
Gal Ben-Naim, Joshua Driskell, Jordi Pujol, and Mike Watson Share Insights on Wealth Management and Estate Planning
The Wealth Management & Estate Planning roundtable is produced by the LA Times Studios team in conjunction with Axos Securities, LLC; IDB Bank; Lagerlof, LLP; and Objective, Investment Banking & Valuation.
Ongoing market developments across multiple sectors have helped to open up new private wealth management products and services to a broader array of people and families. This, along with a surge among high-net-worth families exploring ways to better manage their finances and making plans for their estates in today's economic environment, is an indicator of just how important the wealth management process has become.
To take a closer look at the latest trends, best practices and concerns across the wealth management landscape, we turned to four of the region's leading experts on the topic, who graciously weighed in for a discussion and shared insights on the state of wealth management in 2025.
Q: How would you describe the current investment environment in 2025 and what do you consider to be the best investment approach in general terms?
Gal Ben-Naim, Head of Private Banking Group, California, IDB Bank: The first half of this year has really been about uncertainty and volatility, and it's causing a lot of investors, even the seasoned ones, to feel nervous. We expected some economic and market transitions with an incoming administration, but I think most investors have been surprised by the extent of what we've seen – including the worst day in the stock market since COVID. While tariffs are front and center, our broader economy is really a reflection of compounding factors – geopolitical uncertainty and conflict, inconsistent messaging on inflationary trends and a softening labor market. Our team at IDB believes that healthy portfolio diversification with a focus in alternative assets that don't solely rely on market activity. While this has been an unusually complicated environment, it's given us a chance to really understand the value of our approach in minimizing downside to our clients and continue to support mid- and long-term planning.
Mike Watson, Head of Securities, Axos Securities, LLC: The 2025 investment environment is defined by persistent volatility, tighter monetary policy and rapid technological disruption. In this landscape, the best approach is a disciplined, diversified strategy with a strong focus on quality assets, risk management and long-term value creation. Flexibility and a global perspective are more important than ever.
Jordi Pujol, Managing Director, Objective, Investment Banking & Valuation: It's more clear we've transitioned to a post-speculation cycle. With capital no longer as cheap, investors can no longer rely on rising multiples to justify weak underwriting. In 2025, the most resilient portfolios are focused, yield-conscious and grounded in fundamental cash flow. They are not driven purely by momentum or narrative, but rather by defensible moats and process-oriented scalability. Cash yield, margin of safety and strategic defensibility have replaced passive diversification as the cornerstones of disciplined investing. Private markets have notably shifted from 'growth at any price' to 'performance at the right price.' Investors are paying less for vision and more for repeatability of outcomes. Growth stories need to be backed up by real traction, recurring processes and sustainable/scalable growth. This environment demands real-time valuation discipline and quarterly stress testing of private holdings. Think forward when modeling but underwrite like the exit is tomorrow. Backward-looking assumptions and forward-looking hype no longer suffice.
Q: What are the most critical strategies high-net-worth individuals should prioritize in today's economic environment?
Joshua Driskell, Managing Partner, Lagerlof, LLP: High-net-worth individuals should prioritize flexibility, tax efficiency and multigenerational planning. With inflation, interest rate fluctuations and potential changes in tax law, building a nimble structure is essential. That includes diversifying asset classes, stress-testing estate plans under higher estate or capital gains tax regimes, and taking advantage of current exemptions before they sunset. Establishing irrevocable grantor trusts, family limited partnerships and charitable vehicles can preserve wealth while achieving strategic goals. Proactive wealth transfers, such as installment sales to defective trusts or GRATs, can lock in valuation discounts and freeze estate value. Most importantly, integrate estate and investment planning with family governance to promote cohesion and legacy continuity.
