ONDA Family Law Bolsters Firm with New Associate Frances Seman
'ONDA is known for being both fierce advocates and trusted guides, and I'm honored to join a firm that approaches family law with such humanity and excellence,' said Ms. Seman. Share
A U.S. Army veteran, longtime educator and former legal aid attorney, Ms. Seman brings a rare blend of strength, empathy and dedication to her practice.
'Frances has dedicated her career to helping others, and that passion shines through in her work,' said name partner Scott Downing. 'She is a steady and compassionate advocate, and we are excited to welcome her to the ONDA team.'
Before earning her law degree from UNT Dallas College of Law, Ms. Seman served six years in the Army, earning an honorable discharge in 1998, and spent a decade teaching middle and high school. She went on to work with Legal Aid of Northwest Texas, where she represented survivors of domestic violence. Ms. Seman also holds two master's degrees from Texas Woman's University.
'ONDA is known for being both fierce advocates and trusted guides, and I'm honored to join a firm that approaches family law with such humanity and excellence,' said Ms. Seman.
Ms. Seman recently was named to the 2025 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation, which describes honorees as lawyers who 'provide a forecast of the fascinating future of global law practice.'
The addition of Ms. Seman supports ONDA's continued growth in North Texas, where the firm is known for handling complex family law disputes with precision and care.
About ONDA
Orsinger, Nelson, Downing & Anderson has served families for more than 30 years. With offices in Dallas, Frisco and San Antonio, ONDA is one of Texas' largest family law firms. Each partner is Board Certified in Family Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, and each is a member of the Texas Academy of Family Law Specialists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
This startup offered ride-hailing for women years before Uber and Lyft — and its founder isn't shying away from the competition
Uber is starting to let women request women drivers. It's about time, says Jillian Anderson. Anderson founded HERide, which started offering rides in Atlanta in 2022 — three years before Uber announced last month that it would start allowing women to request female drivers on its app. Anderson said she got the idea for HERide while working as a ride-hailing driver herself. Many of the women Anderson picked up after dark told her that male drivers often asked to take the ride off-app or tried to get their contact information, she told Business Insider. "After hearing endless stories like that for a couple years, I was like, this sounds like a feature that Uber and Lyft could just create," Anderson said. "Why haven't they implemented anything like this?" Instead of waiting for the companies to act, Anderson said she started coding her own app, recruiting women drivers, and creating HERide as an alternative. Today, the app operates in Atlanta, including at Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta International Airport, as well as nearby Athens, Georgia. While ride-hailing is nothing new for most Americans, apps like HERide — and Uber's newest feature, called "Women Preferences" — show one potential avenue for growth in the industry: Offering special rides and services to specific groups of people, from women to older people. Uber said in July that it would pilot its rides-for-women feature in a handful of cities. Already, the company offers rides for teens and a simplified version of the app for senior citizens. Lyft also has an option for women and nonbinary riders to request a woman driver. Besides women, HERide also markets its service to LGBTQ+ clients, DeVynne Starks, the company's cofounder and director of marketing and communications, told Business Insider. "We don't just want only women to be safe," she said. "We truly do want to enforce safer ride-sharing practices for everyone." With Uber unveiling its own rides-for-women feature, HERide is now betting that it will have an edge over its bigger competitors in the places where it operates. Anderson points to one advantage: HERide guarantees riders a woman driver. Uber, meanwhile, says that its Women Preferences feature "increases your chances of being matched with a woman driver," though "it's not guaranteed." Another is that HERide uses a rate card to determine its fares instead of fluctuating rates based on demand or an even more complicated model like Uber's upfront pricing, Anderson said. Before they ride, HERide's users can use a fare estimator widget that Anderson said she coded herself and added to the ride-hailing service's website. "It's probably the No. 1 question that we get before people actually download the app," she said about the price of rides. HERide drivers, meanwhile, get 80% of each fare for rides that they complete, though Anderson says that that will be closer to 70% in the future to make the company profitable. Some Uber and Lyft drivers have told Business Insider that they often get less than half of the fare that customers pay. Anderson said that she wants to retain drivers, including those who make ride-hailing their full-time job. "If we're paying them a fair wage, I believe that we'll stay competitive in the space," Anderson said.
