn't mean that we can be complacent. We must assure that we kick it to death. It must not be allowed to survive this crisis.' The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has made a complaint against Mr Magennis to the Bar Standards Board alleging that is conduct diminishes public trust in him as a barrister. The group alleges that posts on his social media amount to a criminal offence, namely the support of a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. In the complaint, they say: 'We take it as axiomatic that a barrister who commits criminal offences under the Terrorism Act 2000, which are potentially punishable by up to 14 years' imprisonment, is not a fit and proper person to remain a barrister. 'It follows that it is your duty as his regulator to pursue this matter vigorously and without delay'. The complaint went on: 'He is experienced in the practice of criminal law, in addition to which the very words he used both in his offending posts and in the speech he gave at the Marxist meeting, a video of which he chose to embed and republish on X, prove that he knew exactly what he was doing. He acted flagrantly.' The organisation said that alongside the video calling for copycat groups to spring up, Mr Magennis also posted other inflammatory messages. On July 5, he posted 'Escalate!' in response to fellow lawyer Fahad Ansari, who posted: 'The organisation may be banned. The action isn't. Escalate.' Mr Ansari and Mr Magennis are behind a law firm that says it is 'dedicated to understanding and confronting the racist ideology of Zionism' through 'strategic litigation'. The name of the organisation, Riverway to the Sea, is a reference to the slogan 'from the River to the Sea, Palestine shall be free', which has been interpreted by some Jewish groups as a call for the elimination of Israel. That same weekend, Mr Magennis also posted : 'They're not powerful enough to stop us. Elbit Systems UK Limited, you'd better be terrified of what's coming. We're gonna fucking destroy you. We're only getting started. Tiocfaidh ár lá [Irish for 'Our day will come'], you Zionist scum.' A spokesman for Garden Court Chambers said: 'The barrister concerned made the statements and publicised them in their individual capacity. 'Those statements do not represent the views of Garden Court Chambers, and they should not be treated as reflecting any position held by Garden Court Chambers. Furthermore, Garden Court Chambers does not endorse the language and tone used to express them. 'We take this opportunity as a chambers to make clear that we unequivocally condemn racism and anti-Semitism in all its forms.'

Anti-semitism now rife in schools, with pupils chanting 'free Palestine' and 'f*** the Jews', teachers warn
Anti-semitism now rife in schools, with pupils chanting 'free Palestine' and 'f*** the Jews', teachers warn

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anti-semitism now rife in schools, with pupils chanting 'free Palestine' and 'f*** the Jews', teachers warn