Pujol: In today's environment, high-net-worth individuals should prioritize three things: ownership in assets they understand, tax-efficient structures informed by valuation foresight, and optionality through enhanced liquidity. Long-term capital growth is not about chasing trends or the cliched shiny objects but about staying positioned for the right opportunities. We're seeing a move away from over-diversified portfolios toward intentional ownership, where control, structure and timing drive outcomes. This means more alternatives, a mix of private and public holdings, and tax-minimizing structures. Ownership in assets you'd fight to keep, that's the new diversification. I also like the 'cockroach' approach, which is building portfolios that survive the panoply of circumstances the world is throwing at us by selecting traditional and non-traditional asset classes, making sure that correlation is low. I also think cash yields make liquidity an asset and not a drag on returns; it's strategic capital with a clear purpose of optionality. When opportunities arise, those with dry powder and a defined investment playbook are positioned to act quickly and decisively. The most successful families today follow a clear investment policy that outlines the investment discipline before emotions take over. In this environment, structure and readiness matter more than broad diversification.
Ben-Naim: It's not as simple as building your wealth across stocks, bonds and cash anymore. In the past seven to 10 years, we've helped many of our clients increase their alternative asset exposure – ranging from equity and debt investment in commercial real estate, direct lending and hedge funds – from 5% to about 20%, with very positive results due to the less volatile and emotions-driven public market. Our current cycle has also highlighted the importance of hedging strategies. Investors should work closely with their advisors to identify safeguards on the equity market as well as private market entry points that will create protections on the downside, while maintaining participation on the upside. We've seen very positive outcomes as a result of these strategies. Many of our clients who have been allocating funds to private markets have been largely shielded from the recent volatility. Now, they are even taking steps to allocate more funds into these verticals.
Q: How should investors rebalance their portfolios in response to shifting interest rates and market volatility?
Watson: In today's dynamic environment, rebalancing decisions should be made with a clear understanding of how shifting interest rates and market volatility affect different asset classes. Rather than attempting to time the market or make reactive moves, investors should work closely with a qualified investment advisor who can assess their overall investment time horizon, risk profile and long-term goals. An advisor can provide guidance on when and how to adjust asset allocations, evaluate the impact of interest rate changes on fixed income and equity risk and returns, and implement a disciplined, tax-efficient rebalancing approach. With full visibility into an investor's financial profile, an advisor is able to provide holistic guidance. Professional oversight ensures that adjustments are strategic, not emotional, and aligned with broader financial objectives.
Q: What planning opportunities exist when a trust changes from a grantor trust to a non-grantor trust?
Driskell: When a trust converts from grantor to non-grantor status – often due to a death or other triggering event – it opens both risks and planning opportunities. Income tax liability shifts from the grantor to the trust itself or its beneficiaries. Advisors should evaluate whether the trust will accumulate or distribute income to manage compressed trust tax brackets. Capital gain planning becomes especially important. Trustees may consider investing in tax-efficient assets or making distributions to lower-bracket beneficiaries. Basis tracking must be updated, especially for assets with low carryover basis. In some cases, trust modification, decanting or converting to an incomplete non-grantor (ING) trust may optimize results. Coordinating with CPAs and estate counsel at the transition point is essential for tax and fiduciary compliance.
Q: What are some of the biggest mistakes you see individuals make when managing their wealth, and how can they avoid them?
Watson: There are a number of common mistakes. One is the lack of having a long-term plan and clear strategy. The solution for this is to develop a comprehensive financial plan, revisited regularly, aligned with your life goals, risk tolerance and time horizon. Another mistake we see is emotional decision-making. This can be avoided by staying disciplined, relying on objective advice and using a rules-based rebalancing strategy to manage volatility. Neglecting tax efficiency is a mistake that can be avoided by optimizing asset location, using tax-deferred accounts, harvesting losses strategically and engaging in proactive estate planning. Another misstep is over-concentration in a single asset or sector. Investors should diversify across asset classes, industries and geographies to reduce risk. Another mistake to avoid is failing to plan for liquidity needs. It is important to maintain a liquidity buffer for emergencies, major purchases or investment opportunities. Finally, another of the biggest mistakes we see is when people ignore succession and estate planning. It is always good to engage advisors early to create trusts, wills and governance structures that reflect your values and intentions. Avoiding these pitfalls requires proactive planning, trusted advice and the discipline to think generationally, not just transactionally.
Q: How do you advise clients to balance risk and reward when pursuing long-term growth?
