
Geopolitical Turmoil Spurs ConocoPhillips Stock (COP) Bulls
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Nevertheless, some changes could be in store. Since early June, COP stock has been steadily moving northward. Naturally, the upward trend can be linked to escalating tensions in the Middle East, which have raised serious concerns about the stability of global oil supply chains. However, ConocoPhillips has also benefited from a much more productive catalyst — strong support from President Donald Trump.
Throughout the campaign trail, Trump has repeatedly championed the hydrocarbon industry, particularly oil and gas. Therefore, when he signed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' the move came as no surprise to anyone paying even remote attention to American politics. Essentially, the new law rolls back much of the environmentally forward policies of the Biden and Obama administrations. Cynically, the paradigm-shifting decision should help boost ConocoPhillips' relevance.
Given that Trump will be in power for the next three years, long-term investors, including myself, have a justification for being Bullish on COP stock. Importantly, taking advantage of the current price action will require the use of COP stock options and a slightly unconventional approach to ascertaining the probability of near-term prices.
Laying the Foundation of Applied Game Theory
While it's important to understand the color and context of an investment prospect, for options traders, such narratives don't address the two key components necessary for an adequate thesis: magnitude projection (y-axis) and time frame (x-axis). Since all options eventually expire, it's not enough to be directionally confident; there must also be temporal integration.
Let's be practical: most market participants turn to financial publications not simply for general interest, but to gain clear, actionable insights—specifically, identifying promising opportunities and understanding the appropriate timing to act on them. Effectively addressing both elements often goes beyond traditional fundamental or technical analysis. In my view, this is where applied game theory becomes valuable, offering a structured, evidence-based framework to help determine not just what decisions to make, but when to make them.
However, one metric that creates confusion is the share price. As a continuous signal, the share price of any security is unbounded, meaning that it can theoretically go anywhere (with the apparent exception of negative prices). Such kinesis presents significant challenges for comparative studies, rendering statistical analysis extremely difficult, if not impossible.
A more forward-thinking approach involves compressing price discovery into market breadth, specifically, tracking sequences of accumulation and distribution sessions. Market breadth addresses the fundamental question: By the end of the day, was the market a net buyer or a net seller? By distilling data down to its core drivers, we can more effectively spot recurring patterns and the key moments when they begin to shift.
Putting Theory into Practice with COP Stock
Utilizing the above methodology for COP stock across 10-week intervals gives us the following demand profile:
In the trailing two months, COP stock has printed a 4-6-U sequence: four up weeks, six down weeks, with a positive trajectory across the 10-week period. It's a rare sequence, having only materialized nine times since January 2019. Much of its unusual nature centers on the balance of distributive sessions being greater than accumulative, yet the overall trajectory is positive.
What's really intriguing, though, is that in six cases of the 4-6-U flashing, the following week's price action resulted in upside, with a median return of 4.71%. During the three times that COP stock fell, the median loss was 3.37%. Armed with a higher probability of success and a greater performance magnitude, options traders are theoretically incentivized to consider bidding on this particular hand.
Formalizing COP's Market Sequences
It's worth pointing out that if the market were truly random, analyzing the above demand sequences wouldn't matter: the probabilities should coalesce around 50%. Yet that's not what's happening at all. Some hands — if we want to use gambling terms — clearly favor the bettor over others.
My thesis, then, is that the 4-6-U sequence is an intriguing idea to consider given that its chance of upside is nearly 67%. In contrast, the baseline probability (for a one-week-long position) is only 52.05% — that's game theory in action.
With this in mind, aggressive traders may want to consider the 95/97 bull call spread expiring on August 1st. This transaction involves buying the $95 call and simultaneously selling the $97 call, for a net debit paid of $97 (the maximum possible loss). Should COP stock rise through the short strike price of $97 at expiration, the maximum reward is $103, a payout of over 106%.
Is ConocoPhillips a Buy, Sell, or Hold?
Turning to Wall Street, COP stock carries a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 15 Buys, two Holds, and zero Sell ratings over the past three months. The average COP stock price target is $114.71, implying almost 24% upside potential over the coming year.