Anti-semitism is now rife across schools in the UK, with teachers warning of pupils chanting 'free Palestine ' and 'f*** the Jews'. A new survey undertaken by the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) revealed that more than half (51 per cent) of Jewish teachers have experienced some form of anti-semitism since May 2023. Of the more than 300,000 members surveyed, 44 per cent also reported witnessing swastika graffiti at their schools, while 39 per cent have been subjected to Nazi-related comments. One Jewish teacher even reported having students shout 'free Palestine' at them 'on multiple occasions', while, in another instance, someone shouted 'f*** the Jews'. Meanwhile, members of teaching staff recalled instances where they had been told 'it's not racist to say Jews are rich - it's just a fact', while others said they had been assumed to be Israeli, rather than British. Now, the NASUWT are making an urgent plea for education secretary Bridget Phillipson to help tackle these 'unacceptable trends' and 'stamp out discrimination'. Matt Wrack, Acting General Secretary of NASUWT, said that members of the union believe the rise in anti-semitic abuse was due to 'misinformation on social media'. He added that this 'dangerous rhetoric from far-right movements and stereotyping of Jewish people' is helping to 'fuel a rise in anti-semitic and racist abuse in schools'. Mr Wrack, who said that several teachers were now 'fearful' of openly disclosing their religion while at work, said that 'this cannot be allowed to continue'. 'It is clear that schools need swift, strong support in tackling antisemitism so that Jewish teachers and pupils can feel safe', he said. Adding that there is an urgent need for 'visible leadership from the government', he said: Antisemitism does not happen in isolation. We know that many forms of racist abuse are occurring in education settings and will be looking at this closely.' It follows Hamas attacks on October 7 in response to the ongoing occupation of Palestinian land, with the onslaught killing around 1,200 Israeli people and over 250 being taken hostage. In November last year, Jewish children were left cowering after teenage thugs pelted their London bus with rocks and rubbish, before storming onto the vehicle and yelling 'f*** Israel', as police confirmed they are investigating a 'potential hate crime'. Students at Jews' Free School (JFS) in Kenton, north London, were travelling home on two buses, operated by Uno, when the incident occurred on Wednesday, November 25. As the buses made a stop in High Street, Edgware, a large group of teenagers from another school began throwing 'big heavy rocks' at one of the vehicles, one witness told Jewish Chronicle. Four teenagers then boarded one of the buses, swearing and making antisemitic remarks towards the Jewish students. A witness revealed: 'They were also swearing at us, saying, 'F*** Israel, nobody likes you. F*** off you b*****s.' Another youngster who was involved in the incident said some of the children ran off the bus to escape the attack, while others cowered under their seats. They were 'completely terrified', they said, adding that the thugs were seen filming the incident on their phones. Meanwhile in May, a rise in anti-Jewish narratives in university classrooms was also said to be 'flourishing unchecked'. Ongoing Israeli military action in Gaza since October 7 has reportedly led to a spike in 'disinformation' in lectures and seminars. A study by the Henry Jackson Society, a British national security think tank, indicated that more than 70 per cent of those polled thought non-factual narratives had directly shaped their peers' understanding of the conflict. Among the 'falsehoods' referenced were claims about the Israeli government and its stance on genocide. The nature of anti-Jewish hate crimes reported often focused on people appearing to express support for Hamas - a proscribed terrorist organisation in Britain. Hostility on campuses was also mentioned, amid reports students were afraid to walk around freely as they hid kippahs and Star of David necklaces. Lord Leigh of Hurley, a Conservative life peer, said: 'Members of the National Education Union undertake activities such as clearing Israeli-made food from supermarkets and film themselves doing it and circulate those films.' Baroness Deech, the former head of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education, even claimed that the root of the 'behaviour' is the 'religious teaching that Jews are inferior'. She described lecturers as the 'aggressors', adding: 'It demonstrates the failure of Holocaust education which focuses on dead Jews as a feature of the past and has nothing to say about the long history of antisemitism and the focus of antisemitism today, namely the state of Israel.' Regarding concerns around a rise in anti-Jewish hate amongst students, the Office for Students said: 'Universities will need to have effective policies to protect students from harassment, robust procedures to address it if it occurs, and support for students who experience it. '[We have] published a range of case studies and has shared resources to assist universities in their work to tackle antisemitism. 'This includes a guide to historical myths, persistent accusations and modern misconceptions about Jewish people and the truth behind them.' Meanwhile, a report commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews - the UK's largest Jewish community organisation - revealed that there had been an increase in anti-Jewish discrimination across the NHS, education, the arts and policing. Lord John Mann, who co-authored the review, said he had heard 'shocking experiences' from several Jewish individuals, describing a public 'onslaught' of anti-semitism since October 7 as 'unacceptable'. Speaking to the BBC's Today Programme, he added that several individuals have began to feel 'ostracised' in the workplace, with anti-semitism often failing to be adequately tackled in equality training. NHS employees also reported feeling that anti-semitism had been 'swept under the carpet'. In response, an NHS spokesperson told the BBC: 'It is completely unacceptable for anyone to experience racism, discrimination or prejudice in the health service, whether staff or patient, and the NHS takes any instance of antisemitism or discrimination extremely seriously. 'The NHS provides care and treatment for everyone regardless of race, faith, or background and all NHS healthcare providers should have policies in place to address issues like this in the workplace.' In 2024, there were 3,528 anti-Semitic incidents in the UK, the second-highest total ever recorded, a shocking new report reveals today. The year showed an 18 per cent fall on levels seen in 2023, which witnessed an orgy of vile anti-Semitism in the months after Hamas's October 7 assaults. There were also 201 assaults, 157 incidents of damage or desecration, 250 threats and 2,892 reports of abusive behaviour. The figures, compiled by charity the Community Security Trust (CST), said it showed the 'lasting impact' of the conflict in the Middle East/

Law will change to stop attackers fixated on violence, says Home Secretary
Law will change to stop attackers fixated on violence, says Home Secretary

The Independent

time19 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Law will change to stop attackers fixated on violence, says Home Secretary

Yvette Cooper has pledged to change the law to treat people fixated on violence as seriously as terrorists in the wake of last year's Southport attack. The Home Secretary said she would address a 'gap in the law' against planning mass casualty attacks that had no ideological basis, but could be 'just as serious' as terrorism in their impact. She said: 'We have to make sure that the system is able to respond to violent fixated individuals. We will tighten that legislation so that that is taken as seriously as terrorism.' Her commitment, first made in an interview with the BBC, would implement a recommendation from the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, who examined whether terror laws needed to be changed to deal with people such as Southport attacker Axel Rudakubana. The review was prompted by revelations that Rudakubana had been referred to the counter-extremism Prevent programme, but his case had not been followed up as he lacked an ideological motivation. He went on to murder three young girls and seriously wound 10 other people at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport last year and is currently serving a life sentence. Mr Hall's review recommended against widening the definition of terrorism to include individuals such as Rudakubana, but suggested creating a new offence to deal with people who plan mass casualty attacks motivated by personal grievance or an obsession with violence for its own sake. Ms Cooper said there was now a 'pattern' of teenagers being 'drawn into extreme violence and extreme ideologies' in their own bedrooms thanks to 'a really distorted and warped online world'. She said: 'The sorts of things that we're now increasingly seeing online with violent fixated individuals, where there may not be a clear ideology, it may be a fixation with violence, or they may switch between different ideologies.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store