Ben-Naim: In my experience, more than 80% of portfolio performance comes from asset allocation. The other 20% comes from the strategic selection of managers. These should be top-tier professionals and sponsors who have long-demonstrated success. Your advisor should not only provide guidance on the makeup of your portfolio but also serve as a reliable conduit, connecting you to well-vetted sponsors – hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment opportunities that can provide buffers in downcycles, participation in bull markets and demonstrate confident returns in five-to-seven-year cycle. For us at IDB, this network of sponsors and managers is of critical importance. We've found that our clients respond incredibly well to our ongoing introductions to high-performance opportunities from both our broker-dealer partner IDB Capital, our joint venture IDB Lido Wealth and outside partners.
Pujol: Don't chase high risk, high reward; engineer low risk, high conviction through long-term thinking. At Objective, we believe true risk isn't just about market volatility, it's often about overpaying for uncertain outcomes or fads. Long-term growth starts with disciplined entry and should correlate with what you want to own five years down the line. Valuation at entry isn't just for compliance, it's the defense and roadmap for future position adjustments. We often guide clients to model three – cases, low, base and high – because if you only plan for the base case, you've handicapped your understanding of potential outcomes. The best investors price in imperfection, protect capital on the downside and let time handle the compounding on positive trends. In private markets, we also help clients structure investments with asymmetric outcomes, where a 1× downside supports a 3× upside. That can include preference stacks, convertibility on notes and milestone upside through derivatives like warrants. We always model worst-case cash burn first; if it still makes sense at the bottom, everything else is upside. Valuation is your testing ground. Use it to see clearly and act with conviction.
Q: What role does philanthropy play in wealth management today, especially among younger affluent clients?
Watson: Philanthropy plays a significant role in wealth management today, especially among younger affluent clients who increasingly seek to align their wealth with their values. Tools like Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs), Trust Accounts and strategic charitable giving offer flexible and tax-efficient ways to support causes they care about. These options allow clients to create lasting impact while maintaining control over their giving strategy, making philanthropy a key part of their overall financial and legacy planning.
Q: What are the latest trends in estate planning that individuals and families should be aware of?
Driskell: Several emerging trends are reshaping estate planning. First, many families are accelerating wealth transfers ahead of the 2026 estate tax exemption sunset. Tools like SLATs, IDGTs and GRATs are increasingly popular for capturing today's favorable tax climate. Second, planners are focused on trust design that balances asset protection with beneficiary flexibility, including directed trusts and decanting statutes. Third, digital assets – from crypto to intellectual property – require new planning considerations. Finally, estate plans increasingly incorporate non-tax goals, such as family harmony, stewardship and values-based legacy planning. Tailored education and engagement for the next generation is also a growing priority to reduce conflict and enhance readiness for wealth transfer.
Q: What estate planning tools are most effective for minimizing tax burdens across generations?
Pujol: Standard structuring tools still work, but their true power lies in how and when they're used. For example, gifting pre-appreciated assets during downturns or before liquidity events allows wealth to grow outside the estate at a compressed tax cost. Planning with discount studies for minority positioning can allow you to apply discounts for lack of marketability and control, reducing the taxable value of gifted interests while preserving real economic value. Certain traditional trust structures, including those based on annuity techniques, remain effective planning tools. Their impact can be significantly enhanced by aligning transfers with existing tax benefits, such as Qualified Small Business Stock treatment. When minority interests are gifted at trough valuations and supported by appropriate discounts for lack of marketability and/or control, substantial equity can be shifted into tax-efficient vehicles at reduced reported values. Capture step-ups early may save IRS bills later. This clearly shows compliance valuation is not just part of the plan, it's a real economic multiplier. With early planning, millions in future value can be transferred before massive tax consequences.
Driskell: Irrevocable trusts are a cornerstone of multigenerational tax planning. Grantor trusts, such as Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (IDGTs), allow parents to sell appreciating assets without triggering income tax, removing future growth from the estate. Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (SLATs) offer access to income while locking in the current exemption amount. Generation-skipping trusts minimize estate tax exposure across multiple generations. Qualified Personal Residence Trusts (QPRTs) and Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs) are useful for freezing asset values. Family Limited Partnerships (FLPs) and valuation discounts further enhance tax efficiency. Coordinating these strategies with lifetime gifts and charitable giving can significantly reduce long-term tax burdens.
Q: In what ways should wealth managers prepare clients for potential ripple effects from trade restrictions between major economies?