Betting on COP Stock's Potential Rise the Smart Way
While energy investors may appreciate the Trump administration's support of ConocoPhillips and the broader hydrocarbon ecosystem, this narrative alone doesn't really provide actionable insights for options traders, who require a multi-dimensional working thesis. To address this dilemma, we can apply the principles of game theory, identifying patterns and probabilistic projections for a more innovative near-term Bullish approach.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Lula plans new 'national sovereignty' policy for strategic minerals
By Brad Haynes and Lisandra Paraguassu BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told Reuters on Wednesday of his plans for a new national policy treating strategic minerals as a matter of "national sovereignty" in order to avoid exporting minerals without adding value locally. "We won't allow what happened in the last century to happen again, where Brazil exports raw minerals and then buys products with very high added value," the president, known as Lula, said in the interview. "We want to add value in Brazil." Lula's comments came as a new 50% tariff hit U.S. imports from Brazil amid a political spat between the two countries linked to an investigation against the South American country's former president, Jair Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro, under house arrest since late Monday, is standing trial on charges of plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral defeat. Bolsonaro has denied wrongdoing. U.S. President Donald Trump, seen as a Bolsonaro ally, has decried what he calls persecution of Brazil's former leader. Trump has long sought to secure U.S. supplies of critical minerals, complaining of China's near-total control of the industry and striking deals with Ukraine to secure critical minerals in exchange for defense help. Currently, Brazil lacks a complete mapping of its mineral wealth, Lula said, adding that his government would start this process by setting up the national council on mineral materials and standards. The council will safeguard Brazil's control of its mineral wealth, allowing the country to become a global leader in the energy transition, Lula said, adding that businesses will not face difficulties following the council's creation. "Few countries in the world have the opportunity that Brazil has in this area," Lula said. Sign in to access your portfolio


New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Russia secondary sanctions still on track for Friday after Putin, Witkoff meeting
WASHINGTON — US sanctions targeting nations that buy Russian oil will kick in on Friday after Vladimir Putin refused to end his invasion of Ukraine by President Trump's deadline, a senior White House official said following direct talks between Washington and Moscow on Wednesday. Following a three-hour meeting between Putin and Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff, the Kremlin said it wanted to continue talking — which Trump has publicly suspected of being a strategy to 'tap along' his administration. 'The Russians are eager to continue engaging with the United States,' the US official said in a statement, adding: 'The secondary sanctions are still expected to be implemented on Friday.' Advertisement US sanctions targeting nations that buy Russian oil will kick in on Friday after Vladimir Putin refused to end his invasion of Ukraine by President Trump's deadline, following direct talks between Washington and Moscow on Wednesday. GAVRIIL GRIGOROV/SPUTNIK/KREMLIN POOL/EPA/Shutterstock The official also said Witkoff's discussion with Putin 'went well.' Wednesday marked the first time the parties had met for such talks since April, when it became evident little progress was being made toward an end to Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II.


CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump faces a variety of choices as he seeks to fill Fed vacancies
Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler's surprise resignation last week brought back a scenario that seemed to be fading but could have important ramifications for how the central bank conducts policy. With the open seat on the influential central bank board, President Donald Trump now has a number of strategic options, including one where he could appoint a so-called shadow chair whose job would be largely to serve as an instigator until a successor to current Chair Jerome Powell could be named. This in turn raises the tantalizing possibility that an institution historically known for collegiality and an ivory-toweresque approach to policy now will have to deal with a sudden dose of political intrigue. Will Trump use the position to nominate a gadfly to torment Powell, a frequent target of blistering criticism from the president, or pursue a different strategy focused more on the long-term direction of the Fed? "The president has two options. One is he can put a stop-gap appointment to fill the Kugler seat for the remaining four months of the unexpired term," Krishna Guha, head of global policy and central bank strategy at Evercore ISI, said Wednesday on CNBC. "Or he could just decide to compress the entire process and pick the person he wants to be the Fed chair now." Kugler's decision to leave the Fed with little notice would be important under normal circumstances, but the nature of her situation on the board raises the ante. Former President Joe Biden in 2023 named Kugler to the position, succeeding Lael Brainard, who moved over to the White House to serve as a senior economic advisor. Kugler served less than two years of Brainard's unexpired term and left with only about six months remaining, accounting for the couple of months it will take for her replacement to be confirmed. Taking into account the Senate calendar, the new governor would serve at best three or four months, then have to undergo yet another confirmation hearing should Trump decide to reappoint the person. While Trump could be tempted to go the shadow-chair route — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in the past has advocated for that course — it might be an unappetizing choice for the nominee. The shadow chair "is still just going to be one person among many, not enjoying the powers of the office of chairman," Guha said. For Trump, though, selecting a shadow chair would be in keeping with his affinity for conflict and making people prove themselves, Guha added. "He likes to run things like 'Celebrity Apprentice,'" Trump's former reality show on NBC, Guha said. "He likes to have people trialing, dueling it out with each other. So he might be tempted with the idea of putting somebody in the seat for a few months, see how they do, if they pass the audition, then be given the nod for the next Fed chair. So I suspect he's probably pulled in both directions here." The time span that came with Kugler's announcement carries added risk. If she had stayed in the seat, the appointment wouldn't have come at least until her term expired in January and would have been for a full 14-year term on the board. The window between now and then created by the resignation carries both opportunity and peril. Accepting such an appointment also is a dicey proposition. Trump has made it clear he will only appoint governors who are in favor of cutting rates. The president has stated that he not only wants reductions, but is looking for dramatic moves, along the lines of 3 percentage points. Former Fed Chair and past Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on CNBC that Trump's rate demands "should be frightening to markets." "A shadow chairman with only four months to go has some risk," said Brian Gardner, chief Washington policy strategist at Stifel. "Someone can say something that annoys Trump. Maybe there they have to take a position that Trump doesn't like. Just the time that we're talking about increases the chances of that happening so it becomes a more difficult option. That being said, I think the administration thinks it's an attractive idea, and does give them some flexibility." The alternative to a shadow chair, at least regarding the Kugler vacancy, is to appoint the actual person who Trump wants to serve as chair, with the understanding that they would be nominated when Powell exits. In that case, it would present a more conventional approach and not push the new governor into a potentially adversarial relationship with colleagues with whom he or she will serve for potentially the next 14 years. "Maybe they do this as kind of a backup plan to make sure that they have the person they want in place when the Powell chairmanship ends in in May," Gardner says. White House officials did not respond to a request for comment. Trump told CNBC on Tuesday that he has the choice for Kugler's seat down to four finalists — former Governor Kevin Warsh, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett and two unnamed candidates. One of those in contention is thought to be current Governor Christopher Waller. Other names mentioned included economist and former World Bank President David Malpass as well as economist Judy Shelton, whom Trump tried to appoint during his first term but failed to clear Senate approval. Betting markets are split between Warsh and Hassett as the favorite, with Shelton also drawing some interest. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has taken himself out of contention, Trump told CNBC. Assuming Powell leaves the board after his tenure as chair ends, Trump has the chance to hold a majority of his appointees on the seven-member group. However, he would not have a majority on the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, which entails the seven governors plus a rotating cast of five regional presidents. His current appointees are Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, who also is the vice chair in charge of bank supervision. Trump has promised a decision in the next few days. However, he also said he would name a Powell successor weeks ago and has not done so yet. Yellen and others have criticized Trump for leaning so hard against the Fed for lower rates, something that previous presidents have done but in a much less public manner. The concern is that Trump is treading on the Fed's independence, something officials feel is vital for proper monetary policy free of political influence. "There is going to be a bit of an institutional pushback from the Fed," Gardner said, noting that Powell was at the Treasury Department in the early 1990s when President George H.W. Bush was pressuring then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan for lower rates. "I think it's in a secure enough place for now, but things can change. So I don't think it's existential now, but of course, it's a fluid situation."