4 days ago
'Highballed': How disproportionate property taxes are forcing some Americans out of their homes
Bonita Anderson's favorite part of living in Baltimore is having family nearby. A family matriarch with five children and eight grandchildren, Anderson worked hard to buy a place in the city for her family to call home in 2009. "It was an accomplishment for me," she said. "That's where we used to gather to bring the family together." Last week, what was once Anderson's cherished home was listed for sale at nearly $540,000 -- more than five times what she paid for it. But Anderson won't see any of the proceeds. After more than a decade of making payments toward her $100,000 mortgage, Anderson was diagnosed with cancer in 2020. Amid mounting medical bills and property taxes, the lifelong Baltimore resident says she had to choose between fighting for her life and fighting for her home. While undergoing treatment, Anderson fell behind on her property taxes by about $5,000. In 2022, she lost her house at a Baltimore City tax sale. "I sat down and thought, 'Oh my god, I'm 70 years old and I'm homeless,'" Anderson told ABC News Senior Political Correspondent Rachel Scott. The City of Baltimore had put a lien on Anderson's tax debt and auctioned it off to the highest bidder -- a company that specializes in tax lien purchases -- for just $69,500. "If you can't afford to pay your property taxes and you keep missing your payments, government is going to auction your property off for back taxes," said Lawrence Levy, executive dean at the National Center for Suburban Studies at Hofstra University. Court records show Anderson tried to make good and redeem her home, paying the city $18,900 by the end of 2022 -- more than triple her outstanding taxes. But instead of putting these payments toward her back taxes, the city applied the money to taxes that had accrued under the new owner. Anderson was unknowingly paying the investor's tax bills instead of her own, allowing the company to foreclose on her home in 2023. "I was just baffled," she said. 'Filled with distortions' Anderson's home was just one of nearly 44,000 Baltimore properties that were listed at municipal tax sales from 2019 through 2023. It was also among the 92% of those properties located in majority-nonwhite neighborhoods -- which account for 70% of parcels citywide. An analysis of ATTOM and U.S. Census Bureau data by ABC Owned Television Stations showed one likely reason for this disparity: disproportionate property taxes. Property taxes are based on a government assessment of each home's value. But researchers say property values are highly subjective, and these estimates don't always align with market prices. Data shows discrepancies in assessments -- and therefore tax bills -- affect some communities more than others. ABC's analysis found that across the country, homeowners in predominantly Black and Brown areas tend to pay higher taxes than those in mostly white neighborhoods for a house worth the same amount on the open market. "When property tax systems are filled with distortions the people punished tend to be the poorest homeowners," Levy said. "In suburbia, where you have a high level of segregation, the people who are being taxed unfairly based on not accurately capturing the value of the home are people of color." For some of these homeowners who are "highballed" on their assessments, missed bills lead to tax sales, leaving them with nothing. From the time Anderson bought her home until she lost it, the property's assessment more than tripled -- but the home's booming value ultimately went to its new owner. "I don't know what's worse, losing the house or being diagnosed with cancer," Anderson said. "It hurts still." Until recently, Levy noted, tax sales most often took place in cities. As urban neighborhoods gentrified and property values shifted rapidly, longtime residents couldn't always keep up with rising bills. "We're now starting to see more of that in suburban areas, particularly in the poorer suburban areas as we're seeing demographic change," Levy said. In Garden City, a predominantly white suburb on New York's Long Island with a median home value of around $1 million, a typical residential tax bill is around $10,000 to $15,000, property data shows. Down the road in Hempstead, where 88% of residents are Black or Latino, homes tend to be worth less than half that. But the typical tax bill is similar, meaning Hempstead homeowners pay proportionally more in taxes relative to the value of their homes. John Rao, senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, says U.S. homeowners in communities of color face a "double whammy." They often receive "lowballed" appraisals when trying to purchase or refinance their homes, Rao explained, "but when it comes to paying their taxes, once they've owned the home ... often their assessments are proportionally higher than what they should be." 