Watson: Wealth managers should prepare clients for potential ripple effects from trade restrictions by helping them assess and adjust their portfolios to mitigate risk. First, they should review global diversification to ensure clients are not overly exposed to any single economy, industry or region, especially those directly impacted by trade restrictions and geopolitical crises. This may involve shifting exposure from vulnerable sectors or countries to more resilient ones. They should also consider incorporating alternative assets that may offer protection in times of geopolitical instability, such as commodities or real assets. Additionally, wealth managers can guide clients on cash flow management and ensure liquidity needs are met, as trade restrictions could lead to economic slowdowns or disruptions in supply chains. Lastly, they should help clients stay informed and proactive, adjusting investment strategies in response to evolving trade dynamics and market conditions.
Q: What unique considerations should business owners factor into their estate and succession plans?
Pujol: Succession isn't a single event, it's a system that needs to be built, maintained and regularly tested. Business owners and family heads should structure continuity plans with updated valuations, clearly defined buy-sell mechanisms, and governance that depends less on future intentions or personalities and more on thoughtful planning. Uncertainty is one of the biggest threats to enterprise value. If business plans aren't baked into legal documents, the business is exposed to potential family disputes, tax inefficiencies and legal ambiguity. Transfers are also easier when numbers have been agreed to in advance. Plan as if you'll leave tomorrow and revisit that plan at least once a year. More families are treating succession planning like an annual checkup. During year-end valuation work, they run liquidation or 'liquidity fire-drill' scenarios to spot issues and test their transition plans. Some are also using structures to manage control and distributions effectively across family members more dynamically. Like outdated software, if a succession plan isn't reviewed and updated regularly, it's more likely to break when you need it most.
Driskell: Business owners face unique risks and opportunities in estate planning. Key considerations include ensuring continuity of control, managing valuation and liquidity issues, and minimizing transfer tax liability. Proper use of buy-sell agreements, voting and non-voting share structures, and family-limited partnerships helps preserve operations while transferring economic value. Owners should explore gifting or selling interests to irrevocable trusts while leveraging valuation discounts. Planning for management succession is equally vital – aligning legal structure with leadership readiness. Owners often underestimate the need to separate governance from ownership. Coordinating business succession with estate liquidity planning (via insurance or redemption strategies) ensures family and business stability.
Q: What defensive investment strategies are you recommending in light of the geopolitical instability and trade disputes?
Ben-Naim: We consistently review our clients' allocations and advise on defensive strategies that can help ensure a buttoned-up portfolio. These strategies can range from diversifying asset classes to withstand major public market fluctuations, tax incentive investing and hedging. When considering geopolitical instability, our diversification philosophy is much the same. Now is an opportunity to really consider your geographic exposures and to look to consistently performing and emerging markets outside of the U.S. to realize opportunities. Of course, not all markets are winners and investing in a new region requires vetting, oftentimes with boots on the ground. But with careful research, you can make intelligent entry points. For example, despite the war, Israel proved to have a very strong public market in the past 18 months. Other markets, including India and Vietnam, are expected to perform with higher GDP growth compared to the U.S. and present an exciting outlook.
Q: How do you see AI and automation impacting wealth management in the next 5-10 years?
Pujol: AI is beginning to reshape wealth management, but it's not a replacement for advisors, it's another tool in the toolbox. Used well, it can accelerate diligence, surface outliers, stress test assumptions and generate models in seconds. But the truth is clients don't need more spreadsheets; they need clarity, context and judgment. All this comes from the human touch and experience. The advisors who will lead in the next decade are those who treat AI like an enhancement of their own skills, not like a replacement. At Objective, we use AI to flag inconsistencies, improve our communication and stress test our thinking. Then we bring in the human element to synthesize, challenge and advise. AI can compute outcomes, but it's useless without an experienced human interpreter. In the end, it's not about replacing insight, it's about removing noise so advisors can focus on the decisions that actually matter. AI enhances great advisors, but it will never make poor ones great.
Watson: AI and automation are set to significantly impact wealth management in the next 5-10 years, likely accelerating the commoditization of basic advisory services. As technology advances, routine tasks such as portfolio rebalancing, tax optimization and risk assessment will become increasingly automated, making them more accessible and efficient at a lower cost. This will force traditional wealth advisors to rethink their value proposition, as many investment-related services will be handled by AI-driven platforms. To remain competitive, advisors will need to expand their offerings beyond just investments, focusing more on personalized financial planning, estate and tax strategies, and holistic wealth management. By integrating AI and automation into their practice, wealth managers can enhance their operational efficiency, but to truly differentiate themselves, they will need to provide high-touch, value-added services that help clients navigate complex financial decisions and life transitions.
Q: How can advisors better engage younger generations in the wealth transfer conversation to avoid conflict and ensure legacy continuity?
Pujol: If you want heirs to act like stewards instead of recipients, don't just write a will, start a conversation. The earlier families involve younger generations, the more likely wealth becomes a tool for continuity. We've seen families use business valuations, portfolio reviews and cash flow summaries to bring clarity to the 'why' behind the wealth and to tell the full story to their heirs. These tools take emotion out of the equation and turn complex financial decisions into documented, teachable moments. A detailed valuation can start the conversation a trust document cannot. One strategy that works well is forming a Family Investment Committee before the age of 18. You can even give heirs mock capital, or even small portfolios, and let them pitch investments quarterly, benchmarking their results against the real portfolio. Valuation reports and shared KPIs can turn wealth into something they understand and feel responsible for. The more context you provide while living, the fewer misunderstandings arise after you're gone.
Driskell: Engaging younger generations early promotes transparency, reduces conflict and builds legacy alignment. Advisors should encourage family meetings to share the purpose behind planning decisions, including family values and long-term goals. Incorporating educational components – like basic financial literacy, investment principles and trust mechanics – empowers beneficiaries and fosters stewardship. Structuring trusts to provide phased access, beneficiary-directed investment input or co-trustee roles can build confidence and responsibility. Additionally, encouraging philanthropy and impact investing can bridge generational gaps. Above all, advisors must create space for open dialogue, ensuring younger family members feel heard and respected. This relational foundation is often more critical than the legal structures themselves.
Watson: Advisors can better engage younger generations in the wealth transfer conversation by fostering early, inclusive and values-driven dialogue within families. Rather than treating wealth as a taboo or distant topic, advisors should encourage clients to involve heirs in strategic conversations about family values, financial goals and the purpose behind the wealth. This helps build trust, reduce the risk of conflict and ensures that the next generation feels informed and empowered rather than surprised or unprepared. Advisors can also offer educational resources and facilitate family meetings to bridge knowledge gaps and align expectations. By acting as neutral facilitators and emphasizing transparency, advisors play a key role in preserving both family harmony and the long-term continuity of the legacy.
Q: For those concerned that their heirs might abuse their inheritance, what trust strategies are there?
Driskell: Discretionary trusts with independent trustees remain a powerful tool to prevent misuse of inherited wealth. These trusts allow the trustee to make distributions based on the beneficiary's needs rather than mandatory rights. Incentive provisions can be included to reward education, employment or sobriety. Spendthrift clauses protect trust assets from creditors and poor financial decisions. Advisors may recommend staggered distributions or milestone triggers to gradually release funds. For families with ongoing concerns, directed trusts or trust protectors can provide oversight and flexibility. Ultimately, thoughtful drafting and selecting a fiduciary who understands family dynamics are key to protecting both wealth and relationships.
Q: As a trusted advisor, what advice can you share for longer-term portfolio asset allocation?