'Stripping generational wealth' In suburban Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 91-year-old Gloria Gaynor, who suffers from dementia, lost her home of 25 years because of $3,500 in taxes she didn't pay during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gaynor's daughter, Jackie Davis, told ABC station WPVI-TV that her mother stayed home during the pandemic. She skipped her annual trip to the tax office after hearing that tax collectors had paused enforcement as COVID-19 spread through the Philadelphia suburbs. When the government restarted collection efforts and the county tax office reopened, Gaynor went in and made a payment, intending to cover her previous year's taxes, according to her attorney, Alexander Barth. Instead, the money was applied to Gaynor's 2021 and 2022 taxes and not her outstanding balance from 2020, "leaving what is essentially a donut in her tax payment history," Barth explained. A real estate investor bought Gaynor's home from Delaware County for $14,000, the cost of her overdue taxes plus interest and fees. Gaynor had paid off most of her mortgage on the house, which is now worth an estimated $247,000. But she did not make any money from the sale. "This is stripping generational wealth from the have-nots and allowing the haves to have it," Barth said. Gaynor's family went to court in an attempt to get back her home, but two courts upheld the sale. The Delaware County Tax Claim Bureau told ABC's Philadelphia station that while it "sympathizes with the emotional toll" on Gaynor, the county government acted within Pennsylvania law and issued multiple notices ahead of the sale. If Gaynor had lived just a few miles away inside Philadelphia's city limits, officials there would have taken extra steps to try to keep her in her home. Since property taxes are handled differently in different communities, some local governments like Philadelphia have layers of protection for vulnerable homeowners, such as requiring in-person notifications before a tax sale or offering payment plans to redeem a home afterward. "Although local governments should do everything they can to keep people in their homes, whether it's an owner or a renter, at some point they have an obligation to all the other taxpayers, the businesses, the families that are paying their fair share to make sure that these taxes are collected," Levy said. From the living room to the courtroom Just over 90 miles down the road from Gaynor, Anderson spends her days looking back on the memories she built in the home that was once the centerpiece of her family. Now living with her daughter in a Baltimore suburb, Anderson has taken her case to court, joining a lawsuit claiming that the City of Baltimore broke federal law by selling her former home to a private company for pennies on the dollar. The City of Baltimore, which did not respond to ABC News' requests for comment, has defended its actions in court, saying it notified Anderson as required and did not profit from the sale. In 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local governments could not profit from tax sales, finding that homeowners have a constitutional right to any payments beyond the taxes and penalties they owe. Over the last two years, many states across the country have changed their laws in light of the court's decision. But some experts say the federal government also has a role to play. "The federal answer to lower local property taxes is more funding for local services," Levy said. "They need more help from Congress and the White House." As the Trump administration has slashed the federal budget, local governments will have to make up the difference to provide the same services. According to experts, municipalities will likely rely more on property taxes, which in turn, could mean more situations like Anderson's, where homeowners in majority-nonwhite neighborhoods too often pay more than their fair share. When asked by ABC News what happened to her dream of passing down her home to the next generation of her family, Anderson said, "it died." "It still makes me emotional," Anderson said. "It's just hard. Very hard."
Forbes
6 days ago
- Forbes
How Cognitive Manufacturing Is Rewriting The Future Of Work
Manufacturing's next transformation isn't happening on factory floors—it's happening in workers' minds. The most consequential shift since Henry Ford's moving assembly line is not about physical layout or materials science. It's about how humans think, learn, and adapt alongside machines. For over a century, manufacturing excellence meant infrastructure, repeatability, and scale. But the next leap forward demands adaptability, cognitive agility, and loop-based learning. This is cognitive manufacturing—the fusion of AI and human ingenuity to create self-optimizing systems. At the center of this revolution is the platinum workforce: individuals who possess orchestration, systems thinking, and decision-making prowess that elevate man and machine alike. The platinum workforce is the human engine of this cognitive manufacturing revolution—defined by cognitive skills like orchestration and systems thinking, not just physical dexterity. In my upcoming book, The Platinum Workforce, based on rigorous research across three decades of executive experience spanning dozens of industries, I outline 13 essential future-facing competencies that define this workforce. These include improvisational problem-solving, risk aptitude, systems thinking, interoperability facilitation, and cognitive orchestration. These are not soft skills. They are strategic skills—necessary to compete in a world where AI is no longer a tool, but a teammate. The opportunities are so compelling that I now advise friends to encourage their kids toward manufacturing—not only for rising wages and strong demand, but because the work is exciting. For those who chafe at the constraints of traditional higher education, modern manufacturing offers a faster path to hands-on, tech-forward leadership. Three Forces Converge to Reshape the Future of Work Three macro forces are converging to reshape how we make things and who gets to make them: Veteran machinists are aging out. Vocational pipelines are dry. And new grads are often unprepared for digitally integrated production environments. While ARM Institute programs show promise for veteran retraining, the broader reality is more complex. Census Bureau's Veteran Employment Outcomes data shows veterans from combat occupations often start in lower-paying manufacturing roles. Zippia data shows manufacturing operators nationally average $34,457 annually ($17/hour), with regional variations significant. McKinsey research indicates improving employment outcomes for a single cohort of 90,500 transitioning veterans could unlock $15 billion in economic potential over 10 years. The cobot market is projected to grow from $1.9 billion in 2024 to $11.8 billion by 2030—but skilled operators remain scarce, creating wage premiums in automation-heavy regions. Manufacturing is ground zero for the shift from automation to autonomy. What once required rigid scripting now flows through AI copilots and LLM-integrated platforms. Siemens, for instance, reduced complex toolpath generation from 8 hours to 22 minutes using a generative AI assistant. The competitive advantage isn't just faster task completion—it's the ability to rapidly redeploy these cognitive capabilities across changing market demands. Low-code interfaces and plug-and-play cobots are democratizing specialist tasks. The human role shifts from mechanical repetition to orchestration and decision-making. This means an operator might be responsible for overseeing a fleet of cobots, managing their schedules, and troubleshooting their AI-driven workflows—a role that demands strategic oversight, not just button-pushing. This is the rise of cognitive manufacturing. And it requires an equally transformed workforce architecture. The Platinum Workforce in Practice So what does this look like on the ground? To Build the Platinum Workforce, Take Three Strategic Moves Calculate your current state using these metrics: percentage of workers comfortable with digital interfaces, average time to retrain for new processes, and cross-functional skill depth. Companies scoring above 70% are ready for augmented operations; below 50% need foundational digital literacy first. Start with one production line using platforms like Tulip (average 6-month payback) or Ready Robotics ($50K–$150K initial investment for cobot integration). Track three metrics: error reduction percentage, labor efficiency gain, and training time required. Successful pilots typically show 15–20% efficiency gains within 90 days. Deloitte research shows smart factory early adopters ("Trailblazers") achieve average three-year gains of 10–12% in manufacturing output, factory utilization, and labor productivity. McKinsey analysis of Industry 4.0 "lighthouse" factories found manufacturing costs reduced by more than 10%, warranty incidents cut by 50%, and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) improved by 11%. Implementation Priority: Start with quality control and predictive maintenance where ROI is clearest, then expand to workforce augmentation and supply chain integration. Budget 3–5% of payroll for continuous upskilling. Leading manufacturers report task compression ratios of 10:1 or higher when workers use AI copilots. Research published in MIT Sloan Management Review (2024) shows manufacturers need phased approaches: 3–6 months for pilot projects with short-term metrics, 12–18 months for full facility deployment. Cherry Bekaert analysis confirms successful digital transformation requires 12–18 months minimum with clearly defined milestones. Implementation Reality Check: A Reality Check: The Perils of Rushed Transformation Digital transformation failure rates are sobering: McKinsey, BCG, and others report 70–95% failure rates, with Forbes placing manufacturing at 84%. Common pitfalls include resistance to change, weak leadership support, and cultural mismatches. HP's $160 million ERP disaster and Revlon's $64 million rollout debacle underscore the costs. Lesson: pilot first, budget for change management, and secure operator buy-in. The Global Reality: Why This Matters Now U.S. manufacturers face rising competition. China now produces 30% of global output and boasts 5.8% productivity growth—far outpacing Germany's stagnation. China's surplus equals 10% of GDP. Germany's energy crisis and export losses compound the opportunity for agile U.S. firms. The World Economic Forum's Global Lighthouse Network co-foundded with McKinsey shows nearly 60% of manufacturing leaders are implementing AI-driven solutions. Smart factory leaders achieve 15–25% efficiency gains through predictive maintenance and analytics. First-movers in human-AI integration are already pulling ahead—delays compound competitive disadvantage. Policy and Culture Must Keep Pace Manufacturing Extension Partnerships (MEPs), currently financed by a mix of federal and state funding, can catalyze transformation by supporting cross-sector experimentation, while regional learning systems—modeled on Northern Italy's Emilia-Romagna—align public investment with private capacity building. Leaders must actively engage with these partnerships to co-design curricula and share best practices, ensuring a shared regional strategy for talent development. Matt Beane warns of the apprenticeship trap: when machines outperform novices, firms stop training. David Mindell calls for interdisciplinary coalitions to govern tech. We need both—now. Beyond Automation: The Future of Human Ingenuity Platinum evokes catalytic durability and rare value. But this isn't about elitism—it's about capability. The rise of autonomous AI systems demands new workforce capabilities: designing, monitoring, and orchestrating fleets of intelligent agents. This requires moving beyond content mastery toward cognitive design—a new discipline where humans build the scaffolding for insight, discovery, and action. It is the core function of the platinum workforce. At Yegii, Inc., we help employers build AI-enabled learning organizations that amplify human capabilities rather than replace them. Resilience doesn't come from automation. It comes from collective human ingenuity, augmented by technology. Let's build it—together.