Ben-Naim: Now more than ever, high-net-worth investors have access to more asset classes, opportunities and strategies. While this is exciting, it's important to understand the implications of your holdings and to allocate your portfolio in a way that will withstand external fluctuations. It can be nearly impossible to understand the implications of your full portfolio holdings and how they may fluctuate throughout a market cycle or in response to a macroeconomic, geopolitical or industry event. I strongly recommend working with an advisor with a fiduciary responsible to you and your best interests, as well as intimate working knowledge of your profile, family, businesses and interests in order to create the right plan. The right financial advisor will not only know and understand you and your allocations but will also prioritize consultancy and communication to ensure holistic success.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Why Elon Musk left DOGE? DOGE dividend check status 2025: Here's how much money DOGE saved
Why Elon Musk left DOGE? DOGE dividend check status 2025: Here's how much money DOGE saved Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk officially departs Trump administration Elon Musk is leaving the Trump administration as his allotted 130 days as a "special government employee" ends. Special government employee Elon Musk announced he's leaving the Department of Government Efficiency. But, what does that mean for the DOGE savings and possible dividend checks in 2025? The world's richest man tweeted on Wednesday night, "As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending. The DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government." While Musk plans to return to focus on his many businesses, including Tesla and SpaceX, the Trump administration told news officials, "Musk left on good terms and is still friends with the president. This isn't a separation, but just a return to the private sector for Musk. He will continue to be a friend to the president, and we can characterize that as an 'adviser.'" Top Musk lieutenant Steve Davis, adviser Katie Miller and DOGE general counsel James Burnham are all reported to be leaving DOGE as well. The mission of DOGE was to slash federal spending, speed deregulation and "modernize federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." At the time it was introduced, DOGE's effort was to save as much as $2 trillion a year. Here's what this all means for DOGE's future, the savings and status on possible dividend refund stimulus checks for 2025. Who will head DOGE after Musk departure? White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that others in the administration will be left in charge of DOGE, "the DOGE leaders are each and every member of the president's Cabinet and the president himself, who is wholeheartedly committed to cutting waste, fraud and abuse from our government." How much money has DOGE saved? According to the Department of Government Efficiency website, it cites an estimated $175 billion — approximately $1,087 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings through their cuts and reductions in government spending and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only $70 billion is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. What is the DOGE dividend check proposal? The author of the DOGE dividend check proposal was John Fishback. His four-page proposal of the 'DOGE dividend' described it as a refund "sent only to tax-paying householders." Noting the difference from past stimulus checks, he added that DOGE checks would not be inflationary as they would be "exclusively funded with DOGE-driven savings, unlike COVID stimulus checks which were deficit-financed." The idea was originally floated by Fishback on Musk's social media platform X, suggesting Trump and Musk "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend' — a tax refund check sent to every taxpayer, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE." Musk replied "Will check with the President." Fishback's proposal would send checks only to households above a certain income level as opposed to pandemic-era checks that were sent 'indiscriminately.' 'A lot of low-income households essentially saw transfer payments of 25% to 30% of their annual … income,' Fishback said of the pandemic stimulus checks, adding, 'This exclusively goes to households that are net-payers of federal income tax, and what that means is that they have a lower propensity to spend and a higher propensity to save a transfer payment like the DOGE dividend.' "I'm honored to have the president's support, but the plan is very simple," Fishback said. "DOGE is going to save X amount of money over the next couple of years. Let's take 20 percent of that and send it right back to the hard-working taxpayers who sent it to D.C. in the first place." By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user who previously paid for something. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. What are the qualifications for possible DOGE check? The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. The proposed DOGE refund check would be issued per household, rather than to each individual taxpayer, including those receiving Social Security benefits that meet the income tax requirements. What is the status on possible DOGE dividend?
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: London showdown
By Mike Dolan LONDON (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. Soothed by another resilient U.S. employment report and optimism about trade deal breakthroughs, stocks are continuing to nudge higher as all eyes turn to U.S.-China bilateral trade talks in London on Monday. I'll discuss this and the rest of today's market news below. In today's column, I explore a plan for jointly issued euro zone debt that could be a game-changer. Today's Market Minute * Three of President Donald Trump's top aides will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for talks aimed at resolving a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. * California National Guard troops were deployed to the streets of Los Angeles on Sunday to help quell a third day of protests over President Trump's immigration enforcement, a step the state's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, called unlawful. * Japan is considering buying back some super-long government bonds issued in the past at low interest rates, two sources with direct knowledge of the plan said on Monday. * Trump's move to double tariffs on aluminum imports increases the risk of a full-blown scrap war with the European Union, Reuters Open Interest metals columnist Andy Home says. * Europe's ambition to develop cheap, clean energy has recently received a harsh reality check, Reuters Open Interest energy columnist Ron Bousso argues, as power failures and a string of cancelled renewables projects make clear that the road to inexpensive power will carry a very high price tag. London showdown A top-level U.S. delegation including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is in the UK to meet with Chinese representatives for trade talks. China's vice premier He Lifeng is also in the UK. The meeting follows a 90-minute phone call between Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping last week to restart the stalled process. Tensions between the countries remain high, but on a positive note, there was some relief on Friday from news that Beijing had granted temporary export licenses to suppliers of rare earth minerals to the top three U.S. automakers: Ford, General Motors and Stellantis. Meanwhile, trade pressures on China's stuttering economy were all too evident in the latest sweep of May export and inflation numbers released on Monday. China's exports to the U.S. plunged 34.5% year-on-year in May, the sharpest drop since February 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic upended global trade. The decline in imports from America also deepened to an annual drop of 18%. By contrast, Wall Street stocks were buoyed by the April U.S. payrolls report released on Friday, with the S&P500 gaining more than 1% by the close to reach its highest point since February. Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq are now back in positive territory for the year. Nonfarm jobs increased by 139,000 jobs last month, slightly above consensus forecasts, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said. While downward revisions to the two prior months' figures are a cause for some concern, the sweep of the report showed few major cracks. Treasury yields rose after the report, with 30-year yields back within a few basis points of 5% again on Monday ahead of the week's big long bond auction and the May U.S. consumer price inflation data release on Wednesday. Despite President Trump's call for a full percentage point cut in Federal Reserve interest rates on Friday and his statement about naming Fed Chair Jerome Powell's successor soon, Fed easing expectations remain subdued. Futures now only price about a 70% chance of a move by September and expect only 46 bps of cuts by yearend. Outside of the U.S., the Japanese yen firmed to 144.43 per dollar as Japan's economy contracted at a slower-than-expected pace in the January-March period. Japan's government is considering buying back some super-long bonds it issued at low interest rates, according to Reuters sources. The move would come on top of an expected government plan to trim issuance of super-long bonds in the wake of sharp rises in yields. Be sure to check out today's column, which looks at a novel proposal for expanding the size and liquidity of jointly issued euro sovereign bonds. This possible plan comes at a critical juncture when global investors are looking for possible alternatives to the dominant U.S. Treasury market. Chart of the day China's export growth slowed to a three-month low in May as U.S. tariffs slammed shipments, while factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy on both the domestic and external fronts. While the trade story has hogged the spotlight this year, the deflation picture has been brewing for several years, partly because the country's property bust has depressed domestic demand. Today's events to watch * New York Federal Reserve's May survey of consumer expectations, U.S. May employment trends (10:00 AM EDT); Mexico May inflation (8:00 AM EDT) * U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer meet Chinese trade delegation, including China's vice premier He Lifeng, in London * Argentina's President Javier Milei meets with French President Emmanuel Macron in France Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (By Mike Dolan; Editing by Anna Szymanski) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senior U.S. and China envoys to meet for showdown trade talks in London
HONG KONG — Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. The U.K. is providing a venue for the discussions but will not be involved in them directly and the exact time and location of the meeting remains unknown. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' a U.K. government spokesperson said. The effects of the U.S.-China trade rift are already apparent, with China on Monday reporting a 34.5% decrease in exports to the U.S. in May — the biggest drop since February 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, CNBC reported. Investors were relieved last month when U.S. and Chinese representatives meeting in Geneva said they had reached a preliminary agreement to suspend most of the tit-for-tat tariffs they had imposed on each other's goods, which had reached as high as 145%. But in recent weeks both countries have accused each other of violating the agreement. The new round of talks comes four days after President Donald Trump and Chinese Xi Jinping held a lengthy phone call that Trump said focused mostly on trade. The call, which Trump said lasted about 90 minutes, was the first between the two leaders since Trump returned to office, though they spoke a few days before his Jan. 20 inauguration. Trump, who had complained a day earlier that Xi was 'extremely hard to make a deal with,' said in a Truth Social post that the call 'resulted in a very positive conclusion' for both countries. He told reporters Friday that Xi had agreed to resume the flow of rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S. after imposing export controls on the products, which are crucial components for electronics, automobiles and other industries. Trump said his administration was 'very far advanced on the China deal' and that the meeting on Monday was about 'clarification.' The U.S. side will be represented in London by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while the Chinese delegation will be led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. Bessent, Greer and He were all in Geneva last month. Stocks in Asia were up on Monday ahead of the talks. This article was originally published on